english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow CoE Head Buric warns Vaccination Certificates may Affect Human Rights...

CoE Head Buric warns Vaccination Certificates may Affect Human Rights...

Written by ACM
vendredi, 19 mars 2021
coe_sg_buric_slams_eu_vaccination_certification_probable_errors__400_01

 

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- In a Landmatrk Speech at CoE Parliamentary Assembly's Standing Committee today, the Secretary General of the PanEuropean Organisation for Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law : CoE's 47 Member-States-strong  (including Russia) CoE, Marija Pejčinović Burić, a former vice-Prime Minister and EU Affairs Minister from Croatia, (Comp. various Buric's Replies to "Eurofora"'s Questions, f.ex. at : ..., + ..., + ..., etc), Focused into Warning practicaly the forthcoming EU's 27 Member States' Leaders' Summit, in Brussels, Next Week, (March 25-26), to Avoid any Error to eventualy Endorse some Controversial Measures about so-called COVID Virus' "Vaccination Certificates" which might be Violating Human, BioEthical, and/or Social Rights of the People, in this "Moving" and "Complex" Area.

- Otherwise, Any such Eventual Errors would be Checked and Censored, either before the concerned Member Countries' National Courts, and/or, ultimately, before the PanEuropean Court of Human Rights, Headquartered in Strasbourg, while, in Addition, all Other concerned specialized Bodies of the CoE, (f.ex. Parliamentary Assembly, Anti-Discrimination Committee, Commissioner for Human Rights, Social Rights Committee, BioEthical Rights' Committee, Personal Data Protection bodies, Setc) would Also Carefuly Monitor relevant Developments, and Take Action whenever appropriate, as she pointed out.

- Indeed, "the Public Health crisis is Not Static : Rather it's a Moving Target, that poses New Questions and Challenges":

- F.ex., "12 Months Ago, the World was Longing for Effective Vaccines". But "Now", "would it be Acceptable for Countries to make Vaccinations Compulsory for Everyone, or for Specific Groups Only ?", she wondered, in particular.

- Or, "could Governments establish "Vaccine Certificates" that Allow Only those Who have been Inoculated to Cross specific Borders ?"

- "And Might they set up Domestic "Certification" Schemes, that Allow Access to certain Spaces for Citizens who have had the jab, Nut Not to those who have Not ?", F.ex., "Restaurants, Cinemas, >Sports, Events, and so on...", she went on to question.

- All "these are Complex Questions, with Important Human Rights Dimensions", Buric stressed.

Significatively, CoE's Secretary General was Speaking Today Morning in Strasbourg, almost 3 Weeks After EU Commission's President, Ursula von der Leyen, had Announced, Earlier in Brussels, at the 1st Press Conference of the Latest, 25-26 Feb. 2021 EU Summit, that the EU Heads of State/Government had Just Agreed on What might be the main "Content" of such Electronic EU "Vaccination Certificates", (i.e. Vaccinations, AntiCorps from Recoveries, and/or Negative PCR Tests, etc), But Not Yet what they could "Do" with them...: This is due to be anew Discussed and probably Decided in their Forthcoming, March 25-26 EU Summit in Brussels, i.e. Soon...   

=> In Consequence, Buric Reminded, Today in Strasbourg, "First" of all, that "the (Legally Binding) Oviedo Convention" of the CoE, on BioEthics, Human Rights and Medicine/Biology, (Opened to Signature, since 1998, to All Countries in the World), "makes clear that Any Medical Intervention should be subject to a Patient's 'Free' and "Informed Consent"", i.e., f.ex., Nobody should be Obliged to be Vaccinated, Neither Ignore Which Vaccine (among Many Available) he/she would get, and Why, (but, on the contrary, Agree on that Choice)...

+ "Secondly, the (Pan)European Convention on Human Rights, imposes a strict Lawfulness and Proportionality Test, for justifying any Mandatory Measures in sensitive areas, such as Health", she added.

++ "And 3rd, UnJustified Differences in the Treatment of People, Because of their Health Status, may, Ultimately, raise Discrimination Issues, under Both the (Human Rights) European Convention, and the European Social Charter", she added.

+++ "F.ex., Vaccination Certificates need to take into account Privacy and Data Protection Rights", CoE's Head observed.

