english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Accueil arrow newsitems arrow CoE Head Buric warns Vaccination Certificates may Affect Human Rights...

CoE Head Buric warns Vaccination Certificates may Affect Human Rights...

Ecrit par ACM
Friday, 19 March 2021
coe_sg_buric_slams_eu_vaccination_certification_probable_errors__400_01

 

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- In a Landmatrk Speech at CoE Parliamentary Assembly's Standing Committee today, the Secretary General of the PanEuropean Organisation for Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law : CoE's 47 Member-States-strong  (including Russia) CoE, Marija Pejčinović Burić, a former vice-Prime Minister and EU Affairs Minister from Croatia, (Comp. various Buric's Replies to "Eurofora"'s Questions, f.ex. at : ..., + ..., + ..., etc), Focused into Warning practicaly the forthcoming EU's 27 Member States' Leaders' Summit, in Brussels, Next Week, (March 25-26), to Avoid any Error to eventualy Endorse some Controversial Measures about so-called COVID Virus' "Vaccination Certificates" which might be Violating Human, BioEthical, and/or Social Rights of the People, in this "Moving" and "Complex" Area.

- Otherwise, Any such Eventual Errors would be Checked and Censored, either before the concerned Member Countries' National Courts, and/or, ultimately, before the PanEuropean Court of Human Rights, Headquartered in Strasbourg, while, in Addition, all Other concerned specialized Bodies of the CoE, (f.ex. Parliamentary Assembly, Anti-Discrimination Committee, Commissioner for Human Rights, Social Rights Committee, BioEthical Rights' Committee, Personal Data Protection bodies, Setc) would Also Carefuly Monitor relevant Developments, and Take Action whenever appropriate, as she pointed out.

- Indeed, "the Public Health crisis is Not Static : Rather it's a Moving Target, that poses New Questions and Challenges":

- F.ex., "12 Months Ago, the World was Longing for Effective Vaccines". But "Now", "would it be Acceptable for Countries to make Vaccinations Compulsory for Everyone, or for Specific Groups Only ?", she wondered, in particular.

- Or, "could Governments establish "Vaccine Certificates" that Allow Only those Who have been Inoculated to Cross specific Borders ?"

- "And Might they set up Domestic "Certification" Schemes, that Allow Access to certain Spaces for Citizens who have had the jab, Nut Not to those who have Not ?", F.ex., "Restaurants, Cinemas, >Sports, Events, and so on...", she went on to question.

- All "these are Complex Questions, with Important Human Rights Dimensions", Buric stressed.

Significatively, CoE's Secretary General was Speaking Today Morning in Strasbourg, almost 3 Weeks After EU Commission's President, Ursula von der Leyen, had Announced, Earlier in Brussels, at the 1st Press Conference of the Latest, 25-26 Feb. 2021 EU Summit, that the EU Heads of State/Government had Just Agreed on What might be the main "Content" of such Electronic EU "Vaccination Certificates", (i.e. Vaccinations, AntiCorps from Recoveries, and/or Negative PCR Tests, etc), But Not Yet what they could "Do" with them...: This is due to be anew Discussed and probably Decided in their Forthcoming, March 25-26 EU Summit in Brussels, i.e. Soon...   

=> In Consequence, Buric Reminded, Today in Strasbourg, "First" of all, that "the (Legally Binding) Oviedo Convention" of the CoE, on BioEthics, Human Rights and Medicine/Biology, (Opened to Signature, since 1998, to All Countries in the World), "makes clear that Any Medical Intervention should be subject to a Patient's 'Free' and "Informed Consent"", i.e., f.ex., Nobody should be Obliged to be Vaccinated, Neither Ignore Which Vaccine (among Many Available) he/she would get, and Why, (but, on the contrary, Agree on that Choice)...

+ "Secondly, the (Pan)European Convention on Human Rights, imposes a strict Lawfulness and Proportionality Test, for justifying any Mandatory Measures in sensitive areas, such as Health", she added.

