english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow As "Post-Human" Risks grow, Prof. Mattei to EF: BioTech = as Nuclear Bomb +Global Issue for Humanity

As "Post-Human" Risks grow, Prof. Mattei to EF: BioTech = as Nuclear Bomb +Global Issue for Humanity

Written by ACM
Saturday, 04 February 2017
bionc_posthuman_pub_in_stras_400_01


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- While speculations are going on about whether New US President Don Trump will, or not, Reverse Dems' Obama's 1st Decision : to Spend Federal Funds for Genetic Manipulations of Human Embryos, (the "Stem Cell" Controversy), that he had taken as early as since March 2009, i.e. Cancelling Conservative GWBush's August 2001 opposit choice to Stop Wasting Money for such Dangerous Bio-Tech. chimeras, (without having, 8 Years Later, produced any Medical Cure Breakthrough, but Wasted Millions with only outcome a "Copy and Paste" Technic on Parts of Human Genome : See Infra), a crystal-clear Warning was launched by experienced Academician, former Minister of Health and PanEuropean CoE's Rapporteur on BioEthics, professor of Pediaterics and Genetics, Jean-Francois Mattei, speaking to "Eurofora":


- Nowadays, BioTech. has reached a level similar to ...Nuclear Bombs' Technology, while the Issue of Safeguarding People's Human Rights and Democratic Society's Safety has become "Global", spreading in a wide PlayField which extends "allover the Planet, as Humanity itself !", he characteristicaly told us in substance.


Significantly, Mattei said just after a landmark, Keynote Speech and Debate on Births obtained by Non-Natural ways, at Strasbourg's Annual "Forum on BioEthics", which gathers here Scientists, Jurists, Philosophers, Writers, Journalists and other various relevant Civil Society representatives during a whole Week, Focusing, for the 1st Time, in this Year of 2017, on the Most Crucial and "Hot" Issue of all, in the area of Bio-Medicine and Human Rights : that of the Distinction and Threshhold between "Human and Post-Human", as its organizers chose to sum it up, quite provocatively...


However, it was a rather Surprising Fact to find out that, despite their Controversial Decision to Spread throughout the City of Strasbourg, all the way from its Popular Suburbs, via a busy DownTown area, up to its "European Quarter", where not only EU Parliament and CoE's Headquarters, but even its PanEuropean Court of Human Rights (ECHR) are located, a lot of Huge Publicity Placards very Ostensibly bearing the Word "Post-Human", (on a Picture recalling, at least partialy, a rather Mean-looking CyBorg of uncertain sex), Nevertheless, all this generously subsidized by Local/Regional Public Funds' Promotional operation, (already Planified during the terms of Out-Going US and France Presidents Obama and Hollande, respectively) , did Not meet the Same Fate as, back on 2006, (i.e. during the Past Era of former US and France Presidents GWBush and Chirac), anOther such Publicity Placards campaign on "Hot" and BioEthicaly Controversial Issues, by the so-called "Raelian society" at Nearby Switzerland :


- Indeed, then, all such Publicity Placards including references f.ex. to Human "Cloning", and/or to the eventual Artificial production of "Geneticaly" Enhanced Beings, with "Superior" Characteristics to those of the Naturaly Born Humans, had been Strictly Forbidden by the Local and National Swiss Public Authorities, and the "Raelian Society"'s Complaint, lodged to ECHR in Strasbourg, against what they Claimed to be a so-called "Violation of Freedom of Speech", according to their Expensive Lawyers, had been subsequently Rejected, by a very Strong Majority of Euro-Judges, particularly as Contrary to, and InCompatible with the European Human Rights' Values...


