english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Classic Vaccines in Clinical Phase = absolute Majority. But None Authorized by the EU yet = ZERO !

Classic Vaccines in Clinical Phase = absolute Majority. But None Authorized by the EU yet = ZERO !

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 10 August 2021

list_of_covid_vaccines_cabdidates_worldwide_who__eurofora_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- Even if the absolute Majority among the 110 candidate COVID Vaccines which have Currently Reached up to a Clinical Phase (i.e. completed Final Trials type 3) throughout the World, are of a "Classical" Technology, whose Safety and Efficacy has Already been more or less, Tested and Proven, on Various other Occasions during the last 2 Centuries (See Infra), Nevertheless, None among them has Yet been Authorized by the EU until now !...

    On the Contrary, the EU has Authorized 4 Controversial Vaccines, All of a Novel Technology, withOut real Precedent in Medical History, and, therefore, of UnKnown Yet possible Side Effects on Human Health : 2 "Genetic" so-called "Vaccines" ("ANRm" kind, as the Turkish-American "BNT-Pfizer", and the USA's "Moderna"), and 2 with a "Virus Vector" (which may Affect the Human Genome in the Core of a Cell : "AstroZeneka" with a ...Himpadji origin part, and "Johnson-Johnson"'s "Janssen"). The First 2 are Completely UnKnown until Nowadays, and the Following 2 use a Technology Only Tried Earlier on the Exceptional case of "Ebola", withOut a Real Practice : As, by an,Other "Coincidence", also for the Controversial Novel Drug "Remdisevir", of Doubtful effects).

    But All the Other, numerous "Classic" Technology cabdidate Vaccines, Faithful to World-Famous European French Inventor Louis Pasteur's (a former Strasbourg University Professor) well-Known Principles, have been, Curiously Snobed by EU's Experts, until now... This Includes All Kinds of "InActivated" or "Attenuated Virus", and "Protein SubUnits", etc, which have, Notoriously, been Already succesfully  Used, During several Decades, Also against Many and Various Other Familiar Diseases, as, f.ex. : the Flu, Polio, Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR), the ChickenPox and Shingles, or Whooping Cough, Tetanus, Diphtheria and MeningoCoccal Meningitis, (etc)..., as WHO reminds.

    >>> They represent an Absolute Majority of about 51% - 57%, among Candidate Vaccines against COVID Virus, currently at Clinical Phase, (particularly if the "virus-like particles"/"VLP" [6%] are treated as Non-Genetic tools, f.ex. against Hepatites B, Human Papillomavirus, Influenza, Malaria, Mosquirix/RTS,S, etc).

    + The Rest of 43% Candidate Vaccines at Clinical Phase include a Minority of"Genetic" Tools, ("DNA" or "RNAm" : 9% + 16% = 25%), while "Viral Vectors" ("replicating" or "not-replicating":  2% + 15% = 17%) May Affect Human Genome, by penetrating at Cells' Core, etc. "Vnr" and/or "Vvnr" "Antigen-presenting Cells", in some "New" Versions, Might be "Genetically Engineered" recently (2% + 1% = 3%), But that does Not concern yet All of them.

    ------------------------

    => The Main Critical point is that practicaly Nobody clearly Explained Why the EU has Chosen, until now, to Exclude All that absolute Majority of "Classic" Vaccines, and Impose, often by the Forceps (See : "Pass" Cartificates' Row), Only a Few, Controversial "Genetic" +"Virus-Vector" Genome-Affecting Novel Tools, (Comp. Supra)...

    + Particularly when the "Classic" Vaccines' Safety is, more or less, Already Tested and Known, since Many Years ago, while, on the Contrary, the Risks of Eventual "Side Effects" among thosa Novel", mainly "Genetic" Tools, (Perhaps Years Later), are almost entirely UnKnown (as even WHO observes) !

    ++ In Addition, as also WHO Systematically Warns (After "Eurofora", EU Commission's President, the CoE, etc), "there are Currently No substantive Data available related to the Impact of" those Genome-Affecting Novel Tools "on Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 ...Virus" to the Detriment of Other People... On the Contrary, all "Classic" Vaccines use to normaly Protect the Society from further Spread by those who have been Really and properly Vaccinated. (So that "...Pasteur would Spin in his Grave", if he heard of those Fake-"Vaccines", in fact : "Gene Therapy Tools",  as Denounced French University Professor Perronne since 12/2020, while the False Appearances given by Controversial "Pass/Certificates" for such Fake-"Vaccines" might Provoke "Devastating" Effects against Public Health, as CoE Warned on 6/2021)...