++ "And 3rd, UnJustified Differences in the Treatment of People, Because of their Health Status, may, Ultimately, raise Discrimination Issues, under Both the (Human Rights) European Convention, and the European Social Charter", she added.

+++ "F.ex., Vaccination Certificates need to take into account Privacy and Data Protection Rights", CoE's Head observed.

++++ Moreover, "any document Providing Vaccinated People with Access to Rights, Services or Places is Problematic, IF that access remains Off Limits to those who canNot be Vaccinated, or have Not had the chance to be Vaccinated", she Warned, as a matter of Principle, (Comp. Supra).

------------

=> Therefore, all "those Designing Systems like these, should have these Considerations at the Forefront of their minds", Buric advised.

Naturaly, "in the 1st instance, it is for National Courts to assess compliance with these legal Principles". "But ...these debates  ...relate to our (CoE's) Mandate (on Human Rights/Democracy/Rule of Law), and ..., ultimately, they might arrive at the ECHR", in Strasbourg.

CoE's Staff intends to "Continue Following All of this, and tob>Support our (47) Member States in Finding Solutions to such Challenges, in line with our Common Standards", according ton "the Ethos (which) has Defined our (overall) approach so far, including (CoE's) New Cooperation Project (2021+), on the "Protection of Human Rights in HealthCare", (During the Public Health Crisis), that I presented to the Committee of Ministers in January", and which "we will <<Apply to the Challenges yet To Come", while "Moving Forward", CoE's Chief Highlighted.  

>>> In particular, "Prominent among these will be the Long-term Consequences of COVID-19 on Europeans’ Social Rights", Buric Announced for the forseable Future. Because "during Economic Downturns, there always lurks the Danger of widening Social Divisions", and a Priority "will be on Ensuring that we (CoE) Respond in a way that Protects the Rights, Needs and Dignity of those who have Least".

This concerns "All" the PanEuropean CoE, where "the Will Exists" to "Work in Unity", to "ensure Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law are Maintained, in these and All Circumstances, to the Benefit of Every European", Buric concluded, with Voluntarism.

-----------------------

By a Striking Coincidence, that <<Danger of widening Social Divisions>> appears, here, at certain particularly Dangerous, and quite "Shocking" juxtapositions between some UnWarned Workers,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     and many InDifferent or even irresponsible Holiday-Makers,                    abusing of novel "Vaccines" with UnCertain Efficiency... Indeed, as "Eurofora" and Many Other Authors have Already Documented Earlier, Most of those Novel Genetic Techniques do Not seem able to Stop Spreading the Deadly Virus to Other People, Limiting their Action into Trying Only to Prevent Visible Symptoms to those directly "Vaccinated"., i.e. who got the Shots... That"s un UnPrecedented Lacuna in Human History, of which most People are UnAware, so that they can be too Easily Misled into Believing that they would Face No Danger, while, in Fact, their Lives are still at Risk !

    As the Head of EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, recently  Acknowledged, on the occasion of an Eventual EU "Vaccination Certificate" [or "Passport"] Proposal, reportedly due to Facilitate Tourism Economy, and currently still "Discussed" inside EU Council,  - "there are also Open Scientific Questions" :  In particular, " It's Still UnClear, Whether you Can Transmit the Virus, or Not,  Afterwards, Even if you are Vaccinated", she Warned !


=> "Eurofora" had Raised that Key Question, already as Early as since the Eve of the Authorisation for the 1st and 2nd                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Vaccines against COVID Virus, by EU's "EMA", and USA's "FDA", Back at the Beginning of December 2020, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html, etc), Denouncing the Scandalous Fact that Even for EU's Top Competent Press Officers, as well as for Official Documents submitted for those Authorisations, it was ..."UnKnown IF (that) Vaccine Stops or Spreads Virus to other People" !... *


