newsitems
EU Parliament's biggest Group Chair Daul to EuroFora : Support for Cannes' formula on Greece
EU Parliament's biggest Group Chair Daul to EuroFora : Support for Cannes' formula on Greece

*Strasbourg (after Cannes)/EU Parliament/Angelo Marcopolo/- The President of EU Parliament's strongest Group, that of ChristianDemocrats/EPP, Joseph Daul, replying to an "EuroFora" question, indirectly but clearly supported for Greece the alternative, compromise "Formula" that we had discussed in Cannes with a French President Sarkozy's Counsellor, at a crucial moment, at the eve of the "G-20" Summit of Heads of State/Government, before Sarkozy evokes it in a word, and, one day later, it becomes explicitly the official stance of the main Opposition party in Greece, that of "New Democracy" headed by former Foreign Minister and MEP, Antonis Samaras, given largely winner in all Polls during the last Months, (See "EuroFora"s NewsReports from Cannes).

It's, astonishingly, on the basis of this compromise Formula of Cannes, that an interim Government of National Unity was agreed in Greece, due to officialy endorse the Financial aspects of the Loan decided by the 26-27 EU Summit in Brussels, and lead to National Elections on the 19th of February 2012, while, on the contrary, the Economic Policy Plan with concrete Measures needed for the Country to really become able to meet its Financial obligations up to the Numbers and in the Time Deadlines highlighted by the EU Brussels' deal, was reportedly left to be definitively decided, mainly for a new Government, with a fresh Popular mandate.

+ Meanwhile, - "any Proposals can be discussed, if they meet the two basic Conditions of 50% "Haircut" and the Country's Debt's Reduction down to 120% of GDP", as reportedly said these days to negotiators a Senior Official representing a big private Bank from France. (BNP-Paribas).

- Thus, raising "a delicate Question on Greece", "EuroFora" asked Daul whether, in his view, "once the (overall Financial) Agreement made at the 26-27 October EU Summit in Brussels will be definitively endorsed, if everything goes well, since the Majority of (Political) Parties (in Greece) agree now on that point, as it is well known, afterwards, for the Future, is there a hope for the Accompagnying Program,.... to be well (examined and) thought this time, in order to really succeed ?"

- Naturally, (and according to the above-mentioned "Cannes" alternative compromise, which obviously distinguishes between 2 diferend aspects and moments of the overall EU action on Greece : Loans and Economic policies needed in order to honor is debts), that Program of concrete Measures "will concern the implementation of Economic Reforms, which are (needed) precisely in order to succesfully meet now those Numbers (of the overall Financial agreement) in practice", "EuroFora" also observed, in our question.
+ I.e. "if it's necessary to make certain Reforms, f.ex. in the Public Sector, for civil servants, etc., to fully advance resolutely forward", we added, as far as it concerns the obviously Indispensable Change in the Greek State-controlled sector, where Thousands of couterproductive cushy-job holders and/or abusive political lackeys have been notoriously hired by Past clientelist and/or Nepotist former Governments, mainly of PASOK, particularly since the 1980ies, accumulating a constantly growing Debt.
- "But, eventually, if possible, without affecting (adversely) too much the Productive sector (of the Economy), so that the State becomes able to have enough (Tax) Revenues in order to pay the Debt", "EuroFora" went on to stress, clearly pointing at a Vital Need also frequently highlighted, mainly by the No 1 opposition party "New Democracy", as a "sine qua non" Condition for the agreement on the current, Interim Government of National Unity, due to prepare Elections soon.
[ These logical Economic Facts became even more obvious recently, when EU Experts observed that, despite PASOK's previous Plan to heavily Tax private Production and restrict even Poor People's Ecoomies; while practically leaving intact a notoriously too heavy Public Sector, full of counter-productive cushy job holders and/or anusive political lackeys, massively hired by former PASOK Governments in the Past, mainly during the 1980ies, inevitaby resulted recently in ... "more Recession than scheduled", and, therefore, in less Tax Revenues for the State !...
At the same time, EU Experts have just observed that, despite PASOK's heavy restrictions against Production and Poor People's economies, which notoriously provoked heavier than expected Recession, added to Popular Revolts, nevertheless, curiously, "the Public Sector's Expenses remained Too High" !...
Thus, it became now obvious that any Real Solution needs to pass through a serious Structural Change in the Greek State's Public sector, (i.e. by putting, at last, an end to the accumulation of too many counter-productive cushy-job holders and/or abusive political lackeys appointed by former clientelist and/or nepotist Governments in the Past, manly since the 1980Ies, paticularly by PASOK). But, in real practice, this coudn't be done by a simple "interim" Government, largely controlled by PASOK (wih 34 Ministers !). Only a brand New Government, based on a Fresh , Democratic Mandate by Elections, together with a popular "Anti-Corruption" Movement, able to provide both Political and Legal support, while, at the same time, joining Economic Efficiency with Justice. ]
=> So, could this be better done, "in one way or another, with this, or with anOther Government, which may follow Soon ?", "EuroFora" concluded in our Question to Daul, obviously referring to the Agreement concluded between the 2 Biggest Political Parties in Greece, (PASOK and New Democracy, to which was added also a smaller party LAOS), to prepare Elections for a New Government in the middle of February 2012.
-----------------
- "On Greece : Naturally we (EU) want to help Greece. This currently is on its way", started to reply to "EuroFora" from the outset the Head of EU Parliament's biggest Group of MEPs, apparently, already agreeing that the Economic Program with concrete Measures obviously is a separate and distinct piece from the rest of the overall EU structure, on the condition that it fits.

