english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow In Brief arrow LIBELATION ? Who tries to harm Franco-Spanish/US relations and why ? CoE+EU Elections deserve better

LIBELATION ? Who tries to harm Franco-Spanish/US relations and why ? CoE+EU Elections deserve better

Written by ACM
Sunday, 19 April 2009

libelation_400 

(Opinion).

Who tried to harm the good relations between France and Spain, at the eve of Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero's visit to Strasbourg (France) for CoE's Assembly, shortly before the conclusion of the Spanish presidency of the CoE on May in Madrid, and why ?

Press Deontology excludes 2nd hand reporting, unverified infos, personal attacks, superficial bla-bla instead of serious analysis, copying others and grossly distording knowingly, as well as concerted mob-attacks to lynch a person.

But, didn't all this happen with French "socialist" Newspaper "Liberation"''s claims about President Sarkozy's reported descriptions of some other Heads of State/Government, which were immediately copied, sometimes even distorded worse (fex. Guardian), and abused by certain Media, as if to slander and undermine relations and trust ?  

It's as if our fellow Media, (which has the responsibility to inform a part of the public opinion in one among the most important CoE's 47 Member Countries), confused an "r" with an "l", changing over to .. "Libelation"...

Because, in fact, reality seems to be exactly the ..opposite from what "Libelation" and its copyists claim :

During that conversation, Sarkozy had reportedly praised Spanish Prime Minister's move to stop TV Commercial Ads in the Public sector, as France had already done earlier, and he defended M. Zapatero against the criticism of a French Socialist MP. Emanoueli, who had marked a disagreement against his Spanish friend.

Clearly, this appears to be the meaning of the reply to Mr. Emanoueli's critisism of Zapatero, that, even if he (Emanoueli) may think that Spanish PM's move might, perhaps, not be very bright, nevertheless, he had succeeded in politics better than French Left did back in 2002...

This view is also supported by French Foreign Minister, Bernard Kouchner, a long-time Socialist, as well as by "Green" MP

Moreover, at least 2 eye-witnesses denied "Libelation"'s claims on Sarkozy's reported observation about his collegue, Zapatero, and these denials came even from Leftist MPs.

Franco-Spanish relations' level is good : The Spanish Prime Minister was invited even in Franco-Germano-Russian Summits, exceptionally extended to Spain in 2005, by Jacques Chirac, and he recently worked closely together with Nicolas Sarkozy for the succesful 1st EuroZone Summit in Paris, October 2008, while Sarkozy decided that France would give its 2nd seat at Washington's G-20 Summit (as EU chairman then) to Spain, on November 2008.

As for the new American President, Sarkozy, who always likes to stress his good personal relations with Obama, had reportedly praised him as "brillant", "very clever", "charismatic", etc., simply adding what everybody knows : That he just started his White House new job only a few months ago, his 1st term as head of a Government after 4 years as Senator, and, for the moment, seems careful before determining his stance on some issues, according to "Libelation" itself.

Certainly it's not Obama himself who might find this simple fact so scandalous as "Libelation" pretends, since he has just declared to all Latin American leaders himself, (at an obvious attempt to "charm" them and make a good new start on PanAmerican relations), that he came to the InterAmerican Summit in order "to learn".

(Precisely as he had declared, at the beginning of his European trip, that he came, first of all, in order "to listen" what USA's European friends might have to say).

The German Press' generally calm, serious stance, and refusal to be so easily manipulated, by a reported remark that the Economic Crisis' impact would have incited Chancelor Merkel  to fully realize the need for a strong common Franco-German initiative in favor of an EU Stimulus plan,  shows that Franco-German links are stronger, deeper, and more serious than "Libelation"'s superficial claims..

What's common between "Libelation"'s claims, Guardian's obvious worsening (exceptionally followed in part by Brittsh conservative "Telegraph"), a few Spanish  media's row, and NYT's copying  ?