>>> This UnPrecedented  Fact Obviously means that all the People who see that some Individuals would have been "Vaccinated" by such Tools, could be Massively MisLeaded and Lurred into Erronesously  Believing that those persons would have become "Immune" to the Virus, and No More present any Danger to the Society, while, in Fact, they may have Become ..."Silent Killers", i.e. the Worst and Most Dangerous Deadly Virus' Spreaders, simply Because they are "Covert", "Asymptomatic" Killers, Threatening to Infect All Other People at any moment, since the Society does Not Defend itself, simply because it has Never Seen Before, in the History of Humankind, Any so-called "Vaccines" which would Not provide Immunity from a Virus, but Only Cover (for a While) the "Jombie" who took them, while, (most Probably/almost Certainly), Exposing All Other People he/she contacts to Infection and Risk of Death !


=> In Front of such an UnPrecedented, Serious Risk, it's easy to Guess the Grave Damages Against Human Public Health, that might Provoke, f.ex., the UnWarned  imminent Establishment of so-called EU (Pseudo-) "Vaccination-Passports", (Comp. Supra), which would Simply Attest that an Individual got 2 Shots of such a Pseudo-"Vaccine"..., (Particularly for "Facilitating Tourism" Economy : Comp. Supra)... In the USA some have even, reportedly, started to Massively practice a Policy consisting to Oblige All the People who Work in Schools to Submit to such Pseudo-"Vaccines", as a Necessary Consition in order to be able to Work there, Otherwise being Threatened to get Immediately Fired ! (f.ex. in some Ohio's Schools, etc). In such Circumstances, it's Easy to Guess the Sly Trap in which Risk to be Thrown the Parents of such Children : Indeed, they are Obviously Pushed to Hope that their Children would be "Safe" from the Virus in such Schools, merely Because their Teachers would have got Shots of such Pseudo-"Vaccines", while, on the Contrary, they might have, most Probably, almost Certainly, become, in their Majority, Dangerous "Silent Killers", still bearing that Deadly Virus' Infection, (but withOut any Externaly Visible Sign, except from False Appearances, Risking to MisLead their potential Victims)....


In such circumstances, it's Naturally a Worrying Fact for Democracy Nowadays, that Even French Professor Christian Perronne, Head of  Infectiology at Paris' Hospitals, was Suddenly ...Fired from his top job, shortly After Publishing a Critical Article, last December 2020,  Denouncing, inter alia, mainly some Attempts to Impose certain Fake "Vaccines", which, Instead of Protecting Human Society from Massive Spread of Virus' Infections, on the Contrary, seem Now to Focus into Making Genetic Manipulations to Individual Persons' Genome, (Later, perhaps, even into their Descendans, in Future Generations, Despite CoE's BioEthical Principles), making the Historic Inventor of Vaccines, Pasteur, spin in his Grave.., while, on the Contrary, almost at the Same Time, a simple recipient of a Degree in Pharmacology, added Only  to a Banal and UnRelated "Business Administration Master" from Ireland, suddenly was propulsed up to the Top of the Direction of EU's Medical Agency (EMA), entrusted, since December 2020, precisely, with the Responsibility of Chosing those "Vaccines" that would be Authorized (or not yet)  against the Deadly COVID Virus, (including those Criticized by Professor Perronne and others : Comp. Supra)... Was it a purely "Scientific" Move ? One may Legitimately Doubt, until Proof of the Contrary, when we see Even WHO's Chief, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Just After Concluding his Speech at CoE's Parliamentary Assembly, here in Strasbourg, by Warning the Audience that, Despite those "Vaccines" presented recently (Comp. Supra), nevertheless, People should Persist into all their Panoply of "Health Protective Measures" against Risks of Virus' Infections even afterwards, (probably, simply because of the Surprizing Fact that such Strange "Vaccines", Contrary to All Others in the History of Mankinds, do Not Guarantee to Stop Spreading the Virus to All Other People : Comp. Supra), was, Suddenly, and Exceptionaly, Cut off, and Suprirzingly Deprived of the Usual Session of "Questions and Answers" with MEPs, which allowed to Clarify all such Topical Issues...

