english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Inicio arrow newsitems arrow CoE Justice Quality Head Leyenberger to EuroFora: Risk of Politicaly Motivated Court not negligeable

CoE Justice Quality Head Leyenberger to EuroFora: Risk of Politicaly Motivated Court not negligeable

Escrito por ACM
09.10.14

 

 leyenberger_jr_400

*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/- Recent Facts observed in several CoE Member Countries reveal that Politicaly Motivated and/or Partial Justice might become a real Risk against Fundamental Principles of Rule of Law and Democracy, regardless of, and beyond  the more or less Technical Efficiency of one or another National System of Courts, if this crucial point is not seriously examined and dealt with, replied in substance CoE's experienced Director for Independence and Efficiency of Justice, Christophe Leyenberger, to relevant "EuroFora"s Questions, on the occasion of the presentation of the 2014 Annual Edition of the Report on "Efficiency of Justice" throughout CoE's PanEuropean area covering more than 800 Millions of People, (See Infra).


---------------------------------------------------


 - "During recent years there have been many and various Criticisms concerning an alleged "Political Motivation" of some courts' decisions throughout Europe :


 - Even if it might not always be the 1st time, nevertheless, as far as it concerns specifically the elementary Freedoms and Human Rights, eventually the Prosecution, of some Democratically Elected Leaders of Political Parties, and/or (F.) Heads of State, in differend Countries, from the North to the South of Europe, and from the East to West, during the last 3 or 4 Years, various cases raise Critical Questions regarding the alleged Political Motivations of certain Persons and/or Groups inside the Courts' system".


    - Such incidents occur "in a way which obviously might affect the Trust of the Public to the Quality of Justice -i.e. one of your (CoE's) Landmarks - , if it's not efficiently  addressed before it might provoke irreversible consequences, "EuroFora" observed, from the outset.


    -"How do you feel about that, how do you think that things really are in this regard, and what should be done, in order to have the Trust of the Public ?', we asked.

                                                                                                                                           ----------------------

 coe_cepej_press_brief_400


     - Indeed, "What you've said are, without any doubt, Facts that we (CoE) observe inside certain Member States", replied Positively from the start, the experienced CoE's Director for Independence and Efficiency of Justice, Stephane Leyenberger.


    - So, "it's Unfortunate that this (issue) is not included in the work if CoE's PanEuropean Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ)", whose Annual Results for 2013-2014 was presenting Leyenberger.


    - "And, through the Informations that we (CoE) receive" via that mechanism, "we are not (yet) at all in a position to have an overall picture  of the Abuse of Justice for Political Motivations, and/or eventual problems of Corruption in this domain", he regretted.


    - On the contrary, "what we (the CEPEJ) try to do here is to simply watch how Justice works in everyday life. But even this allows, however, to make an interesting Observation", (concerning "EuroFora"s Question : Comp. Supra) :


    >>> - "It's not merely because a given system might, eventually, work more or less properly, in everyday life, that it would also be without any problems of Manipulation of Justice or of Abuse of Justice for Political Motivations", he warned.


     - "That's what we (CoE) underline also in our (CEPEJ's 2014) Conclusions, in fine", Leyenberger pointed out, (See Infra).


    => In fact:  - "Even if I don't have any elements to give you now, nevertheless, it's true, indeed, that, even if we (CoE) might say that certain Courts' Systems are quite Efficient (Technically) in certain States, however, this doesn't mean at all that, concerning the Fundamental Principles of Law and the Independence of Justice, they wouldn't have several Problems to denounce and solve"....


     - "But, that's another kind of work", concluded, smiling, the competrent CoE's Director for the Independence and Efficiency of Justice, in reply to the above-mentioned "EuroFora"s Question.

european_judiciary_systems_cepej


    >>> Indeed, the General Conclusions of CoE's 2014 PanEuropean Report on the Efficiency of Juctice, strongly stress the fact that : -  Any substantial "Evaluation must take fully into account the Specificity of the Public Service of Justice: it must be based on the Essential Principles of the Independence of the judiciary and the Impartiality of judges, which are Pillars in any state governed by the Rule of Law. Policy-makers and judicial practitioners shall work towards a greater Efficiency of their judicial systems, only while fully Complying with these Fundamental Principles", (Comp. Supra).

