newsitems
EU President van Rompuy: We won € Battle +Build Econ Governance. AFCO Chair to EF: 6 Months crucial
EU President van Rompuy: We won € Battle +Build Econ Governance. AFCO Chair to EF: 6 Months crucial

- "We (EU) won the Euro ( € Monetary currency) Battle, this Spring", and Now, after a Faster than expected Growth return, we "are Building the 1st Economic Governance" of Europe, stressed EU President van Rompoy, amidst intensive, Individual and Collective Meetings at EU Parliament in Strasbourg, (close to the Central EU Bank at nearby Frankfurt), where MEPs adopted today a Pioneer Financial Surveillance system, "the Best in the World" according to EU Commissioner Barnier, as 1st part of a"Packet" on a series of "Eco Governance" Tools, whose creation is scheduled during some 6 crucial Months, as the key Cthairwoman of EU Economic Committee (AFCO), Sharon Bowles, told "EuroFora" :

- Preferring to cite "Facts, No Perceptions", as he said, Herman van Rompuy, observed that, just during the "last 8 Months", (since Jan. 2010) , f.ex. we (EU) established a Financial Surveillance, created a brand-new "External Activities Service", to serve EU's Foreign Policy, set up ayt 110 Billions $ Packet for Greece, conditioned by strict Reforms, and we also prepared a 750 Billions € strong Financial Support of any EU Member State(s), "in case" it might, eventually, be needed in the Future : This calmed the markets", he noted.
-Thus, "our Economies are Recovering at an Unexpected Pace", even if, after having already dealt, "in the 1st Half or the Year" 2010, with some "pressing economic issues", now, "the work is not over yet". But, "the Efforts made, ... have started to produce Results : our Economies are in a Better shape Now", and "Confidence is coming back, slowly but surely, van Rompoy observed.
- But, from an Economic "Assessment" point of view, "perhaps it's a bit Premature to say that there was a Mass Recovery", because, at least "as long as the USA is not on the board, we cannot conclude on Full Recovery", particularly Worldwide, nuanced the Top German MEP Werner Langen.
(Topically, the experienced German MEP said that the same Day during which it was anounced that USA President Barack Obama's, "Economic Chief", Summers, was resigning from his White House job)...
- "Budgetary and Economic-Social Governance are both our 2 aims which must be always Linked", advised, meanwhile, the Leader of the Biggest Group of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, Joseph Daul.
- "During the last 2 Years, (practically 2008-2010), we (EU) led a more Intelligent Economic Policy, than in the Past", van Rompoy stressed in conclusion :
Because, in the Past, we (EU) didn't use the occasions offered during some 10 Years, and didn't start earlier to get more Healthy Budgets, more Comptetitivity for our Economy, etc, and that caused problems during the Global Crisis.
But, since 2008, we (EU) started a risky Budgetary policy, stimulating Investment/innovation, and, when Growth succeeded to return Faster than expected, we started, asap, a progressive fiscal Consolidation stage, without abruptly disrupting a partly still continuing this year expansionist economic policy, EU President explained on the Timely, but Careful, EU manouvering. And what we shall do "Now", aims to guarantee Sustainable Development, for a long period of time, while we (EU) also "introduced a Policy on Education, against Poverty, etc., and we keep a Cohesion Policy, Structural Funds, and I hope to really maintain them also in the MultiAnnual Financial Perspectives that we'll adopt, so that some Coherence is kept between various parts inside the EU