Nevertheless, various Contradictions around that Issue still pop up, here or there, even at the Highest Levels : F.ex., inter alia, the experienced President of the German Bundestag, Wolfgang Schäuble, speaking reportedly after a particularly "Hot" Meeting with Chancellor Angie Merkel, the Heads of the Federated States and the Federal Government, on its Virus' Policy, expressed his Astonishment for the Fact that, Even during a particularly Hard Moment of Galoping Infections, Many People were Shocked by a very Big Number of expensive "Exceptional" Air Travel Reservations "for ... Majorka" (sic !)... Obviously, if this concerned some selfish Richies seeking to Amuse themselves, after having been transformed into ..Asymptomatic "Deadly Virus Jombies" for a bit, with some Controversial "Vaccines"' Shots and relevant "Certificates", (Comp.), while being Served by some Poor People, Risking their Health and/or Lives, withOut even Knowing anything about that, then, Obviously, Marija Buric's Warning about Grave Risks for an Appart-Heid-like "Social Distance" Gap, might, indeed, be just Starting !....  (Partly UPDATED).

 

 

(../..)

 

 

("Draft-News")

 

---------------------------------------------

 

Multi-lingual Interface

Statistics

Visiteurrs: 59010007

Archive

Login Form





Se souvenir de moi

Perdu votre mot de passe?
Pas encore de compte? Enregistrez-vous

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 imag0087_400_01

Recent developments proved that Europe can suceed to overcome challenges by aiming at great objectives, and this is needed also in 2009, said EU chairman, French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

    - "It's in the name of Great Ideas, Projects, Ambition and Ideals, that EU can overcome" challenges, stressed Sarkozy at EU Parliament in Strasbourg, in conclusion of a dense 7 months EU Chairmanship. "It's even easier for Europe to have Great projects, able to overcome national egoism, instead of limiting itself only to small projects" (unable to do alike), he observed.     

- "Europe must remain Ambitious and understand that the World needs her to take Decisions". "The World needs a Strong Europe", which "thinks on its own, has convictions, its own responses, its imagination" : "A Europe which does not limit itself into following" others, (as it did in the Past, when it followed USA, f.ex. on Bosnia). On the contrary, "Europe should undertake its own responsibilities", he said, after a series of succes in stopping the War between Russia and Georgia, and organizing the 1st EuroZone's Summit in Paris, which incited the Washington DC G-20 Summit to extend similar decisions World-wide.  


    - "When you sweep it all under the carpet, prepare yourself for hard tomorrows", he warned. "What hinders decisions is the lack of Courage and Will, the fading away of Ideals", he stressed before EU Parliament's 2008 debate on Human Rights and Sakharov prize on Freedom of thought attributed by MEPs to Chinese cyber-dissident Hu Jia, followed by an EU - Turkey meeting on Friday.

    - "I don't abandon my convictions" and "I will take initiatives" on EU level also in 2009, Sarkozy announced later. "France will not stop having convictions and taking initiatives" on Europe. + "It's an Error to wish to pass over the Heads of those who are elected in their Countries" : "It's an integrism I always fought against"', he warned.
---------------------
French EU Presidency faced 4 unexpected Crisis :

- An institutional crisis, with the Irish "No" to EU Lisbon Treaty, just before it started. A geopolitical crisis, wth the threat of War between Russia and Georgia risking to throw Europe back to Cold-war divisions, on August. A World-wide Financial and Economic crisis, arriving at a bad moment before crucial 2009 EU elections. And even a Strasbourg's mini-crisis, with EU Parliament's roof curiously falling down, from unknown reasons, in a brand new building on August, provoking an unprecedented transfert of the 2 September Plenary Sessions...

But it wasn't enough to stop Sarkozy ! On the contrary, it stimulated him...
---------------------------------------

- "The better way to deal with the recent problems of EU institutions (as the "3 NO" by France, the Netherlands and Ireland) is to take them as a "Test" in order to find solutions closer to Citizens' concerns", said later in Strasbourg Sarkozy's new choice as Ministe for EU affairs, Bruno Le Maire.

