

New+f.STOA Chairs Campos+Ruebig for EuroFora in EUCitizens input on EUParliament Science Options

*Strasbourg/EU Parliament/Angelo Marcopolo/- Both the new 2012-2014 President of EU Parliament's prestigious Committee competent to assess Scientific Options on Topical issues of Crucial importance for Modern Society, (from BioEthics and Energy to Institutions-building or Space Technology), etc., former Minister Antonio Correia de Campos (SD MEP from Portugal), and the experienced former President and now 1st vice-President, Austrian EPP MEP Paul Rübig, replying to "EuroFora"s Questions, invited "EuroFora"s co-Founder to actively contributr into relaying EU Citizens' concerns, queries or ideas, possibly expressed earlier in our Website's MultiLingual Forum, in the final public Discussions at STOA's Workshops together with specialized Experts.

They were speaking at a key moment in a Press Conference in EU Parliament in Strasbourg after a "Constitutive" meeting of the STOA (i.e. "Science-Technology Options Assessment Committee"), where Ruebig switched Today job with Campos, taking over STOA's 1st vice-Presidency, while STOA's other 2012-2014 vice-Presidents are Conservative MEPs Malcolm Harbour from the UK (Comp. Harbour's replies to "EuroFora"s questions in other issues, See previous NewsReports), and Oldrich Vlasak from the Czech Republic.
STOA's New President proposed to "EuroFora" to practically come to STOA's Meetings and Workshops in order to speak, during Discussions with the Panel of Experts, about Questions previously raised by EU Citizens f.ex. in "EuroFora"s open public discussion Website, where the forthcoming Events would have been anounced to the Public early enough in order to collect People's main reactions.
This was Campos' reaction to "EuroFora"s suggestion to be informed one or more Months before STOA's Workshops about the forthecoming Events in order to launch Public EU-wide Debates via our Internet MultiLingual Forum, where EU Citizens, other Experts, Businesses, Associations, Journalists, national a.o. Politicians, etc. who couldn't be always physically present at the prescribed Time in the precise location of a specific STOA Workshop.
>>> - ... "Why don't you come with the Panel to do it yourself ?", STOA's new 2012-2914 President suggested to "EuroFora".
- "Because most of us (MEPs) are not specialists", so that "I don't know if it's feasible" for us (MEPs) to react to EU Citizens' questions or suggestions on STOA Workshops' issues, he carefully warned. Precisely, "because we don't know, we are asking Civil Society and Specialists. We (STOA's MEPs) are Facilitators So, we cannot answer (personaly) questions" on the STOA Workshops' Scientific/Technological matters , Campos explained.
- Thus, "we (STOA MEPs), by definition, have not any opinion. The Opinions are from those who are in the Workshop's Panel. "We just need to be sure that they are Respected Members of the Scientific Community, that's all. But they can bring in their own Opinions. We have nothing to say about that".
=> In consequence, "the Best Way is for you to come to (STOA's) Meetings or at the end in the Workshops, and Ask Questions at an Open Time for Discussion", he proposed. "In all (STOA's) Meetings this Possibility exists" for Journalists or other Civil Society members to raise topical questions to the Scientists/Researchers who form each STOA Workshop's Panel", President Campos guaranteed.
= "Thanking" for "EuroFora"s input in "that Crucial question", the experienced STOA's 1st Vice-President, Austrian EPP MEP Paul Rübig, added that, indeed, "it's very Important for us (STOA) that we'll have Closer Contacts with the Science Community", as wel as "with the Society at large", as adds an Official Communiqué published Today, to which he pointed out.
=> "And (for that purpose) we use All Possibilities in this House", (EU Parliament), " in order to be, as much as possible, Present in the Official Life", as Rübig replied to "EuroFora", obviously including Innovative Methods as our Internet MultiLingual Forum suggestion, close to the "e - Democracy" Tools that a STOA Report had explored under his presidency in 2011 (See Infra).
--------------------------------
-+ "EuroFora" had initially raised to STOA's Leaders 2 specific Questions, during their Press Conference :

- "As you know very well, there is a New (8th) Research Framework Program on the pipeline, and the Pluri-Annual Funding framework, where there are many Choices to be made on Scientific Issues, that are also Topical Issues". In this regard, "is there any Roadmap that you have prepared on the Main Issues that you think that they should be dealt by the STOA" during 2012-2014 ?
