english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Romanian Popular Referendum for Natural Family, (defined as ECHR's Article 12: for Men+Women)

Romanian Popular Referendum for Natural Family, (defined as ECHR's Article 12: for Men+Women)

Written by ACM
Saturday, 06 October 2018
romania_flag__eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/-
Surprizingly, it's even Years After controversial former US President Barack Hussein Obama's notorious Pressure to Impose UnPopular "Same Sex Marriages" between Homosexuals, Submitting to their "Power" even Children under pretext of so-called "Adoption", that Countries such as Romania a.o. still feel, Nowadays, the Need to SafeGuard Natural Family, by organizing a Referendum to clarify in their Constitution, a Definition of Marriage similar to that of Article 12, of the PanEuropean Convention on Human Rights, which Recognizes to "Men and Women" a "Right to Marry and found a Family", already, since Half a Century ago.


This is the main object of the Popular Referendum opened to Vote during this Week-End, (October 6 and 7, 2018), by Romania's 20 Millions Citizens, thanks to a People's "Initiative" dating from 2015, which Succeeded to Gather 6 Times More Supporters than needed, (instead of just 500.000, it was Signed by 3 Millions on 2016 !), and to be, in Addition, Endorsed Both by the Parliament and the Senate of the Country, (with 232 Votes against only 22,  and 107 against only 13, respectively, on 2017 and 2018).


Curiously, However, its Opponents have Claimed that such a Popular Referendum would be ..."Against Europe (sic !)", (as a Strange Article by a Romanian Author argued in Liberal German Newspaper "Zeit"), and, particularly, that it was against "LGBTI Rights", (according several NGOs, mainly Backed by Controversial Multi-Millionaire Soros, etc).


Both seem Unable to explain the Fact that this Popular Referendum simply Reproduces the ECHR's Original Text on Men and Women's Right to Marry and found a Family, witOut adding Homosexuals there, (Comp. Supra, and See also Infra)...


----------------


All the (manifold) Parties located at the Right Side of the Political Spectrum support this Popular Referendum, Joined by an Historic, later Marginalized, but Recently slowly ReGaining Force "Ecologic" Party, as well as even a Part of the ..."Socialist" Party, (something that former Long-Time President of Romania, Trajan Basescu, pointed out as a "Paradox").


Opposed (or, rather, "Boycotting") are a Minor, openly "Technocratic" Party, added to a Split of atypical "Greens", curiously very "Liberal/Private Economy"-minded, and looking more and more as an Appendix of "LGBTI" Lobbies, and a Recent Part of a (much Wider than that) Anti-Corruption Movement, with Exceptionaly Shaky Leaders who have all Failed to Stay at least One (1) Year in the job (sic !).


"Neutral" reportedly is a Part of some Long-Time "Liberals", who Recently turned their coats towards the "EPP" Group in EU bodies, but wihOut adhering to the ChristianDemocrats' traditional BioEthical Values, (etc).


------------------------------


However, a Strange Feeling of possible Ambiant Hypocrisy, at least from Some sectors and/or Parties, (Comp. Supra), Might, Perhaps, explain the Fact that this Popular Referebdum's Date of Vote was, astonishingly, Postponed, Belied, and, Later anew Modified, too Many Times in a row : F.ex., initially foreseen on Fall 2017, it was Changed for May 2018, Later Moved to June 2018, Afterwards on September 2018, and Now on October 2018...


+ In Addition, this Latest chosen Date, astonishingly Coincides with an EU Parliament's Debate Criticizing the current State of Law in Romania, (last Wednesday Morning in Strasbourg), on which, a more or less "Hot" Resolution was, curiously, left for Vote only Later-on, i.e. at the Next Session of EU Parliament, towards the End of October, scheduled for just AFTER that Referendum... (Almost at the Same Moment that anOther, even more Crucial Resolution, by CoE's PanEuropean Assembly, related to Russia's Membership, was Curiously entrusted as Rapporteur to a Notorious pro-LGBTI Technocrat, working on Artificial and other Reproductions of Human Beings, from the "Socialist" Group, Next Week in Strasbourg - i.e. just Before the Final Vote, Later in EU Parliament, on the Referendum for Romania - traditionally Linked to Neighbouring Countries and Russia itself also through Orthodox a.o. Christian Networks Backing that Referendum).


----------------------


More Serious is the Fact that its (Open or Disguised) Critics, here even more than elsewhere, Attempt to Evade the Main Substance of the Key Issues at Stake, and, particularly, that what is Really the Matter,


- is Not Homosexuals' Individual Liberty in their own Private Life, (since they are Free to have any Sexual Life they might want, and might, even, perhaps, form some kind of "Personal Unions" for Practical Issues, etc),


- But rather the Risk for Many Thousands of Homosexual "Couples" to become Easy Prey and slyly "Trapped" by a Lobby of Shady Technocrats, who could Exploit the LGBTI Community's InCapacity for Natural Births, (since they are Not Fertile), in order to "Use" them as a "Proxy" Group of Interest secretly Manipulated Against Natural Births of Human Beings, Pushing them, instead, in favour of various Artificial Tehniques for ProCreation, (f.ex. Artificial Reproductive Technology, In Vitro Fertilisations, Artificial Inseminations, Pre-Natal Tests, Creation of SuperNumerary Embryos, Human Embryos' Genetic Manipulations, "Banks" of Frozen Embryos, Sperms and/or Ovaries, Artificial Wombs, Surrogate "Mothers", New "Gene-Editing" Technologies, etc), provoking obvious Dangers for Humankind !

I.e. what is really at Stake in such kind of Topical BioEthical Issues is, in Fact, so Important, that Adversaries of Natural Human Family and Natural Births don't Dare Oppose it Oppenly, but Rather Try to Abuse of InDirect Methods to Undermine that : F.ex., here, they reportedly Push to Lower the percentage of Popular Participation to that Romanian Referendum's Votes under the Crucial Threshhold of 30%, (even if about 90% of Voters appear to be Supporting that BioEthical Referendum, according to Polls).

Will the Romanian People let a Shady Minority Lobby Block Democracy in such a Serious BioEthical Issue of Nowadays Society, with manifold Crucial Reperscussions on Humankind's foreseable Future (Comp. Supra) ?


(../..)


------------------------------------------------
StartUpEU

Statistics

Visitors: 37753669

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 bisky_center_400
 

Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.

For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :  

- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.

imag0025_400_01

- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties",  he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
 
At any case,  "we  (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.

- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"           

- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
                                                                                                                                                                        
- "EuroLeft  and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"

- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."

- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.

imag0935_400

Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :

- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.

But, many Facts indicate the contrary :

Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).

During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side :  Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.

The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).

Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.

"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.  

So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.

To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...

Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of  representative Democracy a topical meaning :

 - "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.

Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".

- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.

***





-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.