english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow UN Spokesman Nesirky to EuroFora on IMF's Straus-Kahn UN VIP Pass +NY trip after Turkey UN/CoE event

UN Spokesman Nesirky to EuroFora on IMF's Straus-Kahn UN VIP Pass +NY trip after Turkey UN/CoE event

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
 
nesirky_on_others_quest_400


UN Press Director/Spokesman Martin Nesirky said to "Eurofora" that, even if IMF Chief Strauss-Kahn may have a UN Pass, as his Lawyer told a NY Court, and was at a UN Conference in Turkey with UNO's Secretary General Ban Ki Moon before the NY Sofitel incident which brought him to Jail for alleged assault, he "hadn't the slightest idea" why DSK had come at New York (UN Headquarters' city) just for one day, before he tried to cross again the Atlantic Ocean for scheduled meetings in Europe with German Chancellor Merkel and Brussels' €uro-EU Officials, immediately afterwards.

ldc_un_conference_istanbul_913_may_400

"EuroFora" observed that DSK was included among key-note Speakers in a UN Conference on the Least-Developed Countries hosted in Turkey, Istanbul, together with former UNDEP Turkish Official Kemal Dervis, almost at the same Days and at the same City where a Paneuropean CoE Foreign Ministers' session had been exceptionally transfered from Strasbourg to Istanbul at the initiative of its out-going Turkish chair, on May 10 to 11. The two events coincided so much, that Diplomats told "EuroFora" that f.ex. a Minister was able to "jump" from the UN to the CoE subsequent meeting on the spot !

coe_cm_istanbul_400.


It's immediately after these events, that IMF's Top Official suddenly bought, on May 12, his New York ticket, as "AirFrance" reportedly found, travelling to the UN Headquarters' City for reasons which still remain unknown.
------------------

ar_istanbul__ny__berlin...._400

Many Media have raised the Question what DSK was doing at New York on Friday, May 13, before the Sofitel incident which led to his arrest on Saturday afternoon (May 14) at JFK Airport in a Plane ready to fly towards Europe, where he should start a series of crucial meetings from Sunday :


- Fly from Turkey (Istanbul), crossing all Europe and the Atlantic Ocean, just in order to stay only one (1) Day in New York, before re-crossing for a third time the Atlantic to reach the EU next Day, (for meetings in Berlin and Brussels, etc), while his Home and Job were at Washington DC, and his wife stayed in Paris, is obviously a strange way to waste so much precious Time, Energy and Money, unless DSK had serious reasons to do so.


After French "Figaro", "Le Monde", etc. and U.S. mainsteram Media, even ..Chinese Newspapers wondered what IMF's Chief was doing at New York on Friday, May 13 : - "It wasn't clear why he was in New York. The IMF is based in Washington, and he had been due in Germany on Sunday to meet with Chancellor Angela Merkel", noted "People's Daily".
-------------------------------------

dsk_judge_400

+ The Imbroglio became even more confused when IMF Chief's Lawyer at New York County's Court tried to use the claim that DSK had "a VIP Pass issued by the United Nations", (as he said at the obvious instigation of Mr. Strauss-Kahn himself, who appeared eager to stress that point in front of the Judge, as it clearly results from full Video Reports of the 1st Public Hearing), in order to vainly ask to let him Free to go on Bail, arguying (without convincing the NY Judge) that UNO's document would somehow confront the NY Attorney's accusation that DSK was allegedly trying to flee, in precipitation, shortly after the Sofitel incident, bypassing usual routine procedures in a suspicious hurry, augmenting the impression that, (independently of whether he was innocent or guilty for the crimes for which he was accused), pending on-going Investigations, he was a "Flight Risk".

un_immunity..._400


The UNO's Spokesman had just reacted, earlier this day, to a differend but related Question by another Journalist at NY, who had asked him if IMF's Chief had any UNO "Immunity", to which, Nesirky, according to the official UN "full" transcript, preferred to carefully "check" before giving, later-on, a definite reply, without any comment on the "sub-judice" case itself, as he said.


