english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Brittish Prime Minister Cameron, speaking as CoE's chair, explains refusal of "State Multi-Culti"

Brittish Prime Minister Cameron, speaking as CoE's chair, explains refusal of "State Multi-Culti"

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 25 January 2012

 bfgnhgn_400

*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/- Incoming CoE Chairman (11/2011-5/2012), Brittish Prime Minister David Cameron, replying to MEPs' questions at CoE's PanEuropean Assembly in Strasbourg, gave a definitive and crystal clear confirmation of the main EU Leaders' refusal to admit "Multi-Culturalism"'s divisive effects against European Society's cohesion, reiterating in an even more detailed manner his agreement with German Chancellor Angie Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy on a key Socio-Political issue that some Turkish networks, (including in the recent Past even Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan) had notoriously attempted to exploit in order to keep "their" immigrants in separate, "parallel" groups, socio-culturally cut-off from host EU Countries' History and Culture, instead of integrating it, to the obvious and well known detriment mainly of young Children's learning potential, notoriously risking to provoke "Ghettos" controlled from the ourside by Foreign States, (as some Danish. a.o. Experts had initially warned at CoE's Conferences in Strasbourg, as early as since the 1990ies)..


    - Asked by Azeri MEP Seyidov to "clarify" his "understanding" of the refusal to accept more "Multi-Culturalism", the Brittish Prime Minister referred from the outset to his "Speech in Germany" on 2011, while also praising Britain's "demonstration how you can tackle racism and have people from different cultures and countries living Together", "with full rights and full participation", from "People from all over the world", living inside "a successful multiracial democracy", as he said.


    -  "MultiRacial democracy is .. possible". "I say yes to the building in Britain of a multiracial democracy", and, both "we in Britain", as well as "many of the countries represented here", at CoE's PanEuropean Assembly,  "are showing how it can and should be done", he distinguished. I.e. "Those people who come and live in your country are not just expected to assimilate into your culture: they are bringing something to your country that is going to be different and will benefit you", he acknowledged at first.


    >>> But this goes only if and when "you build something positive together", Cameron stressed, apparently as a central, key condition.


    =>  Thus, launching a strong Criticism of Errors committed by others in the Past, the new Brittish Prime Minister denounced the fact that, "however, ....we have sometimes made Mistakes. ...there was a time when we had an approach that ...as "State Multi-Culturalism", ...almost as if the State were encouraging people from different countries and cultures, instead of trying to Integrate more, and build a new home together"


    - "The State was almost treating them as Separate cultures and entities... . That ...has been a Mistake, ... State Multi-Culturalism has Failed !". "People" "should Not" be "treated" "as representatives of Different Blocs", Cameron denounced.


    - F.ex., referreing to the way in which UK's "Chief Rabbi in Britain (Comp. his earlier replies to "EuroFora"s Questions at EU Parliament) has put it particularly well: we are Not trying to create, he said, a series of Different, Segmented houseS; we should be focusing on a Home that we are Building Together", as he characteristically said, naturally pointing at social and cultural Cohesion.


    => Therefore, "I say No to State MultiCulturalism, that treats people as members of (separate, differend) Groups. We should treat our citizens as Citizens – as individuals with full rights – rather than just thinking that they belong to a Different Bloc", Cameron concluded, widely applauded by many MEPs from various European Countries on this landmark point.

(../..)


***

(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent earlier to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors. A more accurate, complete Final Version may be published asap).

***

1st european sme week 2009

Statistics

Visitors: 2251602

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0218_400_01

(Opinion).

 In Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs, as the New EU Parliament's President, new EU Commission's President (+ probably EU Council's President, EU Foreign Minister, etc) should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies.

At the heart of the biggest EU Countries, in France and Germany, EU Citizens clearly voted for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe based on Values, declared explicitly incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

This main choice was also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries, such as Austria (cf. promise of a Referendum), Spain (cf. EPP program's reservations vis a vis Enlargment), etc., while EPP Parties won also in Poland, Hungary, Cyprus, etc.

In other Countries, whenever Governing coalitions didn't make these choices or eluded them, continuing to let a Turkish lobby push for its entry into the EU, they paid a high price, and risked to damage Europe, by obliging EU Citizens to massively vote for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to offer a possibility to promise  real change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU :

It's for this obvious reason that British UKIP (IndDem) succeeded now (after many statements against Turkey's EU bid) to become Great Britain's 2nd Party, unexpectedly growing bigger even than the Governing Labour Party, as well as the Liberal party  ! Facts prove that it's not an isolated phenomenon : A similar development occured in the Netherlands, where Geert Wilders "Party for Freedom" (PVV) became also the 2nd biggest in the country, (after EPP), boosting the chances of a politician who had withdrawn in 2004 from an older party "because he didn't agree with their position on Turkey". And in several other EU Member Countries, even previously small parties which now focused on a struggle against Turkey's controversial demand to enter in the EU, won much more or even doubled the number of their MEPs (fex. Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, etc).

On the contrary, whenever Socialist and oher parties were explicitly or implicitly for Turkey's controversial EU bid, they obviously lost Citizens' votes and fell down to an unprecedented low.

In consequence, EU Citizens clearly revealed their main political choices, in one way or another : They voted to change for less Bureaucracy, but more Politics and Values in a Europe really open to EU Citizens, but without Turkey's controversial EU bid.

Recent political developments are obviously different from the old political landscape which existed in the Past of 1999-2004, when Socialists based on Turkish 1% vote governed undisputed not only in Germany, but also in the UK, Greece and elsewhere, France followed old policies decided when it had been divided by "cohabitation", before the 3 "NO" to EU  Referenda since May 2005, before Merkel, before Sarkozy, etc.... before the surprises of 7 June 2009 new EU Elections.

If the current candidates to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, OK.

Oherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People.

The beginning of crucial, final Decisions are scheduled for the 1st EU Parliament's plenary session in Strasbourg, in the middle of July, and they could be completed towards the October session, when Lisbon Treaty's fate will have been fixed.


See relevant Facts also at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/2009electionsandturkey.html
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/daulelections.html
http://www.eurofora.net/brief/brief/euroelectionresult.html

 ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.