

CoE+EU Local Democracy watchdogs CLRAE+COR Heads Whitmore + Bresso to EuroFora on Ukraine Elections

Both CoE's and EU's watchdogs on Local and Regional Democracy, CLRAE and COR's Presidents, Keith Whitmore and Mercedes Bresso, speaking to "EuroFora", stressed the importance for a European Monitoring of Sunday's Elections in Ukraine on the spot, and pointed at its aftermath, in the middle of a fast-moving EU/CoE reform of legal structures, political interests and leaders' choices, whose real stakes will appear only with the results of today's activities in the forthoming few Months, even before Ukraine takes over CoE's rotating Chairmanship from May 2011.
Ukraine is currently involved in Trade and other negotiations with the EU, keeping the aim to progressively advance towards a closer, strategic partnership and/or an EU accession strategy, while also welcoming Russian Prime Minister Putin this week for important deals, and promissing to be a "trustworthy" and "stable" strategic transit country for gas Energy links between Russia and the EU, in the run up to a forthcoming EU - Ukraine Summit later this year.
It's so more important for this EU/CoE check of 2010 Ukranian Local Elections to be efficient, serious; balanced, just and fair, that extremely contrasting Press reports currently go from claims with gross insults against the Ukranian Government, condeming the vote as rigged and undemocratic even before it takes place, up to lenient assurances that almost all will be clean and proper...
Complicating things for Objective Observers, a Turkish lobby's notorious anxiety to find pretexts for a Controversial, too Expensive, too Long, (uselessly zig-zaging far away from Europe), and too Risky (exposed to Conflicts, Kurdish a.o., Earthquakes, Political Blackmails, lack of sufficient Gas, etc), old Pipeline project pompously titled "Nabucco", has an obvious interest for Ukraine's EU - Russia Gas link to be seen as untrustworthy and couldn't really dislike some trouble up there...
--------------------------------------------
It's in the middle of all those "hot" GeoPolitical factors, largely cited by numerous mainstream Media all over the World, from Europe up to the USA and even Australia, etc., that CLRAE's new President, Keith Whitmore, an experienced Brittish Liberal representative from Manchester, gave to "EuroFora" an Interview on several Topical issues, including the forthcoming Ukranian Elections :
- "It's a very Important" Mission for "for the Congress" of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE), stressed from the outset its new President.
- "Ukraine has gone through much Changes, for Democracy, during the recent Years", observed Whitmore.
- "Most were for Progress, but there have been some Backward Steps as well", the experienced Head of CoE's watchdog for Local/Regional Democracy carefully warned.
- "We (CLRAE) have a very distinct Role to make sure that we teach the New Democracies on the track of Democracy : That is very important. "Sometimes we don't give sufficient help to some of the new democracies, to get their democracy to flourish", he added, referring mainly to the former Central-Eastern European Countries, many of whom have become, meanwhile, also EU Members.
- But, keeping for the moment away from directly Political issues, Whitmore prefered to cite an example in needs for "Training" : - "F.ex., in my own country, (the UK), with Local Politicians, we have Local Improvement Agencies, to assist Counsellors in the way they work. But, we don't do that effectively, I think, in some of the New Democracies. I always felt very strongly that we need that kind of Training" : F.ex. - "We need counsellors to speak, to actually put forward what their needs are, and I've seen situations where Counsellors have spoken to Government Ministers, and haven't been able to put forward the case themselves that they need to put. And that kind of training, f.ex. when you have to speak to Ministers, to focus on what you want, particularly when these things are on Negotiation, and the talents (skills) of negotiation, are very important". Therefore, "Yes, I agree", that we (CLRAE) could develop something accross these lines in cooperation with the EU, as "EuroFora" suggested, Whitmore concluded as a matter of a general orientation.
------------------
Keith Whitmore personally has an extensive, recent Experience on Politically "delicate" issues, as former President of CLRAE's "Institutional" Committee, and was the man chosen in 2010 in order to start Monitoring also the obscure but obviously important issue of a large Number of Kurdish elected Mayors and Regional Counsellors (including 2 former CLRAE Members) who were arrested shortly after winning the 2009 Local/Regional Elections in Turkey, closed to Prison since then, and currently prosecuted to Turkish Courts under accusations to allegedly have spoken in favor of "terrorist" organizations, according to some Turkish Officials.
These 2009-2010 exceptional incidents since the latest Turkish Local/Regional Elections coincided with a strange "disappearance" until now from Strasbourg of the then CLRAE President, Yavuz Mildon, (a Turkish politician himself, with firm positions in Political issues, but kind and smiling in personal contacts here, who had succeeded to win a human sympathy from many, including "EuroFora"), after he reportedly faced a sudden problem of "Blood Pressure" in Turkey which apparently left him seriously handicaped.
Meanwhile, under the acting CLRAE Chairmanship by the experienced Chamber of Local Authorities' President, Dr. Jan Micallef from Malta (ChristianDemocrat/EPP), CLRAE had organized 2 Public Hearings in Strasbourg on the on-going Problems for Local/Regional Democracy in Turkey, (but not yet a full Plenary Debate and Vote on a Report with a Resolution, unlike to what is usually done also for all other CoE Member Countries, such as Ukraine, Russia, and many EU States), while Ankara has yet to apply a landmark CoE Resolution adopted by the CLRAE as early as since 1997, and vainly confirmed in a 2007 Strasbourg debate...
Questioned on his 2010 findings after a recent Monitoring Visit in Turkey and a CLRAE Committee Debate held in Belgrade during the Summer behind closed doors, (see relevant "EuroFora"s Publication with the statements Whitmore had given us just before that), Whitmore appeared unusually tight-lipped, at least for the moment : - "I have to speak first with the Turkish Delegation this week in Strasbourg", during CLRAE's Autumn Session. - "I know that there have been many frustrations about this, and there is also the long-standing Kurdish issue, etc., but I think that we'd better Wait and see" what may happen, at least for the moment, he simply told us this time.
---------------------------