+ Moreover, "in some issues, not only BioEthics but also on other points, as you know very well, the Legal Principle of Precaution has been accused, sometimes, by certain parties, to excessively block research mauy , while, on the contrary, other parties, sometimes consider that it's not always efficient, or not enough."=> "As a matter of General Principle, and taking into account your Experience on various issues, don't you think that the Precaution principle could also Stimulate and Justify (Scientific and Technological) Research, just in order to be sure that some Technological Choices are Safe ? So that it could also be "Research-Friendly" ?, we asked.
-----------------------------------

- "Thank you for the Questions : You mentioned 2 Important issues, (including also) BioEthics and the Principle of Precaution, in order to have a "Friendly" liaison with Science", STOA's New President De Campos started to reply to "EuroFora" :
- But, "the better way to say what we (STOA) are, is to say what we are not :- We are not Science Makers, we don't do research : we are not researchers. We are not Science Managers : the only manager here is the (EU) Commission. "So, we do not take Decisions on these Difficult Science issues".
- "We are simply Facilitators : Our Legitimacy comes out from our Panels : 5 (EU Parliament's) Commissions that elected our Members and appointed us to run this project'. I.e., "we help to inform Decision makers, for doing themselves the decision. We Enlarge the Discussion, we make the Information more Transparent, we Inform our Collegues (MEPs) for the Options, But we (STOA) never take decisions" (on he substance of the Issues raised), he explained.
- Thus, "we are running Workshops without any Connexion between these Workshops and our (personal) Opinions" : - "For instance, we are going to have a Workshop on (the highly Controversial issue of) "Human Enhancement", on (Bio-)Ethics, with the European Council of Churches. Many Churches are represented there, (but) neither from us (MEPs) is taking a position there. We (simply) think that it's Worthwhile to have this Panel of Different Opinions", De Campos observed.
- 'Our Duty is to inform collegues (MEPs) about such issues", after hearing all invited Speakers : Scientists, Businesses, Government agents, Associations, Journalists, other Politicians, etc., he concluded.
----------
- Indeed, "our 1st and central Priority is our Duty to inform and Help Collegues (MEPs) on the Decision-Making Process" in ordrer "to help them on Options", i.e. "to make the (Scientific and Technological) Options as Easy, as Intelligent, as Transparent as possible, in order to share the Technicalities and the Difficulties in interpretation, to bring this in a Smooth, Transparent, and Easy way, for all of us (Euro-Politicians) to make Decisions", as Campos explained earlier.
So, "We don't decide ourselves, we decide through Others, but... >>> - "Here, on Science, because it takes Options that are very Important for Society, we need to be very Conscious of what these Options are : That's our Duty", he stresssed, apparently in relation to the "BioEthical"/"Precaution Principle" Question, initially raised by "EuroFora" (Comp. supra).
----------------------

- "That's a Crucial question, thank you", started to reply to "EuroFora" also the Experienced out-going STOA's 2009-2012 President, and New 1st Vice-President, Austrian EPP MEP Paul Rübig.
In this regard, - "I think that it's very Important for us (STOA) that we'll have Closer Contacts with the Science", " it's quite Essential to bring Together the Science area with the Politics level", he pointed out. "This can bring a Better Undestanding of what is needed from the Political side, and what is needed from the Science - Research side". Indeed, "It brings not only a Study. It also Builds Personal Relations", with a lot of ideas on how to cooperate in the most important areas of Science and to built Personal Contacts with these People, because I think that this is the road to Succes", Rubig added earlier.
=> That's why, "we (STOA) decided to have a "Pairing Scheme" (where) MEPs should meet with Scientists Twice in a Year. Once in EU Parliament, another time at a Workplace of the Scientific Researchers". While "we (STOA) are also in relation with the World Science Conference in Japan which is the biggest in the World, as well as the European Science' Conference in Budapest, and we plan to bring one also in the EU Parliament, by presenting the World Science Conference", he anounced.
---------------------
- About the "RoadMap" asked by "EuroFora" (See supra), Rubig reminded, earlier, concerning the recent Past (2009-2012)n that, - "during the Last 3 Years, we (ST0A) focused on 3 Items" : (a) Eco-Mobility (i.e. when World Population grows from 2 to 10 Billions of People during our Lifetime, which Options can we offer world-wide for a good Mobility situation, as f.ex. in the program "Eco-Efficient Transport", etc.; (b) Sustainable Resources, (when we have Rare Resourcess around the world, here also we wanted to show the Options available for the Political level, for the Business level, with experience from the Science area : A Priority for the Long-track, where we must still look how to become more efficient); (c) Social Networks and E-Goverment, (f.ex. this New Technology of Back up which is quite important for efficiency, but we have to see where we can be Transparent, and where we must keep Privacy, so that there is an InFight between these two Principles, which will go on in Future", (etc), as he said.
-------------
+ Now, concerning "what the Principles for the Future will be", while "we (STOA) are looking about what Technology Options we have for the Future", the outgoing STOA President, (and new 1st Vice-President), limited himself into simply referring to a Press Release (See Infra), while also giving the speech to his successor, De Campos :
- Of course the "Innovation" topic is on board on all Issues, and not only in our Universities, especially in the comming Horizon 2020 project", for the New EU Pluri-Annual Research Program, "which is the Biggest EU ever had", stressed from the outset the in-coming, New STOA President. - Indeed, EU's 8th RST Framework Program 2013-2020 "is improving from 50 to 80 Millions €, it's important, and we hope that it will help Reduce the Gap of Development which exists between Societies"?
+ "We (STOA) are also concerned with Basic Science, and that's why we organize our big Science event at the CERM, on November of this year, in earby Geneva), which is a Huge Laboratory which has produced already 16 Nobel Prizes", Coreia de Campos anounced.
-Finally, "if we look at Sciences that can materialize easily, we shall look also to Social Sciences, in order to see how we can keep, here in Europe, our so succesful for 60 Years Social Model, in order to be Happy enough to produce more Science in the Future", as he said.
---------
+ Concerning Future projects, "EuroFora" also reminded Campos that he had personaly chaired (together with MEP La Via, EPP from Italy), a Pioneer Workshop on "CO2: Future Fuel ?", which aimed to start exploring a Pioneer Idea, strongly supported by Strasbourg-based "European Materials Research Society" (EMRS), to use CO2 as an Alternative Fuel in the Horizon of 2050, last March 2010 in Brussels, (Comp. relevant earlier "EuroFora"s NewsReports).

- "This is going to be Changing a lot", immediately reacted the New STOA's 2012-2014 President, even he carefully acknowledged that he "doesn't know" yet how far might go, in this regard, the consequences of the 2010 Fukusima Disaster, which notoriously provoked even Germany's decision to drop Nuclear Energy, thereby augmenting the need for New Energy Sources, given Oil - Gas' currently growing Prices and External EU's dependency, as well as Renewables' too Slow development. Topically, STOA's New "Initiatives"" for the "Coming Years", anounced Today (See infra), include, precisely, such "Alternative Fuels"
----------------------------------
+ Rübig, after consulting Campos on "EuroFora"s 1st Question, (See supra) pointed at a Press Release published Today, which not only anounces that "in the Coming Years" STOA's "scheduled Iniiatives" target (1) "Cloud Computing, Science Metrics, Alternative Fuels, and Technology Options for Feeding 10 Billions of People", as well as (2) "the use of new Mobile Media" to inform all MEPs, but also officially confirms that "STOA will further continue to organise, pro-actively and in response to ongoing developments, Information Events, relevant-to (EU) Parliament's Work and to (EU) Citizens' Expectations and Concerns in every area where Science and Technology assessment will be required".
-"Visibility ..is Vital for the accomplishment of STOA's Mission, which requires active Knowledge-Sharing with MEPs, the (overall) Schientific Community and the Society at large", today's Document indicated by Ruebig also stresses from the outset.
=> One of STOA's recent Reports (2011) even builds upon "EuroFora" co-Founder's original 1997-2007 idea, (as officially proposed, while Heading a Team of experienced European Journalists from various EU Countries, Universitarians, etc. for an Innovative EU Commission's project since as early as 1997, whose Timely adoption would certainly have contributed into Preventing the notoriously Negative 1999-2004 period of sharply growing Majority Abstentions in EU Parliament's Elections, followed by 3 "No" to EuroReferenda in France, the Netherlands and Ireland, etc. from 2005), to invent new ways, using the Modern Tools of Tele-Communication (including Interet, etc), of systematically associating all genuinly interested EU Citizens' participation in Public Debates and Dialogue before EU Institutions take important Decisisons affecting their Lives....