- On the Institutional front, Sarkozy gave Time to the Irish to think about it, and stroke on December a deal including a New Referendum after the June 2009 EU Elections, in exchange of a promise to keep the rule of "one EU Commissioner for each EU Member Country", and some opt-outs on Defence and Fiscal EU policies, Abortion, etc. If the Irish get a "Yes" Majority, then the institutional package could be completed in 2010 or 2011 on the occasion of Croatia's probable EU accession.

He was accused in Strasbourg to upgrade EU Council and downgrade EU Commision, but he replied that "strong Political initiatives by EU Council reinforce also the more technical role of EU Commission, under the political-technical leadership of its President", all 3 "working together with EU Parliament".


- But, meanwhile, Sarkozy energetically spearheaded an Historic 1st Summit of EuroZone's 15 Heads of State and Government at EU's core, exceptionally enlarged to a partial participation of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on October 12 in Paris' Elysee palace, which started to tackle succesfully the growing world Financial crisis.

    It also paved the way for its endorsement by a subsequent Brussels' 27 EU Member States' gathering, before it all come to Washington's G-20 Summit. And "Europe was united, it asked for the 1st G-20 Summit, and it will also organise the next G-20 Summit on April in London", he observed.   

 But a Conference with EU, Russia, African and other Developing Countries, hosted in Strasbourg shortly after Washington G-20 Summit by the French EU Presidency, took a Resolution asking to enlarge participation to Global Economic Governance. Many found, indeed, illogic and unacceptable that f.ex. states as Turkey were given a seat at G-20 level, while all African Countries, and even the African Union itself, representing the greatest Continent on Earth, were excluded...


    Meanwhile, even USA''s "Paulson No 3" Plan, was, in fact, inspired by Europe's No 1 Plan", Sarkozy observed, largelly applauded by MEPs.

    And "Europe showed Solidarity" by mobilizing some 22 Billion credit for Hungary, 1,7 billion for Ukraine, as we do nowadays for Baltic States, etc., he added.

    The move on Economy was extended on December by an EU stimulus' plan totalling some 200 billion Euros, including 5 Billions released by EU Commission for big Projects, as well as various parallel National plans for Economic revival, (fex. 26 billions in France alone). They might appear limited, compared to USA President-elect Obama's reported plan to boost the American economy with 800 billion $, but at least succeded to overcome Europe's divisions for the first time on Economic governance, opening new horizons.

- The French President stressed even harder the unique role of an active EU Council's chairmanship, when he moved swiftly and efficiently, at the beginning of August, to succesfully stop War between Russia and Georgia, at the last minute, which threatened to bring Europe back to Cold War division.

"We (EU) also wanted to avoid a situation like in Bosnia, in the Past, when EU was absent, so that our American friends took their responsibilitues, and EU only followed", despite the fact that the conflict took place in Europe. Now, it was the EU who took its responsibilities".

A roadmap towards a new PanEuropean Security policy, before which all unilateral moves to place new Missiles (from USA or Russia) would be freezed, was proposed by Sarkozy after a meeting with Russian president Medvedev, at the eve of Washington DC's G-20 Summit.

Ukraine's "European" character was stressed at a Sarkozy - Jushenko Summit, September in Paris, while EU adopted on December an "Eastern policy", in which, "I'm convinced that our (EU's) future is to find with our Neighbours the conditions for Economic Development. Peace and Security, by explaining them that.. they must respect (Human Rights') Values, and adopt behaviors different from the Past", explained Sarkozy in Strasbourg.

Meanwhile, the "Union for the Mediterranean" was created, since July's Summit if 45 Heads of State and Government in Paris, as "an organisation for a permanent Dialogue, that we need", mainly in order to tackle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, by bringing together, for the 1st time, Israelis and Arabs, where "Europe must be present, in order to avoid a frontal clash".

