english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Prime Minister Sanader to EuroFora on Croatia in EU/CoE Energy plans for Sea-River Transport

Prime Minister Sanader to EuroFora on Croatia in EU/CoE Energy plans for Sea-River Transport

Written by ACM
Thursday, 05 February 2009

croatia_map_400_01

Prime Minister of Croatia, Ivo Sanader, speaking to "EuroFora" at the conclusion of his visit to EU Parliament, which just voted on "EU's Energy Strategy" strongly supporting Liquefied Gas and Sea-River Ship Transport, at the same time with an even more specific Motion by PACE's MEPs, revealed that he is discussing with EU Commission Zagreb's contribution to EU Energy policy, where "Ships are important".

Croatia will bring into the EU another part of Danube river, which crosses Vukovar, leaving Serbia as the last "Missing Link" for a Black Sea - North Sea network via Danube and Rhine rivers, open to big Ships since 2001, through EU's Industrial heartland. (See earlier EuroFora publication).


But it will also add a large portion of Europe's Seaside and Coasts : That's why, -"Yes, Ships are important for us", Croatian Prime Minister Ivo Sanader replied with a smile to "EuroFora" question.

- "I spoke with EU Commission's President Baroso on the ways Croatia could serve Europe's Energy needs, and he just sent an Expert for detailed discussions", added Sanader

sanader_ep_400_02

    The Resolution adopted earlier this week in Strasbourg by EU Parliament on "Energy Strategy" strongly asks for "Liquefiied Natural Gas (LNG) capacities, consisting of Liquefication facilities", "LNG Terminals and SHIP-based regasification in the EU", which "should be available to all Member States... on the basis of a Solidarity mecanism". "New LNG Terminals" are "projects of European Interest, on account of their key contribution to the Diversification of Supply Routes", EU Resolution adds.

    In  a timely reply to any attempt by any Third Country to exploit Pipelines for implicit (comp.Ukraine - Russia economic differend) or explicit pressure on EU, (comp. Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's political threats), MEPs also warned that, "relations with Energy Transit countries should in no circumstances take place to the detriment of EU's Values, with regard to respect of Human Rights", but only "go hand by hand with" that.

     - "Many European Countries are almost entirely reliant on natural gas from geographically very limited sources, ...transported ...mostly by Pipelines. i. e. only in fixed routes that cannot be simply modified in conformity with changing conditions of the Market and of the Psituation. Consequently, occasional Crises caused by various disturbances cannot be promptly and successfully solved", denounced meanwhile a Motion tabled at PanEuropean CoE's Parliamentary Assembly (PACE).

    At the initiative of EU Chair, Czech Republic's MEP Milos Melcak, and signed by many other MEPs from various CoE Countries, PACE's Motion concludes that ,"completely New solutions must be taken to diversify ..Gas transport".

    It supports "combined River-Sea LNG tankers of varied origin", from Russia or Asia up to "Algeria, Middle East, etc", for a "New Diversified System of Gas Transportation","using" mainly "the Danube River".

    For "long-distance Marine transportation,...at the moment there is a Boom in the fleet" of "special LNG carriers", "with a total of more than 140 vessels on order at the world's Shipyards...The majority of the new Ships under construction are in the size of 120,000 to 140,000 m³. But there are orders for Ships with capacity up to 260,000 m³", which "can carry 156 mil. m3 of gas".

    "Barges and vessels for River and canal transport of LNG ...have usually a capacity ..equivalent to ...2.4 mil. m3 of natural gas", with "a possibility to increase this..up to 12 mil. m3 of natural gas) on rivers offering sufficient heights of bridges".

    "Danube River is of great potential in this regard, as it offers bridges of sufficient height and permits vessels of advantageous size. Moreover, ...Danube... (added to Rhine, Rhone, a.o. adjacent Rivers) follows a course parallel to the transport flows of natural gas from all important sources of this fuel including Middle East, Algeria and countries overseas", so that this "enables a ... Diversification of gas Supply from one source to another".

    Moreover, Danube "connects with important Centers of Consumption: such as Chemical industry centers in Romania, Serbia, Hungary, Bratislava and Vienna"  (etc). And it can "offer direct transport to the huge underground Gas Storage facilities in Western Slovakia.. and Southern Moravia", "connected with main routes of Gas (pipelines)" linking "Central and Western Europe with Russia", as well as in Germany, at the junction with Rhine, close to France's Strasbourg."

    Adding to the already existing (since 2001) Danube - Rhine link, also a call to "accelerate" the "planned Danube - Oder connection" to big "Storage reservoirs", PACE's Motion "calls for an Urgent International feasibility Study",  "in ..conformity with PACE's Resolution 1473 (2005) on European Waterways",

    Experienced, former mainstream MEP, Konrad Schweiger of Germany, who has already highlighted a possibility to import Asia's Energy resources, mainly gas, directly into the EU, by Ship transports from Black Sea to Danube and Rhine rivers, already in his Report on Azerbaidjan, tabled as early as in 1996, topically reminded now to "EuroFora" that there are big possibilities for Gas storage and distribution "from the Danube-Rhine junction" and forward.

- "Croatia is on the right path to joining the EU from 2010", confirmed recently the President of EU Parliament's largest Political Group (ChristianDemocrats/EPP), French MEP Joseph Daul, who visited Sanader in Zagreb on 2009, following EU Commission's latest Enlargment Report (November 2008), largely positive.  - "We are confident of the outcome", said Daul, "urging" the Croatian authorities to do everything in their power ..in order to satisfy the conditions for accession, "notably in ..the fight against corruption", while the "Czech EU Presidency" would "overcome the .. dispute with Slovenia". "Gas" was discussed by Daul in Croatia among current concerns on "Economic" and "Middle East" crises.

    On Human Rights, in earlier statements to "EuroFora" while visiting CoE in Strasbourg, Sanader has expressed his personal commitment to the return of refugees and IDPs mainly of Serbian origin : - "We accept and shall do whatever possible to facilitate refugees' return. My Government's coalition had the support even of a serbian party. After all, refugees are also Croatian citizens".

    CoE's PanEuropean Commissioner on Human Rights, Thomas Hammarberg, said afterwards to "EuroFora" that "the return faces still difficulties in practice, particularly in housing and socio-economic reintegration. Things evolve slowly but positively, so that we hope that the number of refugees free to return will become higher.

    Croatia is due to join NATO in 2009, probably after its Heads of State/Government's Summit, April in Strasbourg.

Multi-lingual Interface

Statistics

Visitors: 59186851

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING