english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Turko-USA BioNTech/Pfizer Fake "Vaccine" Spreads Infections + Deaths in Australia !

Turko-USA BioNTech/Pfizer Fake "Vaccine" Spreads Infections + Deaths in Australia !

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 27 October 2021
virus_australia_explodes_on_infections_during_biontechpfizer_fake_vaccine_whoeurofora_400
 

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- For the 1st Time so Obvious, the Failure of the Turko-USA Fake "Vaccine" (in Fact a Controversial Novel Tool of m-RNA, Affecting the Human Genome, Contrary to "Classic" Vaccines of the Last 2 Centuries, since Pasterur's times) of BioNTech/Pfizer (See, Already, many relevant Data at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fewfakevaccinesfascismcrashes.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/majorityvaccinesclassicbutnotyeteu.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/echrcriticalquestionsoncompulsoryvaccination.html, etc), became Spectaculary Blatant in the case of a whole Continent as Australia Nowadays :

Indeed, Soon After the Beginning of this Year 2021, Australian authorities were Pushed to Change their Policy on the Virus by Adopting and Imposing that Controversial Fake "Vaccine" Alone, (since "Astrozeneca" had been practicaly Abandoned, as also anOther, Nationaly produced Vaccine, for reasons UnRelated to its Efficacy, while USA's "Moderna", "Janssen", or "Novavax", as well as China's "CinaVax", etc., had Not Yet been Authorized or Imported/Distributed there, at least Until, practicaly, the End of October)....

virus__pfizer_fake_vaccine_in_australia__wikipedia__eurofora_400_02

----------------------------

+Almost at the Same Time, many pre-existing Public Health protection (Non-Pharmaceutical) Measures (including, f.ex., Closure of Restaurants, Schools, etc), were more or less Lifted or Abandoned, until Recently, (as the Global Establishment's Medias Nowadays abudantly reported).

Until Now, Australia had been particularly Distinguished by a Fight against the Virus which, (After a "Harsh" Beginning with a lot of Blunders, provoking Infections and Deaths, since Back on Early 2020), Later Inspired itself from the Succesfull Neighbouring China's example, i.e. Focusing mainly on strict Public Health Measures, in the Absence of any Medical Drug and/or Vaccine yet, Resulting in a Positive Outcome, with an Exceptionaly Long Period of practicaly No Infections, Neither Deaths, During Many Months, (as Early as From September 2020 up to the End of June - Beginning of July 2021), allowing to add Even a short Period of DeConfinement, which had ReLaunched its Economy at a Higher Level than in the Past !

>>> But, Since Recent Events misled Australian authorities into progressively Droping their previous Public Health Measures, in order to Focus, instead, to Controversial Fake "Vaccines", (in fact, Only "Pfizer", Until Nowadays), Suddenly, a highly Spectacular, Negative "U-Turn" Emerged at the overall Situation, with a Massive "Explosion" of Infections, followed also by a Huge Upheaval of Deaths, until now..., (as "WHO"'s Official Data clearly reveal).

virus_australia_explodes_on_infections_during_biontechpfizer_fake_vaccine_whoeurofora_400_01 

virus_australia_deaths_boom_under_pfizer_fakevaccine_who__eurofora_400 

=> The main Responsible for having practicaly Provoked such a Sudden Tragic Mess, - and/or, at least for having Blatantly Failed to Prevent or Reduce it, - Obviously was that Controversial Fake-"Vaccine" (in fact an "mRNA" Novel Tool Affecting the Human Genome) of the Turko-USA "BioNTech/Pfizer" consortium, (Notoriously Funded by controversial Bill Gates as Early as since 2019 already, at the Same Time as "Moderna" too), Since it had, in Australia, during Many Recent Months until Now, a quasi-Monopole of Authorisation, Import or Production, and Distribution there, (that All Other kinds of Vaccines hadN't got Yet until Nowadays)...

+ Such New Facts Reveal, even More Obviously, the Blatant Failure of those Few and Fake "Vaccines", (in fact : just 4 Controversial Novel Tools Affecting the Human Genome), the Only to be Authorized by some obscure EU Bureaucrats still Excluding Any Other Vaccine, (and, Particularly, All the "Classic" Vaccines, Faithful to Louis Pasteur eprouved Methods of Stimulating the Natural Human Immunity System, instead of ByPassing it, as an Absolute Majority of such Vaccines prepared Against COVID Virus, and having Succesfully passed even a 3rd Phase Test, still Currently does, according to WHO's Data : See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/majorityvaccinesclassicbutnotyeteu.html, etc).

=> Indeed, the Limitation Only to -and the Forced Imposal of just - that "Band of 4" Manipulators of Human Genome, ("Astrozeneca", "Janssen", "Moderna" and "Pfizer"), with a Surprizing Total and persisting Exclusion of Any "Classic"-type Vaccine, Respecting the Natural Immunity System of the Human Genome, appears to be the main Responsible for the Enigmatic current Stagnation and Failure of that Strange Pseudo-"Protection" System in front of the Deadly Virus, still Imposed to the Eurpean People by some Bureaucrats, which has Forced Europe to become ..."the Only (big) Continent in the World where that Virus again Grows Nowadays ("for +18% per last Week" !), and Even Deaths (+16% Last Week...) as Mainstream Medias just Observed, Based also on WHO's Official Data, (in Addition to small Australia recently, as we saw Supra) !

virus_europe_the_only_big_continent_with_growing_infections_who__eurofora_400_01
-----------------------------------

Meanwhile, Poor Africa seems to partly Escape, at least, from such a Risk, (Perhaps due Also to the use of Cheap and Accessible HCQ Prophylaxis) ; America appears a Little bit Less Affected, (given also a, comparatively, Stronger Resistance, particularly from Most of the Right) ; Asia is largely covered by the unexpected Success of China's Public Health (Non-Pharmaceutical) protection Model, (which is Not Against "Classic" type Vaccines : See Infra), Added to Neighbouring Australia's almost 1 Year Success, with Similar Methods : Comp. Supra) ; as in Pan-European Russia, many People seem to Tragically Resist to a "Virus' Vector" Novel Tool also Affecting the Human Genome, while Vladimir Putin apparently does Not yet Oppress them as Harshly as Others currently do inside the EU, (Perhaps Hoping that a New "Classic"-type Vaccine, reportedly Prepared by a World-Famous Saint-Petersburg Labo, Expected around the 2021's End to 2022's New Year, Might, Eventualy, Help Save a lot of surviving Human Lives).

=> In Front of such a Bumpy and Dangerous Global, overall UnCertain, Situation, Establishment's Backers of those Fake "Vaccines", realizing that their bid is Failing, Recently started to Claim, in substance, that Even if their Counter-Human Genome Novel Tools might, Indeed, Neither Protect against Infections, Nor against many Deaths, at least, they Would "Diminish the Risks" of Death or Serious Infections requiring "Heavy" Hospitalisation (f.ex. with Mechanical Respirators, etc), in terms of Percentage, Compared with Not Yet Vaccinated People...

    Their alleged Numbers look UnCertain, and, at any case, Should be Checqued.

    >>> But, at least, if their Concern might, perhaps, be really what they Claim, Then, they Must Explain to the European People Why they still Refuse to Authorize, inside the EU, Any "Classic"-type Vaccine, Not Affecting the Human Genome, (as Louis Pasteur-Invented Vaccines do, During some 2 Centuries now), Including, f.ex., among others, also China's "CinoVac" Vaccine, Already present in several Countries accross All Continents of the World, which, (According even to WHO's Latest Official Findings, on August 2021), seems to Protect the People from Serious Ilnesses (i.e. that would require "Heavy" Hospitalisations), and from Deaths, in percentages reaching (in Both cases) ... "100 %" !

 

 

(../..)


("Draft-News")


--------------------------------------


 

StartUpEU

Statistics

Visitors: 52356945

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.