++++ Moreover, "any document Providing Vaccinated People with Access to Rights, Services or Places is Problematic, IF that access remains Off Limits to those who canNot be Vaccinated, or have Not had the chance to be Vaccinated", she Warned, as a matter of Principle, (Comp. Supra).

------------

=> Therefore, all "those Designing Systems like these, should have these Considerations at the Forefront of their minds", Buric advised.

Naturaly, "in the 1st instance, it is for National Courts to assess compliance with these legal Principles". "But ...these debates  ...relate to our (CoE's) Mandate (on Human Rights/Democracy/Rule of Law), and ..., ultimately, they might arrive at the ECHR", in Strasbourg.

CoE's Staff intends to "Continue Following All of this, and tob>Support our (47) Member States in Finding Solutions to such Challenges, in line with our Common Standards", according ton "the Ethos (which) has Defined our (overall) approach so far, including (CoE's) New Cooperation Project (2021+), on the "Protection of Human Rights in HealthCare", (During the Public Health Crisis), that I presented to the Committee of Ministers in January", and which "we will <<Apply to the Challenges yet To Come", while "Moving Forward", CoE's Chief Highlighted.  

>>> In particular, "Prominent among these will be the Long-term Consequences of COVID-19 on Europeans’ Social Rights", Buric Announced for the forseable Future. Because "during Economic Downturns, there always lurks the Danger of widening Social Divisions", and a Priority "will be on Ensuring that we (CoE) Respond in a way that Protects the Rights, Needs and Dignity of those who have Least".

This concerns "All" the PanEuropean CoE, where "the Will Exists" to "Work in Unity", to "ensure Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law are Maintained, in these and All Circumstances, to the Benefit of Every European", Buric concluded, with Voluntarism.

-----------------------

By a Striking Coincidence, that <<Danger of widening Social Divisions>> appears, here, at certain particularly Dangerous, and quite "Shocking" juxtapositions between some UnWarned Workers,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     and many InDifferent or even irresponsible Holiday-Makers,                    abusing of novel "Vaccines" with UnCertain Efficiency... Indeed, as "Eurofora" and Many Other Authors have Already Documented Earlier, Most of those Novel Genetic Techniques do Not seem able to Stop Spreading the Deadly Virus to Other People, Limiting their Action into Trying Only to Prevent Visible Symptoms to those directly "Vaccinated"., i.e. who got the Shots... That"s un UnPrecedented Lacuna in Human History, of which most People are UnAware, so that they can be too Easily Misled into Believing that they would Face No Danger, while, in Fact, their Lives are still at Risk !

    As the Head of EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, recently  Acknowledged, on the occasion of an Eventual EU "Vaccination Certificate" [or "Passport"] Proposal, reportedly due to Facilitate Tourism Economy, and currently still "Discussed" inside EU Council,  - "there are also Open Scientific Questions" :  In particular, " It's Still UnClear, Whether you Can Transmit the Virus, or Not,  Afterwards, Even if you are Vaccinated", she Warned !


=> "Eurofora" had Raised that Key Question, already as Early as since the Eve of the Authorisation for the 1st and 2nd                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Vaccines against COVID Virus, by EU's "EMA", and USA's "FDA", Back at the Beginning of December 2020, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html, etc), Denouncing the Scandalous Fact that Even for EU's Top Competent Press Officers, as well as for Official Documents submitted for those Authorisations, it was ..."UnKnown IF (that) Vaccine Stops or Spreads Virus to other People" !... *


>>> This UnPrecedented  Fact Obviously means that all the People who see that some Individuals would have been "Vaccinated" by such Tools, could be Massively MisLeaded and Lurred into Erronesously  Believing that those persons would have become "Immune" to the Virus, and No More present any Danger to the Society, while, in Fact, they may have Become ..."Silent Killers", i.e. the Worst and Most Dangerous Deadly Virus' Spreaders, simply Because they are "Covert", "Asymptomatic" Killers, Threatening to Infect All Other People at any moment, since the Society does Not Defend itself, simply because it has Never Seen Before, in the History of Humankind, Any so-called "Vaccines" which would Not provide Immunity from a Virus, but Only Cover (for a While) the "Jombie" who took them, while, (most Probably/almost Certainly), Exposing All Other People he/she contacts to Infection and Risk of Death !


