newsitems
EU President van Rompoy's d. Spokesman to EuroFora: Mid-Term Election won't affect USA-EU Summit
EU President van Rompoy's d. Spokesman to EuroFora: Mid-Term Election won't affect USA-EU Summit

(Updated) * EU President Herman van Rompoy's deputy Spokesman, Jesus Carmona, replying to "EuroFora"'s Questions on the forthcoming EU - USA Summit in Lisbon (Nov. 20), said that, in principle, it wasn't expected to be influenced by this week's Mid-Term Elections' results in the USA, but didn't exclude a special "mood" concerning US President Barak Obama, (as the American Press had already noted).
However, since the recent Brussels' Summit, (October 28-29), concrete details for EU's position appeared still unclear (See infra), while Turkey was reportedly attempting to use an adjacent NATO Summit in order to provoke some pressure on EU Countries mainly to push aside Ankara's obligations on Cyprus' issue, which was due to be examined, meanwhile, by UNO's Secretary General Ban Ki Moon at another meeting organized at New York on the eve of NATO and EU-USA Summits (Nov. 18).
----------------
- "Do you think that the recent Elections in the USA might have any impact on the (forthcoming) EU - USA Summit, or it doesn't have absolutely anything to do" with that ?", "EuroFora" asked van Rompoy's d. Spokesman.
- "I don't think that the current (U.S.) Elections will have an influence on the Trans-Atlantic Agenda", we are talking about "differend" things, stressed EU President's d. Spokesman, Carmona, in reply.
- This being said, however, "obviously, I also don't know the Mood of (U.S. President) Obama", but "that's something differend", he added, in what might be a reference to Obama's recent notorious statements about his reaction to the results of the US Congress' Elections, largely won by the Republican Party, but also of his call and promise to try to work for "Bi-Partisan" cooperation, as well as to make some "Midcourse Corrections" on certain Policies.
- Usually, "when we are dealing with TransAtlantic relations, (National) Elections have nothing to do with that", Carmona added in conclusion. - "We are not dealing (in Lisbon) with TransAtlantic Elections : Nothing to do with that", he estimated.
This seems close to U.S. State Secretary, former 1st Lady, Hillary Clinton's reported reaction that National "Politics stop at the Borders"....
But U.S. President Obama himself has acknowledged that 2010 Mid-term Elections necessitated certain "corrections" and "adjustments" of US Policy, on which he intends to discuss with the elected Republican leadership. This might iclude, among others, also efforts to make visible "progress" trying to follow the example of Rev. Martin Luther King on upholding Human Dignity and Rights "everywhere", as he added shortly afterwards, i.e. Foreign Policy-related issues.
At any case, inside EU Parliament, whose forthcoming mini-plenary sesssion is due to discuss Next Week the up-coming EU-US Summit's main "Priorities for Cooperation" between the two partners, many MEPs clearly felt that it's important to note that this debate "takes place at an actual political moment after candidates for the US Congress and Senate stood for Mid-Term Elections", as, f.ex., the largest Group, that of the European People's Party, observed.
---------------------------------------
But if Obama really wants to start "cooperating" with the 2010 winner GOP, it seems difficult, this time, to satisfy all Turkey's desiderata, after a systematic, virulent slandering attacked personaly Republican candidates with an unprecedented blatant Interference by a Turkish Media called "The young Turks" inside USA's National politics, which constantly tried to ridiculize the American "Republican Party", the "so-called Christians", (as they named American People's values movement), even "the Bible", harassing them with Personal Attacks, gross insults, etc.... There is no other Foreign Country or Ethnic Group, not even the biggest ; f.ex. Russia, China, India, Brazil, South Africa, Australia, Canada, etc, or the E.U. , which ever dared interfere so shamefully and systematically in the internal affairs of the U.S., spending money in R-TV studios, staff, etc, to launch attacks against American Politicians under a Foreign Ethnic Banner.
Turkish Media's personal attacks against USA politicians, particularly Republicans, and mainly against American values' popular movements, extended even to the detriment of the topical issue of "BiPartisan Cooperation" between GOP and Obama after the 2010 Mid-Term Election, (which inevitably touches also upon Foreign Policy, including EU - USA relations), by slandering a leader of GOP's new Majority in the House of Representatives, John Boehner, taxing him as an "Hypocrit" (sic !). This came in addition to Moral Values, Cultural Identity, immigrants' Integration, a.o. issues that the Turkish lobby also ferociously attacked during the latest Elections, (apparently not only failing to convince, but also ...stimulating People to vote against its gross propaganda, as results showed)...
---
Despite Republicans' win of a Majority in the US House of Representatives and at least 6 Senators more, as well as most States' Governors, etc. in the 2010 Mid-Term Elections, however, Polls reportedly showed that Obama remains largely popular inside his Democratic Party followers, and could even be re-elected on 2012 if he faced McCain-chosen former GOP vice-Presidential candidate Shara Palin, with 52% against 44%.
But if the Republicans' 2012 Presidential nominate was former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, the 2007-2008 revelation of GOP's Primaries who ended 2nd after succeeding to lead a hard race at the 1st place even without any Money to spend, then, he would clearly win with the same large margin of 52% against only 44% for Obama, the same CNN Poll revealed. No 3 of the 2008 race, Millionaire Mite Romney might also win v. Obama, but with - 3% less (only 50 to 45 %), the poll found. Another possible 2012 contenter is former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Huckabee, (who cultivates a "Charismatic" personality, as Obama did, and is also a former Priest), has insisted much more on "Soft Power" than on Military alone, and on "how to win Hearts and Minds" of the People, both inside America and Worldwide. In his biggest text on Foreign Policy, he had focused also on the need to fight against threats to expand violent Islamist extremism. Most important : He has notoriously close links with the 2010 Mid-Term Elections' winner popular movement composed of "Tea party", "Citizens United", "Families for Values," a.o. grassroots Citizens' groups, which mushroomed and developped further mainly after 2008, and he is also traditionally open for National and General Interest compromises and selective cooperation with current U.S. President Obama, as he has already declared.
Sometimes, concrete "details" might be important : - "A Pew Research Center/National Journal poll released Oct. 25 found majority approval of .... GOP agenda item.. (on) allowing more Oil and Gas Drilling off US Shores", CSM reported. This obviously could mean a lesser U.S. need to insist on far away Oil/Gas issues, located f.ex. in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, etc, and related Foreign Policy matters, (including, f.ex. a controversial, too costly, too dangerous, and rather ...empty gas pipeline zig-zaguing through Turkey), diminishing, in Future, Washington D.C.'s Past pressure on European and other allies to swallow, at any price (be it Financial, Political and/or Moral : i.e. on Human Rights, etc) the desiderata f.ex. of an eventually transit State as Turkey, etc...
Meanwhile, according to the Turkish Press, "Secret" bargaining was allegedly pushed via EU Commissioner on Enlargment Fule, in order to press for more Chapters to be opened in EU - Turkey negotiations, despite Ankara's persisting refusal to comply with its obligation to stop discriminating EU Member Cyprus' related Ships and Airplanes, contrary to EU Summits' repeated, crystal-clear calls all these years (2005 - 2010), as well as to prevent pre-existing and/or new EU Countries' Governments from raising any problematic issue which might affect EU - Turkey negotiations' already slowed pace, (or the huge sum approaching 1 Billion € that EU Taxpayers, including Poor People via VAT, are paying to Turkey each year, instead of investing in EU High-Tech RST and other EU Productivity enhancing assets, even during the present times of hard Financial "Cuts" in all EU Countries).
The reported Turkish lobby's concern might go, in particular, not only for France, Germany, Cyprus, maybe Greece and/or Austria, etc., particularly after the June 2009 EU Parliament Elections' issues, but also for New, center-right Majority Governments which have recently won National Elections in several EU Countries during 2009-2010 with a more Critical Agenda, apparently more conscious of the Economic, Education, Cultural/Historic Identity, Human Rights, GeoPolitical, a.o. issues notoriously raised by Turkey's controversial and impopular EU bid, (f.ex. Hungary : 1/2011 EU Chair, Belgium : current EU chair, Holland, Slovakia, Latvia, Bulgaria, etc., while also critical political oppositions were growing even in the UK, Greece, Austria, Sweden, etc).
