english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Virus Pass: CoE Warns v. Discrimination/Coercion/Infection Risk (Doubtful Vaccines, Less Protection)

Virus Pass: CoE Warns v. Discrimination/Coercion/Infection Risk (Doubtful Vaccines, Less Protection)

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 22 June 2021
pace_2_coe__eurofora_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/-  A Stern Warning Against Risks to massively Infect UnWarned innocent People by Jombies Lurring via False Appearances with a few Controversial "Vaccines" of UnKnown + Shrinking Efficacy in, perhaps, Stoping, or Not, the Deadly Virus' Spread, (and Recently found to unexpectedly Expose Many Recipients to Infections ! S. Infra), was Launched by the 47 Member States-strong (Russia + UK included) Organisation for Human Rights, Democracy, and Rule of Law, Strasbourg-based, Council of Europe (CoE), the Oldest PanEuropean Organisation (1949-2021), by adopting Today a landmark Resolution on the Topical Controversy about the Virus' "Pass"/ "Certificates" of Vaccinations, Tests, or Recoveries, Voted by an Overwhelming Majority of MEPs in its Parliamentary Assembly : 96 in Favor, Against Only 2, and 19 Abstentions, (apparently by Some who Wanted an Even "Sharper" Resolution, f.ex. Respectful of Citizens' "Religion", withOut "InEquities", etc., about "Vaccines", as a Blocked Amendment had asked).

pace_eurofora_400 

>>> But, Interestingly, it's with a Landmak "Unanimity" that CoE's PanEuropean Assembly Voted a Crucial Amendment Calling to Not "Institute COVID Pass regimes (but) ONLY WHEN Clear and Well-Established Scientific Evidence exists that such regimes Lower the Risk of the Transmission of the SARC-CoV-2 Virus to an Acceptable Level, from a Public Health point of view"... I.e. a Key-Element, which Currently Lacks, at least until Now, (See, among many others, f.ex. also : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/euandgenemanipsviavirus.html,
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/kennedyjrinberlinonvirusandweb.html,
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html [NB*];
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html ,
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/eusummitonvaccinesquestions.html,
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/hoxmerkelwillgoinhistory.html, etc
, and Infra). "This means that Nothing that might Affect Public Health Measures (i.e., f.ex., DeConfinement, etc), should be Done withOut a Sufficiently Certain basis in Scientific Evidence. This certainty is Only Now "Emerging" for the effects on "Transmission Risk" by users of some Controversial "Vaccines", points out CoE's Resolution, Confirming what "Eurofora" had earlier Found, (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pseudovaccinespassportstohell.html, etc).  "Only once there is Certainty about the Effects of Vaccination, recovery from infection, and negative Test results on Transmission Risk (including in particular information on the Effectiveness of different Vaccines, the Duration of protection, etc., it Will be Possible to Evaluate the relevance of Introducing such documents (as the Controversial "Virus' Pass"+) for Non-Medical Purposes, and define the Limits on their use", CoE stresses, as far as the crucial matter of "Timing" is concerned.

----------------------------------

    - Among 3 main Risks, as things sand Nowadays, the First : that of Massive Infections which Might be Provoked in any Society particularly by Less Public Health Protection Measures (Non-Pharmaceutical : f.ex Distancing, Masks, Ventilation, Quarantine, etc) Dangerously Exposing UnAware Innocent People in front of a lot of "Jombies" Boasting to have Official COVID "Passes" or "Certificates" and Lurring by the False Appearances of a few Pseudo-"Vaccines", based on some Novel Genetic Technologies of UnCertain Yet Consequencies, particularly on Spreading, or Not, the Deadly Virus to Other Persons, Contrary to All "Classic" Vaccines, and Never Seen Before in Humankind's History, is, Obviously, the Worst. It Might Result into an "Explosion" of Virus' Spread, sooner or later, with a Lot of Innocent Victims "Trapped" among 3 Controversial Public Policies, (Hasty DeConfinement, MisLeading "Passes/Certificates", with Only a Few, UnCertain Fake-"Vaccines", and practically No Therapy Drugs).