=> In Front of such an UnPrecedented, Serious Risk, it's easy to Guess the Grave Damages Against Human Public Health, that might Provoke, f.ex., the UnWarned  imminent Establishment of so-called EU (Pseudo-) "Vaccination-Passports", (Comp. Supra), which would Simply Attest that an Individual got 2 Shots of such a Pseudo-"Vaccine"..., (Particularly for "Facilitating Tourism" Economy : Comp. Supra)... In the USA some have even, reportedly, started to Massively practice a Policy consisting to Oblige All the People who Work in Schools to Submit to such Pseudo-"Vaccines", as a Necessary Consition in order to be able to Work there, Otherwise being Threatened to get Immediately Fired ! (f.ex. in some Ohio's Schools, etc). In such Circumstances, it's Easy to Guess the Sly Trap in which Risk to be Thrown the Parents of such Children : Indeed, they are Obviously Pushed to Hope that their Children would be "Safe" from the Virus in such Schools, merely Because their Teachers would have got Shots of such Pseudo-"Vaccines", while, on the Contrary, they might have, most Probably, almost Certainly, become, in their Majority, Dangerous "Silent Killers", still bearing that Deadly Virus' Infection, (but withOut any Externaly Visible Sign, except from False Appearances, Risking to MisLead their potential Victims)....


In such circumstances, it's Naturally a Worrying Fact for Democracy Nowadays, that Even French Professor Christian Perronne, Head of  Infectiology at Paris' Hospitals, was Suddenly ...Fired from his top job, shortly After Publishing a Critical Article, last December 2020,  Denouncing, inter alia, mainly some Attempts to Impose certain Fake "Vaccines", which, Instead of Protecting Human Society from Massive Spread of Virus' Infections, on the Contrary, seem Now to Focus into Making Genetic Manipulations to Individual Persons' Genome, (Later, perhaps, even into their Descendans, in Future Generations, Despite CoE's BioEthical Principles), making the Historic Inventor of Vaccines, Pasteur, spin in his Grave.., while, on the Contrary, almost at the Same Time, a simple recipient of a Degree in Pharmacology, added Only  to a Banal and UnRelated "Business Administration Master" from Ireland, suddenly was propulsed up to the Top of the Direction of EU's Medical Agency (EMA), entrusted, since December 2020, precisely, with the Responsibility of Chosing those "Vaccines" that would be Authorized (or not yet)  against the Deadly COVID Virus, (including those Criticized by Professor Perronne and others : Comp. Supra)... Was it a purely "Scientific" Move ? One may Legitimately Doubt, until Proof of the Contrary, when we see Even WHO's Chief, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Just After Concluding his Speech at CoE's Parliamentary Assembly, here in Strasbourg, by Warning the Audience that, Despite those "Vaccines" presented recently (Comp. Supra), nevertheless, People should Persist into all their Panoply of "Health Protective Measures" against Risks of Virus' Infections even afterwards, (probably, simply because of the Surprizing Fact that such Strange "Vaccines", Contrary to All Others in the History of Mankinds, do Not Guarantee to Stop Spreading the Virus to All Other People : Comp. Supra), was, Suddenly, and Exceptionaly, Cut off, and Suprirzingly Deprived of the Usual Session of "Questions and Answers" with MEPs, which allowed to Clarify all such Topical Issues...

Nevertheless, various Contradictions around that Issue still pop up, here or there, even at the Highest Levels : F.ex., inter alia, the experienced President of the German Bundestag, Wolfgang Schäuble, speaking reportedly after a particularly "Hot" Meeting with Chancellor Angie Merkel, the Heads of the Federated States and the Federal Government, on its Virus' Policy, expressed his Astonishment for the Fact that, Even during a particularly Hard Moment of Galoping Infections, Many People were Shocked by a very Big Number of expensive "Exceptional" Air Travel Reservations "for ... Majorka" (sic !)... Obviously, if this concerned some selfish Richies seeking to Amuse themselves, after having been transformed into ..Asymptomatic "Deadly Virus Jombies" for a bit, with some Controversial "Vaccines"' Shots and relevant "Certificates", (Comp.), while being Served by some Poor People, Risking their Health and/or Lives, withOut even Knowing anything about that, then, Obviously, Marija Buric's Warning about Grave Risks for an Appart-Heid-like "Social Distance" Gap, might, indeed, be just Starting !....  (Partly UPDATED).

 

 

(../..)

 

 

("Draft-News")

 

---------------------------------------------

 

EUDigitalMedia

Statistics

Visitors: 48336954

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.