Apparently reflecting somehow a GeoPolitical coalition behind Whitmore's election with a large majority as new President of CoE's PanEuropean watchdog for Local and Regional Democracy, after a particularly "hot" competition (See separate DraftNews, already send to "EuroFora"'s Subscribers/Donors), the CLRAE Delegation sent to monitor the Ukrainian Elections this Sunday, is headed by Austrian Gudrun Mosler-Törnström (Socialist), with Rapporteur Nigel Mermagen, from the Chamber of Local authorities, and Speaker for the Regions Doreen Huddart, (both Brittish Liberals). By a coincidence, it's also Brittish Liberal Christopher Newburry, a serious CLRAE Member (See Newburry's earlier statements to "EuroFora" on Citizens' participation and other issues, already sent to Subscribers/Donors), who is reporting this week in CLRAE's Plenary Debates on Russia too.
After holding several High-level meetings scheduled with Ukranian Officials since 29-30/10/2010, the CLRAE Team, (composed of 19 Elected Representatives, cooperating together with 4 Members of EU's Committee of Regions, who had already visited Ukraine earlier this Month for a Pre-electoral check), plans to form 10 separate groups to be deployed in various Cities, meeting with Elected representatives, candidates and NGOs, before observing the Elections on Sunday 31/10/2010, and anouncing its main conclusions in a Press Conference at Kiev on Monday, November 1st.
A Report with a draft Resolution on CLRAE Teams' conclusions is due to be prepared in the following Months in view of a final Public Debate and Vote at CLRAE's next Plenary Session "on March 2011", said to "EuroFora" CLRAE's Head of Communication and International relations/Elections observation, Renate Zikmund from Austria.
----------------------
Recent developments seem to have, meanwhile, augmented CLRAE's relevance in relation to the EU, as indicated to "EuroFora" the new CLRAE's Secretary General, the EU-experienced Andreas Kieffer from Austria :
- "We (CLRAE) have agreed with EU's Committe of Regions to have regular contacts and, in particular, provide them with all our Monitoring Reports on Local and Regional Democracy, f.ex. Election monitoring on the spot, etc", in all CoE Member Countries, including on EU Candidate and/or EU Neighbouring Countries, CLRAE's new Chief Executive Officer told us earlier in Strasbourg.
---------------------------
EU's Committee of Regions' President, Mercedes Bresso, speaking later to "EuroFora" in Strasbourg, confirmed her interest "to cooperate with CoE's CLRAE" and to use, indeed, "CLRAE's Reports on Elections' Monitoring" - "Yes, it is an objective Field of work of the CLRAE, because they have a clear mandate and large experience, she observed.
- "But, often, it's useful that our (EU's COR's) Members participate also directly on the spot", as, f.ex., this time in Ukraine, where EU is sending its own Observers, together with CLRAE's team, the Committe of Region's Chairwoman pointed out to "EuroFora".
The issue might even affect EU's Strategy, since COR's President said to "EuroFora" that Local/Regional Elections' Monitoring, would be included also in a "Forum" she is currently preparing with the incoming Hungarian EU 2011 Chairmanship on EU's "Eastern Strategy in general", including Western Balkans, Ukraine, and other neighbouring countries, scheduled in Budapest before "Spring 2011", (i.e. almost at the same time that CLRAE's is due to hold a public debate and vote on its Report on the Ukranian Elections : See supra).
The Budapest event could also pave the way to the creation of an Eastern Partnership "Assembly, similar to ARLEM" (for the Union for the Mediterranean's area), due to have both a Parliamentarian and a Local/Regional representatives' section, for which already exists an EU Council's official "Mandate", "EuroFora" was told by Bresso.
------------------------------------------