- "If Europe doesn't take its part for Peace in the Middle-East, nobody else will do that in our place", Sarkozy stressed.
-----------------------
    Meanwhile, other EU Agreements were brokered during the French EU Presidency on Immigration, (fex. common Asylum rules, etc), and Climat- Energy :

    - On Climat-Energy, the 2007 German EU Presidency had fixed a triple 20% aim for 2020 (20% renewable Energies, 20% reduction of CO2 emmission, 20% energy efficience/economies), and the 2008 French EU Presidecny realized that, making the necessary compromises in order to modernize EU's industry, but without throwing some former Central-Eastern European Countries into abrupt Economic break down risking "social explosion".

    - Defence-Security EU policy was mainly postponed for April 2009, since both German chancellor Merkel and French president Sarkozy want to strike a deal with the new American president Obama in Strasbourg's NATO Summit.

    However, with all these 4 unexpected Crisis diverting attention to other urgencies, People wil wonder now, what happened to the famous deal proposed by freshly-elected French President Sarkozy on Turkey's controversial EU bid, back on August 2007, to continue EU - Turkey negotiations, but on the double condition that core chapters, intrinsequally linked with EU Membership, will be excluded, and that a collective Reflexion and Debate on Europe's future would start before the end of 2008.

    It was meant to reply to the crucial question : What kind of Europe do we want in 10 or 20 Years from now : A large Market, or a Political Europe, with a popular identity ? In Sarkozy's thinking, presented in his 2 landmark speeches on Europe in Strasbourg, shortly before and after the 2007 Elections, (on February and July 2007), Turkey's controversial EU bid would be incompatible with the second choice.

    It's true that EU Commision's Chairman, Jose Barroso, (who had notoriously declared, as former Portuguese Prime Minister, that he found "nonsense" the idea that Europe might become equal to the US), had repeatedly tried to avoid that Sarkozy's criticism on Turkey might start winning a larger audience in Europe, preferring a discrete "wismens' committee" work. And that most of the personalities later chosen in order to participate in a Committee on Europe's Future, are too much linked with Socialist parties and/or American policies, to be really critical of USA's notorious wish to impose Turkey to the EU, as Sarkozy had noted himself since March 2007..

     - "It's on EU Council's presidency to take political initiatives. EU Commission has other competences", stressed Sarkozy. The "European Ideal" is to "build Europe with the States, not against them". "Ask Europeans to chose between their countries and Europe won't work. You don't choose between your two parents : We must add them together".

    "France and Germany have an Historic Duty to work together, precisely because of what happened to the Past. We have to work hand by hand. We cannot be separated.It goes beyond me and Mrs Merkel today, Mr Schroeder and Mr. Chirac yesterday. It's not a choice, it's a duty to Europe and to the World".  "We need Germany, as Germany needs Europe". Compromise is inevitable, here as everywhere, and each one made some steps towards eachother's positions.

    But "it's true that Mrs Merkel didn't chose her Socialist partners, while I chose mine", Sarkozy said, in an indirect hint that the Socialist Minister of Finance in Germany might be a cause of minor past disagreements in Economy, which were overcome in recent negotiations.

    "We (France and Germany) have particular duties in Europe", but "in a Europe of 27 Member States, it's not enough for France and Germany to agree between them.

    "I always thought that Great Britain has a special role to play in Europe. ... Now, everybody "saw what it cost payed the UK for having been too exclusively open towards the US (and) Financial services. Europe needs the UK, but also the UK needs Europe" :- "We were able to face the hardest moment of the Financial crisis because the UK clearly chose Europe", stressed Sarkozy, reminding Gordon Brown's exceptional participation to the Historic 1st Heads of State/Government Summit of EuroZone, October 12 in Paris (See EuroFora's Reportage from Elysee Palace then).

     - "Some look at Europe with old glasses aged 30 years ago. While we must look at her in relation to what it will be in 30 years" in the Future, Sarkozy concluded.

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Résultats

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING