english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Accueil arrow newsitems arrow EU to Boost Vaccine Production+UpDates, But UnClear if those available Stop Virus' Spread, or Not...

EU to Boost Vaccine Production+UpDates, But UnClear if those available Stop Virus' Spread, or Not...

Ecrit par ACM
Thursday, 25 February 2021

 

eu_summit_press_conf_25.2.2021_eu_video_eurofora_screenshoti_400

 


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- From the outset of the 1st Video-Press Conference on Brussels' EU Heads of State/Government Summit of 25-26 Feb. 2021, Focusing on EU Health and Defense Autonomy, EU Council and EU Commission Presidents, Charles Michel and Ursula von der Leyen, stressed, in substance, that EU must Boost its own Production and UpDates of Deadly Virus' Vaccines, particularly as those Few Hastily Advanced  by some Controversial Foreign Start-Ups, "Still, it's Not Even Clear, if they can Stop the Spread of the Virus, or Not" !..., as the Latter Denounced Today, (See, Already : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html, etc).

- Indeed, Seeking to "give a Message, of both Truth and Hope", President Michel didn't hide the Fact that "Our present situation is certainly Difficult", in the Fight against a Mutant Deadly Virus' Pandemic, stressing also that it " is Global :  We (EU) won’t be Safe until Everyone (the World) is Safe", (concerning f.ex., not only Travel Restrictions, but also WHO's Solidarity mechanism "COVAX", for Poor Countries, where the EU is largely committed, a probable "International Treaty on Pandemics", that he proposed, a hopefuly dynamic "G20 World Summit on Health", soon expected in Italy, etc). At the same time, the EU " has the Tools, the Resources, the Capacities to ensure, in the coming months that Europe will play a Key Role", particularly by "Speeding up the Production ...of Vaccines", with "more Predictability and Transparency", "to ensure that Pharmaceutical companies comply with their Commitments" to Deliver, as well as with "Continued Investment in Vaccine Research", Nowadays mainly in order "to Identify Mutations" of the Deadly Virus, (f.ex. UK's, South African, Japan/Brazilian, Brittany's/French, etc), especialy by "Enhancing our Sequencing Capacity", as he said.

However, it's, Obviously, Also True that the persisting Lack of Any realy European Vaccine, remains, until now, an UnExpexted,  UnExplained and Schocking Fact ! And the Same goes     Even for the similarly UnExpected, UnExplained and Schocking Lack, among the Few Vaccines Authorized untl now, of Any kind of "Classic" Vaccine, Based on Pasteur's well established and largely Tested Ideas and principles..., (instead of a quasi-Monopole of Only "DNA" and/or "RNA" Genome Manipulations, double "Virus' vectors", etc, which are Novel and Controversial Technologies, withOut Enough Time to really Test Seriously all Possible "Side Effects" Dangerous for Human Health)... Such UnExpected Problems, should, Normaly, Incite Scientists to, at least, Facilitate the Research and Use of Various interesting or useful Therapies (i.e. Medical Drugs), which Might have Helped, at least, to Gain some Time, by Saving Human Lives, and/or alleviating Hardships, perhaps Contribute to strengthen ProPhylaxis, etc. But the UnExplained Hate of an Establishment against HCQ, Abused of Any Holow Pretext in order to Slander (Even Accuse and Prosecute !) its Supporters, in a Grossly, Caricatural and Systematicaly Anti-Scientific way, which added several Gros Scandals, apparently Serving some Shady Interests...

- Nevertheless, according to President Von der Leyen, the EU stil Aims to have "Vaccinated" about 75% of EU's Population, i.e. "about 255 Millions of Adults", with Any Available Vaccine, until the "End of the Summer" 2021, she Confirmed Today.

>>> However, (as the Head of EU Commission Acknowledged, on the occasion of an Eventual EU "Vaccination Certificate" [or "Passport"] Proposal, reportedly due to Facilitate Tourism Economy, and currently still "Discussed" inside EU Council),

 - "there are also Open Scientific Questions" :  In particular, " It's Still UnClear, Whether you Can Transmit the Virus, or Not,  Afterwards, Even if you are Vaccinated", she Warned !