    This overall CoE's Conclusion, (already pinpointed by Leyenberger at his Replies to "EuroFora"s Questions : Comp. Supra), sticks perfectly well with the recently announced intention of experienced President of the Biggest EU political Party : that of ChristianDemocrats/EPP, Joseph Daul, to launch a Europe-wide Initiative for systematic and thorough Investigations of all denounced incidents where Facts clearly raise Critical Questions on Risks of Abuses which may be committed by some Politicaly Motivated and/or Partial National Judges, obviously Dangerous both for Civic Liberties and Democracy, particularly if they systematically target and harass certain Democratically Elected Leaders of the People, and/or Political Dissidents.

 

 (../..)


-------------------------------------------------------

european sme week (since 2009)

Statistics

Visitantes: 56928173

Archive

Login Form

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 politkovskaya_gongadze_adali_400

Hu Jia's prize brings SAKHAROV's wife to "EuroFora" on murders of Journalists Politkofskaya, Gongadze and Adali :

- Elena Bonner : "All Journalists' murders must be fully investigated", without Double Standards.                                                                                    

During a special Mega-Event to celebrate 20 Years of SAKHAROV Prize for "Freedom of Thought", attributed in 2008 by EU Parliament to jailed Chinese Cyber-Dissident Hu JIA, the move was reinforced by strongly criticizing the persisting impunity in three cases of Journalists' Murders, such as POLITKOVSKAYA in Russia, GONGADZE in Ukraine, and ADALI in Turkish-occupied part of Cyprus.

Any bureaucratic doubt about whether Cyber-dissidents like Hu JIA might have, or not, a right to be protected as all Journalists must be, particularly when they take risks to search, find and publish original and critical News on issues of general interest to the society, could not resist to the emotion provoked by the message of his Wife, Zeng JINYAN spectacularly transmitted at a big screen in EU Parliament's hemicycle :

- "The most important and most interesting thing he did was to ... say the Truth :.. to write about the phenomena he observed... He never stopped Publishing.. on websites, so that the Public could learn about the reality .. and understand it.  In my view, this has been his greatest contribution", stressed the young wife of the jailed man, eager to cite also the cases of other critical journalists who faced various kinds of "harassment".

 - "Welcoming all those who have suffered for defending Human Rights", EU Parliament's President, German MEP Hans Gert POETTERING, who had invited to Strasbourg all former Sakharov prize-winners from various Countries throughout the World, said that "China needs Europe, and Europe needs China : A great nation" with which "we want to have a good relationship", "association and ..friendship". "But we are never going to stop our fight for Human Rights, and No Government can expect this from us".

    - "It's impossible  to achieve goals of Peace, if Human Rights are left out. In fact, Peace and Human Rights are intrinsequaly linked", added POETTERING.

    It's in this spirit that MEPs adopted, on Thursday, a Resolution denouncing that "the criminal
investigation and trial following the murder of (a) Journalist ...raises serious concerns with regard to transparency and respect for the rule of law", when a "brutal killing has not yet been fully investigated and solved in a satisfactory way".

    The text refered to dissident Journalist "Anna POLITOVSKAYA", a critic of Tchechen conflict, killed some years ago in Moscow, where Russian Authorities have found, arrested and are currently judging two executants, while also searching to arrest also a 3rd one, allegedly escaped in Belgium. But they have not yet found the instigators.

     Similar texts were adopted recently also on dissident Ukranian Journalist Georgiy GONGADZE's murder, for which Ukranian Authorities have at least found, arrested and condemned 2 executants to 12 and 13 Years of jail, but not yet the instigators. For that purpose, they recently accepted an International Experts team to participate to the investigations.     

But, it's only for the Murder of dissident Turkish Cypriot Journalist ADALI, in the occupied territories of Cyprus, that Turkey has NOT yet found ANYONE responsible, and even claimed recently inside CoE that it would be "impossible" to do so !    