However, speaking later to "EuroFora" in a Phone contact from CoE's Headquarters, Strasbourg, the UN Secretary General's Spokesman, did not deny that IMF's Head might, indeed, have a UN Pass :


- When we asked Nesirky whether "at [his] knowledge, IMF's Head was given a General VIP UN Pass for Airports, or if that was a Specific Pass related to that UN Development Conference" in Turkey that same week (See supra),  the UN SG Spokesman preferred to give to "EuroFora" a reply from the point of view of "general principles" or "general practice" :


 - "I don't know anything about that" (DSK) in particular. But "what there is, is a UN "Laissez-Passez.. It's a Travel document. UN issues such "Laissez-Passez" Documents", including "to Officials of Specialized Agencies, as is the IMF and some other Organizations", he confirmed.


 - But this should be always done "in Line with Agreements concluded (by the UN) with those (specialized) Organizations ", UN Spokesman added. I.e. UN "Laissez-passez" documents are meant, in each case, to refer to the appropriate Agreements relating to the Status of the relevant Organization and its Officials", he pointed out.


- Asked by "EuroFora" to clarify whether such UN Passes are "issued for Long periods of Time, or just for Specific events", Nesirky replied that he "can't speak about what may be happening in Specialized Organizations", as the IMF, but, "what happens inside the UN, f.ex. in the Laissez-Passez that I have, its Expiry Date is the Expiry Date of my Contract", (i.e., the equivalent, for DSK, of Autumn 2012, according to his IMF mandate).


- However, "I have No Idea" on what is happening inside the IMF in this regard, f.ex. about its current Head, DSK, and "that's something for the IMF to answer", he carefully added.


 - At any case, "these (UN Passes are) given not just to Top Officials, but (wider) to Officials, including of the IMF but other Organizations as well, according to Agreement concluded with them, (when they are) Travelling on Official Business", Nesirky underlined.


However, on DSK's case, both IMF and USA's State Department reportedly declared earlier that IMF's Chief had travelled to New York "on Private business", (comp. Supra).


- "I don't know what the situation is in the IMF, (f.ex.) for how long those Documents are Valid : That's not UN business, that has to deal with the IMF". But, inside the UN itself; "Laissez Passez are Travel Documents that UN issues for UN Staff travelling for Official Business", he stressed.


Asked whether such UN Passes might somehow facilitate an exceptionally Speedy Departure from an Airport, as JFK in DSK's NY saga (See supra), Nesirky, without replying precisely on that point, simply observed that they "cannot replace Passports, but go with your National Passport",  - "But, f.ex., if you travel in a Country which needs a Visa, that Visa will go in your (UN) Laissez-passez with which you are travelling on Official Business", UNO's Spokesman added.     

               
- "It simply Identifies a Person as an Official of the UN, or, for Officials of other Specialized Agencies, then it identifies them as Officials of those specialized organizations" (as f.ex. IMF). - "That's simply a (UN) Document which goes with you when you are Travelling on Official Business : That's what it's for", he reiterated.
------------------------------
- But, as for the Question that many Media ask (See supra), i.e. "why (DSK) came to New York for one Day (See supra) ?", UNO's Spokesman at first declined to give any reply, advising  "EuroFora" twice that we "need to ask the IMF why he came to New York".

the_united_nations_building_new_york_heaquarters_400_01

-  "IMF already said that it was on Private Business", "EuroFora" reminded, pointing at several other Media. But, at least, "was there any useful business for the UN" itself, "any UN activity on the 13th" of May in New York, which might have involved DSK ?, we went on to ask specifically.


+  "EuroFora" also reminded Nesirky that IMF Top Official was among the participants to a UNO Conference on Development, in Istanbul, Turkey, almost at the same moment that CoE's Committee of (Foreign) Ministers was convoked there by its (out-going) Turkish rotating chair, on May 11th, at the eve of his suprising, last-minute decision  to get an Airplane Ticket for a 1 Day trip back and forth to New York, (See supra).


 -"It was about the Least Developed Countries ... I was there (at Istanbul, Turkey, on May 10-11), with the (UNO) Secretary General", Ban Ki Moon. - But this was "an entirely Different business", the UN Spokesman clarified.

least_developed_countries_in_istanbul_turkey_400


- Nevetheless, "given the Fact that he (DSK) was involved in a UN Conference just before, the question is if there might have been any kind of useful UN activity" for him also (in UN Headquarters' City New York) "on the 13th" of May, or not, "EuroFora" wondered, noting that many Media ask what might have (suddenly) brought (IMF's Head, DSK) there.


IMF's head was due to visit the EU for crucial Financial decisions including on Public Debt provoked in Greece (after a 1999-2001 deal to exchange Turkey's unpopular EU bid with Greece's entry into €uroZone earlier than normal, i.e. before Reforms needed to cut the excessive Number of Public Sector's cushy job holders accumulated since the Nepotism of the 1980ies : See "EuroFora"s earlier Publications).


The move came just before Elections in Cyprus (May 22) and Turkey (June 12), closely followed by a Top meeting with UNO's Secretary General at nearby Geneva on July 4, where some want to decide an International Conference for a Solution to Cyprus' issue, including on Greek Cypriot Refugees' Family Homes, Private Properties and Ancestral Land, that Turkey, which still occupies the Northern part of Cyprus since the 1974 Invasion of Ankara's Military, notoriously aims to keep, without Restoring nor really Paying them, despite ECHR's Judgements supposed to be executed under the supervision of CoE's Foreign Ministers, that IMF's Head crossed in Istanbul (see Supra).       

                                             
- But, "I have not the slightest idea" about DSK's "Itinery", after his departure from that UN Conference in Turkey, and the reasons for which he came at UN Headquarters' City, New York just before flying back accross the Atlantic ocean to Europe. - "It's really for them (IMF) to say".- Because this, apparently, had ..- "Nothing to do with the UN", Nesirky strongly denied in conclusion.

 imf_build__logo_400

If it's indeed the case, it's obviously not clear whether the use of a UN "Laissez-Passez" at JFK Airport by DSK, right after the Sofitel incident, (as he asked his Lawyer to stress : See supra), might have been justified, or rather not.

dsk_in_court_all_400

The supplementary fact that IMF's Chief, DSK, returning from a UN Conference on "Least Developed Countries", at Istanbul (Turkey), is accused by NY Police to assault a poor African Woman, immigrant precisely from one of these Poorest Countries in the World : Guinea, Mother and Widow, obliged to work as cleaning Hotel Maid, in a 3.000 $ per night luxuous suite at New York, inevitably looks even more upsetting. -------------------------


At any case, at least the additional fact that the NY island-prison where DSK was reportedly kept, served that day, ... "Turkey  burgers, with Smashed potatoes", as NY-based "Bloomberg-News" noted with dubious humour, should probably be due to a mere coincidence...

***

 

Multi-lingual Interface

Statistics

Visitors: 2721311

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0634_400

People in Europe and the World expect from CoE to make a succes of its "Monitoring" for Human Rights and Democracy, despite difficulties, said Finland's President Tarja Halonen to "EuroFora" at a crucial moment for the mecanism built 15 years ago by the paneuropean organization which celebrates its 60th Anniversary in 2009.

Halonen, known as "Mother" of CoE's "Monitoring" mecanism, a long-time MEP and former Foreign Minister before becoming Finland's President, holds a long experience in the mattter, after also serving twice as CoE and EU Chairwoman in the past. That's why she is well placed to judge how CoE's "monitoring" should deal today with some crucial issues of importance both to CoE and to the EU.

The move came just a Month before a crucial, last visit to Turkey, scheduled for June, by the President of CoE''s "Monitoring" Committee, Ukranian MEP Serge Holovaty, to finalize his Report on Ankara, the CoE Member State with the longest Monitoring procedure. From its results depends its overall credibility.

This is a Test-case, because, in fact, it's in order to avoid Sanctions threatened against Turkey by a CoE's Assembly's April 1995 Resolution for grave Human Rights violations, Democracy gaps, the continuing Military Occupation in Cyprus, the unresolved Kurdish problem, Aegean differend with Greece, etc., that MEPs decided to create, for the 1st time on April 1996, a "Monitoring" proces, allegedly destinated to check, without excluding Countries who did not fulfill all CoE's standards.

In the Past, the obliged withdrawal of Greece's Military regime and of its "Civil" cover-up out of the CoE had helped bring back Democracy in 1974. But, on the contrary, since April 1996, the idea was to "monitor" Human Rights' respect while keeping most concerned Countries inside the CoE. After Turkey's oldest example, this was extended also to several former "Eastern" European Countries, even if CoE's Assembly has imposed to some of them (fex. Ukraine, Russia, etc., after Belarus, Serbia, etc) various "Sanctions", that Ankara always avoided. Curiously more succesful even than .. USA itself, (a CoE "Observer" since 1995), which has been at least threatened with sanctions some years ago..

EU-effects of CoE's Monitoring process became obvious between 2001-2008, since the "closure" of this procedure, when CoE felt that a Country had met most of its Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law obligations, (i.e. the "Copenhagen Criteria" for the EU), helped trigger Negotiations with the EU for "Accession" or other closer relations : This occured already before the 2004 and 2007 EU Enlargements to former "Eastern" European Countries, as well as for the commencement of "accession" negotiations with Croatia, and of "open-ended" negotiations with Turkey in 2005.

    But a stricking new development are Holovaty's recent findings that on core Human Rights issues as Torture and Freedom of Expression, Turkey, even "5 Years after" CoE closed its "Monitoring", back in 2004, inciting EU to start accession Negotiations in 2005, still presents grave problems.

    His findings are of crucial importance after a 2008 CoE Resolution called, "if need be", to "seriously consider the possibility of Re-Opening the Monitoring procedure for Turkey" : A move which might affect Ankara's controversial EU bid, since EU Accession Negotiations are based on the Hypothesis that the Candidate fullfils the "Copenhagen Criteria" (See above)..
-------------------------
    Holovaty expressed his will to check  "Matters still Outstanding" and  those that he "didn't have an opportunity to discuss" at an earlier visit this year, "in order to discuss the more complex issues in greater depth", at his forthcoming New Visit to Ankara, before the December 2009 EU Summit.  This is all based on the 2004 CoE Resolution which stresses that, CoE "will continue.. post-monitoring Dialogue with the Turkish authorities,...in addition to a 12-points list,..and on any Other Matter that might arise in connection with Turkey’s Obligations as a CoE member state".

    CoE's Resolution also asks  from Turkey "to secure the proper Implementation of Judgements, particularly in the Cyprus v. Turkey InterState case", of 2001, which concerns also the plight of many Hundreds of MISSING People. It adds Turkey's obligations to "execute" ECHR's Judgements in the Loizidou case,..and in particular adopt General Measures to avoid repetition or continuation of Violations found by the Court" to the detriment of Refugees.

    Nevertheless, Holovaty said to "EuroFora" that "MISSING" persons,"might be included" and cannot be excluded, but he has yet to examine the situation "to find out  which issues will be raised" to the Turkish Government.

    Therefore, "EuroFora" asked Halonen, as the Historic "Mother" of CoE's Monitoring mecanism, if she thought that, "whenever there are grave Human Rights Violations, as fex. "MISSING" persons, attested even by ECHR's judgements, they should be always checked by a Monitoring process. Or could they be forgotten ?"
    
     - "We (CoE) must be, at the same time, Fair, Realistic, but not in the mind that "now we have Forgotten", etc., replied to "EuroFora"'s question Halonen, speaking as a matter of general principle.

    - "When we think of those People that are suffering from the lack of Democracy, of Human Rights, and of the Rule of Law", "we should find a base on how to deal with the (Monitoring) system more rapidly"', she stressed.

    - "Sometimes it's very difficult to combine Transparency and Effectivenes together, particularly in this specific case", she went on to say. But, "I have not found a (CoE Member) Country who could be insensitive in this sens", Halonen answered concerning grave Human Rights violations attested by the ECHR.

    - "I have no ready-made answer. I have the expectations that you, in the CoE, will, step by step, find the different types of the monitoring systems."

    Also "because this is a part of the UN's Post-Conflict system, (fex. when it comes to Cyprus' MISSING persons), and it's a more Global system". So that, "If we make a succes in Europe, the others will follow", throughout the World.  "But they expect that we (Europe) are this opportunity, this Opportunity to make a Succes", Halonen concluded.

    In addition, she advised to extend CoE's Monitoring to all its 47 Member States, "because, as long as we hear that, all these monitoring systems are "OK for the neighbor, but not for me", "it's very difficult" to understand. Something which could make easier to Compare...

    Finnish MEP Jaako Laakso, former CoE Rapporteur on the Occupied Territories of Cyprus and one of the 5 Signatories of the Historic CoE's call to create the "MONITORING" mecanism since 1996, was more specific :  - "We (CoE Assembly) have to find a way for the issue of Cyprus' MISSING People to be better followed", he stressed, anouncing his intention to "speak to Mr. Holovaty" about that. "There might be also other ways", added Laakso.