But, Today, the real Situation has become even more Serious, as the main Organizer and co-Presidenrt of Strasbourg's Annual "BioEthical Forum", Professor on Gynecology at the University of Strasbourg, Raphael Nisand, clearly told "Eurofora" :


- Explaining the Reason for which such a particularly "Hot", obviously Controversial, and potentialy Dangerous Issue as the eventual emergence of a "Post-Human" reality, was Chosen this Year, in order to be Placed at the Focus of this 2017 edition of such a Widely Publicized Event, Professor Nisand observed that, in Fact, he had personaly Noticed that Recent Bio-Technological Advances and imminent Prospects, especialy around Acting on the Human "Brain", and ways to selectively Target and Modify specific Parts of the Human "Genome", (etc), clearly gave Nowadays an overall Impression that the Time had, most probably, come, to Raise the Question of eventual Changes in the ways that Human Organisms and/or ReProduction had been Working until now, for many Thousands of Years : Already, in a remote Past, f.ex. the Invention of Fire, allowing to Cook and Stock Food, gave so much Time to Human's everyday Life, f.ex. for Thinking, Building, Exploring, etc. that it Modified quite radically their overall existence, he argued, (while, However, trying, at the same time, to Distance himself from the very Controversial, often Schocking Claims of those who are usually called "Trans-Humanists", and allegedly Push towards the Creation of a kind of New, Superior Race of "Enhanced" or "Post-Human" Beings, with obvious potential Dangers for Humanity, (See also Infra).

Nevertheless, Language, (and, therefore, the possibility of Dialogue, Reflexion, Reasoning and Logic, i.e. the main basis for Personal and/or collective Freedom of Choice, Democracy, etc), appeared after "Homo Sapiens", a Long Time After the purely "Technological" Advances of various "Tools" that had been Already invented, much Earlier, "by the Hominids", at a more Remote Past, pointed out Criticaly, later-on, a representative of Human and Social Sciences, Professor Philippe Breton, of Strasbourg University's Journalism unit and Chief Editor of a Political Analysis website, who was Today the Keynote Speaker at the Concluding Session of 2017's BioEthical Forum, (dedicated to a "Hot" Debate on "Enhanced" and/or "Manipulated" Human beings).


As for the above-mentioned Invention of how to Use "Fire", the World-Famous image of Mythical "Prometheas", since the Ancient Grteek Mythology, (i.e. a Hero who Sacrificed his own Freedom in order to Bring the Secret of the Fire to all Humans, and who had been severely punished and sufferered for having done so, until he was set Free by another, comparatively Newer, Mythical Hero : Heracles), obviously reminds us, Today, that, as long as such a kind of ..."Modern Prometheas" has Not yet Emerged in Nowadays Society, in one way or another, inevitably, any eventual Invention of some kind of "New Fire" tools, claiming to perhaps "Enhance" some persons, would Not Yet Escape from the Risk to provoke a Dangerous Appart-Heid, which might even eradicate Humanity, at least as it has been for many Hundreds of Thousands of Years until now...

However, Mattei's topical Metaphore about cutting-edge BioTech. having reached, nowadays, a level Similar to "Nuclear Bombs'" Technology, (Comp. Supra), was subsequently reiterated, in a much More Lenient form, on the Occasion of an Interesting Debate about Recent Developments around the Human Brain, by Grenoble Medical Faculty's Director on Neuro-Science Research (France), and more recently also at nearby Geneva University in Switzerland, (which has for Decades pursued a High-Tech. International Research on Human Brain, including with the US, etc., as he confirmed to "Eurofora"), Professor Pierre Pollack : Nuclear Bombs might also be Dangerous for Humankind, but, nevertheless, the International Community has succeeded, at least until now, to Keep a Global Peace and Stability for Many Decades, he argued, pleading for a less anxious approach of Modern BioTech's new possibilities able to affect Human persons' future behavior and social way of life, even radicaly.


But, when "Eurofora", speaking later with Professor Pollack, observed the Fact that, Unlike to what has notoriously happened with that "Nuclear Bombs" Metaphore (Comp. Supra), on the Contrary, in the Particular case of Some Controversial Bio-Tech New Possibilities,  there is Not yet Any known Equivalent of "Nuclear Deterrence", which has been, all this Time, at the Basis of Global Peace, since the Invention of the Nuclear Bomb, (perhaps, at least Partly, thanks also to the Drama of the Rosenberg's couple, executed during the Cold War), he didn't find anything to object, simply limiting himself into kindly smiling and noding, in a silent but obvious acknowledgement...


