english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Inicio arrow newsitems arrow Trump claims Win on Election Night based on Many Votes, takes Biden by Surprize, Warns of Fraud

Trump claims Win on Election Night based on Many Votes, takes Biden by Surprize, Warns of Fraud

Escrito por ACM
03.11.20
usa_2020_elec_trumps_midnight_win_announcement_trump_team_video__eurofora_screenshot_400


*Strasboug/Angelo Marcopolo/PARTLY UPDATED)- Embattled US President Don Trump's Sudden Move to Claim Win OverNight, at Crucial 2020 US Elections, pointing at Many Key Votes' Results, while Also Warning against Risks of incoming Fraud, apparently took Former Vice-President Joe Biden's Camp, Initialy by Surprize, so that Responses either Delayed, looked Spasmodic, or Self-Betrayed some Fishy Concrete Situations, to Start with :

In Fact, the Most Surprizing Result of these 2020 USA Elections is that, Despite an UnPrecedented Sabotage of his Presidential Work by 3 Years-Long "Impeachment" Threats with Bogus Claims ; Systematicaly Hostile and Often Slandering Establishment's Medias, (most of which Forgot Press Deontlogy); Oppressive "Social Networks" at the Internet, Notoriously Censoring Trump-Friendly Citizens and/or Politicians, (including Himself); a Scandalously     UnFair and Discriminatory Pre-Electoral Context, (particularly on the Few Public Debates with Biden, who Got much More Free Prime TV Time and far Less Interruptions by Hostile "Moderators", etc: See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/mediadiscriminatetrumpbidendebates.html); even an Infection by the Deadly Virus, (from UnKnown yet Source) in the Middle of the Electoral Campaign, (from which he Recuperated in Record-Time, Aged 73); and Contrary to Fake, but Persistent Establishment's Polls which All (Except from those Excluded from Mainstream RePublication) Claimed that he would Lose, with - 10% Less (sic !), in front of Biden, instead of the current 50 -50%, approximatively ; (etc),

Nevertheless, President Trump Managed to Stimulate the Biggest Ever Popular Participation in USA's Elections, and Succeeded to Keep a Conservative Majority in the Senate, to Strengthen Further Conservatives in the House, and, Most of all, to Gain so Many Votes and/or States himself, that he Could, Now, Revendicate a Win (on Votes and/or Electors) at this Crucial US Presidential Election of 2020 !                                                    

=> In Consequence, the Surprize by Trump's OverNight substantial Statements and Facts, seems to have Shocked the Dems, whose Team Started to React Only Next Morning, (and that, in an Obviously too Nervous way), with Biden reacting Even Later, towards Midday, InCompletely, and Even by Leaking some, apparently, Embarassing, for his Side, Details... (See Infra)...    

- However, Nonobstant a Wider Understanding, involving also Many Medias, to Avoid, as a matter of Principle, any Precisious, Too Early and/or UnSubstantiated Claims about "Winning" the Race, etc., it's Biden, First, who almost Broke that Deal, with an "Electoral Night" Video-Statement : - "We (Dems) are in track to Win !", he Boasted, (But withOut giving any substantial Data to try to prove it, at all).

- On the Contrary, When, Afterwards, OverNight, in ..."The Latest Press Conference I Ever had", as he significantly pointed out, President Trump spoke about "Phenomenal Results", "Success", etc., adding that, "Frankly, We Did Win this Election !", or, rather, -"We Will Win it, and, as far as I'm concerned, We have Already Won it !", this was said Only After having Presented, Earlier, Many relevant Facts as Proof, (See Infra)...

>>> Indeed, - "First of all, "The Citizens of this Country have come out in such Record Numbers, this is something that, Frankly, there has been Nothing like that...", Trump stressed from the outset.

- Particularly in order "To Support our Incredible Movement, Even in States where it wasN't Expected to", he observed.

- - F. ex., "in Florida, we are Winning by a Lot. (Applaud).

- "We Won the Great State of Ohio, we Won Texas, by +700.000 Votes (difference), = (more Applaud), and They (Establishment's Medias) do Not Include it Even in the Tabulations"...

- "We Won Georgia : We are Up by +2,5% and +17.000 Votes, and Only 7% Left. They'll Never Catch us"..., he estimated.

- "Likewise, we've Clearly Won North Carolina : (Applauded), We are Up +1,4% and 77.000 Votes, with Only, Approximately, 5% Left. They Can't Catch us"....

- "We have Also, if you look, a lot of Life in Arizona, and somebody said that it will be a Victory, and this Might be, it's Possible, there are a Lot of Votes there that We Can Get, Because Now it comes into what they wall "Trump Territory", or whatever you call it, this is Friendly Counties, and that Could be OK". .... However, "We doN't even Need it, it's just a State that We Could have, and that would be Nice. There is a Good Possibility, and, indeed, SInce I Saw it First, the Numbers are Changing, just in a Small amount of Hours. So, We Want that, Obviously, to Stay in Play", he Soberly conluded.