=> "Eurofora" had Raised that Key Question, already as Early as since the Eve of the Authorisation for the 1st and 2nd                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Vaccines against COVID Virus, by EU's "EMA", and USA's "FDA", Back at the Beginning of December 2020, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html, etc), Denouncing the Scandalous Fact that Even for EU's Top Competent Press Officers, as well as for Official Documents submitted for those Authorisations, it was ..."UnKnown IF (that) Vaccine Stops or Spreads Virus to other People" !... *

>>> This UnPrecedented  Fact Obviously means that all the People who see that some Individuals would have been "Vaccinated" by such Tools, could be Massively MisLeaded and Lurred into Erronesously  Believing that those persons would have become "Immune" to the Virus, and No More present any Danger to the Society, while, in Fact, they may have Become ..."Silent Killers", i.e. the Worst and Most Dangerous Deadly Virus' Spreaders, simply Because they are "Covert", "Asymptomatic" Killers, Threatening to Infect All Other People at any moment, since the Society does Not Defend itself, simply because it has Never Seen Before, in the History of Humankind, Any so-called "Vaccines" which would Not provide Immunity from a Virus, but Only Cover (for a While) the "Jombie" who took them, while, (most Probably/almost Certainly), Exposing All Other People he/she contacts to Infection and Risk of Death !

=> In Front of such an UnPrecedented, Serious Risk, it's easy to Guess the Grave Damages Against Human Public Health, that might Provoke, f.ex., the UnWarned  imminent Establishment of so-called EU (Pseudo-) "Vaccination-Passports", (Comp. Supra), which would Simply Attest that an Individual got 2 Shots of such a Pseudo-"Vaccine"..., (Particularly for "Facilitating Tourism" Economy : Comp. Supra)... In the USA some have even, reportedly, started to Massively practice a Policy consisting to Oblige All the People who Work in Schools to Submit to such Pseudo-"Vaccines", as a Necessary Consition in order to be able to Work there, Otherwise being Threatened to get Immediately Fired ! (f.ex. in some Ohio's Schools, etc). In such Circumstances, it's Easy to Guess the Sly Trap in which Risk to be Thrown the Parents of such Children : Indeed, they are Obviously Pushed to Hope that their Children would be "Safe" from the Virus in such Schools, merely Because their Teachers would have got Shots of such Pseudo-"Vaccines", while, on the Contrary, they might have, most Probably, almost Certainly, become, in their Majority, Dangerous "Silent Killers", still bearing that Deadly Virus' Infection, (but withOut any Externaly Visible Sign, except from False Appearances, Risking to MisLead their potential Victims)....

In such circumstances, it's Naturally a Worrying Fact for Democracy Nowadays, that Even French Professor Christian Perronne, Head of  Infectiology at Paris' Hospitals, was Suddenly ...Fired from his top job, shortly After Publishing a Critical Article, last December 2020,  Denouncing, inter alia, mainly some Attempts to Impose certain Fake "Vaccines", which, Instead of Protecting Human Society from Massive Spread of Virus' Infections, on the Contrary, seem Now to Focus into Making Genetic Manipulations to Individual Persons' Genome, (Later, perhaps, even into their Descendans, in Future Generations, Despite CoE's BioEthical Principles), making the Historic Inventor of Vaccines, Pasteur, spin in his Grave.., while, on the Contrary, almost at the Same Time, a simple recipient of a Degree in Pharmacology, added Only  to a Banal and UnRelated "Business Administration Master" from Ireland, suddenly was propulsed up to the Top of the Direction of EU's Medical Agency (EMA), entrusted, since December 2020, precisely, with the Responsibility of Chosing those "Vaccines" that would be Authorized (or not yet)  against the Deadly COVID Virus, (including those Criticized by Professor Perronne and others : Comp. Supra)... Was it a purely "Scientific" Move ? One may Legitimately Doubt, until Proof of the Contrary, when we see Even WHO's Chief, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Just After Concluding his Speech at CoE's Parliamentary Assembly, here in Strasbourg, by Warning the Audience that, Despite those "Vaccines" presented recently (Comp. Supra), nevertheless, People should Persist into all their Panoply of "Health Protective Measures" against Risks of Virus' Infections even afterwards, (probably, simply because of the Surprizing Fact that such Strange "Vaccines", Contrary to All Others in the History of Mankinds, do Not Guarantee to Stop Spreading the Virus to All Other People : Comp. Supra), was, Suddenly, and Exceptionaly, Cut off, and Suprirzingly Deprived of the Usual Session of "Questions and Answers" with MEPs, which allowed to Clarify all such Topical Issues... (Partly UPDATED).

 

 

(../..)

 

 

("Draft-News")

 


---------------------------------------------

 

 

Enterprises' Competitiveness for 2014-2020

Statistics

Visiteurrs: 57364335

Archive

Login Form





Se souvenir de moi

Perdu votre mot de passe?
Pas encore de compte? Enregistrez-vous

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Résultats

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.