- In the foreseable Future, "we (CLRAE) intend to focus more on CoE's core business, which is Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law", and, therefore, "Monitoring", f.ex. of Elections, and checking "Good Governance" will come at the forefront of CoE's watchdog on Local and Regional Authorities, its new President, Keith Whitmore stressed from the outset, speaking one day later in front of Strasbourg's permanent journalists, including "EuroFora", (Comp. other Whitmore's statements in reply to "EuroFora"'s questions on different issues at this occasion, sent earlier to Subscribers/Donors).
- CLRAE "has a unique role in Monitoring" Local and Regional Democracy, and this should be the "No 1 Priority" of CoE's PanEuropean watchdog. Moreover, a 2009 CLRAE Resolution made it clear that "the Human Rights situation will be examined during the Monitoring of Local/Regional Democracy in any CoE Member Country", stressed during this week's debates CLRAE's Rapporteur on the 2011-2012 Priorities, experienced Dr. Jan Micaleff, former acting CLRAE President, and unfortunate candidate for a fully-fledged Presidential mandate, won by Whitmore after a particularly "hot" competition.

- This is "New", because it implies to "move beyond Standard-setting" only, contrary to the Past, since "our intention is to pay more attention to Human Rights" : Indeed, - "We (CLRAE) have become increasingly aware of the fact that we cannot have real Democracy without Human Rights' respect", because "Human Rights are the sine qua non of Democracy", Micaleff concluded.
Without contesting the overall result of a CLRAE vote largely in favor of Whitmore, backed by the heads of 3 Groups, Micaleff (who got some 35% of votes) and the Heads of the Italian, French and Dutch EPP delegations etc. appeared upset on the alleged circumstances in which he was denied backing from the leadership of his own Group, the largest inside CoE : that of ChristianDemocrats/EPP, (which, despite its name, has 18 Turkish, i.e. ..Muslim Members, compared to only 14 for the Biggest EU Country : the 90 Millions-strong Germany, and only ..4 for France, while an exceptionaly high proportion of CLRAE Members : 33%, are Independents), reportedly because of a previous "Agreement" between Groups on rotation and post sharing, according to a usual practice inside CoE's various bodies, (f.ex. its Parliamentary Assembly, etc), which, however, is not always absolute, (as the election of new CoE's SG, Jagland, proved).
While it might, eventually, have some relevance to CLRAE Monitoring in Countries as f.ex. Turkey, (some Officials of which, had, in the Past, reportedly argued that CLRAE's mandate was limited only into checking Elections and/or Laws, contrary to this "new" 2009 CLRAE development, which explicitly stresses also CoE's general concerns for Human Rights, f.ex. to check if any Local/Regional elected representative faced arbitrary arrest, torture and/or inhuman/degrading treatments, unfair trial, violation of his/her freedom of expression, etc), however, it wasn't yet obvious if that exceptional moment of competition between 2 long-standing CLRAE mainstream politicians, who, as both said, were "Friends" and used to "work together" since 1996, might, eventually have anything to do with the imminent Ukranian Election and its aftermath, or not.
---------------------------
At any case, it's a fact that the most Critical of all vis a vis Ukraine this week in Strasbourg obviously was CoE Assembly's Chair, Mevut Cavusoglu (2010-2011) from Turkey :