+ "But, Most Impôrtantly, We are Winning Pennsylvania (i.e. a currently "Socialist/Liberal" State), by a Tremendous Amount of Votes, (very much Applauded). We are at +690.000 Votes (More) ! This is Not even "Close".... With 64% of the Vote in, it's  gonna be Almost Impossible to Catch... (for Biden). And we are Coming into Good Pennsylvanian Areas, where they happen to Like Your President... So, We'll, Probably, Extend"...

+ Also, "We are Winning at Michigan : Look at the Numbers... I Said "Wow, that's a Lot ! Almost +300.000 Votes (More), and 65% of the Vote is In".

++ "And We are Winning Wisconsin" too...", he hoped.

- "We DoN't Need All of them. We Need ... Because We Won Texas... The Governor called me to Congratulate, and said : - "What's going on ? I've Never Seen something Like this !" (In Magnitude of GOP's Votes).

+++ indeed, "We Won by a +107.000 Votes (more) and 81% of the Vote (in)"

=> -"So, If you take Those 3 States, in particular - And We have All the Others, ... We had such a Big Night, if you Look at All those States that We Won ToNight, and, then, Look at the Kind of Margins with which we Won them by":

- F.ex.: (Looking at his Notes), "Florida was a Tremendous Victory : +377.000";

- "Texas as we said", (Comp. Supra.

-"Ohio, a tremendous State; I love Ohio : We Won with +8,1% by +465.O00, almost +500.000 Votes".

- "In North Carolina we Lead with +76.000 Votes, with almost Nothing Left", (etc).

=> "We were Getting Ready to Win this Election. (And), Frankly, We Did Win this Election ! (Applauded). Now, for the Good of this Nation, We Must Ensure it...", he Urged.

-----------------------------------------

 usa_2020_elec_trumps_midnight_fraud_denonciation_trump_team_video__eurofora_screenshot_400

>>> Because, almost at the Same Time, (i.e. OverNight, from 3 to 4 November 2020), President Trump clearly Warned, Also, of Possible Massive "Fraud", for which Attempts were, apparently, just Starting, right then, (a Fact which Could Explain that Strange Hour, Exceptionaly Chosen for

 - "This is a very Big Moment". And, this is a Sad Moment. This is  a very Sad Moment for me", (Because), this is a Major Fraud on Our Nation !", indeed, he Announced.                                                                   

- "We (Republicans, i.e. Trump), "were Ready to get out and Celebrate something which was so Good...", (Comp. Supra). "We were getting Ready for a Big Celebration... We were Winning Everything !", (Comp. Supra).

- But, "all out of a sudden, it was Called Off.. All of a Sudden, What Happened to the Election ? It's Off... And we had all those Announcements..."

 - "They (Dems, i.e. Biden) Knew that they could Not Win. So, they said..." "A very Sad Group of People is Trying to DesEnfrachise that Group of People" (who "Supported" the GOP), he Denounced. => This is a Fraud on the American Public... This is an Embarassement to our Country !"  

=> - "We woN't stand for it !  (Many Applauds)...  - "Let's go to Court !", Trump Called. -"I Predicted that...", he reminded.  In fact, "We Want a lot to be used in a Proper Manner. So, We are going a lot at the US Supreme Court".

>>> - Because "We Want All Voting to Stop ! We doN't Want them to Find Any kind of Ballots, After 4h o'clock in the Morning, and Add them to the List !", President Trump Urged in real practice, (Speaking almost at such an Imposible Hour)...

-------------------------------

us_elec_bidens_team_briefing_1_after_biden_twitter_video_eurofora_screenshot_400 

+ Biden's Team, Later-on, apparently Upset by Trumps' Earlier Announcement of his initialy Good Results and Late Fraud Warning, Nervously Slandered that as an "Absurd" and "Cynical" "Attack", "Doomed to Fail" (sic !), But, also, Unwillingly Self-Betrayed the Fact that ...he was Probably Right :

- Indeed, they had practicaly Nothing Important to Claim, at This Hour, as alleged "Good Results" for Biden, But Mainly a Speculation on"Pennsylvania" : that some Mysterious "Ballots", "Expected ... To Be Counted these Days" (i.e. Not Yet Used), were (according to their Hopes) "Due to OutNumber What Is Now", from around Tomorrow Afternoon or Evening... (Obviously, one is Wondering What Made them so Sure about their Predictions for the Future, unless...)

+ In Addition, Biden's Team practicaly Raised anOther Question Mark, when they Pompously Claimed that they Had, Already "Prepared", f.ex., "Lawyers, Papers, Staff Training", etc., in order to Face, Nowadays, probable Legal Actions from the Conservatives on this 2020 Presidential Elections' final Results, so that they were "Ready to Go in 1 Hour", as they Characteristicaly Boasted.