    - The 2008 "Year had been a very Bad one for Turkey with regard to Human Rights in general, and Freedom of Expression in particular", denounced, meanwhile, Holovaty's preliminary Post-Monitoringh Draft Report by Holovaty, published by the CoE on April 2009.

    "Amnesty International believes that freedom of expression is not guaranteed given the various articles of the Criminal Code that restrict it. .. "For example, 1,300 Websites are said to have been closed down by the (Turkish) authorities in 2008" ! While "the new Turkish Criminal Code was used to bring a total of 1,072 proceedings between June 2005 and April 2008, and led to the conviction of 192 people", for expressing views. "Representatives of the Özgür Gündem newspaper, which specialises in Kurdish affairs, ..complained about Numerous Attacks on their Freedom of Expression ...as was everyone who advocated a settlement to the question by means other than the intervention of the army" "According to their figures, 19 Newspapers had been suspended 43 times between 4 August 2006 and 4 November 2008" !...

    Moreover, on 2008,  CoE's "Ministers adopted its 4rth Resolution on the execution of the judgments of the ECHR, ...and outstanding issues regarding 175 Judgements and decisions relating to Turkey delivered between 1996 and 2008...  concerning Deaths resulting from the excessive use of force by members of the Security forces, the failure to protect the right to life, the DIisappearance and/or death of individuals, Ill-Treatment and the Destruction of property". CoE's " Ministers urged the Turkish authorities ...to ensure that members of Security forces of all ranks can be prosecuted without administrative
authorisation" for "serious crimes". Holovaty reminded.

"Nonetheless", Holovaty heard anew of "Several cases of Violence committed last year (2008) by the (Turkish) security forces". Amnesty International speaks of Many Cases of ill-treatment and Torture in the prisons and by the police". "Including, fex."'the death of Engin Ceber, a young man of 29 who died on October 2008 as a result of the TORTURE allegedly inflicted on him by police officers, prison staff and members of the gendarmerie. He was part of a group of people arrested on September 2008 during a demonstration and Press Conference in Istanbul'. Proceedings against suspects are "on-going" in this case.

- " I therefore noted an Obvious Contradiction between the Government’s stated “zero tolerance” policy.... of Torture and other forms of ill-treatment, and the different testimonies given", denounced CoE's Rapporteur.  Turkish "authorities must make considerable efforts to guarantee that proper investigations are carried out into allegations of abuses by members of the security forces and that perpetrators are effectively punished" "In this respect, I have requested detailed Statistics on the number of Investigations, acquittals and convictions in cases involving allegations of abuse in order to show the positive impact of the measures taken to date", Holovaty said, repeating a permanently unsatisfied CoE's demand to Turkey since a Decade...

    - "The Political Crisis that shook the country in the spring of 2008 highlighted the Weaknesses of the (Turkish) Constitution", which comes from the Military regime of 1982, "and the Urgent Need of Reforms", stressed from the outset CoE's Rapporteur in 2009. In particular, "the ...Democratic functioning of state institutions, including the independence of the judicial system, are crucial", he observes.

    But, "the Electoral  system and the ways in which it is circumvented do not appear to give those elected complete Legitimacy, and tend to pervert the course of direct universal suffrage", denounces Holovaty, observing that, even 5 Years later, Turkey did not yet change the 10% nationwide Threshold for a party to take any seat, which is "far higher" than the "3%" maximum in Europe and already condemned as contrary to European Standards by the CoE.

    + Moreover, EU Parliament's 2009 Report on Turkey, drafted by Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten and adopted in Strasbourg on March, expresses "Concern over the Failure of the (Turkish) Judiciary to prosecute cases of Torture and Ill-treatment, the Number of which is Growing". EU also "is concerned about continuing Hostility and Violence against Minorities" in Turkey. It also "calls on the Turkish Government to launch, as a matter of Priority, a Political Initiatve favouring a lasting Settlement of the Kurdish issue, (while "condemning violence.. and terrorist groups"). EU "regrets that No progress has been made on establishing full, systematic Civilian suprevisory functions over the (Turkish) Military".

    The final results of Holovaty's 2nd and last visit to Turkley will be known later this year, and, at any case, before EU's December 2009 Summit.

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.