english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow CoE Head Buric warns Vaccination Certificates may Affect Human Rights...

CoE Head Buric warns Vaccination Certificates may Affect Human Rights...

Written by ACM
Friday, 19 March 2021
coe_sg_buric_slams_eu_vaccination_certification_probable_errors__400_01

 

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- In a Landmatrk Speech at CoE Parliamentary Assembly's Standing Committee today, the Secretary General of the PanEuropean Organisation for Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law : CoE's 47 Member-States-strong  (including Russia) CoE, Marija Pejčinović Burić, a former vice-Prime Minister and EU Affairs Minister from Croatia, (Comp. various Buric's Replies to "Eurofora"'s Questions, f.ex. at : ..., + ..., + ..., etc), Focused into Warning practicaly the forthcoming EU's 27 Member States' Leaders' Summit, in Brussels, Next Week, (March 25-26), to Avoid any Error to eventualy Endorse some Controversial Measures about so-called COVID Virus' "Vaccination Certificates" which might be Violating Human, BioEthical, and/or Social Rights of the People, in this "Moving" and "Complex" Area.

- Otherwise, Any such Eventual Errors would be Checked and Censored, either before the concerned Member Countries' National Courts, and/or, ultimately, before the PanEuropean Court of Human Rights, Headquartered in Strasbourg, while, in Addition, all Other concerned specialized Bodies of the CoE, (f.ex. Parliamentary Assembly, Anti-Discrimination Committee, Commissioner for Human Rights, Social Rights Committee, BioEthical Rights' Committee, Personal Data Protection bodies, Setc) would Also Carefuly Monitor relevant Developments, and Take Action whenever appropriate, as she pointed out.

- Indeed, "the Public Health crisis is Not Static : Rather it's a Moving Target, that poses New Questions and Challenges":

- F.ex., "12 Months Ago, the World was Longing for Effective Vaccines". But "Now", "would it be Acceptable for Countries to make Vaccinations Compulsory for Everyone, or for Specific Groups Only ?", she wondered, in particular.

- Or, "could Governments establish "Vaccine Certificates" that Allow Only those Who have been Inoculated to Cross specific Borders ?"

- "And Might they set up Domestic "Certification" Schemes, that Allow Access to certain Spaces for Citizens who have had the jab, Nut Not to those who have Not ?", F.ex., "Restaurants, Cinemas, >Sports, Events, and so on...", she went on to question.

- All "these are Complex Questions, with Important Human Rights Dimensions", Buric stressed.

Significatively, CoE's Secretary General was Speaking Today Morning in Strasbourg, almost 3 Weeks After EU Commission's President, Ursula von der Leyen, had Announced, Earlier in Brussels, at the 1st Press Conference of the Latest, 25-26 Feb. 2021 EU Summit, that the EU Heads of State/Government had Just Agreed on What might be the main "Content" of such Electronic EU "Vaccination Certificates", (i.e. Vaccinations, AntiCorps from Recoveries, and/or Negative PCR Tests, etc), But Not Yet what they could "Do" with them...: This is due to be anew Discussed and probably Decided in their Forthcoming, March 25-26 EU Summit in Brussels, i.e. Soon...   

=> In Consequence, Buric Reminded, Today in Strasbourg, "First" of all, that "the (Legally Binding) Oviedo Convention" of the CoE, on BioEthics, Human Rights and Medicine/Biology, (Opened to Signature, since 1998, to All Countries in the World), "makes clear that Any Medical Intervention should be subject to a Patient's 'Free' and "Informed Consent"", i.e., f.ex., Nobody should be Obliged to be Vaccinated, Neither Ignore Which Vaccine (among Many Available) he/she would get, and Why, (but, on the contrary, Agree on that Choice)...

+ "Secondly, the (Pan)European Convention on Human Rights, imposes a strict Lawfulness and Proportionality Test, for justifying any Mandatory Measures in sensitive areas, such as Health", she added.

++ "And 3rd, UnJustified Differences in the Treatment of People, Because of their Health Status, may, Ultimately, raise Discrimination Issues, under Both the (Human Rights) European Convention, and the European Social Charter", she added.