=> A subsequent Problem is that, during this Period AFTER the Election Day, when there are, normaly, No More Expensive Collective Meetings to organize, etc, inevitably, one Wonders Why, even Biden himself, Suddenly Felt a Pressing Need to Exceptionaly Publish 3 or 4 Written "Appeals" for ... more "Money" to be "Donated" to his Electoral Campaign's "Fund", during the 4th, 5th and 6th November 2020, [UPDATED] (going Even as far as to Publish Two [2] such Urgent Appeals for Money in just 1 Day : Nov. 5, and at the Same Morning !)...

    >>> Biden Himself does Not give Any clear Explanation for those Repeated Strange Moves for More Funds, After the Election Day, Urgently. But he, Curiously, Claims, at least, that Money would be Needed, even Nowadays, for "Counting" and/or Re-Counting More Ballots... + Even More Strange : in his Latest such "Tweet" Asking for Funds, Biden abuses of an UnHeard of Claim : - Now he sayq that Money would have, Suddenly, become Urgently Needed, Even Long After the Election Day, Because ..."DEMOCRACY is SOMETIMES ...MESSY" (sic !)...

=> What does Biden Mean with that Strange Claim ? What could be "Messy", with a Sudden and Repeated Need of more and more Money, just After a Crucial Election, When he is Focused on "Finding" more and more Late "Ballots" (of Dubious Legality) to "Count" in order to "OutNumber" Trump's UnExpected Initial Lead on Popular Votes ? (Comp. Supra)... Do, Perhaps, such "Findings" ...COST, Now, More than Usual ?...

-- By the way, it's also a Fact that Rep. Senator Graham, who tried, Notoriously, to Help Trump go to the Federal Supreme Court against Fraud in these 2020 US Elections, reportedly Denounced that, currently "Socialist/Liberal"-controlled "Pennsylvania is More CORRUPTED than a SNAKE !" (sic)...

+ And "Socialist/Liberal" former Governor of Illinois (a Neighbour of PA), Blagojevich, (Notoriously convicted for the Scandal of ...Selling Obama's former Senate Constituency there to a New Candidate), when he was Nowadays asked Whether a "Socialist/Liberal" State like Pennsylvania (where he comes from) might, eventualy, Rigg such an Election, reportedly Replied that it was done Often, OverNight, and  - It's as if you are Wondering : - <<Is, Pope, a Catholic ?>>...

------------------------------------

Meanwhile, it's Also at Nearby Michigan (Comp. Supra) that Similar (even if Not Identical) Questions, mutatis-mutandis, about Suspicious "Late" Ballots Suddenly Changing the Initial Course of an Election, were Raised Nowadays :

- Its very Controversial "Socialist/Liberal" Governor reportedly Warned some Establishment's Medias that the Decisive Moment for the Votes in Michigan was Due to Occur Not on the Election-Day of Nov. 3, But, Curiously, Onky during the Next Day, Nov. 4, as Late as around Midday...  

 us_elec_2020_biden_next_day_speech_twitter_video_eurofora_screenshot_400

=> Indeed, Also Biden himself, Observed, Next Day, that his Voters were, Suddenly, "Growing", (After a Nov. 3 Initial Lead by Trump ; Comp. Supra). In fact, "Michingan" has Not Yet, But "Will Complete its Votes Soon", he Curiously Added, on Nov. 4, Midday, (withOut Explaining Why)... Biden went, Even, as Far as to Suggest that this Might Take Longer, Perhaps Extending Also towards Nov. 5 : - "May be, as Early as the Day" (of Nov. 4), or May be Not, he Added.

-------------------------------------------

>>> At any case, one of the Most Fishy Cases, seems to really be that of "Pennsylvania", (Comp. Supra) :

- "I Feel very Good about Pennsylvania", Biden said at his 1st Reaction After the Voing Day, on Nov. 4. - Because ..."All (sic !) the Ballots Remaining to be Counted, were Cast by Mail !", (I.e. the Most Suspected for Fraud, and Denounced by the Conservatives, Already Long Before the Election Starts), he Revealed ...

+ "And We (Dems) are Winning, in the Votes by Mail, with a 78% Margin !" there, Biden boasted.


=> Among the main Obvious Critical Questions Raised, are :

- How did Biden Know that this Late "Rise" was going to be Extended throughout All those "Mail Votes" ?

- And, How did he Know, (in Advance),  that, Suddenly, Dems might, Perhaps, Start to have a So Extra-Ordinary Huge : Precisely "+78% Margin", at All those Late Mail Votes in PA, (i.e. something Around 80% - 20%) ?!...

>>> After the American People, (Surprisingly Overcoming Establishent Medias' Slandering, Web Censorship, an UnFair Electoral Process, Fake "Polls", etc), Gave an UnExpected Initial Lead to Trump, (Comp. Gacts Supra), did Biden's Dems OverReact by Late Fraud ?

 

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

----------------------------------

european sme week (since 2009)

Statistics

Visitantes: 52938420

Archive

Login Form

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Mostrados

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.