- "Ukraine must fulfill is commitments to the CoE", the PanEuropean Organization for Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law, stressed from the outset Cavusoglu, who knows wery well what it really means, considering Turkey's notorious grave violations of Human Rights, International Law, etc...
- "There is no pretext for Ukraine not to go on with more Reforms", since, after the Internationaly Community acknowledged that "the Presidential Elections were fair", "he has a clear Majority in Parliament", he argued.
- Therefore, "the country should take advise of Venice Commission", CoE's watchdog on Constitutional Law and Elections, (which has recently issued also an important Report on what must change in the Turkish Constitution in order to bring it in line with Democratic standards, that Ankara notoriously refuses to follow)...
- Nevertheless, Cavusoglu went on to criticize Ukraine stressing that "Corruption is a Problem", while "there are also other issues", and the "Opposition must be involved", as he asked.
- It's for all those reasons that, "of course, (31 October 2010) Local Elections are a Test for Democracy in Ukraine", he concluded, speaking at CLRAE's Plenary session in Strasbourg, which is currently supposed to be checking the accordance with Democratic principles of the exceptional fact that, in Turkey, most ethnic Kurds elected Mayors and Regional Counsellors were arrested immediately after the 2009 Elections, jailed for 1,5 Year, and currently prosecuted...
PACE's 2010-2011 Chair also condemned "Islamophobia", found "Unacceptable Speaches" in "France" on some issues, stigmatising what he called "Hate Speech", (a pretext often, abused by Turkish and other oppressive Officials in order to muzzle and harass various Political Dissidents, as, f.ex., the Armenian Journalist Hrant Dink murdered on 2007); and called to "implement CoE's Resolutions", (that Ankara notoriously neglects for more than a Decade, particularly on grave Human Rights' violations found by ECHR)...
Cavusoglu went on to denounce "Problems in the Western Balkans", including "in Albania and Bosnia", etc., but found ..."Progress in Turkey", mainly because of a controversial recent Reform on nomination of Judges, strongly denounced by the Opposition, despite a persisting refusal to drop the Highest Threshhold in CoE's 47 Member Countries for representation in Ankara's Parliament, (more than 10 % throughout all Turkey !), regardless of the notoriously persisting (some International NGOs even say : "aggravating") practice of Torture and/or Inhuman/Degrading Treatments, and despite ECHR's September 2010 landmark Judgement's findings, in the famous case of Armenian Journalist Hrant Dink's Murder, that Turkish State Officials "knew" about the Plans to kill, but didn't warn nor protect the Victim, .. prosecuting him, on the contrary, in a joint move together with his future Murderers, who, later-on, appeared (even in Photos) to benefit from scandalous sympathies or complicities amidst some Turkish Officials still persisting until today (2007-2010) to cover up all those who planned and incited the cold-blood brutal killing, (according to ECHR's judgement) ..
----------------------
Ukraine's forthcoming 2011 CoE Presidency "crucial" also for the EU and all Europe, because it will negotiate EU's Accession to the ECHR, avoiding Differend Human Rights' standards in an otherwise separated European continent with a "2 Speeds" Apartheid on Citizens' freedoms...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
However, Ukraine seems particularly important today for the CoE and the EU, not only because of its unique Geopolitical location, its EU - Russia Oil-Gas transit links, its unquestionably European History and Culture, its Airplane and Rocket High-Tech know-how, its Mineral resources (Uranium, etc), its abudant and complementary Agricultural products (wheat, etc. : The real cause of the famous Troye War in Ancient Greek History, because of the control of the Ship routes between Ukraine and the rest of Europe, through the International Straights of Dardanelles), the Ukranian channel to Danube's delta, additional to Romania's Seaport, able to ling Central Asia's Energy Sources, through the Black Sea, to EU's Rhine river Industrial Franco-German a.o. Heartland, etc.