Ibid, when we also mentioned to Pollack the supplementary Fact that, an eventual Abuse of some notoriously Dangerous Bio-Tech. new tools, (f.ex. by a Rogue State, a Dictatorship, or a Criminal Gang, various Terrorists, etc), Contrary to what usualy happens in most cases of Nuclear Bombs' Explosions, in that, Differend, case, there would Not be, Neither Any Loud "Boom" Noise, Nor any "Huge Mushroom" covering the Sky, No Bright Lightings, nothing of the sort, but just a Silent, Invisible but Radical Mutation, whose realm Consequences would become Perceptible Only Too much Later-on, so that People, Societies and the International Community might Not been given any Equivalent Chance to be Warned.                                  

                                                 
Experienced vice-President of 2017's "Forum on BioEthics", Professor of Genetics at the University of Strasbourg and Member of the prestigious "College de France", Jean-Louis Mandel, speaking to "Eurofora" on such issues (significantly : Selected at his own Initiative !), strived to "Calm" the overall Ambiance, and "Minimise" the eventual Risks, as much as possible : - My main point is that Both the Dreams of various "Trans-Humanists" for Radical Mutations, and the Fears of several People about eventual Dangers of Abuse of some New Bio-Tech. tools, are largely Exagerated, since the Reality is, in fact, very Far Away from what Both Claim, at least for the foreseable future, as we have already seen, in similar "Fake Promisses" and/or "False Alerts", also in the Past, Mandel told us, in substance, (before trying to Illustrate his Viewpoint with some Concrete Examples, in his various subsequent interventions during the still on-going debates, up to the concluding one).


- Nevertheless, "my Main Concern, is that a Dictatorship (abusing Bio-Tech) doesn't Fall upon us, out of a Sudden !", sternly Warned, the well-known Writer of Science Fiction, Engineer, and Journalist at the World Famous "Monde Diplomatique" Paris' review, Catherine Dufour, speaking earlier to "Eurofora", after a worrying Debate on the Critical and "Whistle-Blower" Function of "Science Fiction" litterature in several Books and Films in Modern History. (Such as, f.ex., among many others, also : Huxley's "Brave New World", Orwell's "Time Machine", Spielberg's version of "War of Worlds", Charlton Heston's "Green Sun" and/or "Planet of Apes"-like situations, among various Creatures Artificialy fabricated at some kind of "Dr. Moreau's island", and/or by one or another "Dr. Frankenstein", via some Maverick "Dr. Strangelove/ Folamour(s)" like that of Stanley Kubrick, etc., only to mention a Few among a Lot of relevant Science Fiction Warnings already given and illustrated previously, starting by a Russian Writer, at the Beginning of the 20th Century, who had, it seems, Inspired Aldus Huxley himself)...


+ And when, even the deadly Serious Global Diplomatic Community, at nearby UNO's European Headquarters in Geneva, has Recently debated about Starting to consider some New, "active Biology" High-Tech. Research and/or eventual Deployment, as a Part of various "Warfare" possibilities in Future, in the Context of the International Organisation's Peace Safeguarding Treaties and conventions' updates, All this could Not be merely Dismissed as pure 100% "Fiction", and Nothing else.

Similar, (even if, comparatively, somewhat less Tragic, in appearance) Concerns and Warnings, were expressed by Many Participants f.ex. also on "Mass Spying", (a very Topical Human Rights' and Democracy Issue, particularly popularized in nowadays' "After-Snowden" era, from 2013, i.e. Long After Orwell's "Big Brother" of his "1984"  Famous Book), during a Special Debate about "Big Data" and Multinational Companies' (as California's "Google", etc) possible intrusion in a Huge Number of People's Personal Data concering their Private, Professional, or Socio-Political Life, and particularly their "Health", (something that Insurance Businesses notoriously would like to dispose)...