+++ "F.ex., Vaccination Certificates need to take into account Privacy and Data Protection Rights", CoE's Head observed.

++++ Moreover, "any document Providing Vaccinated People with Access to Rights, Services or Places is Problematic, IF that access remains Off Limits to those who canNot be Vaccinated, or have Not had the chance to be Vaccinated", she Warned, as a matter of Principle, (Comp. Supra).

------------

=> Therefore, all "those Designing Systems like these, should have these Considerations at the Forefront of their minds", Buric advised.

Naturaly, "in the 1st instance, it is for National Courts to assess compliance with these legal Principles". "But ...these debates  ...relate to our (CoE's) Mandate (on Human Rights/Democracy/Rule of Law), and ..., ultimately, they might arrive at the ECHR", in Strasbourg.

CoE's Staff intends to "Continue Following All of this, and tob>Support our (47) Member States in Finding Solutions to such Challenges, in line with our Common Standards", according ton "the Ethos (which) has Defined our (overall) approach so far, including (CoE's) New Cooperation Project (2021+), on the "Protection of Human Rights in HealthCare", (During the Public Health Crisis), that I presented to the Committee of Ministers in January", and which "we will <<Apply to the Challenges yet To Come", while "Moving Forward", CoE's Chief Highlighted.  

>>> In particular, "Prominent among these will be the Long-term Consequences of COVID-19 on Europeans’ Social Rights", Buric Announced for the forseable Future. Because "during Economic Downturns, there always lurks the Danger of widening Social Divisions", and a Priority "will be on Ensuring that we (CoE) Respond in a way that Protects the Rights, Needs and Dignity of those who have Least".

This concerns "All" the PanEuropean CoE, where "the Will Exists" to "Work in Unity", to "ensure Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law are Maintained, in these and All Circumstances, to the Benefit of Every European", Buric concluded, with Voluntarism.

-----------------------

By a Striking Coincidence, that <<Danger of widening Social Divisions>> appears, here, at certain particularly Dangerous, and quite "Shocking" juxtapositions between some UnWarned Workers,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     and many InDifferent or even irresponsible Holiday-Makers,                    abusing of novel "Vaccines" with UnCertain Efficiency... Indeed, as "Eurofora" and Many Other Authors have Already Documented Earlier, Most of those Novel Genetic Techniques do Not seem able to Stop Spreading the Deadly Virus to Other People, Limiting their Action into Trying Only to Prevent Visible Symptoms to those directly "Vaccinated"., i.e. who got the Shots... That"s un UnPrecedented Lacuna in Human History, of which most People are UnAware, so that they can be too Easily Misled into Believing that they would Face No Danger, while, in Fact, their Lives are still at Risk !

    As the Head of EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, recently  Acknowledged, on the occasion of an Eventual EU "Vaccination Certificate" [or "Passport"] Proposal, reportedly due to Facilitate Tourism Economy, and currently still "Discussed" inside EU Council,  - "there are also Open Scientific Questions" :  In particular, " It's Still UnClear, Whether you Can Transmit the Virus, or Not,  Afterwards, Even if you are Vaccinated", she Warned !


=> "Eurofora" had Raised that Key Question, already as Early as since the Eve of the Authorisation for the 1st and 2nd                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Vaccines against COVID Virus, by EU's "EMA", and USA's "FDA", Back at the Beginning of December 2020, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html, etc), Denouncing the Scandalous Fact that Even for EU's Top Competent Press Officers, as well as for Official Documents submitted for those Authorisations, it was ..."UnKnown IF (that) Vaccine Stops or Spreads Virus to other People" !... *


>>> This UnPrecedented  Fact Obviously means that all the People who see that some Individuals would have been "Vaccinated" by such Tools, could be Massively MisLeaded and Lurred into Erronesously  Believing that those persons would have become "Immune" to the Virus, and No More present any Danger to the Society, while, in Fact, they may have Become ..."Silent Killers", i.e. the Worst and Most Dangerous Deadly Virus' Spreaders, simply Because they are "Covert", "Asymptomatic" Killers, Threatening to Infect All Other People at any moment, since the Society does Not Defend itself, simply because it has Never Seen Before, in the History of Humankind, Any so-called "Vaccines" which would Not provide Immunity from a Virus, but Only Cover (for a While) the "Jombie" who took them, while, (most Probably/almost Certainly), Exposing All Other People he/she contacts to Infection and Risk of Death !


