english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow BioEthique: Projet Loi depassé sur Fabrication Artificielle d'Enfants est Bombe contre l'Humanité !

BioEthique: Projet Loi depassé sur Fabrication Artificielle d'Enfants est Bombe contre l'Humanité !

Pisac ACM
08. 06. 2021.


 bionc_protests_v._artificialfabrication_of_childrren__by_labos_france_2021_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- C'est incroyable comment les débats de l'establishment sur le très controversé Projet de Loi pour la BioEthique, (actuellement de rétour à l'Assemblée Nationale pour un Vote Crucial, après les Réfus du Sénat), ne mentionent presque pas le Fait que la Fabrication Artificielle d'Enfants aux Labos de Technocrates, sur démande de Lesbiennes ou autres, est, en réalité une Vieille et Controversée concession, de la dernière minute, à quelques lobbies, Actuellement Dépassée par des Evolutions plus récentes, avec des Dangers Contre l'Humanité pires qu'une Guerre Nucléaire Globale !
 
Cette promesse préelectorale controversée arrachée à Macron, apparement visant surtout le pétit Lobby des Lesbiennes, fut faite, en catimini, et sans que presque persone d'autre ne l'a pas vraiment remarqué, aux environ de 2016-2017. 
 
Mais, plus tard, dépuis Novembre 2018, la situation Change Radicalement : Soudain, un pétit Technocrate "Chinois" devoyé à Honk-èKong, endoctriné, promu, payé et manipulé par un Lobby des Technocrates Américains, prouve qu'aux Labos on a trouvé déjà comment Fabriquer Artificiellement d'Enfants ayant été Génetiquement Manipulés, de facon que ces "Mutations" se repandent, désormais, automatiquement, aussi aux Génerations suivantes !
 
Autrement dit, certains Technocrates sans scrupule, pourraient déjà Fabriquer des Vraies RACES, faisant Eclater l'Humanité en Espèces Differents sans fin, et ainsi provoquant son Extermination Massive, ...comme une Bombe Nucléaire à retardement, "furtive" et silencieuse, mais beaucoup Plus Monstrueuse et Mortelle qu'une Serie de Bombes Nucléaires...
 
A fortiori lorsque ce même Projet de Loi contesté veuit Imposer aussi des "Chimeres" Homme-Animal, et même des Manipulations Génetiques sur Embryons Humains...
 
bionc_mpteuirofora_400 
 
Le Président Chinois Xi a eu, au moins, la Conscience morale d'Arrêter, Dénoncer, et Condamner en Prison de 5 Ans, ce pétit Technocrate dévoyé et manipulé, Annoncant ces Décisions le 30 Décembre 2019 : Cad., par incroyable "Coincidence", ...la Veille de l'Annonciation officielle du Virus Mortel "Covit-19", que l'OMS, notoirement, ne sait plus, Aujourd'hui, s'il faudrait attribuer son Origine à quelques Labos de Technocates, ou pas ! 
 
Mais, certains parties des Lobbies de Lesbies (en réalité Manipulées et Exploitées Honteusement, comme Prétexte), et (surtout) de quelques Technocrates dévoyés et sans scrupule, Persistent, Même Aujourd'hui, à pousser le Président Macron vers le Précipice, même en 2021, comme s'il ne serait rien passé Entre-Temps...
 
Macron pourrait Gagner aux Elections de 2022 et être réelu, SI une partie notable des "Républicains"/"Majorité Silencieuse" allait le rejoindre, comme il le souhaite. 
Mais, s'il Tombait au Piege d'insister Aveuglement à cette vieille Concession à quelques Lobbies, Dépassée par l'Histoire, et si Dangereuse pour l'Humanité, d'Imposer au Forceps la Fabrication Artificielle d'Enfants aux Labos, (et même Pendant la Crise du Pandemique, lorsqu'll est, en réalité, Interdit et Anti-Démocratique, à faire des "Réformes de Société" en plein Régime d'Urgence, selon le Conseil de l'Europe, la CEDH, la Commission de Venise, etc), alors, ca Change, et il risquerait, vraiment, de Perdre !
 
La situation actuelle est si "tendue", pleine de Tension, sourde mais malfaisante, avec diverses Aggressions furtives par des Laquais de tel ou tel Lobby louche, que ...même le Pape Emerite Bénoit Dénoncait, récemment, que certains voudraient le faire "se taire", en le muselant, "parce que je Ne veut pas que des êtres Humains soient Fabriqués aux Labos", comme il aurait averti... En effet, exceptionellement, son plus récent Livre a, curieusement, eu trop du mal à être Traduit et Publié en francais et/ou en anglais, en version integrale, pour la 1ère fois... 
>>> Mais l' Humanité ne sera jamais muselée !
 

(../..)
 

(NDLR: A Series of Cyber-Attacks, at an Exceptionaly Important Moment of Overload in Crucial Issues to investigate and report on them, HIndered us from making a fully-fledged Article).
 

----------------------------------------

EUPartnersInvestors

Statistics

Posetioci: 53704407

Archive

Login Form





Upamti me

Izgubili ste lozinku?
Nemate nalog? Napravite nalog

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Rezultati

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.