    - AnOther Serious Risk is that of Coercion, eventualy Obliging UnWilling Citizens to be Submitted in one or another Vaccine (among those Selected by some Public Authoriies, Excluding Free Choice), which is, in Principle, an illegal act, Contrary to the General Prohibition of any Imposed Bio-Medical Intervention in a Humann Person's Health, Opposed to his/her Wish, (Requiring an "Informed Consen"), already Since the InFamous NAZI "Tests" in Concentation Camps, (But Even USA's Secret "Tests" on Black a.o. People in a remote Past, etc : See Also World-Famous Swedish Film-Director, Igmar Bergman's awsome Warning in : "The Serpent's Egg", etc), as Human Rights' case-law and CoE's PanEuropean "BioMedical Ethics" Convention (1998) Clearly Prohibits.

Obviously, these 2 Risks Might be Combined, particularly When People Hesitating to Sumbit into Some Controversial Vaccines, may be, in real Practice, Threatened by that Deadly Virus' Infections provoked by "Jombies" whose Dangerosity, or not, is Nowadays Scientificaly UnKnown, as CoE's Report Denounces, i.e. so-called "Vaccinated" Individuals, If they have taken Only some Controversial Novel Tools, (as f.ex. of mRNA-Technology, which, Currently has a Surprizing ..quasi-Monopoly inside the EU..), in the Current Absence of Any Serious and UnContested, Real Scientific Knowledge abou their Dangerosity for Other People and the Society, (Contrary to "Classical" Vaccines, which, Since Pasteur's times, Notoriously Protect All Contacts from any risk of spread of a virus by the recipients of a real vaccine : A quality still Denied to those Novel "mRNA" Tools, by some Senior Medical Scientists, at least in the Present state of Scientific Knowledge, as things stand Nowadas : See Infra). Such a Double Risk may exist particularly If Public Health Protection ("Non-Pharmaceutical") Measures might be Lifted, as far as those "Jombies" are concerned, withOut any due Protection for all Other People that they might Lurre and Infect !

    - 3rd (and Most Probable) Danger, by those Controversial "Virus Passes or Certificates", naturaly might be a Massive, undue "Discrimination" against All Other, UnVaccinated People in a Country, which Manifestly Risks to be Provoked by a Lot of Various Concrete Measures with which Some Public Officials scandalously Attempt to exert Pressure on the People to Submit even to some Controversial so-called "Vaccines", by Allowing them certain Activities which are Prohibited for UnVaccinated People, withOut due Reason, and/or DisProportionaly. Obviously, this, Also, might be Combined to the Above-Mentioned Risks, in order to, eventualy, Impose an (otherwise Prohibited : Comp. Supra) Coercion...

F.ex. CoE, ECHR, and EU Parliament plenaries' Host-City Strasbourg is due to Illustrate such an Example, by Famous Greek Compositor Theodorakis' Musical adaptation of Pablo Neruda's "Canto General", followed by "Jazz" Music, etc, at the superbe Franco-German "2 Shores" Garden on the Rhine river, whose Access is reportedly to be submitted to a "Virus' Pass" Certificate... And things become even More Nasty, when Even the Access of Workers to some Sectors of Activities, (f.ex. Restoration, Health Care, Schools, etc), is Recently Threatened to be Reserved Only to such "Virus Pass"' Holders...

-----------------

>>> CoE's Rapporteur, Swiss Liberal MEP Damien Cottier, (seconded by Opinion Rapporteur from the Social Affairs Committee, Center-Right ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Ms Carmen Leyte from Spain), Consulted several TrustWorthy sources, such as 2 Eminent Experts : Professor Siobhan O’Sullivan, Chief Bioethics Officer at the Department of Health in Ireland, Professor of Healthcare Ethics and Law at the Royal College of Surgeons, Vice-President of EU Commission’s Group on Ethics in Science, and Vice-President of CoE's Committee on Bio-Ethics (DH-BIO); and Professor Ross Upshur, of the University of Toronto's School of Public Health, Canada, Co-President of the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Ethics and Covid-19 Expert Group. As well as Professor Samia Hurst, Bio-Ethics Expert, Director of the Institut Éthique Histoire Humanités at Geneva University, and Vice-President of the Swiss National Covid-19 Task Force. Moreover, that CoE's Resolution is Also Based on an Important CoE's Secretary General, Marija Buric - Pejčinović's Written "Statement on Human Rights and the <<Vaccine Pass>>", issued on 31 March 2021, (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coewarnsoneuvaccinationpassports.html, etc), and on CoE's BioEthics' Committee's "Statement on Human Rights considerations relevant to <<Vaccine Pass>>", as well as on CoE's Personal Data Protection's "Statement on Covid-19 Vaccination, Attestations, and Data Protection". To all this was, Meanwhile, Added also a Pioneer CoE Assembly's Debate on those Issues, held on 19 April 2021, (just Before German Chancelor Angie Merkel's Key-Note Speech), that Nowadays' Rapporteur Cottier Includes among his Main Sources.

