english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Accueil arrow newsitems arrow EU Parliament President Buzek to EuroFora on Zacharov Prize: Free Speech Condition on Cuba + Turkey+

EU Parliament President Buzek to EuroFora on Zacharov Prize: Free Speech Condition on Cuba + Turkey+

Ecrit par ACM
Wednesday, 15 December 2010
20101223_23_55_20_400

EU should respect the same Principle of putting Free Speech Conditions on Economic Aid to 3rd Countries, as in Cuba also in Turkey, etc. and anywhere else in the World it was needed, including in, or close to Europe, replied in substance EU Parliament's President, Jerzy Buzek, to "EuroFora" questions after the Zakharov Prize for Freedom of Speech was attributed to Cuban dissident Guillermo Farinas, who could only send a written message or speak by phone, but was not allowed by the Cuban Authorities to come to Strasbourg for reasons that they didn't explain, leaving without any reply Buzek's letter to Castro, as he told us.


The move came timely, while EU reportedly prepares to review its economic a.o. relations to Cuba, shortly after both EU Commission's 2010 Annual Report and EU Parliament's Rapporteur on Turkey,  Dutch EPP MEP Ria Oomens-Rujten, slammed Turkey for failing to respect Freedom of Speech by restricting it too much, harassing dissidents, prosecuting them and/or throwing them in prison,  while they also face various other pressure or even aggressions etc, and European Court of Human Rights has recently condemned Ankara, this Autumn 2010, for the way it misbehaves in the landmark case of the cold-blood Murder of Armenian Journalist Hrant Dink, (See "EuroFora"'s NewsReport dated 14/9/2010).

---------------

Farinas, a critical Cyber-Journalist at the WWW who has also launched more or less succesful Hunger Strikes asking to free prisoners considered to be political twice in the Past, including in early 2010, was only able to phone and send a text to EU Parliament in Strasbourg, where he was hindered to come for the award of Zakharov Prize, reportedly because he didn't yet receive a Visa from Cuban Authorities (who reportedly have accused him to be a USA-paid agent, while he admitted just to be co-financed by anti-castrists) to travel to France, urging MEPs to keep tight Economic Sanctions against the Cuban regime, (that USA would be ready to partially ease), which is due to hold in 2011 an exceptionally important Congress on the Strategy to follow after its 50th Anniversary.   
---------------

pe_zakharov_prize_buzek_points_at_agg.._400

- After EU Parliament's President noded personaly rowards "EuroFora" in his Press Conference for the award of the 2010 Zakharov Prize on Freedom of Speech, in a 1st Question, given "the Fact that the winner of (2010) Zakharov Prize is not here", in Strasbourg, to receive it, and that, despite "recent Insufficient Movements (in Cuba) to liberate some out of (52) Prisoners, with the intermediation of the (Christian catholic) Church", he had "said that there are still 11 that remain (in jail)",  we asked him if, at least, he "had got any Reply, direct or indirect, to (his) Letter (to Cuban Authorities), explaining what might be the Pretext for not giving him the Freedom to come here, and what is now the Situation about the rest of the Prisoners. Or didn't you receive nothing, not any Reply ?"


+ Moreover, considering that this "Prize of Freedom of Speech" is "for the Year" 2010,  "during which we had also some Judgements of the ECHR, about other Countries, which are related" to issues of Oppression against Free Speech, "EuroFora" sincerely felt that, " to be Honest, we should do our Duty and try to raise" equally "a 2nd Question .. about such" issues, which "is also Topical" :

pe_zakharov_agg_freedom_of_thought_should_be_defended_everywhere_400

- During this same year, 2010 "there was a Judgement of the ECHR on September", "about the well known issue of Freedom of Speech and Life of Armenian Journalist Hrant Dink who was murdered in Turkey", "condemning the fact that No sufficient measures were taken to find out all those who instigated and were really Responsible for the Murder, or accomplices, nor to ensure that they will be all really Punished for that" case of Brutal Killing of a Journalist, "which is closer to us" (EU), given Turkey's controversial and impopular EU accession bid.

pe_zakharov_buzek_hearing_agg_1st_quest_400

=> "Don't you think, Mr. President, that, as a matter of general Principle, Freedom of Thought should be defended" by the EU, in the same way, "EVERYWHERE, f.ex. in  Cuba, Turkey, Russia, France, Germany,  etc., considering even matters which are still going on at this moment that we are speaking ?", we asked Buzek in conclusion.
-------------------------


- Buzek revealed, in reply to "EuroFora"s "1st Question", that he "did not receive any Answer" to his Letter towards Cuban Authorities, which had asked for Farinas to be allowed to visit EU Parliament in Strasbourg for the Zakharov Prize award.