=> In Front of such an UnPrecedented, Serious Risk, it's easy to Guess the Grave Damages Against Human Public Health, that might Provoke, f.ex., the UnWarned  imminent Establishment of so-called EU (Pseudo-) "Vaccination-Passports", (Comp. Supra), which would Simply Attest that an Individual got 2 Shots of such a Pseudo-"Vaccine"..., (Particularly for "Facilitating Tourism" Economy : Comp. Supra)... In the USA some have even, reportedly, started to Massively practice a Policy consisting to Oblige All the People who Work in Schools to Submit to such Pseudo-"Vaccines", as a Necessary Consition in order to be able to Work there, Otherwise being Threatened to get Immediately Fired ! (f.ex. in some Ohio's Schools, etc). In such Circumstances, it's Easy to Guess the Sly Trap in which Risk to be Thrown the Parents of such Children : Indeed, they are Obviously Pushed to Hope that their Children would be "Safe" from the Virus in such Schools, merely Because their Teachers would have got Shots of such Pseudo-"Vaccines", while, on the Contrary, they might have, most Probably, almost Certainly, become, in their Majority, Dangerous "Silent Killers", still bearing that Deadly Virus' Infection, (but withOut any Externaly Visible Sign, except from False Appearances, Risking to MisLead their potential Victims)....


In such circumstances, it's Naturally a Worrying Fact for Democracy Nowadays, that Even French Professor Christian Perronne, Head of  Infectiology at Paris' Hospitals, was Suddenly ...Fired from his top job, shortly After Publishing a Critical Article, last December 2020,  Denouncing, inter alia, mainly some Attempts to Impose certain Fake "Vaccines", which, Instead of Protecting Human Society from Massive Spread of Virus' Infections, on the Contrary, seem Now to Focus into Making Genetic Manipulations to Individual Persons' Genome, (Later, perhaps, even into their Descendans, in Future Generations, Despite CoE's BioEthical Principles), making the Historic Inventor of Vaccines, Pasteur, spin in his Grave.., while, on the Contrary, almost at the Same Time, a simple recipient of a Degree in Pharmacology, added Only  to a Banal and UnRelated "Business Administration Master" from Ireland, suddenly was propulsed up to the Top of the Direction of EU's Medical Agency (EMA), entrusted, since December 2020, precisely, with the Responsibility of Chosing those "Vaccines" that would be Authorized (or not yet)  against the Deadly COVID Virus, (including those Criticized by Professor Perronne and others : Comp. Supra)... Was it a purely "Scientific" Move ? One may Legitimately Doubt, until Proof of the Contrary, when we see Even WHO's Chief, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Just After Concluding his Speech at CoE's Parliamentary Assembly, here in Strasbourg, by Warning the Audience that, Despite those "Vaccines" presented recently (Comp. Supra), nevertheless, People should Persist into all their Panoply of "Health Protective Measures" against Risks of Virus' Infections even afterwards, (probably, simply because of the Surprizing Fact that such Strange "Vaccines", Contrary to All Others in the History of Mankinds, do Not Guarantee to Stop Spreading the Virus to All Other People : Comp. Supra), was, Suddenly, and Exceptionaly, Cut off, and Suprirzingly Deprived of the Usual Session of "Questions and Answers" with MEPs, which allowed to Clarify all such Topical Issues...