+ "We have put (EU) Experts, who are EU Civil Servants, who are (currently) in the process of making an Analysis of what is needed to be set up in order to save Greece, I'd say, from the top", Daul went on to add, making even more Clear the Fact that the Program of Economic Policy Measures needed in Greece, hasn't been at all decided yet, not even described in the Financial overall Agreement brokered back in the 26-27 October EU Summit, but, on the contrary, it ..."is (currently) in the Process of making", (etc).
- "We (EU) shall put all necessary means, together with the Greeks, so that everything goes well", said also Daul, expressing a positive Will to act Efficiently this time, "during the next Years", as he added, probably indicating that the above mentioned Process is expected to durate so long, that at least the Main Decisions woud practically have to be taken by the EU "together" with a New Greek Government, which could be based on a Fresh, Democratic Popular Mandate, f.ex. in the scheduled February 2002 Elections, (Comp. supra)...
--------------------------
+ Meanwhile, Daul also stressed, earlier, "concerning Greece, (that) ...I'm very glad that the Papademos' Government is setting up this National Unity, (because) I think that it's the Best way to face the necessary Reforms in Greece, if we have Democrats and proEuropeans United together", obviously considering it comparable to other countries.
- Moreover, "(EU) Solidarity goes through such Reforms, and I don't think that we could have an €uroZone of various Speeds", the President of the biggest Group of MEPs in EU Parliament declared on this occasion, as far as related General issues are concerned.
- "I have always supported, and I will always support for Greece to stay inside (€uroZone), and establish Rapidly the (currently debated €uroZone) Governance also vis a vis Greece, so that it will be able to manage their country and solve their problems", Daul added.

- "The European Governance is a CDU proposal (of the German Governing party). I think that we are in front of a major U-turn in Europe's History !", the French Top MEP observed, speaking of the Annual, 2011 German ChristianDemocrats' conference, a few Days earlier.
- "I'm very close to (the German) Chancellor Merkel, that I admire very much, and, in particular, the advance that she has made during the last Year, (when several German groups wanted to return back to the Mark, particularly that "controler" of Stuttgart, who are rather Anti-Europans in fact), and, when I see all that Unity that was achieved in Germany, and those Decisions taken to support €uro, as well as what the (Governing Party of ChristianDemocrats) CDU decided this week, without entering into details, f.ex. whether EU Commission's President should be Directly Elected (by EU Citizens), etc. , the will to support EU Integration, is a very Strong Signal which was debated and decided by the CDU".
- "I've already said, and I repeat, that the Solution to the (Global) Crisis is more Europe, so that I entirely support what CDU proposed. I have a Rendez-vous Next Week with the (German) Chancellor (Angie Merkel), in order to advance discussions to Strengthen Europe in the middle of this (Global) Crisis."
=> But "we can't wait to change EU Treaty in order to settle this (Global) Crisis. I don't say that we won't, probably, need to modify it somehow. However, f.ex. in an Association, we have a Statute., but when Rapid Decisions are needed, there are also Internal Rules, which can be more easily adapted. Afterwards, we naturally can change the Treaty, with National Parliaments having a say, etc.
>> - "And I'm sure that this European Governance must go ahead in the direction of a more advanced Democratisation", i.e. closer to EU Citizens. Daul went on to add, (making a point of obviously particular interest to "EuroFora")..
+ In parallel, "I said to EU Commission's President (Barroso) not to hesitate to bring in front of the (EU) Court of Justice any Head of State/Government who might not respect his/her obligations, ... If we have to continue working together", .. - Because, "I'm always moved when I receive in my office particularly. Greek Citizens whose small Retirement benefits are being reduced, small Salaries are being cut, because we (i.e. some EU Heads of State/Government of the Past : Comp. "EuroFora"s analysis on the 1999/2000 Politico-Financial "Deal" concerning Turkey's controversial and unpopular EU bid, in exchange of Greece's earlier than normal entry in €urozone, even before making necessary Reforms, mainly on too many counter-productive cushy-job holders, abusive political lackey's etc., hired by PASOK's nepotism since he 1980ies) have not done what we ought to do" in the Past. "Politicians have all a Responsibility", Daul stressed.
- Both those 2 Concluding key points made by Daul : "move towards more Democratisation", and really raise issues of political "Responsibilities" for what really happened in Past Errors which provoked today's problems, obviously, at least in Greece's concrete case, fit better with Democratic Elections soon enough, as officially scheduled, (Comp. Supra).
(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent earlier to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors. A more elaborated and complete Final Version is due asap).
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Visitors: 63435797Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.
They stressed that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.
They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.
- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.
In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

- The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.
Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.
- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.
- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe. Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.
- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.
EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :
- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.
But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".
- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.
If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel. - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July, but this must be done in full agreement.
- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.
France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy. Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".
- "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel
- "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.
- "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President. If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.
But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.
As for the precise Timing : - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And, then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".
However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.
But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.
There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.
In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.
On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).
It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.
In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.
Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".
Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.
As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".
"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."
Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".

