- At least, "it was a fortune that we (EU Parliament) could contact  our Laureat, Guillermo Farinas, and to have something so important for us, like that short Speech (for this occasion", he added.

imag0259_2_400

- "We (EU) have to place Conditions to our (EU's) openess ..., we (EU) can't be Unconditionally Open... ". "Wherever there is an Improvement on Human Rights and the Rule of Law, then, there are better Trade Relations and closer Cooperation as a result, F.ex. Visas ...granted, etc". "We (EU) have to be clear about what our position is". "This is an important Signal" to be "sent". "EU and other "Democratic Countries took a Similar approach", "just like" that, "with other ....Countries in the Past", f.ex. in the case of "(former) Central-Eastern European Countries", Buzek reminded earlier, as a matter of Principle.


- "I have no doubt that it's the case" also for Cuba, he replied previously to another Journalist's question, who observed that, f.ex., "Farinas raised 5 Conditions". -"Without Permanent Trade and Contacts with Wealthy, Democratic Countries it's very Difficult for Cuba to cope in the current Economic Situation", because "Cuba has Economic Difficulties". Thus, "the Cuban Authorities need to Open up to the World, and they need to loosen up, in a Democratic Direction, inside the Country", Buzek concluded in this particular example.

+ Thus, concerning "the last, 2nd Question" by "EuroFora", on the comparison with recent ECHR findings on Turkey, and the Principle that respect of basic Human Rights as Free Speech should be a condition in all EU's Economic Aid to any Country, etc., (See supra + infra), Buzek strongly stressed from the outset that he agreed with us :

b_400

- "I can answer you very shortly : - "Yes !"", EU Parliament's President replied to this "EuroFora"s observation,  (See supra). - "Human Rights should be object of such action by the EU also" elsewhere, he stressed.


 - "And you have also Independent Institutions which are taking care about such issues", both in and out the EU, Buzek  added, apparently pointing at NGO's, Courts, etc.
------------------------------
    Precisely, ECHR strongly condemned Turkey this Autumn 2010 for grossly violating Freedom of Speech and the Human Right to Life in the case of the cold-blood Murder of Armenian Journalist Hrant Dink, denouncing an impressive series of misgievings, including, f. ex. the fact that, even if Turkish Authorities knew about Plans to kill him, they didn't protect him at all, but on the contrary ...prosecuted the victim, together with those who had planned his murder (!), and afterwards, until now (2010), dragged their feet, didn't really try to make any efficient Enquiry to search and find all those Responsible for instigating, planning and executing the Murder, even covered up apparent complicities at various levels, or provocative sympathy to the suspected Murderer (even of Turkish Policemen notoriously photographed lauphing together with the No 1 suspected Killer under extremist banners !), practically leaving until now totally Unpunished even several Turkish Officers who had failed to accomplish their Duty, by "stopping", "rejecting" or Time-barring "all procedures" which raised questions on their Responsibilities, while even "Suspicions that a Turkish Police's Chief would have revealed his own UltraNationalistic views and supported the suspected Killers", "were not seriously investigated", as EuroJudges found...
-------------------------
    Another Strasbourg-based Organisation, CoE's Secretary General, Thornbjorn Jagland (Norway), was also obliged to officially award another Prize in the absence of the recipient a few days earlier, concerning the Nobel Prize attributed to dissident Liu Xiaobo of China.   


    In the case of 2 other Cuban dissidents also awarded EU Parliament's Zacharov prize in the Past, and dissident Oswaldo Paya (2002),  and "Damas in Blanco" (the Ladies in White), wifes and family relatives of prisoners (2005), Paya could come, while the women's group was only alowed to visit EU Parliament 2 Years later. - "I hope for Farinas it will be shorter",  Buzek concluded in reply to another Journalist afterwards in the same Press Conference, after pointing at a "Cuban Flag" that he had placed at the empty chair.


    On Turkey, only one (1) Dissident, former MP Leyla Zana, was awarded the Zacharov prize, back in 1995, but she was also hindered to come then to Strasbourg, as she was still imprisoned in Turkish Jails, from which her Husband had just walked out, after being Prisoner for more than 15 Years. Zana finished her jail term later on, but her Son was reportedly also targetted by Turkish Authorities pushing to arrest and jail him under various accusations recently, while even herself faced anew threats, harassment, accusations, and prosecutions, even before Hundrends of recently Elected pro-Kurdish Minority's Mayors and Regional counselors were massively arrested in 2009 and most still kept in Prison today, persecuted by Turkish Courts who only started to judge them recently, almost 2 Years after arresting them practicaly the day after the were elected...
--------------------
    The main point for EU and its Citizens obviously is that, whatever Cuba's misgivings might be, at least, Havana is not claiming, as Turkey does, to be paid nearly a Billion € from EU Funds each year, nor asks to enter inside the EU (bringing at the Heart of Europe a Risky climate of Impunity and even several dangerous unpunished Criminals : Comp. supra for ECHRs findings on Turkey) , contrary to what Ankara's controversial and impopular EU bid claims. So that EU standards on respecting basic Human Rights as Freedom of Speech should normally be more elevated, concerning "candidate" and neighbouring Turkey, than far away Cuba, and, at any case, certainly not lower...


    Thus, several MEPs from various EU Member Countries had already asked, if not to stop EU - Turkey controversial "Open-ended" Negotiations, at least to drop, freeze or suspend, all or at least a part of EU's Funding (more than 800 Millions €, almost a Billion €, each Year,  even during the current Global Financial Crisis, when EU Citizens and EU itself face severe Cuts) given to Turkish Authorities who blatantly disrespect Human Rights, Democracy and/or Rule of Law, including, f.e. such mainstream MEPs of the Governing Majority in Germany, ChristianDemocrat MEPs Ingeborg Graessle and Monika Hohlmeier, who have already tabled relevant Amendments on the occasion of Critical observations on Turkey by the EU Court of Auditors, and would intend to repeat that again until it succeeds to attract a Majority of votes in EU Parliament, as they earlier told "EuroFora".

agg_lamassoure_lewandovski_zakharov_prize_on_free_speech_400

    Something that might eventually interest also, not only the President of EU Parliament's Budget Committee, French MEP and former EU Minister Alain Lamassoure, but also EU Commissioner in charge of Budgets, Lewandovski from Poland, a strong supporter of EU Cohesion funding for EU Citizens, notoriously threatened by current fund Cuts' prospects, who, by a Symbolic coincidence, were this week filmed and published by EbsTV while speaking to "EuroFora" right in front of a huge placard on EU Parliament's Zacharov Prize for Freedom of Speech...  (See Photo)
-------------------------------------------

farinas_on_phone_christmas_tree_home_speaks_on_ep_prize_same_day_400


    But, while the Cuban Government didn't give yet any reply to EU Parliament's President, Jerzy Buzek's letter on Farinas' freedom to travel, as he revealed in reply to "EuroFora"s question (see supra), on the contrary, the Turkish Authorities, after vain, bellied promisses, found a crystal-clear way to "reply" to ECHR's condemnation for practically covering-up, until 2010, with scandalous Impunity almost all of those involved, in one way or another,  in the instigation, preparation, execution and/or cover up of the real complicities to the cold-blood Murder of Armenian Journalist Hrant Dink :

hrant_dink_murdered_400 

- Shortly after ECHR's judgement was published on Autumn 2010, Turkish courts reportedly have just scandalized even a part of the Turkish Press by recently deciding to treat the only arrested suspect as a .. "Kid", i.e. so that he could any way be released free after only a few years... That recent Turkish move obviously abuses of tactics which have already been denounced, f.ex. on recent Killings of Religious persons in Turkey, to stop enquiries, by merely designating a young man as if he was alone to blame, and afterwards qualify him as a "child", f.ex. when he's aged 17 or so, as a pretext to release him soon free, so that those really responsible for the murders remain hidden in Impunity...

hrant_dink_family_400 

***
european sme week (since 2009)

Statistics

Visiteurrs: 56807900

Archive

Login Form





Se souvenir de moi

Perdu votre mot de passe?
Pas encore de compte? Enregistrez-vous

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Résultats

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.