english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Foreign Investment leader Montenegro Prime Minister Dukanovic to EuroFora: EU Quality before Speed

Foreign Investment leader Montenegro Prime Minister Dukanovic to EuroFora: EU Quality before Speed

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
imag0551_400

Long-time Prime Minister (1991-1998 and 2008 - 2014) and former President (1998-2002) of Montenegro, Milo Dukanovic, replying to "EuroFora"s questions at the CoE in Strasbourg, stressed that "Qu    ality before Speed", is the Strategic aim of the EU Accession proces, which might start in 2010 and complete in the next few years, for the small but Strategically located, more Peaceful Country at the former Yugoslavian Region, whose Stability and Economy is one of the Brightest, and beneficial to the surrounding Western Balkans' European integration developments.
-------------

"EuroFora"s 1st out of 2 Questions was exceptionaly an "open" one :  - "If everything goes well, when do you hope that your Country will become EU Member ?", we simply asked Montenegro's Prime Minister.

    - "Our Plan is to meet expectations under a European Union Agenda", Dukanovic willingly admitted, "but we don't set any Time-Frames", he carefully stressed.

    - Because "we are sincerely guided by the Principle : "Quality before Speed", underlined Montenegro's Prime Minister, who also Chairs this Year (2010) the Central European, the South-East, and the Adriatic - Ionian Seas' EU Initiatives.

    - "We want to be part of the EU. But this is not our goal in itself. We want to make sure that in Montenegro we have a Quality of Life fit for European Citizens of 21st Century", he said.

 - "That's why we are primarily devoted to Reforms. Because Reforms ...enhance Quality of Life, and also lead to EU Membership", Dukanovic observed.

    -  In fact, "the actual (partial) goal that we Now have is to get this Year (2010) a(n EU) Candidate Status, and a Recommendation to start Accession Negotiations. We think that this role is absolutely Realistic", Montenegro's Prime Minister estimated.

 In other words, Dukanovic, (as he added later in Strasbourg) would like to avoid a situation similar to FYROM's, who hurried up to become EU Candidate, but hasn't yet got a Date for EU Accession Negotiations, (mainly due to the pertaining lack of a Solution to the issue of the Name "Macedonia" which is traditional also in Greece's Millenary History, so that an intelligent and adequate compromise has still yet to be found in order to allow an otherwise Friendly and mutually Beneficial Regional Cooperation in the framework of a Stable EU Integration).

        - "We also think that it is possible for Montenegro, within the Next Several Years, to succesfully complete Negotiations with the EU", carefully but Optimistically concluded in his Reply to "EuroFora"s 1st Question Dukanovic.

---------------------------
     - Meanwhile, "on Economy, are there any important Projects on Infrastructures, f.ex. Sea Transports, Gas, etc, currently prepared ?", asked "EuroFora"'s 2nd Question the Prime Minister of Montenegro, (which is well known, not only for its Natural Landscapes, but also as Danube Riverside Serbia's outlet to the Adriatic Sea).

    - "The main Opportunities for Montenegro's Development in the Period Ahead are precisely what You have mentioned : These are Infrastructures, Energy, and, in addition, Tourism", the Country's experienced long-time Political Leader replied to "EuroFora".                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

    - "There is a Huge Interest from the part of Foreign Investors. The main foreign Investors come from the EU. During recent Years, Montenegro has been the Leader in Europe in terms of Foreign Investment per capita. This was so even in the Last Year (2009). And 80% of Foreign Direct Investments in Montenegro have been investments from the EU"

    - This is partly due also to the fact that Montenegro has already introduced, and will continue its Pioneer, Voluntary use of Euro € as Currency, despite problems and "hard Reforms" needed for that, considering that "National Debt was "only 36% of the GDP", i.e. "much lower than in some EuroZone Member Countries".. Meanwhile, Montenegro's Citizens have just got a "Visa-Free travel to Shengen Zone (EU) Countries" since December 2009, he added afterwards at CoE's Assembly,