    + A Landmark Input, from the Legal point of view, is, particularly, the French Highest Court on Administrative Law : the prestigious "Conseil d'Etat"'s Ruling of last April (1/4/2021), which Judged that those kind of so-called "Vaccinated People (mainly by RNA Genetic novel tools), could ... Still Carry the Virus, and, thereby, Contribute to its Spread, to an Extend that was, at Present, Difficult to Quantify". And this Fact, "Based on the Evidence Available at the Time", Still depends on "Scientific Knowledge (which) Evolves" Currently, having Not Yet Concluded, as CoE's Rapporteur rightfully observes.

    ++ In Addition, EU's European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), reportedly Found, on 21 April 2021, a real "Risk of Developing Severe Covid-19 Disease for an UnVaccinated adult who has been in Contact with a fully Vaccinated person (by Controversial "RNA" or Other Genetic Novel Tool, Contrary to Classic Vaccines)exposed to SARS-CoV-2 Infection", at least in a real "moderate" form of "Risk in Older Adults, or Persons with Underlying Risk Factors".  Moreover, ECDC "took into Account a Study from Scotland that Virus' <<Transmission can Vary, by Vaccine product, Target Group, and SARS-CoV-2 Variant>>"

    => As a Consequence, among others, "“in the Current Epidemiological context in the EU/European Economic Area, in Public Spaces and large Gatherings, including during Travel, NPIs (Non-Pharmaceutical interventions, such as Masks and social Distancing) should be Maintained, Irrespective of the Vaccination status of the individuals”, ECDC concluded.

    >>> In Such a Context, "a Document issued under the authority and aegis of EU would presumably be Perceived as ... trustworthy by much of the Population, who may Give it Greater Significance .... This could Lead to an unwitting Increase in Risky Behaviour by holders of Covid Passes, providers of, f.ex., Tourism services, and public Authorities in travel-destination countries, with potentially DEVASTATING Consequences",  CoE's Report Warned.

 That's, apparently, the reason for which the Most Controversial "Vaccines"-using European Country : the UK, has recently faced an UnExpected Boost of Infections, to the point that Medical Authorities have Warned of a Risk for People Waiting to find a bed in a Hospital to pass from 5,3 Millions to more than 13 Millions "in the coming Months" ! (Partly UPDATED). Similar Problems of Recent Virus' Spread "Boom" also Elsewhere, when such Controversial Vaccinations went on, as, f.ex. from Sheychelles up to the Netherlands, with a Sudden "Jump" from 500 to 7.000 Infections in just 1 Week !

uk_1st_euro_fake_vaccined__infections_rebound_july_2021__who__eurofora_400

________________________

    => Therefore, CoE's Assembly Resolution "Calls" on its 47 Member States, First of all, to "Continue implementing the Full range of Public Health Measures Needed to bring Covid-19 under Control".

Indeed, f.ex. China and Australia, etc., who have Focused, Not on Controversial Pseudo-"Vaccines", But, Mainly on Public Health (Non-Pharmaceutical) Measures, have Astonishingly well Succeeded, (Already Since 2020, When any "Vaccine" had Not Yet been Authorized anywhere), to almost Eradicate Both Infections and Deaths, whose Numbers have, since, miraculously Fallen to about Zero or just 1 or 2...

china_eradicated_most_virus_20202021_who__eurofora_400

+

 virus_australia_infections_data_2020__2021_who__eurofora_400

virus_australia_deaths_data_2020__2021_who__eurofora_400

-----------------------------------------

    + "Covid Pass regimes" must Not be "instituted" But "Only When clear and well-established Scientific Evidence exists that such regimes Lower the Risk of Transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus", (i.e. Not Yet. For that purpose, States Must "take into Account of the Latest Evidence and Expert advise".

     ++ At any case, States must "Avoid Discrimination", particularly by Ensuring that "the extent to which the holders of different categories of Covid pass are Exempted from Restrictions is consistent with the extent to which the Risk of their Transmitting the SARS-CoV-2 virus is reduced", (If and When this Might, Perhaps, be Scientificaly Proved).

    +++ In particular, they Must "take due Account of ... the Relative Effectiveness of Different Vaccines and vaccination regimes, in Preventing Transmission of SARS-CoV-2". Something which, at least for the Time being, has  Not Yet been realy Proven in the case of Novel RNA Fake-"Vaccines", as f.ex. that of the Turkish-USA/Pfizer, of the Amenian-USA Moderna, etc.