But even more because Ukraine will take over, for the 1st time in History, CoE's Presidency from May to November 2011, and it's precisely during that period, i.e. under Ukranian CoE Chairmanship, that EU is expected to make an Historic Agreement with the CoE on the concrete mecanism which will allow the EU to accede to the PanEuropean Convention of Human Rights, scheduled by EU's Lisbon Treaty which entered into force since December 2009, as CoE's Secretary General, Thornbjorn Jagland revealed :
- Indeed, speaking at CLRAE's Plenary, Jagland anounced that he expects for such a landmark EU - CoE Agreement (on the concrete terms under which EU will accede to the ECHR) to be concluded "before the Summer of Next Year : 2011", (i.e. during Ukraine's forthcoming CoE's Presidency), so that the Ratification process should be completed asap.
- Jagland made it clear that, in fact, it's "a Crucial issue that EU accedes to ECHR, because, otherwise, after EU Lisbon Treaty's Fundamental Rights Charter's recent entry into force (12/2009), this would Risk to develop a Differend case-law on Human Rights by the Luxembourg (EU) and Strasbourg (CoE) Courts, resulting in 2 Differend Levels of Human Rights' respect, Dividing CoE's Countries in 2 Different parts on Human Rights' issues" (for EU Members, and Other Countries) , as he warned.
- That's why "we hope an Agreement before Summer Next Year" ( 2011 : i.e. during the forthcoming Ukranian CoE Presidency), concluded CoE's Secretary General.
---------------------
By a coincidence, it's precisely at the moment and at the exact location where a CLRAE Member was in Dialogue with CoE's SG Jagland on whether and how could be avoided such a Risk to Divide the Continent into 2 areas with Differend Levels of Human Rights' respect, one of CoE's ECHR (threatened to become Lower, extending to Third, Non-EU Countries) and another by EU's European Court of Justice (expected to become Higher, but only for EU Countries), that the Head of Cyprus' Delegation to the CLRAE, former Minister Andreas Christou, was shown by the cameras to take his nearby seat...

This visible fact inevitably triggered a Symbolic "flash" to whoever follows EU/CoE issues, obviously warning also of a similar Risk to push for "Double Standards" among CoE and/or ECHR's practices if they differ too much (according to some Lobbies' notorious interests) between CoE Member States, pressing f.ex. some to respect some Principles, at the same time that others are allowed to grossly violate them.... (Comp. also supra).
F.ex., strongly criticize and threaten Ukraine for this or that error (even if some might be at least partly true, eventually), while at the same time practically closing eyes on Turkey's notoriously grave violations of Human Rights, including on Cyprus' Refugees, "Missing" persons' Families, etc., would be an obvious "Double Standards" stance threatening to put CoE's credibility in danger... Thus, if CoE is really interested into avoiding a Human Rights' Apartheid separating the Continent in 2 Different parts, (as his S.G., Jagland warned : See supra), then, logically, it should also take care for its own Principles for Democracy and Human Rights' Values to be equally applied throughout all its 47 Member States, without any (silent but obvious) exceptions or deviations..
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Visitors: 59727471Archive
Login Form
Other Menu
The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.
They stressed that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.
They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.
- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.
In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

- The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.
Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.
- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.
- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe. Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.
- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.
EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :
- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.
But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".
- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.
If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel. - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July, but this must be done in full agreement.
- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.
France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy. Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".
- "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel
- "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.
- "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President. If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.
But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.
As for the precise Timing : - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And, then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".
However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.
But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.
There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.
In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.
On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).
It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.
In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.
Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".
Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.
As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".
"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."
Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".