Certainly, when Professor Nisand, (the President of Strasbourg's "Forum on BioEthics" : Comp. Supra), asked himself the participating Experts whether there was, or not, at least some "Useful" possible utilisations of such "Big Data", the Replies were Positive : Indeed, if well and adequately used, the overall Analysis of such Massive Informations, thanks to Modern "Digital" Tools, Internet connexions, various new, "smart machines", etc., may provide some very Interesting Inputs for Health Policies, several Experts clearly acknowledged.

But, sometimes, Big Surprises might be Hidden even behind certain, apparently very Anodynous and Sympathetic Bio-Tech. research nowadays, as the Debate on Human Brain spectacularly Revealed :


- It all Started with Grenoble+Geneva Universities' Professor Pierre Pollack (Ciomp. Supra), who was invited to Describe his Famous Invention developments about "Brain Stimulations", via Electro-Magnetic Waves, aimed to Fight against a recently Growing quasi-Epidemics of "Alzheimer" Disease, notoriously affecting particularly Elderly people, in Modern Ageing Societies, where individuals normaly Live much Longer than in the Past. Pollack clearly and extensively presented a wide view of his Team's relevant Research work against Alzheimer disease, (which, as he reminded, Threatens to Degrade or even Destroy People's capacity to memorize various quasi-"Automatic" reactions to external stimulus, that everybody Needs in EveryDay Life, and has, normaly, aquired, already since early Childhood). For that purpose, he explained that Modern Research has Focused particularly on a certain Area of the Human Brain, which lies Deep inside its Core, trying to "stimulate" it adequately.

- However, as anOther Expert patiently Revealed - also Neurology Professor Mathieu Anheim, of Strasbourg's University, a specialist of "Parkinson" disease at Inter-Regional area, and particularly "interested in Behavioral" Science, as he told afterwards "Eurofora" -  near Pollack's area of Brain experiments, stands also something Else, which is very Important :


>>> Indeed, it's also there that Human Persons' capacity to Withhold, for a Time, any otherwise Impulsive Reaction to various External Stimulus, f.ex. in order to be Able to Think, Examine Seriously a given Situation and its Future Prospects, Reflect on Alternative Possible Consequences, and/or Freely and Concsiously Choose what is Best to Do, withOut any quasi-Spasmodic Automatic Impulsion being eventualy Imposed upon them, Professor Anheim explained. So that, even these Same "Stimulations" of that Brain area's Forgotten Automatisms that Pollack strived to Explore in order to Fight against "Alzheimer" Disease (Comp. Supra), might, eventualy, (if incorrectly used, or abused by anyone else), also Provoke various UnDesirable "Impulsive", mechanic Reactions of People, in whose Brain that precious Capacity to take enough Time in order to Think well abd Consiously Decide what's really Best to Choose, Instead of merely Reacting to External Stimulus made by Others, might have been Dangerously Reduced, (f.ex. by an Artificial Intervention).

=> In other words, if nobody paid any Attention to such potential Risks, then, People's Brain might be Externaly Manipulated, Professor Anheim concluded in substance...


A Timely Warning, especialy when several other Experts almost agreed, in the Concluding Debate, that a Foreseable Move might be the possible Emergence of a Push towards some kind of "CyBorgs", where certain individuals could be Artificialy "Enhanced", not only through various Genetic Manipulations' Technics, but also via differend Electro-Magnetic or other Interactions, "Prothese", etc., connected to the Human Body, (etc).

Such kind of Facts are obviously Interesting to be seriously examined and debated Nowadays, particularly when f.ex. the French National Assembl is due to Publish and Vote, in just 1 Month (on March 2017), a crucial Report on BioEthics, drafted by MP Jean-Yves Deaut, who is also preparing another Topical draft Resolution on Modern BioTechnologies due to be Debated and Voted by CoE's PanEuropean Parliametary Assembly during its forthcoming, Spring 2O17 Session, on April, as Deaut (who is also a mainstream PACE's MEP) told "Eurofora".

But, as far as the even "Hotter" Controversy, about some's Wishes or even Attempts to artificialy create a kind of New, "Mutated" Beings, of a "Post-Human", or even "Trans-Humanist" Agenda, (against which, Most Participants Warned about particularly Aggravated Risks of several "InHuman" consequences being obviously possible, if nobody takes care to Timely prevent Abuses), things risked, at the end, to become quite Nasty, when a Group of so-called "Trans-Humanists", (Omni-present during almost  all this Exceptional 2017 Strasbourg's "Forum on BioEthics" week of meetings, in which at least one of them Fully Participated among the officialy Invited Experts, as several attending People, astonished Complained to "Eurofora" and others), attempted to even Take the Speech in Public and make open Propaganda, also at the Concluding Session, (while, on the Contrary, Nobody among those Clearly Opposed to such Chimeras, obviously Dangerous for all Humankind, didn't manage to get a Chance to Speak in Public then)...

It's Interesting to note, in this occasion, the Fact that, when "Eurofora", in a private conversation with the person who seemed to be the "Leader" of that "TransHumanist" propaganda Group, simply Asked him if there was "Any Guarantee" that what they Seek to impose, "will Not result Neither to a kind of "Appart-Heid", Nor to any sort of "Dictatorship"", (as we said, Simplifying things to make short), his Reply was Astonishing : - How could anyone "Guarantee", or provide "Safeguards", against such Risks, (concerning an eventual "TransHumanist" abuse of some controversial Bio-Tech. researches : Comp. Supra) ?", he spontaneously, but significantly wondered. All this is a question of Political (sic !) Fight, withOut any Guarantee, Neither Safeguards being possible a priori, he concluded, without having anything more to say on this naturaly Crucial point.

=> In these Conditions (Comp. also Supra), is it Better to consider the Nature of the Human Person, as a Holy and/or Impregnable Sanctuary, as advised Civil Society Leader of "VITA" NGO, Tugdual Derville, who has endoresed also, After 2013, the "Human Ecology" Movement of Ideas, that he co-represents now in France ? (I.e. as f.ex. Pope Emeritus Benedict had inspired previously by his landmark 2011 Speech at the German Bundestag, after his 2009 Encyclic "Caritas in Veritas", etc. : See relevant "Eurofora"s NewsReports of 2009, 2010, 2011, etc., but also, Comp. our earlier, 2004, 2005, and previous various Publications, since the 1990ies, including on "MPA" Press Agency and various other fora, until recently, on this issue of key importance for all Humankind nowadays).

At any case, at least 1 main point is for sure : Many among the recent, and still Rapidly Developing Bio-Tech. Controversies vis a vis the Nature of Humanity, have certainly become, more and more, a very Crucial Issue for Human Rights and Democracy, as well as for the Present and Future of Humankind !

And as Derville told "Eurofora" that his NGO intends to Publish soon, before the forthcoming French Presidential Elections of April - May 2017, an overall Assessment of the Out-Going Socialist Government's, "of Hollande'"s, 5 Years of Acts "vis a vis Bio-Ethical Values" (2012-2017), we urged him to cooperate with other adequate people for a Similar "Assessment" also on former US President Obama's acts in the field of Bio-Tech and Ethical Values.


Obviously Starting from that Controversial and apparently Inefficient, at least as far as Human Health is concerned, 2009 Obama's decision to re-instore Federal Funding for Genetic Manipulations of Human Embryos, as Clinton had already done previously, but Contrary to former US President GWBush's 2001-2008 honestly kept pre-electoral promisse to Stop such a Controversial and Dangerous Waste of Federal Funds, in order to Protect Humanity from any eventually serious risks.


Now it remains to be seen what the New US President Don Trump's team, (Together with vice-President Mike Spence, and/or their Friend Governon Mike Huckabee, etc), may decide, sooner or later, to do in that crucial field too (Comp. Supra), as several Franco-American and Other Experts, including, f.ex., Nicolas Miaille, from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, told "Eurofora" that they think quite possible, if not even logical.