Indeed, Recent News, f.ex. from Canada, Israel, and Greece, etc., Denounce a Diminished Protection for the Recipients, reportedly Falling Down to about 75% or Even 64%, particularly on Virus' variant Delta, While Virus' Infection Clusters in Israel and Greece were found to Contain around 45% or 55% of so-called "Vaccinated" Individuals ! - UPDATED).

 On the Contrary, f.ex., among others, Hungary, which Notoriously decided to use Many and Various Vaccines, withOut being Limited Only to those Few and Controversial Genetic Tools Authorised by EU's EMA Bureaucrats, (such as Turkish-USA Pfizer, USA-Moderna, UK's Astrozeneka, USA-Johnson), But Adding also Russian, Chinese, etc., as well as Drastic Public Health (Non-Pharmaceutical) Measures, apparently Succeeded, Recently, to Sharply Reduce, almost make Disappear, Both Infections and Deaths, according to WHO's Official Data... +Something Similar, reportedly goes Also for San Marino, which would have just Won against the Virus, and ReStarts its Economy Nowadays.

virus_hungary_2021_crushed_the_virus_since_various_vacc._who__eurofora_400

 

virus_infections__san_marino_as_hungary_various_vaccines__ok_who__eurofora_400 

---------------------------------------

      ++++ CoE also Denounced "TRANSMISSION RISKS involved in different Activities that might be Permitted for holders of Covid Passes, especially where they may come into Contact with people who have not acquired immunity through vaccination or prior infection and whether those people are at a higher Risk of severe illness or death from the illness".

 

    **** Most Important : Considering "the situation of those who for Medical reasons cannot, Or, for reasons of personal Opinion or Belief, Decline to be Vaccinated", "any system of Covid Pass must NOT become tantamount to COERCION and make VACCINATION COMPULSORY", CoE's PanEuropean Human Rights Organisation clearly EXCLUDES, in Conclusion. (Comp. also Supra).

 

(.../...)

 

("Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------

 

European Entrepreneurial Region

Statistics

Visitors: 48910641

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 slovenian__croatian_presidents_at_coe_400

    The recent paradox of freezing EU Talks with front-runner Croatia, while continuing controversial EU - Turkey talks, despite Zagreb's acceptance of Refugees' Human Rights to return, that Ankara refuses fex. in Cyprus, while both have "Good Neighborhood" problems vis a vis Slovenia, or Greece, Cyprus and Armenia respectively, can it be justified by the non-fullfilment of EU criteria, as Slovenia says, or, is it "Double Standards" ?    

The question became unavoidable after statements by Presidents of Slovenia and Croatia, Tuerk and Mesic, respectively, to "EuroFora", exclusively or among Strasbourg's journalists this week at the CoE, on the sidelines of its 2009 Summer University for Political Schools, which topically brought them together as successive key-note speakers.


    Comming only a few Months before EU checks Turkey's compliance to its commitments on Cyprus, etc., scheduled for December 2009, this obviously has a special importance for the coherence of EU Enlargement's principles.

     Suspension of EU Negotiations is a normal consequence in case of a Candidate Country's failure to fullfil EU Conditions, such as "Good Neighborhood relations", stressed at first Slovenian President Danilo Tuerk, current CoE's chair.

    But, regarding EU's Criteria,  there shouldn't be any "Double Standards",  reacted Croatian President Stjepan Mesic, commenting the fact that Turkey's controversial EU negotiations continue, while they were recently "freezed" in the case of Croatia, an "unquestionably European Country", which oficially accepts to respect Refugees Human Rights, contrary to Ankara's notorious refusals or reluctance.                                       

imag0475_400
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           - "EU itself has set as a Criterium (for EU Enlargement) the "Good Neighborhood relations",  and their absence justifies the "Suspension" EU Negotiations, (f.ex. with Croatia), because of a Border dispute affecting the territorial integrity of an EU Member Country, stressed Slovenian President, Danilo Tuerk, CoE's Chairman in office (May - November 2009), speaking to Journalists in Strasbourg including "EuroFora".    

Questioned earlier what "consequences on EU's Enlargement policy" can have the "Ban on EU Membership Negotiations", imposed to Croatia, Tuerk replied that "this question comes down to the fulfillement of (EU) Criteria for membership. One has to look at each Candidate Country ., from the point of view whether it fullfils the Criteria that EU has set. One of them are Good Neighborhood Relations, I'd like to remind. And also, there are other factors, such as Justice, Home affairs, Rule of Law, and others".