 - "I' m sure that Montenegro will complete its commitments to the CoE and  then start fullfiling the conditions also for the EU", Djukanovic also stressed. And he explained that there is a close Link between certain Reforms, such as those required in order to fight efficiently against Corruption, (still widespread accross the whole South-Eastern area, particularly after the Econoimic Destructions provoked by the War iin the former Yugoslavian area in the recent Past), and Boosting the Judiciary, Rule of Law, etc,  (thanks also to a close cooperation with Venice Commission), as means to win, develop and safeguard IForeign Investors' remarquable "Trust".
-----------------------------
        As for Refugees/Displaced Person's Rights to Return and have their Homes Restored, (a wide-pread problem in South Eastern European, i.e. Balkan neighbouring Countries, as well as in the Caucasus, Turkey, occupied territories of Cyprus, etc), Montenegro's situation is, compared to others, so "Positive", that it has exactly the .. Opposite problem :

- Instead of delays to accept  Refugees/IDP's return, as it's more or less the case  elsewhere, (with the sole Exception of Turkish- Occupied Territories of Cyprus, where Ankara still refuses even to admit the Principle of Greek Cypriot Refugees/IDP's return),  on the Contrary, Montenegro is ... eager to accelerate the Return Home of numerous Refugees, from various other States of the Region, who have seeked an Asylum in that Country, because it remained always in Peace, without any violent conflict, as its President, Dukanovic, observed, launching a "Call" to all those involved and to the International Community to help Refugees' Return to their Homelannds asap...

That's one of the reasons for which Montenegro has a genuine Interest for Development and Stability in its  Neighbouring Countries accross the whole Region :
------------------
- Montenegro's reforms "contributed  also to developments in the Region, and, therefore to  European Integration", praised, indeed, the Country, CoE's Secretary General Thornbjorn Jagland.

    - "From the CoE side, we are very satisfied by the Cooperation with Montenegro, and will be a partner for us also for the (PanEuropean Organisation's own) reforms" in Strasbourg, Jagland observed, giving a carefully Positive mark. - "I've commented Montenegro for its achievements, in particular ratifications of many CoE Conventions, I'm aware of the fact that we have more Work to do, and that the CoE will hopefuly cooperate also in the future with Montenegro, to fullfil all its commitments and continue all the ratifications. I also thanked very much the Cooperation of Montenegro Authorities with the Venice Commission, on Amendments to the Constitutional Law, (i.e. mainly on the Judiciary, Rule of Law, etc. : See supra) that we (CoE) find very important", CoE's Head added.

However, replying to another Journalist's question, Jagland, while being clearly Positive, nevertheless, he avoided to speak in terms of race for EU Accession, between the various Western Balkan Countries :

 - "I don't want to compare Montenegro's integration to others', in the Region", he simply said.  - "But I will reiterate that we are satisfied for the way Montenegro has fullfilled its commitments. There is some more Work to do. But it's by implementing (CoE's) Convention(s) (including, naturally, the most important : That on Human Rights), that Montenegro will advance further"

 - And "it's also important for us (CoE) to see the important role Montenegro plays in the Region" of the entire Western Balkans and South East Europe :  - "It's a Stabilizing Factor, which cannot be underestimated", Jagland concluded.

***
Multi-lingual Interface

Statistics

Visitors: 56879642

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 bisky_center_400
 

Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.

For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :  

- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.

imag0025_400_01

- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties",  he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
 
At any case,  "we  (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.

- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"           

- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
                                                                                                                                                                        
- "EuroLeft  and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"

- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."

- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.

imag0935_400

Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :

- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.

But, many Facts indicate the contrary :

Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).

During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side :  Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.

The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).

Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.

"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.  

So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.

To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...

Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of  representative Democracy a topical meaning :

 - "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.

Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".

- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.

***





-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.