english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Inicio arrow newsitems arrow CoE Local Authorities President Knape to EF: To prevent Terrorism Cities must skip Ghettos+Integrate

CoE Local Authorities President Knape to EF: To prevent Terrorism Cities must skip Ghettos+Integrate

Escrito por ACM
18.10.17

  clrae_localauthorities_president_anders_knape_to_eurofor_400

*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/- Experienced, Long-Time President of CoE's Chamber for Local Authorities, Anders Knape from Sweden, speaking to "Eurofora", stressed that Cities' contribution on the Prevention of Deadly Islamist Terrorism, can be important :


- "Eurofora" had pointed at the concrete examples of European Cities including London, Paris, Berlin and Brussels, etc., where ISIS' Deadly Terrorists had cowardly Targetted mainly innocent Civilian People, and asked President Knape what did he think that Cities could do to help Pevent that.


Knape agreed with those who urge to Avoid Ghettos to be formed inside European Cities, also for that purpose.


In fact, the most important starts with Education, he observed. Inter alia, Mass Migrants' Children should not be all concentrated, f.ex. in 1 School, but rather, shared among many Schools.


But, it's also Work, that is important too, he added. F.ex., when you have Education and Work, you can Move around, instead of staying always in a Ghetto, he pointed out.


However, the fact that at least several among those Deadly ISIS Terrorists came from a 2nd Generation of Migrants shows that Integration had Failed somewhere, he critically noted.


Ths doesn't mean that we should Close Mosques, outlaw Preachers, etc, but, when there are sufficient Facts showing that some spread Deadly Hate Speech in certain Hot Areas, then, action should be taken, he carefuly advised.


Ghettor, however, do not emerge, normally, because of some Cities' Policies, but we must act efficiently in order to face and prevent or change them, mainlu by adequate Integration of the concerned population.


At any case, this is a serious and Difficult Problem, Today, that we must Study, Analyse, and Find adequate ways to tackle, he concluded, in substance.

 

(../..)


-------------
EUDigitalMedia

Statistics

Visitantes: 25347628

Archive

Login Form

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0218_400_01

(Opinion).

 In Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs, as the New EU Parliament's President, new EU Commission's President (+ probably EU Council's President, EU Foreign Minister, etc) should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies.

At the heart of the biggest EU Countries, in France and Germany, EU Citizens clearly voted for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe based on Values, declared explicitly incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

This main choice was also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries, such as Austria (cf. promise of a Referendum), Spain (cf. EPP program's reservations vis a vis Enlargment), etc., while EPP Parties won also in Poland, Hungary, Cyprus, etc.

In other Countries, whenever Governing coalitions didn't make these choices or eluded them, continuing to let a Turkish lobby push for its entry into the EU, they paid a high price, and risked to damage Europe, by obliging EU Citizens to massively vote for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to offer a possibility to promise  real change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU :

It's for this obvious reason that British UKIP (IndDem) succeeded now (after many statements against Turkey's EU bid) to become Great Britain's 2nd Party, unexpectedly growing bigger even than the Governing Labour Party, as well as the Liberal party  ! Facts prove that it's not an isolated phenomenon : A similar development occured in the Netherlands, where Geert Wilders "Party for Freedom" (PVV) became also the 2nd biggest in the country, (after EPP), boosting the chances of a politician who had withdrawn in 2004 from an older party "because he didn't agree with their position on Turkey". And in several other EU Member Countries, even previously small parties which now focused on a struggle against Turkey's controversial demand to enter in the EU, won much more or even doubled the number of their MEPs (fex. Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, etc).

On the contrary, whenever Socialist and oher parties were explicitly or implicitly for Turkey's controversial EU bid, they obviously lost Citizens' votes and fell down to an unprecedented low.

In consequence, EU Citizens clearly revealed their main political choices, in one way or another : They voted to change for less Bureaucracy, but more Politics and Values in a Europe really open to EU Citizens, but without Turkey's controversial EU bid.

Recent political developments are obviously different from the old political landscape which existed in the Past of 1999-2004, when Socialists based on Turkish 1% vote governed undisputed not only in Germany, but also in the UK, Greece and elsewhere, France followed old policies decided when it had been divided by "cohabitation", before the 3 "NO" to EU  Referenda since May 2005, before Merkel, before Sarkozy, etc.... before the surprises of 7 June 2009 new EU Elections.

If the current candidates to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, OK.

Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People.

The beginning of crucial, final Decisions are scheduled for the 1st EU Parliament's plenary session in Strasbourg, in the middle of July, and they could be completed towards the October session, when Lisbon Treaty's fate will have been fixed.


See relevant Facts also at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/2009electionsandturkey.html
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/daulelections.html
http://www.eurofora.net/brief/brief/euroelectionresult.html

 ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Mostrados

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.