- In particular, the (EU) Commission is coming up with (Draft) Legislation at the end of the Month", (i.e. around "29 of September", as its President, Jose Barroso anounced, earlier this Month, at EU Parliament in Strasbourg : See "State of the Union" Debate, on which we already published a partially related Article, added to specific DraftNews, already send earlier to "Eurofora"'s Subscribers/Donors).
- So, in all, "there are 6 files, of which 4 concern (EU) Parliament as Co-Legislator", she explained.
- That's why, we have to counter-act Quickly, to join that, as much as possible, and as Soon as possible", AFCO Chairwoman Bowles carefully but willingly concluded.
Concerning a real Legislative "Package", in fact, "all (its center-pieces) are important : You can't separate them out !", (f.ex. by claiming that only this, or that, might be "the more important"), the AFCO Chairwoman estimated, on the EU planned Economic Governance Mecanism's parts :
- "Because, (f.ex.) there are things dealing with how to conduct Surveillance, to see if (EU) Member States are making Improvements, if they act in the Right Way, (and), if they don't, then, "what do you do", "what kind of Sanctions are you (EU) going to take, (f.ex. "how you (EU) adjust Member States' Votes"), etc. "And, you shall see, in my Report (largely adopted by EU Parliament's Plenary in Strasbourg on Wednesday), that you (EU) can use even Financial Surveillance (in order) to do that".
- Questioned by "EuroFora" on - "When will be the main Decisiion Time ?", AFCO Chairwoman Sharon Bowles, replied with something around "6 Months". - Because "I cannot see how we (MEPs - Governments) can get through Co-Decision (process) in Less than 6 Months",( i.e. leaving practically the ball for next, Hungarian Jan. - June 2011 EU rotating Presidency),
- "Well, we (EU Parliament) have to wait and see : - If they (EU Commission's forthcoming Drafts) are OK, and (if) we don't have many Amendments... ", she carefully added, apparently, not excluding even earlier, (i.e. during the current, Belgian EU rotating chairmanship, up to December 2010, included).
- "But, I'm also concerned with the fact that there is also the Task Force", (set up by EU Council's President van Rompuy, and on whose preparatory work, due to conclude on October 2010, he reportedly focused his Strasbourg visit during EU Parliament's Plenary session) :
- "and then, the (EU) Council (perhaps) won't adopt a very "Fixed" Position, and that would make Negotiations and TriaLogue (i.e. EU Commissioners - MEPS - Governments' discusssions) much more Difficult : - So, we have to avoid that kind of Flop !", the AFCO Chairwoman Warned.

Several points from Sharon Bowles' Tuesday's statements to "EuroFora" were highlighted on Wednesday by EU President, van Rompoy himself :
- "I am Confident" that on October, EU Heads of State/Government "will draw the Final Right lessons of the (Global) Crisis", he stressed.
- "We (EU Member States) have a large consensus on some of the most important issues, like the macro-economic surveillance framework. This will monitor and correct imbalances, risks of bubbles, and
divergences in competitiveness", he noted.
- " There is also agreement on strengthening national fiscal frameworks, enshrining European budget rules in national legislation and on the principle of what has been called the "European Semester".
- "We (EU Council) also made progress on sanctions, even if more work is needed".
(All) this amounts to a strengthening of the 'Economic ' pillar of our .... Union", stressed Van Rompuy, anouncing that " a (Collective) meeting with 7of (EU Parliament's) Committee Chairs and the Leaders of ...(Political) Groups" discussed all that "yesterday" (Tuesday) in Strasbourg.
--------
An important 1st step in that larger Horizon, was made today, when EU Parliament adopted in Strasbourg a key-part of the overall Mecanism : the Financial Surveillance, also in order to avoid in Future other such Global Financial Crisis mainly imported from the USA :
- "We (EU) build the Best System of Financial Supervision in the World !", praised in conclusion of a specific debate, the experienced twice EU Commissioner, former Minister, Michel Barnier...
(NDLR : More Details and a 3rd article on van Rompoy-related developments in EU Parliament in Strasbourg, already sent partly to "EuroFora"'s Subscribers/Donors, is due to be published asap)
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Visitors: 67356147Archive
Login Form
Other Menu
They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------
CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment
Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :
A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.
"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...
Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.
Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..
Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.
But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..
Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.
- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.
- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

