    - "Now, ..Candidate Countries are at Different Levels of fulfillement of Criteria", he observed.

    - " Croatia is obviously the closest to that. I'm rather optimistic : I think that in the coming Months we'll have an opportunity to look at all these issues constructively and hopefully we'll be able to make progress". "My main concern, at this point, is the situation in Bosnia : We haven't seen enough progres domesticaly. We haven't seen enough during ..political parties within their country.We need a New Energy, a new energetic move towards the Candidature for EU membership. "Other (Western Balkan) Countries (Serbia, Montenegro, FYROM, Albania) have been making soaring Progress, and I think that they should be ready, in a few Years, for the Candidate status".

    - "As far as the Western Balkans are concerned, .. nobody should be left outside" the EU, Slovenian's President concluded, ommitting to mention Turkey's controversial EU bid.

    - "This process may be seen as Slow, but..  Slovenia has also has also been exposed to various "Booms of Slowness" in our accession period. But now we can say that the process was relatively quick, because changes which occur after becoming EU member, are quite large, and they require proper Preparations before the (EU) membership becomes a new factor, an impacting line for a new (EU) member country".
----------------------------

EU "Solidarity" ?
------------------------------   

Slovenian statements made some participants from certain 3rd Countries as FYROM, etc. claim that "the Principle of EU Solidarity" would "produce a.. rising European Union Nationalism (sic !), against Non-EU Countries", as they said, asking unhappy foreign countries to form a "bloc" to exert pressure on the EU...    

But Croatian President Stjepan Mesic dismissed that, supporting "EU Integration", "after the Economy also in Political" issues, as "the achievement" of our times. In EU there is "diversity, but it's United", he stressed, "EU has to be United so that it can become a central factor of Peace" also at the surrounding areas, he replied.

croatian_president_mesic_ 

Speaking later exclusively to "EuroFora", the experienced twice President of Croatia, former President of the International "Non-Aligned" movement, denounced "Double Standards" in the way EU treats recently Croatia compared to Turkey :   

 - "I think that there shouldn't be Double Standards", stressed the Croatian President, in reply to a Question comparing the freeze of EU - Croatia talks, with the continuation of EU - Turkey talks, despite the fact that Croatia is an "unquestionably European country", while Turkey's EU bid is notoriously controversial.


    Mesic was reacting to the observation that, even if he confirmed his "respect of Refugees' Human Rights to return, etc. (See infra), nevertheless, EU talks are suspended with Croatia.. While for oher, controversial candidates, who refuse to respect Refugees' Rights to return, etc., as fex. Turkey does in occupied Cyprus and elsewhere, EU negotiations continue".

    - "I believe that Croatia's accession will confirm that all European Countries who fulfill all of the Conditions and achieve European Standards, have to join the EU. There shouldn't be any Double Standards", went on to add in reply President Mesic.

    In this relation, Croatia's President found "of paramount importance", CoE's "mechanisms enforcing ECHR's judgements"
    
    - "On Refugees and Displaced persons, the process will be completed only after the last person demanding to return will be allowed to do so !", President Mesic Croatia stressed earlier, setting a general standard of obvious importance also for otherr candidates, as f.ex. Turkey, often accused to exclude or heavily restrict Greek Cypriot Displaced persons' return to their Family Homes and ancestral land, provoke difficulties to Turkish-Kurd IDPs return to their home regions at the South-East, etc.

    Some "2.000 People are still reported Missing" in former Yugoslavia, for some Years, (as in Cyprus, modern Europe's oldest case, for 3 Decades. Nagorno-Karabach, Tcecnya in Russia, etc, more recently), and Investigations "will only be completed after establishing the fate of the last one of them", he added.
    
    Speaking earlier on "War Crimes", President Mesic stressed that "Leaders are responsible for (the) Wars (of the Past), not the People", and called against Impunity :  "Individuals have to be held Responsible for Crimes. International Penal Tribunals have to persecute those individuals", perpetrators of War Crimes, he underlined.

    Such statements naturally made Mesic rather popular at ECHR, whose President, French EuroJudge, Professor Jean-Paul Costa, looked particularly smiling when he welcomed him later on Wednesday afternoon, after Slovenian President Daniko Tuerk earlier this week.
           

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.