- According to Brittish "Socialist" Newspaper "The Guardian", Turkish "Deep State"'s usual mouthpiece, Hurriyet, reportedly revealed that Ankara would attempt to exploit the Missile Defense plans "to its advantage" by opposing them unless USA "increased American pressure on France and Germany to unfreeze Turkey's E.U. membership bid". "Washington thought about that too, and that's why one of the Top Agenda items in the U.S.-E.U. summit, ...right after the NATO summit, is going to be Turkey's E.U. Membership" impopular demand, it warned.
Turkey had notoriously blocked for more than a day NATO's 60th Anniversary Summit, on April 2009 in Strasbourg (See "EuroFora"'s Newsreports from the event), refusing the election of its new Secretary General, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen, by demands against the Press Freedom of a Kurdish R-TV accused by Ankara to support Violent Separatism, asking a job for a Turkish Official, and other NATO concessions...
--------------------
A usually interlinked issue notoriously is Turkey's Veto against almost any kind of EU - NATO cooperation involving all EU Member Countries, including Cyprus, that Ankara still refuses to recognize, despite a long-standing and crystal-clear, official call by EU Heads of State and Government to normalize its relations with the Cypriot Government, officially launched as early as since September 2005 already, confirmed and reiterated several times by EU Summits since then, and expected (according to reported leakages the Turkish Press itself) to be anew stressed in the forthcoming EU Commission's 2010 Annual Report on Turkey's efforts to meet the European Standards, due to be published next week on Tuesday, November 9.
- "Cyprus' issue is one of the most important priorities because it has a wide impact also on EU - NATO relations, from Kosovo up to Afghanistan", characteristically claimed the experienced Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, in reply to an "EuroFora" co-founder's question when he had the responsibility to chair CoE and EU successively during the same year (2008), speaking at a CoE Committee of Ministers' Press Conference in Strasbourg.
German Chancellor Angie Merkel has also pointed out that a solution needs to be found in this issue, long before she anounced, recently, (after UNO's vote, on October, for Germany to become a Security Council's new Member for 2011 and 2012), her intention to "visit Cyprus from January 2011".
Merkel's 2011 official visit to Cyprus is naturally important, because of Germany's obvious influence on EU issues, particularly augmented thanks to the recently confirmed close personal and political links with French President Nicolas Sarkozy in the famous Franco-German EU "motor", (France being already present at UNO's SC as one of the 5 permanent members, so that during 2011 - 2012 Paris and Berlin will be able to work together also inside the New York - based International
Organization), and considering UNO's recent vote for Germany's entry inside the S.C.
The last Merkel's visit in Cyprus was focused only on another, differend aspect of the Strategic EU Member island : that of Germany's leading role on the EU's Maritime force destinated to Monitor Libanon's SeaCoasts vis a vis Israel, (which was hosted in Cyprus' Pafos Seaport, etc), after a UNO's 2006 Decision, taken in order to avoid any more Libano - Israeli border conflicts, gave a Monitoring mandate including to an International Terrestrial Peace-keeping mission initially headed by France.
But, even before Merkel's forthcoming 2011 visit to Cyprus, UNO's Secretary General, Ban Ki Moon, reportedly invited both Cyprus' President Demetres Christofias, and the Leader of the Turkish Cypriot Community (living in the Northern Territories of Cyprus' Occupied by Ankara's Military), Dervis Eroglu, currently engaged in on-going inter-communal talks) to come and meet him at New York on the 18th of November 2010, shortly after UN Chief's relevant statements made in reply to "EuroFora"s questions at his October Press Conference in EU Parliament in Strasbourg (See : .... ).