Nevertheless, various Contradictions around that Issue still pop up, here or there, even at the Highest Levels : F.ex., inter alia, the experienced President of the German Bundestag, Wolfgang Schäuble, speaking reportedly after a particularly "Hot" Meeting with Chancellor Angie Merkel, the Heads of the Federated States and the Federal Government, on its Virus' Policy, expressed his Astonishment for the Fact that, Even during a particularly Hard Moment of Galoping Infections, Many People were Shocked by a very Big Number of expensive "Exceptional" Air Travel Reservations "for ... Majorka" (sic !)... Obviously, if this concerned some selfish Richies seeking to Amuse themselves, after having been transformed into ..Asymptomatic "Deadly Virus Jombies" for a bit, with some Controversial "Vaccines"' Shots and relevant "Certificates", (Comp.), while being Served by some Poor People, Risking their Health and/or Lives, withOut even Knowing anything about that, then, Obviously, Marija Buric's Warning about Grave Risks for an Appart-Heid-like "Social Distance" Gap, might, indeed, be just Starting !....  (Partly UPDATED).

 

 

(../..)

 

 

("Draft-News")

 

---------------------------------------------

 

EUHorizonSMEtool

Statistics

Visitors: 52357342

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

dsc00365_400

3 EU Parliament votes to boost EuroGroup !

---------------------------------

After EuroZone Paris Summit's succes, Sarkozy calls to "think anew how to re-construct Europe !

"EuroZone and EU Institutional debates pave the way to 2009 discussions on EU Future, including Enlargment, Turkey etc. ?


23 October 2008

After EU Parliament strongly suppported in 3 successive Votes this week in Strasbourg French EU Chairmanship's move to boost Euro-Group at EU's core, while ideas on EU Institutional problems are awaited on December, "it's an open Question now" if this may lead to a debate on EU's Future, or not, told us French President, Nicolas Sarkozy''s Spokesman, Pierre-Jerome Henin.

MEPs voted on Thursday fresh Funds to support EuroGroup, after adopting on Wednesday a Resolution asking a "further Evolution" to "the 1st ever meeting of Heads of State and of Government of the Euro-Zone, taking decisions in that capacity", while earlier this week a Report asked "a stronger Institutional setting" for "EuroGroup", extended from "competitiveness/industry" to "environment, employment and education", with "increased powers for Political decision-making", according to a text drafted by French MEP Francoise Beres and German MEP Werner Langen, "10 Years after the creation of Euro" (1999 - 2009).

- Brussels' subsequent "EU Council ..(simply)..ratified the measures decided by EuroGroup on October 12" in Paris, which "were necessary to contain the current Financial Crisis", Resolution observes, expressing also support to the new process succesfully initiated by Sarkozy and due to be completed by agreements with USA and other countries at a Global level.

From now on, it's between two differend but parallel moves : EU's delay, and EuroZone's acceleration, that Enlargement and particularly Turkey's controversial EU bid, will have to search its way :

Indeed, EU's 27 expect a "Roadmap on how to deal with the Irish problem" on Lisbon Treaty ratification after December, risking to pass even 2009 Elections and next Commission with the old Nice Treaty of 2000, out-dated and unfit even for 2004's Enlargement...

On the contrary, EU's core launches a real "Economic Governance for EuroZone at the highest level of Heads of State/Government" of the 15, which started in Paris on October 12 and was strongly supported this week in Strasbourg by Sarkozy and EU Parliament.
----------
- "It's a good idea, to launch such a debate ("on EU's Future") in EU Parliament in view of 2009 Euro-Election : Perhaps some MEPs will seize an opportunity", told us mainstream French MEP Alain Lamassoure, former EU Minister and EU Spokesman for France's governing party UMP.

- "All MEPs' debates on such EU Councils are also part of the larger debate on Europe's future : Now with EuroZone, and even more when, on December, Irish Prime Minister is due to table proposals in Strasbourg on how to deal with EU Treaty's ratification", replied earlier to our question EU Parliament's Press Director and Spokesman, Jaume Duch.
--------------------------------------
Sarkozy has formally anounced his intention to open EU Debates on Economy, Identity/Enlargement (i.e. mainly Turkey), etc. both linked to a popular Political view of Europe, since his Historic speeches on EU in Strasbourg, on February and July 2007, when he stressed that "Europe needs a New Renaissance". At the beginning of the French EU Presidency, on July 2008, replying to a MEP, he suggested that EU Parliament takes an active part in Debates on EU's Future.

- Now, in 2008, "Crisis are an opportunity to re-think how to re-construct Europe", Sarkozy stressed. At any case, the Historic 1st EuroZone Summit of Heads of State/Government, which started replying to the Financial crisis,"is a Turning Point : After that, Europe cannot be governed as before, but differently" : People "like a Europe with Strong Will".

- "We must make the System move !", "Europe needs Innovation" and free political debates. EU "Elections are in a few Months", Sarkozy warned.

He invited EU Parliament to fully play its role as "the Democratic Heart of the Europe we want : United, Independent and Voluntarist, because the World needs Europe's voice".

- "It's no more possible for Euro-Zone to continue without an Economic Government" at the Highest Level of Heads of State/Government, who provide "Democratic Legitimity" and can take important decisions, he announced, strongly supported by EU Parliament's Economic Committee which just voted to boost the "Institutional" aspects of "EuroGroup".

Plasticity offered by the current absence of a special Treaty on EuroZone's Institutions "made it easy to adapt the organization of the 1st Summit with imagination, to efficiently meet urgent needs", he observed, on the occasion of Brittish Prime Minister's exceptionnal presence at the greatest part of EuroGroup's Paris Summit.

- "In EuroZone we have the same Bank, the same Money, and, thus, a same duty for Unity" : "By bringing together EuroGroup's 15 members States we suceeded to find a solution and prepare a Giant Plan of 1.800 Billion euros", Sarkozy reminded of Paris' 1st Historic EuroZone's Summit.

Afterwards, Brussels' EU Council followed the move, and USA's Paulson II Plan was inspired from that. "Europe must promote the idea of Global Economy's Refoundation", he stressed.

dsc00390_400


- "I was frankly astonished when I found, at the EU, a rigid system, where any New Idea was seen from the outset as a sacrilege, while, on the contrary, Europe needs Innovation !", he described.

F.ex. ,"'When we first spoke about the "Union for the Mediterranean", it was misunderstood as something extraordinary.. When later we had the Russia -Georgia crisis, it seemed against EU's custom to act "in the middle of August", instead of staying a passive spectator ! And when, in front of the Financial ciris, we gathered the 1st EuroZone Summit of the "15", some thought of it as a lese-majesté", he denounced.
----------------------
On Geo-Political Principles :
----------------------
- But, by moving resolutely, "EU obtained the ...withdrawal of Occupation Troops in 2 Months !", reminded Sarkozy, observing that Russia "fulfilled its commitments", in the Georgian crisis, where a "disroportionate reaction" from Moscow followed a "totally inappropriate action" from Tbilisi's troops. "It would be crazy to reply by military means : EU should not become accomplice of another Cold War, imposed by lack of cool heads".. as he said.

In future, "the creation of a common European Economic Area with EU and Russia, would also obtain a raprochment on our Human Rights and Democratic Values", added Sarkozy, in a statement which should logically be applied, a fortiori, to controversial EU "candidate" Turkey..

Particularly when, the same week that EU Parliament voted 2009 EU Funds for Turkey's controversial EU bid, ECHR took a series of judgements condemning Turkey for grave Violations of Human Rights, such as : Torture, death of a political prisoner in unclear circumstances followed by failure to conduct a proper Investigation, "enforced Disappearance" of a youngster aged 17, Killing of a sepherd with Tank Shells, persecuting Journalists for articles on "Missing" People, even a former President of Human Rights' Association, (etc)

- "We (EU) can defend our ideas on respect of Sovereignity and territorial Integrity, on Human Rights and other differences ... without confrontation", Sarkozy stressed, on the occasion of Russian/Georgian conflict, reminding that : "we were only 2 steps from catastroph", when a Peace agreement brokered in Moscow prevented, at the last minute, Russian troops' advance towards Tbilisi.