     Concerning that, it's Already a Worrying Fact that Countries which are Pioneers in such Fake-"Vaccines" and relevant "Passes", have Faced, Recently, an "Explosion" of Virus' Infections, (as, f.ex., in the UK, Spain, Greece, Netherlands, etc., followed by France and Others), while, on the Contrary, those Countries who Added also "Classical" Vaccines and/or SafeGuarded Public Health Measures, Succeeded to practicaly Stop Virus' Infections and Deaths, (such as, f.ex., China, Australia, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, San Marino, Serbia, etc), in Addition to USA's Recent spectacular "U-Turn" (from May to July 2021) on so-called "Vaccinated" Individuals' Obligation to Wear "Masks", be Excluded at US-Canada Borders, etc. Last, but not least, Beyond UK's "Boom" in more than 5 Millions People Waiting to Find a Bed in Hospitals, (Soon, even 13 Millions, according to the Minister of Health !), the Additional Fact of South Korea's Big Spread of massive Infections (and Deaths), suddenly Emerging ...Since those Pseudo-"Vaccines" appeared from December 2020, Until Nowadays, on August 2021, is a Stunning Reality, (see relevant WHO's Graphic, Herewith).

s._korea_virus_infections__booms_since_fakevaccines_who__eurofora_400 

-----------------------------

    +++ But a Most Dangerous Factor is, Also, that, while such Fake-"Vaccines" Notoriously Affect a Protein, at the same time, according to mainstream "BBC", Even "Tiny Modifications of Proteins" might "provoke Catastrophes" (sic !) inside the Human Body, that has Many Thousands of Proteins, with a "very Complex Molecular Structure", from which, Only about "17%" is Currently Known... Moreover, Genetic Manipulations ("Gene Editing") in Mamals, including Humans, May Provoke UnKnown Yet "Side Effects", particularly "Cancer", but also Chronic Diseases, as a landmak Big Collective Study on Artificial Procreations in Labos, Published on 2020 in China, Warned....

    Risks for such Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Persons themselves, having used Genome-Affecting, Controversial Novel Tools (Comp. Supra), include, in Addition, a too Rapid Drop in Protection from Infections, (particularly in the Turko-USA "BNT-Pfizer", which Droped down to Only 64% on June, and ...39% on July in Israel !), just ...2 Months After the 2nd Dose, reportedly Obliging to take even a 3rd, "Booster" Shot, (and currently Threatening to have to Repeat that, Also "Forward", during the foreseable Future !). Something that the WHO Finds Shocking, particularly as many Other, Poor Countries, have Not Yet got 1 First Shot... Meanwhile, however, Even ...inside USA's "White House" were found Infected Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Individuals, as 45% of UK's Deaths from the Virus concerned, Also, such Pseudo-"Vaccinated" People recently, Added to an UnExected Big Number of Similar Infections in a July 4 Event at the USA, and an Equivalent Proportion of Hospitalized such Victims at "Serious" conditions in Greece, (etc).   

    On the Contrary, at least Some among the "Classical" Vaccines, appear reportedly Able to Face Most Virus' "Variants" of concern, (f.ex. one from Russia's Saint-Petersburg, expected towards the End of 2021, and one Forthcoming in the USA, etc), while, in Addition, a Chinese "Classic" Vaccine would have (according to the "WHO") an Efficacy of ..."100%" (sic !) against Hospitalisations in Severe Conditions, and/or Deaths. (NDLR : Not Exhaustive List).

    => In Such Circumstances, EU's Stuborn Refusal, Until Now, to Authorize any "Classic" Vaccine, among an Absolute Majority of current Candidates Worldwide (Comp. Supra), at the Same Time that Controversial (and Failing) "Fake-Vaccines", Dangerously Affecting Human Genome, are Recently Imposed even to UnWilling People, by the Forceps, (Ibid), Obviously has No more Excuses or Pretexts, and URGENTLY Needs to be Droped and Changed !

    Particularly Nowadays, at the 200th Anniversary of Louis Pasteur's Birth : 1.821 - 2.021, Europe Must Prove (Both to its Citizens and the World) that is has Still Memory of its History, and Creative, Responsible Strength.

 

(../..)

 

('Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------------------

 

EuroStars-Eureka

Statistics

Visitors: 51474441

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.