Turkey, in a Contradictory move, reportedly claimed to be anxious for a kind of settlement, after notoriously draging its feet for Decades on Cyprus' Political and/or Human Rights' issues since the 1974 invasion/occupation of the island's Northern part, to the point that Ankara had even backed a Turkish Cypriot leader's blunt ...refusal to participate in a High Level New York meeting, droping invitations by f. UNO's Secretary General Koffi Annan to start Talks for Cyprus' ReUnification on the basis of UNO Security Council Resolutions, on September 12, 2001 : It's only by exploiting the coincidence of the blockade of Airplane flights, provoked by the 9/11 Barbaric Terrorist Attacks' mass killings, that Turkey avoided EU reactions then... During more than 35 Years since the 1974 Turkish Military Invasion and Occupation of Cyprus' northern part, Ankara didn't ever accept any UN proposal, with the only exception of a Controversial 5th version of a Draft Plan for a Cyprus' Deal which had been prepared (without EU presence, except briefly at the end) mainly by a "Socialist" Brittish UN Official, speaking Turkish but not Greek, with some strange personal links on GeoPolitics and Economy, who was dismissed by Annan after this Draft's failure, on 2005, (and replaced by a UN Official which had monitored Appartheid's End in South Africa : Ismail Gabari, that he appointed UN undersecretary general for Political affairs : See his statements to "EuroFora"'s co-founder, September 2005 at New York). But, on mid-2010, the Turkish side reportedly provoked a "Deadlock", by asking Excessive Derogations against< Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their Family Homes and Ancestral Land, and to restore or compensate their Private Properties, as well as for a long foreign Military presence, a Separation of the Country's Natural Resources, etc., stressing a "2 States" Agenda instead of the Official UNO' aim to focus on Cyprus' ReUnification.
Thus, Ankara's alleged sudden hurry, might just be a reaction probably made under EU indirect pressure and repeated calls for Ankara to fullfil, at last, the Commitments it has undertaken to stop Discrimination against Cyprus since 2005, (when it started Negotiations with the EU), but notoriously failed to meet until the December 2009 initial Deadline, and still refuses to honor even towards 2010's end, while in 2012 Cyprus is due to take over EU's rotating Chairmanship...
---------------------
- Questioned by "EuroFora" about details on "EU's position in the forthcoming Summit with the USA", van Rompoy's d. Spokesman Jesus Carmona acknowledged that it had not been made "known" in public "exactly", and offered to "call back" later on, after checking carefully, so that he "might be able to help" with some concrete info.
According to the tight-lipped official "Conclusions" of the October 28 - 29 Brussels' European Council, the 27 Heads of State/Government simply "exchanged views" and "discussed" the "key political messages" that Van Rompoy, together with Barroso, "will promote" in the EU - USA Summit, as the text says.
But it wasn't clear after Brussels' Summit what "exactly" would do the Heads of State/Government of the biggest EU Countries, considering also that the forthcoming NATO and EU - USA Summits, following eachother in just a few Hours' short distance on November 19 and 20 in Lisbon, (Portugal), are notoriously due to focus largely also on Security - Defense and Politically related issues, which are mainly at the hands of sovereign States, (as f.ex. U.K. - France Summit between Brittish Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Nicolas Sarkozy highlighted, particularly on Defense Industry and High-Tech matters, in their joint Press Conference in London).
--------------------------
+ Another issue which might, eventually, be evoked at the EU - USA Summit could be the EU - US Data Protection Agreement, that EU Parliament will discuss next week, while EU is reportedly prearing negotiations on airplanes' Passenger Name Reports with the US, Canada and Australia, where MEPs, starting to use new powers given by Lisbon Treaty, reportedly want to "remind .. the Principles ..to keep in mind during the Talks" and to "be fully informed on ..developments".
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Visitors: 62653843Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.
For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :
- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.

- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties", he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
At any case, "we (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.
- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"
- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
- "EuroLeft and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"
- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."
- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.

Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :
- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.
But, many Facts indicate the contrary :
Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).
During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side : Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.
The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).
Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.
"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.
So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.
To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...
Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of representative Democracy a topical meaning :
- "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.
Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".
- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.
-

