Perhaps, only one thing : All this happens at the start of the Electoral campain for crucial June 2009 EU Elections, and  those who followed "Libelation"'s abuse, are notoriously opposed to President Sarkozy's famous preference for a privileged partnership, instead of accession, for Turkey's controversial EU bid, But they don't seem to have anything substantial to say yet, in order to convince a majority of equally opposed EU Citizens in France, Germany, Netherlands, Austria and several other EU Countries...

Even CoE is currently in a pre-electoral mood, since its inter-Governemental Committee of Ministers has to prepare the election of a new CoE Secretary General before June !

At any case, 2009 EU Elections really "deserve a real debate on European issues", and not to fall victim of "a Hold-up" with anti-Sarkozy "tracts", as French UMP party spokesman, Lefebvre, put it this week.

"Libelation" harshly replied by accusing Lefebvre to be a "pug" (sic !), and cried about "Freedom of Press".

The following weeks will prove whether "Libelation"'s networks also respect "EuroFora"'s Press Freedom.

Some of "Libelation"s friends should remember that former Socialist leader and subsequently French President Mitterand had won his first election, back in the 1980ies, with arguments and political moves, not with libel...

Not sly personal attacks, (which only reveal a political weakness in those who are responsible for such a kind of anti-deontologic behavior by some old Medias).

European Democracy needs for 2009 EU Elections a loyal and substantial debate on important political choices about general interest issues which affect EU Citizens' lives now and in the foreseable Future.

european sme week (since 2009)

Statistics

Visitors: 60273214

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarkozy_merkel_berlin__stras_400

Sarkozy and Merkel : June 2009 solution to May 2005 "NO" ?

 - Will French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel live up from June 2009 to their obvious Historic European mission to revitalize, and re-launch the "European Dream", after the series of 3 "NO" since May 2005 in France, the Netherlands and Ireland, by renewing, and changing the EU with fresh stimulus, big horizons, and values attractive for EU Citizens ?

Whatever views anyone might have, it's a Fact that, recently, EU's political spectrum didn't produce other more charismatic and popular EU leaders than Merkel and Sarkozy, starting from September 2005 and May 2007, respectively.

This trend was confirmed, in one way or another, both during the German EU presidency in 2007 (shared by Merkel with the SPD), and mainly during the French EU Presidency in 2008, (with Sarkozy "free" to move).


The positive 2009 EU Polls are a natural consequence :

- Both with 72% Sarkozy and Merkel are considered by EU Citizens to be "the most Influential" leaders in Europe, by far.

- They are the only EU political leaders to attract a Majority of "Positive" views by EU Citizens, (Merkel over 60%, Sarkozy over 50%, particularly in the continent).

- 60% of EU Citizens find the 2008 French EU Presidency "Good", (and the satisfaction grows up to 67,5% in continental Europe).

The Poll was made by "OpinionWay" in big EU countries as Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, (with the only exception of France), from 26 to 28 May 2009.

sarkozy_merkel_polls_400

But the most important is that both Franco-German leaders seem willing to, at last, really start serious business on EU's indispensable renovation and Renaissance from 2009 : Year of crucial EU and German Elections.

Therefore, this time, the joint European move by Sarkozy and Merkel, which just published a common Franco-German Manifesto, aims to stimulate aspirations and action not only in their respective countries, but also in many other EU "partners", as they say.

Both on EU economy, social values and scientifico-technologic research, as well as on Turkey's controversial EU bid, obviously incompatible with a popular Political Europe, whose Citizens can find a collective Identity and popular Values, they have already started to magnetize various growing voices accross the European landscape :

"Today, more than ever, it' time for action", they stress from the outset.

Facing "an unprecedented Global financial and economic Crisis", "Europeans must get resolutely involved if they want for the World which is being built to meet their Values of Liberty, Solidarity and Justice".

"That's what we want" and "propose to our Partners" :

* "A strong Europe, able to protect us" :

- "We refuse a Bureaucratic EU, which mecanically applies burdensome rules and is afraid of change. We want a European Union which listens what Citizens have to say, which innovates, stimulates".