>>> In Fact, Nowadays, there is obviously a Vital Need for quite Strong and Crystal-clear Ideas, Able to rapidly spread a both Deep Conscience of what is really at Stake, and what should be Urgently done, in order to find an Adequate way to benefit from real Health-strengthening possibilities from certain Bio-Technical Advances, while also ensuring, as a matter of Priority, to Safeguard Humanity's present and future.

 

(../..)


--------------------------------

***

european sme week (since 2009)

Statistics

Visitors: 29578319

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 imag0972_400


    Scientific innovation joined to Faith for Human Rights, Eastern Partnership and fight against the Crisis, but above all, the need to overcome the "Crisis of Trust" from EU Citizens, are the main priorities for new EU Parliament's President, Polish Jerzy Buzek, that a 555-votes-strong majority of MEPs on July 14,  Strasbourg made a living symbol of the fact that, 20 years after the fall of Berlin Wall (1989 - 2009) there is no more an Eastern or Western Europe, but only one Europe, as the head of the largest group of MEPs, ChristianDemocrats/EPP, Joseph Daul, stressed after the event.

    Speaking later to a group of Strasbourg's Journalists, including "EuroFora", the new EU Parliament's President clarified his stance on concrete topical issues, as f.ex. that of Turkey's controversial EU bid, which was one of the main issues of the June 2009 Electoral campain, clearly won by his party of ChristianDemocrats/EPP :  - "At present, Turkey does not fullfil none of EU conditions", he stressed, (See infra).

imag0958_400

    Buzek is well known in Strasbourg and to "EuroFora" as EU Rapporteur for the Framework Program of Scientific Research and Development of Technologies. A Natural Science Professor from the Historic and Religious landmark Polish City of Częstochowa, active in the famous Solidarnosk grass-roots social movement, he served 4 years as Prime Minister (1997-2001), before being elected as MEP in 2004 and 2009, after he brillantly won the latest EU Election at the head of his party (EPP) almost doubling the number of its MEPs from 15 to 28 !

    - "Innovation" and "Energy safety", as well as fight against the "Cimat change", but also "Eastern Partnership", the "Mediterranean", "Strategic partnerships" with Russia, the USA, etc, and the search for "solutions to the Economic Crisis" that EU Citizens "expect" from us, will be his "priorities", announced from the outset the new EU Parliament's President, reminding also that the quest for "Human and Civic Rights" played an important role in his experience with the Solidarnosc grass-roots social movement in Poland's History

    But, the most important of all, is the urgent need to overcome the "Crisis of Trust" between EU Institutions and the People he stressed : - EU "Citizens often don't understand us", denounced Buzek, launcing a call to "do anything for EU Citizens to understand our work" in EU Parliament : "We (MEPs) need to make EU Citizens involved" in "what we are doing every week, in Strasbourg and Brussels", he proposed. Pointing f.ex. to the hot "Debates" with "strong arguments" exchanged between MEPs during the preparation of their Legislative Decisions, in Committees, delivering often hard struggles between initially opposed points of view, long before forging a majority at the final vote, sometimes more than a year..

    Therefore, EU Parliament will be "open to your criticism, for discussion and exchange of views", he promissed to Journalists in Strasbourg.

    In this way, Buzek, in fact, highlighted "EuroFora"s main idea, that we strongly advocate since 1997-2007, to systematicaly and actively involve EU Citizens in public debates during the decision-making process of important EU measures, which affect their lives and the society in which they live, (and not only just a few weeks each 4 or 5 Years at the eve of EU Elections)...
--------------------
    This is related also to the symbolic gift that Buzek chose to give to the out-going former EU Parliament's President, Hans Gert Poettering, (2007-2009), his collegue in the ChristianDemocrats/EPP, who brillantly won 2009 EU Elections in Germany : A genuine statute of sainte Barbara crafted in Silesia's black Coal by Polish Miners : Those simple but strong people who fought for social change against some technocrats and bureaucrats disguissed into so-called "real-socialists" of old times. (PHOTO).