+ It topically includes, in the same framework, also Lisbon Treaty's EU "Citizens Initiatives", on which "EuroFora" has already pubished many Original NewsReports with INTWs and replies of main actors to our Questions, (f.ex. EU Parliament's Rapporteur, former Minister for EU affairs, Alain Lamassoure, EU Commission'q vice-President Maros Sfcovic, new EU Parliament's President Martin Schulz, etc. : See relevant earlier "EuroFora"s NewsReports). and which is due to start working, as informed EU sources recently confirmed us, from April 1st.
-----------------------------------------
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Lankytojai: 59758571Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

The incoming Swedish EU Presidency (July-December 2009) may still remain in favour of Turkey's controversial EU bid, despite June 2009 EU Elections' results, but it has "very strong demands on Turkey"'s obligation to respect EU Rules, said the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, to "EuroFora", reacting to critical Press reports.
- "I know (that) the link is often made also to Sweden's position on Turkey"'s controversial EU bid. Indeed, "we (Swedish EU Presidency) are very much engaged in the future membership of Turkey, but not without fullfiling all the Criteria".
- "It's very clear that we (Swedish EU Presidecny) have very Strong Demands on Turkey, in a sort of concept for Future membership of the Union, ...which will be a Long Process...", she stressed.
This means, in particular, "the Copenhagen Criteria (on Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law), and also the adaptation to the Acquis of the European Union".
- "If you listen to what Mr. Bildt (the Swedish Foreign Minister) says on Turkey at different occasions, it's very clear : We want Turkey to become part of the Union, in the Future. But we want it to fullfil all the Criteria : The Acquis of the European Union. That's very clear", she concluded.
The Senior Official of the Swedish Foreign Ministry was reacting to critical Press Reports, from Brussels' Journalists invited by EU Commission's secretariat to Stockholm, who claimed that Bildt was abusing of a ..."Whip" (sic !) against Cyprus, by "threatening" the presence of UNO's Peace-keeping force at the "Green line" which separates the island's Government-controlled areas from the territories occupied by Ankara's army, if Nicosia didn't accept any political solution, regardless of Turkey's demands, before the end of 2009.
Governing AKEL Party's new Secretary General, Andros Kyprianou, reacted by declaring that no-one can threat the People of Cyprus : -"We shall decide for our Future, and nobody else", he reportedly said, asking to "keep calm". "In order to find a Solution soon, certain basic Principles must be respected", he stressed, calling those who feel an urgency to use their influence on Turkey. Other Political Parties were more critical.
This was a reference to recently reported statements by Turkish Minister Bagis, Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan and Turkey's National Security Council (a Military-Political body), accused to push towards a partitionist "2 States" solution, contrary to UNO SC Resolutions for Cyprus' reunification.
December 2009 is a crucial moment for EU's appraisal of Turkey's controversial EU bid, because EU Council has decided to review then Ankara's compliance with the European position on the recognition of Cyprus' Government, which was clearly set out by an EU reply of 21 September 2005 to Turkish Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan's claims, refusing to recognize even the existence of EU Member Cyprus, in controversial statements he made to London (former EU chair) on July 29, 2005.
EU Parliament's latest Resolution on Turkey, adopted on March 2009 in Strasbourg, warned Ankara that "the non-fulfillment of Turkey's commitments... by December 2009, may further seriously affect the process of Negotiations" with the EU.
In practice, the issue boils down to Ankara's "embargo" against Ships and Airplanes using Cyprus' seaports or airports at the strategic EU island, which traditionaly hosts one of the World's biggest Shipping flags. EU has already "freezed" 6 relevant Chapters in EU - Turkey Negotiations since December 2006, after Ankara refused to fullfil a commitment it had undertaken when EU had decided to open controversial "accession" negotiations with Turkey, back on December 2005.
- "As far as EU - Turkey relations are concerned, it's clear that Turkey needs to fullfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the additional Protocol (to "EC-Turkey Association Agreement"), This is an important issue....and should be addresseed as soon as possible as it clearly affects the pace of the accession negotiations.Issues covered by the Declaration of September 2005 will continue to be followed up, and progress is urgently awaited", warned earlier in Strasbourg the out-going Czech EU Presidency (former vice-Prime Minister Alexander Vodra).