These astonishing differences exist despite the fact that ECHR condemned alike Ukraine and Turkey with 2 Judgements on the same year : 2005, for the murders of  Journalists GONGADZE and ADALI, strong critics of Corruption in Ukraine, and of Ankara's policies on mass-influx of Turkish Settlers in the Occupied Territories of Cyprus, respectively.    

Regarless of that, CoE's Committee of Ministers, who is entrusted with the duty to supervise execution of ECHR's judgements, has just asked Ukraine's Government to reply to further questions on Gongadze's murder before March 2009, while Turkey, curiously, got a longer postponement for answering questions on Adali's murder, until June...   

A comparison of these cases, raises serious questions about Double Standards :

------------------------

On TRANSPARENCY :
--------------------------
    On Gongadze's murder, CoE's body speaks even about the participation of
"an INTERNATIONAL group of Experts" in the Investigation, (f.ex. of "Tape Recordings"), accepted by Ukraine.
    On the contrary, on Adali's murder, CoE is obliged to repeatedly ask (for a 2nd
time) Turkey whether, at least, it informed the victims' Family, or not...
------------------------------
- On EFFICIENCY :
-----------------------
On Gongadze's murder, CoE formally "recalls that the Committee (of Ministers) ..URGED the Ukranian authorities.. to TAKE ALL NECESSARY INVESTIGATIVE STEPS TO ACHIEVE CONCRETE and VISIBLE RESULTS in the INVESTIGATION, aimed at the Identification of the INSTIGATORS and Organisers of the Murder", and "STRONGLY INVITED the Ukranian Authorities to provide information on the PROGRESS IN THE INVESTIGATION", before MARCH 2009.

But, on Adali's murder, on the contrary, CoE's body merely .. "took note" of the "arguments presented by" Cyprus, which denounce the absence of any proof of new "investigation" by Turkey. Following Turkey's own suggestion (!), it simply "noted" that there is "no limitation period" for "any new element" to "lead potentialy (sic !) to a Re-Opening of the Investigation". Without saying who might find any such "new" fact, since Turkey stoped searching... It also POSTPONED the issue until .. JUNE  !
-----------------------
 - On the PUNISHMENT OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE :
----------------------
 -  On Gongadze's murder case, Ukranian Authorities already arrested and condemned, at least 2 suspects, to 12 and 13 Years of jail. And on Politkovskaya's murder at least 2 suspects are judged, and a 3rd one "wanted".

On the contrary, on Adali's murder case, the Turkish authorities simply claim that "it had not been possible to obtain new .. information .. on the basis of which criminal charges could be brought against ANY person" !...

Moreover,  a LETTER sent by Turkey ...2 Years after CoE's 2006 call to re-investigate anew Adali's murder case, is totally EMPTY of Facts ! As Cypus' Delegation denounced earlier, Turkey's Letter ONLY CLAIMS that a "New Investigation" was made without any result, but does NOT even cite ANY FACT to prove it :

F.ex.,on the crucial issue of the "MOTIVATIONS" behind Adali's murder, noted by ECHR, Turkey MERELY CLAIMS that "all allegations  were investigated; without result", but OMITS ANY FACT TO PROVE IT !..(It doesn't even remind which were these "allegations").. .

+ On ECHR's astonishment that the Turkish Occupation regime didn't produce any "BALLISTIC REPORT" on the Shots which murdered Adali, Turkey again repeats, 12 years later, that, still, even until now, "it  was not possible to obtain the BalisticReport"...

- As for the astonishing absence of key-WITNESSES' Testimonies, denounced by ECHR, Turkey agains repeats various pretexts avoiding to reveal anything, (Fex. that a person "left" the Occupied Territories  "on 2002", or that another witness was heard, but without revealing nothing of what he said, etc).

Turkey obviously "FAILS TO MEET THE CRITICISM made BY THE COURT" for lack of any efficient Investigation in Adali's case, concluded Cyprus' Government.
---------------------------------------------
Replying to our Question which COMPARED these 3 outstanding cases of "JOURNALISTS MURDERS", Adali, Gongadze and Politkovskaya, in order to avoid "Double Standards" by asking from Ukraine and Russia more than what is asked EU candidate Turkey, many European personalities were critical /

They criticised Ankara's recent claim at the CoE to stop investigating, because it would be "impossible to find anyone" responsible for the 5 bullet shots which killed Kutlu ADALI in front of his Family Home, contrary to the other two Journalists' murders, where Ukraine and Russia at least arrested the executants, searching now for the instigators :
----------------------------------

imag0103_400

    - "Where was that ? In Turkish Occupied Cyprus ? WITHOUT ANY DOUBT : Any murder of Journalist should be investigated in full ! All these Murders must be investigated !", replied the famous SAKHAROV's wife, Elena BONNER to our question on Adali's case, compared to Gongadze and Politofskaya.

    Elena Bonner spoke us EXCLUSIVELY shortly after being honored by the President
of EU Parliament on the occasion of 20 Years of her husband's SAKHAROV Prize.

    A strong personality, Sakharov's wife even had to struggle against an anonymous EU staffer who, astonishingly, tried to stop her speaking when h heard our question on "Turkey" (!) : - "Please, let me translate, she continues
speaking, don't stop us !", had to cry Sakharov's daughter, (a Journalist
herself), who was translating her mothers' reply, (obliged to speak louder to
make her voice heard despite the harassment).. (= + Audio Proof !)

    Earlier, Elena Bonner also fustigated "Double Standards" at another case, on
Western countries' attitude vis a vis Kosovo and the Kurds : -F.ex. "You have
recognized a few 400.000 Kosovars as an "independent" country, but you still
deny that to 30 millions of Kurds in Turkey !", she denounced.
-----------------------------
    - "This (ADALI's murder) is an issue which should be pursued by the Committee
for Human Rights. That's why we have one, and it's its duty to examine cases of
Journalists' murders as the one you referred to. You should bring the case in
front of that Committee", suggested in reply to our question on Adali, EU
Parliament's President, German MEP Hans Gert POETTERING.

    - "It's impossible  to achieve goals of PEACE, if HUMAN RIGHTS are left out :
in fact, Peace and Human Rights are intrinsequaly linked", added POETTERING.
--------------------------------------
    + "For us (European/International Federation of Journalists) it's clear :
Whenever a Journalist is Murdered, the Investigation should continue until
those Responsible are found !", replied earlier to another question on ADALI
EFJ/IFJ's Secretary General, Aidan WHITE.

    Speaking as a matter of General Principle, White asked us for "concrete data"
on the execution of ECHR's judgement on Adali case, in order to "look at it in
depth" and "make a formal statement", in comparison with the other Murdered
Journalist case, also pending at CoE's  Ministers for completing its execution,
on Ukranian Gongadze.
----------------------------------------------------
     From EU Rapporteur on Human Rights, vice-President of EU Parliament Liberties' Committee, MEP Giusto CATANIA, we were told that, since there is an ECHR judgement in both Adali and Gongadge's cases, "Turkey must naturally execute the judgement and make a full and efficient investigation, until those responsible for the Journalist's murder are found and punished".

    Even if "we (Catania's "EuroLeft" Group) support Turkey's EU perspectives, this does not mean that Ankara should not behave properly. On the contrary, it means that they have to meet tough conditions, particularly on Human Rights", was added on the occasion of Adali's murder case.

    Moreover, "since you raise the issue of Mr. Adali's muder as a part of a Series of Journalist's murders, including fex. Gongadze, Politkovskaya, ao., tthen we (EU) could also act together with CoE's Commissioner on Human Rights, Thomas HAMMARBERG, it was suggested.

    - "We (EU) must step up efforts against the problem of IMPUNITY : Real Peace cannot exist without Justice",  stressed also this week at EU Parliament in Strasbourg, French Minister on Human Rights, Mrs Rama YADE.
------------------------
                     

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Mostrados

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.