    It's enough to have seen a popular open air mass, at Warsaw's center, with many thousands of people, old and young, simple workers and intellectuals mixed together, with references to Poland's history and struggles for survival and liberty, through various ages, (as fex. that organized at the eve of CoE's 2005 panEuropean Heads of State and Government for the beatification of late Pope John-Paul II), in order to understand what such symbols mean..

buzek_press_a_400

    But, overcoming the "Crisis of Trust" with EU Citizens obviously implies also to rectify any errors done in the past, fex. on Turkey's controversial EU bid, with controversial decisions taken in 1999 and 2004 to give a "candidate" status and to start EU negotiations, provoking an unprecedented series of 3 "No" to EuroReferenda and 3 Majoriy Abstentions in EU Parliament Elections : 1999, 2005 and 2009, (even if the latest one succeeded to decelerate and almost stop the drop of participation rates, opening hopes for vote's revival after an electoral campaign clearly critical to Turkey's claims in several mainstream EU countries)
    
    Therefore, Buzek was faced with manifold critical Questions on EU Enlargement, most of them citting concrete examples of certain political problems  :  But his replies were almost always given as a matter of general principle :

    F.ex. Questioned on the suspension of EU - Croatia talks because of a Border conflict with EU Member Slovenia, Buzek prefered to speak about principles :

- "We know that during Enlargement, the process can be blocked by failure to resolve this kind of issues",  This concerns also other enlargments' cases", and "these rules are always in force" he warned.


But Buzek avoided to directly reply to a queston on "French and German EPP' calls to define the Borders of Europe", as a German journalist asked him by making a reference to French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and German Chancellor Angie Merkel's, critical statements on Turkey at the June 2009 Electoral campain.    

- "Concerning Enlargement, there's always the same rules : There have to be Criteria, which have to be respected if a Country wants to join the EU", he started to simply reply.

- "For my country (Poland) it took us 15 Years to fullfil these Criteria", Buzek reminded, indicating, if proportions are kept, that Turkey, fex. would have to spend some 25 years before eventually joining the EU..

- "Countries wishing to join the EU need to Change their Systems", as we (Poland and other former Eastern European Countries) did, he stressed.

- "'For me, meeting the condition of Human Rights is one of the Key conditions for membership in the EU", preferring again to speak from the point of view of General Principles, on the occasion of an untimely question on Serbia (which is not even a candidate yet)...

- "Turkey" has, "first of all", to fullfil (EU) Copenhagen criteria". Bevause, currently, none of them is fullfiled by Turkey", New EU Parliament's President, denounced, speaking later to a group of Journalists, including "EuroFora".

buzek_close_a_400 

In particular, on Human Rights :  - "We (EU) can never forget Human Rights", because "this is at the very Foundations of the EU", Buzek added.

On the contrary, when he referred to EU Enlargment for the  "Western Balkans Countries ", Buzek appeared upbeat, finding "promising situations", despite "difficulties" in the Past, since "Countries are queuing to become EU members", and this "generated changes", as he said.

As for Russia, Buzek observed that it was a "very important" country, located "in the same Continent", Europe,  "close to our borders", and "we need eachother". "But Russia' has 'differend poblems : "They claim that their system is Democratic, but rules are differend", and we must be "aware of such differencies", fex. "on Human Rights", that we can't ignore, as he said;

Concerning China, where a journalist observed that the recipient of EU Parliament's latest "Sakharov prize" for freedom of thought is "still in prison", Buzek found that since the 1999 events in Tien Amin square, "we see differencies on Human Rights still today", and expressed his "support" for those who try to ameliorate the situation.

On the contrary, speaking recently to "EuroFora" he strongly supported the idea for an EU - Ukraine cooperation, fex. between Airbus and Antonov, in order to build a  less costly but more performant than the old and problematic A400M, new Military Transport Airplane : - "They (Ukranian Antonov Company) can certainly do it. I'm sure they can. It's a good Idea, and I'd be glad if it was done", he told us. (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/airbusantonov.html )


(../..)

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.