But the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, dismissed "interpretations" by "some" that Foreign Minister Carl Bildt was reportedly "threatening" Cyprus with consequences on the UNFICYP, if it doesn't accept any solution until December 2009, while Turkey is reportedly delaying in an attempt to impose a partitionist "2 States" solution.
On the contrary, Julin, stressed that "Sweden has strong demands on Turkey'"s respect of "Copenhagen Criteria and EU Acquis".
Meanwhile, Sweden is "concerned" about the risk of "Stalemate" in Cyprus' Talks, but is well aware that "the main responsibilities lie with the two leaders and the UNO", Europe playing only a role of "facilitator".
After carefully verifying, the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, stressed to "EuroFora" that Bildt's reference to UNFICYP "was not linked to a Threat", and dismissed those who "interpreted" it so.
On the contrary, the Swedish EU Presidency acknowledged the fact that Peace Talks are mainly for the UN and the leaders of the Cypriot communities, EU's role being limited into that of a "facilitator".
As for Turkey's reported attempts to impose a "2 States' solution", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service sharply replied by stressing that Turkey must respect the "EU Acquis" rules.
In particular :
- "Basically he (Bildt) underlined that it's the leaders of the two communities in Cyprus and the UN that have the main responsibilities for solving the problem", started to say the Swedish Senior Official to "EuroFora", referring to the above-mentioned "briefing".
- "But the EU had a role in sort of pointing out the benefits and facilitating a little bit the outcome for the settlement of the whole Cyprus' issue", she added.
- "And he did state the Fact, that the rest of the World (i.e. USA, etc) will, of course, look at the differend issues which are at the table, and the future of the UN Peace keeping force is part of what is at the table", she admitted.
- "I understand that some have interpreted that as a Threat, by the Swedish Minister" "But", in reality, "it's a statement of a Fact, that, when we'll look at the differend issues, one of the issues on which we shall have to take a stand on, is the future of the UN Peace keeping force in Cyprus".
Indeed, one of the questions usually raised for a Solution of Cyprus' issue is what International and/or European or other Guarantees, by a Peace-keeping force, might be needed afterwards, eventually for a transitory period.
Questioned anew by "EuroFora" whether (according to critical Press Reports) this could be taken as a veiled warning that, if Cyprus didn't accept any Turkish demand for any solution whatever, it might be left alone to face Ankara's Military Invasion/Occupation, she denied :
- "He (Bildt) didn't say it in that way"... "It was not linked to a threat, or anything like that", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service stressed.
On the contrary, "he (Bildt) underlined that the main responsibility lies with the parties concerned on the island". "The EU can try to facilitate and show the benefits of reaching a settlement. But also, when the EU and the rest of the World (i.e. USA) will have to look at it, they will look at all the Facts on the table, and the presence of the UN Peace-keeping force is one".
And "he (Bildt) didn't speak about that at all", she replied to "EuroFora" question on Turkey's reported attemps to impose, in one way of another, a partitionist "2 States solution".
Asked whether Bildt's aim was to incite both parties to move forward efficiently, she agreed :
- In fact, "the EU is really very concerned with the Stalemate in the situation. Yes !", the Head of Sweden's Foreign Ministry's Press Service anounced. That's why Bildt "was hoping for the two parties (i.e. for Turkey's also) to engage and break, a little-bit, the present stalemate, come to a solution of the issue" of Cyprus.
But, replying to a "EuroFora"s question on the risk, denounced by several politicians in case of strict Time Deadlines, for Turkey to provoke a stalemate and wait for the time to come to impose a partitionist "2 States' solution", she reacted by pointing at Turkey's obligation to respect "EU Acquis" :
- "Turkey must fullfil the EU Acquis : That's clear !", the Swedish Senior Official stressed.
More details are expected when Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt will debate his Programme with new MEPs at EU Parliament's plenary mid-July in Strasbourg, that he has visited already in 2008.
Foreign Minister Carl Bildt became familiar with Strasbourg's CoE last year, when Sweden chaired the PanEuropean organization of Human Rights. As EU chairman-in-office, he will also chair the 27-member States strong EU Group inside the 47-member States strong CoE.
Minister for EU affairs, Cecilia Malmstrom is well known at EU Parliament, where she has been an active MEP of the Liberal Group for many years, following also Press Freedom issues.
Both have already made various statements at "EuroFora", on differend topical matters.