An EU Parliament Resolution adopted Wednesday in Strasbourg on the occasion of Russia - Georgia conflict, outlines a set of Principle which apply elsewhere too, (particularly when EU Rapporteur for Russia and Turkey is one and same person ; Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijtanen !)

Clearly rejecting any "military solution to the conflicts", MEPs "condemn ..all those who resorted to force and violence". They denounce a "disproportionate military action", "as well as (an) unilateral decision to recognise the independence" of brekaway regions, "calling.. to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity" of the concerned country, "and the inviolability of its borders recognised by all EU Member States". They warn that "EU must review its policy towards" a 3rd Country, "should .(it)...not comply with its commitments", and "stress that the withdrawal of.... troops from the areas ....is an essential additional step".

EU Parliament "calls for the safe and quick return of refugees, (accepted by Russian President Medvedev) accompanied by the deployment of EU observers on the ground", and "regrets ...that ..EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) is not allowed to enter the ...breakaway regions". Moreover, "It's important to ensure that persons and NGOs ..engaged in defending human and civil rights can operate". "Until ...all remaining issues (are) resolved..., and notably the continuing ...Military presence", "relations with the EU ..cannot be fully normalised", MEPS warned.

As nobody likes to be accused to practice "Double Standards", this should be regarded as "Principles" applicable to any Third Country at EU's Neighborhood.. No ?

-------------------

On Economy :

-----------------------
- "When Financial crisis shook US and EU's Banks, without result from the 1st (American) Paulsen plan, it was the common reply of the 1st EuroZone's Summit, involving some 1800 Billion euros, which started a positive move in the markets, soon strengthened by the follow-up of the US Paulson 2 Plan, noted Sarkozy.

- "Europe should not be only on the defensive, but, if necessary, know also how to take an offensive", he said, brushing away hesitationsto act on Economy: - "I'm for a refondation of Capitaliism, but against Speculators, who betray its values" : "Lack of Rules was profitable to speculators, Not to businessmen !" We must make sure to prevent any such crisis in future". "We, the rest of the World, cannot continue to bear the deficits of the 1st World power without saying anything !", the French President said, applauded by EU Parliament. All this needs "a New Global Governance", on which EU Parliament must debate. That's why "we proposed together with USA, several Summits from mid-November", to which G-8, enlarged to China, India a.o. countries, should participate. UNO's SG; Ban Ki Moon, the IMF, etc.

Financial crisis lowered shares' prices even for healthy companies, sometimes to 1/3 of their initial price, so that strangers might buy EU industries for only a portion of their real value, and Europeans may wake up one day with their main industries sold out to foreigners !

That's one of the reasons for which EU should debate about creating "Golden Shares" for States to jointly take Strategic participations to help European Industries until the end of the Crisis, particularly against distording competition, he suggested, pointing at USA's 35 billion $ plan for American Car Industry."We shall struggle for Europe to be able to build Airplanes, Ships, Trains, Cars, because we need a strong Industry", he concluded.

"F.ex. as we did back in 2004, when as Finance Minister, we bought Alsthom's shares for 800.000 euros, and, after restructuring, we sold them for 2 Millions : Help a company and make money is not so bad"...

As for the UK, "when Ireland announced that it would guarantee only Irish Banks, London City emptied from liquidities in 24 hours : It's the EU which helped to restore the situation, Not the UK alone !", reminded Sarkozy to nationalist British MEP Nigel Farage.

dsc00381_400


On the contrary, in a last-minute attempt for the EU to catch-up with its Institutional delay "before the European Elections" of June 2009, MEPs simply voted a call for a "set of proposals" to be made for the "Irish public opinion" at the end of the year...

- "As long as Lisbon Treaty is not ratified by all 27 EU Member States, there is an unanimous decision to stop Enlargement, reminded Wednesday in Strasbourg the French Minister for EU affairs, Jean-Pierre Jouyet..

Added to an indirect but clear warning that, without Lisbon Treaty, all 27 EU Member Countries may not have a Commissioner in the 2009 resuffle, MEPS in the Constitutional/Foreign affairs Committees applauded hoping that this might motivate their Irish friends..

dsc00360_400

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.