- "We want a strong and united EU in the World, while also respecting its Member States' Diversity", which "brings Courageous Replies to the Questions of our Times, ensuring our Prosperity :  

This implies to "favor Research and Innovation", "Economic Coordination", to "develop real Policies on Immigrationn, Energy, Defence, and modernise  common policies, particularly Agriculture".

*  "EU must bring immediate replies to the Global Crisis".

- "Lawless liberalism failed". "The Model we want is that of a Responsible Market Economy, which favors Enterpreneurs and Workers, above Speculators ;  Long-term Investment, over immediate profiits".

- "We appeal upon the EU to take, from June, the first decisions to ensure a real European Regulation of Financial Markets, based on coordination and cooperation". "On speculative funds, on fiscal heavens, CEO's and financial operators' earnings, EU must give the example".

- "We call to change the rules of accounts, which are important for our Economy's revival : The competent normative authorities must take action". "The issue of a sufficient Credit offer is of central importance for our Economy". "We don't accept that, during this Financial Crisis, the European Banks' capacity to lend money might be unjustly reduced by Capital's requirements and accountant's rules

* "During the German and French Presidencies, EU has resoçlutely prepared itself for the fight against Global Warming... EU is the 1st and only area in the World to have adopted a package of ambitious and legally binding rules to comply with International Aims"

- "We have now to convince our Friends and Partners, to get involved, in order to atteint, next December at Copenhagen, a Global Agreement worthy of whay is at stake. Our closer ally, the US, but also other big industrial countries, must commit themselves with the same force as the Europeans".

"Green Growth is a Chance ... and an opportunity to create jobs turned towards the Future. Europe must be a leader".

- But, at the same time, we must ensure that our companies remain competitive in the World. The ambitious European involvements on Climat must not lead into a position where EU industry might become a Victim of Unfair Competition. Climat protection and Competitvity must go together. If our International partners refuse to associate themselves to our efforts, we are determined to take measures to protect European Industry"

* "Europe must be more ambitious for its Industry" : "It must favor the emergence of strong European enterprises at a Global level".

- "As long as an International mechanism" to "monitor Public Aids at WTO level, and hinder 3rd Countries to give abusive subsidies to their enterprises, provoking unfair competition", is "not yet set up, we must consider Transitory European Solutions".

* "The current Public Debt is too heavy... We must head anew towards sound public finance, as soon as we'd have passed the crucial stage in this crisis".
-------------------------------------------------

* Last, but not least :  "Europe must play a top-level role in the World"

- "For that purpose,  it needs efficient Institutions. That's why we need Lisbon Treaty". "The 27 Member States decided, last December (2008) that the Treaty should enter into force before the end of this year (2009)". To obtain that, June EU Council must agree "on the Guarantees for Ireland".

- But, "to be able to act, EU needs Borders. An Enlargment without Limits is not possible", Sarkozy and Merkel stressed in an obvious reference to Turkey, etc.

- "In order to be strong, Europe must assume its Values and its Identity". "Human Rights .. are at the basis of our commitment for a Peaceful Development accross the World".

- "For that purpose, we shall strengthen our common Defence and Security policy".
----------------------

* "We are ready to contribute to activate the EU towards the realisation of these aims, with our EU Partners".

"In order to succeed", Europe  "needs the active involvment of all, starting by Citizens themselves. That's why the June 7 rendez-vous is important", and "we are calling all Europeans to vote".

"We are convinced that, if Europe wants, Europe can", they conclude.
-----------------------

Precisely : - What can better forge "Europe's Will" than a "European Consciousness" emerging from political, democratic struggles to face Global Challenges, and open big New Horizons, including by crystal-clear Public Debates, with active EU Citizens' involvement, before the most important EU Decisions affecting People's lives ?

Precisely what "EuroFora"s project warns since 1997-2007, and unprecedented Majority Abstentions, since 1999-2004, added to 3 "NO" to EU Referenda in 2005 and 2007, proved meanwhile..

Let's hope that the Time wasted by some scandalous anti-European and anti-Democratic obstacles of the Past, will stimulate faster, simplified but substantial and persistent, efficient action.-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING