english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow UN Spokesman Nesirky to EuroFora on IMF's Straus-Kahn UN VIP Pass +NY trip after Turkey UN/CoE event

UN Spokesman Nesirky to EuroFora on IMF's Straus-Kahn UN VIP Pass +NY trip after Turkey UN/CoE event

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
 
nesirky_on_others_quest_400


UN Press Director/Spokesman Martin Nesirky said to "Eurofora" that, even if IMF Chief Strauss-Kahn may have a UN Pass, as his Lawyer told a NY Court, and was at a UN Conference in Turkey with UNO's Secretary General Ban Ki Moon before the NY Sofitel incident which brought him to Jail for alleged assault, he "hadn't the slightest idea" why DSK had come at New York (UN Headquarters' city) just for one day, before he tried to cross again the Atlantic Ocean for scheduled meetings in Europe with German Chancellor Merkel and Brussels' €uro-EU Officials, immediately afterwards.

ldc_un_conference_istanbul_913_may_400

"EuroFora" observed that DSK was included among key-note Speakers in a UN Conference on the Least-Developed Countries hosted in Turkey, Istanbul, together with former UNDEP Turkish Official Kemal Dervis, almost at the same Days and at the same City where a Paneuropean CoE Foreign Ministers' session had been exceptionally transfered from Strasbourg to Istanbul at the initiative of its out-going Turkish chair, on May 10 to 11. The two events coincided so much, that Diplomats told "EuroFora" that f.ex. a Minister was able to "jump" from the UN to the CoE subsequent meeting on the spot !

coe_cm_istanbul_400.


It's immediately after these events, that IMF's Top Official suddenly bought, on May 12, his New York ticket, as "AirFrance" reportedly found, travelling to the UN Headquarters' City for reasons which still remain unknown.
------------------

ar_istanbul__ny__berlin...._400

Many Media have raised the Question what DSK was doing at New York on Friday, May 13, before the Sofitel incident which led to his arrest on Saturday afternoon (May 14) at JFK Airport in a Plane ready to fly towards Europe, where he should start a series of crucial meetings from Sunday :


- Fly from Turkey (Istanbul), crossing all Europe and the Atlantic Ocean, just in order to stay only one (1) Day in New York, before re-crossing for a third time the Atlantic to reach the EU next Day, (for meetings in Berlin and Brussels, etc), while his Home and Job were at Washington DC, and his wife stayed in Paris, is obviously a strange way to waste so much precious Time, Energy and Money, unless DSK had serious reasons to do so.


After French "Figaro", "Le Monde", etc. and U.S. mainsteram Media, even ..Chinese Newspapers wondered what IMF's Chief was doing at New York on Friday, May 13 : - "It wasn't clear why he was in New York. The IMF is based in Washington, and he had been due in Germany on Sunday to meet with Chancellor Angela Merkel", noted "People's Daily".
-------------------------------------

dsk_judge_400

+ The Imbroglio became even more confused when IMF Chief's Lawyer at New York County's Court tried to use the claim that DSK had "a VIP Pass issued by the United Nations", (as he said at the obvious instigation of Mr. Strauss-Kahn himself, who appeared eager to stress that point in front of the Judge, as it clearly results from full Video Reports of the 1st Public Hearing), in order to vainly ask to let him Free to go on Bail, arguying (without convincing the NY Judge) that UNO's document would somehow confront the NY Attorney's accusation that DSK was allegedly trying to flee, in precipitation, shortly after the Sofitel incident, bypassing usual routine procedures in a suspicious hurry, augmenting the impression that, (independently of whether he was innocent or guilty for the crimes for which he was accused), pending on-going Investigations, he was a "Flight Risk".

un_immunity..._400


The UNO's Spokesman had just reacted, earlier this day, to a differend but related Question by another Journalist at NY, who had asked him if IMF's Chief had any UNO "Immunity", to which, Nesirky, according to the official UN "full" transcript, preferred to carefully "check" before giving, later-on, a definite reply, without any comment on the "sub-judice" case itself, as he said.


However, speaking later to "EuroFora" in a Phone contact from CoE's Headquarters, Strasbourg, the UN Secretary General's Spokesman, did not deny that IMF's Head might, indeed, have a UN Pass :


- When we asked Nesirky whether "at [his] knowledge, IMF's Head was given a General VIP UN Pass for Airports, or if that was a Specific Pass related to that UN Development Conference" in Turkey that same week (See supra),  the UN SG Spokesman preferred to give to "EuroFora" a reply from the point of view of "general principles" or "general practice" :


 - "I don't know anything about that" (DSK) in particular. But "what there is, is a UN "Laissez-Passez.. It's a Travel document. UN issues such "Laissez-Passez" Documents", including "to Officials of Specialized Agencies, as is the IMF and some other Organizations", he confirmed.


 - But this should be always done "in Line with Agreements concluded (by the UN) with those (specialized) Organizations ", UN Spokesman added. I.e. UN "Laissez-passez" documents are meant, in each case, to refer to the appropriate Agreements relating to the Status of the relevant Organization and its Officials", he pointed out.


- Asked by "EuroFora" to clarify whether such UN Passes are "issued for Long periods of Time, or just for Specific events", Nesirky replied that he "can't speak about what may be happening in Specialized Organizations", as the IMF, but, "what happens inside the UN, f.ex. in the Laissez-Passez that I have, its Expiry Date is the Expiry Date of my Contract", (i.e., the equivalent, for DSK, of Autumn 2012, according to his IMF mandate).


- However, "I have No Idea" on what is happening inside the IMF in this regard, f.ex. about its current Head, DSK, and "that's something for the IMF to answer", he carefully added.


 - At any case, "these (UN Passes are) given not just to Top Officials, but (wider) to Officials, including of the IMF but other Organizations as well, according to Agreement concluded with them, (when they are) Travelling on Official Business", Nesirky underlined.


However, on DSK's case, both IMF and USA's State Department reportedly declared earlier that IMF's Chief had travelled to New York "on Private business", (comp. Supra).


- "I don't know what the situation is in the IMF, (f.ex.) for how long those Documents are Valid : That's not UN business, that has to deal with the IMF". But, inside the UN itself; "Laissez Passez are Travel Documents that UN issues for UN Staff travelling for Official Business", he stressed.


Asked whether such UN Passes might somehow facilitate an exceptionally Speedy Departure from an Airport, as JFK in DSK's NY saga (See supra), Nesirky, without replying precisely on that point, simply observed that they "cannot replace Passports, but go with your National Passport",  - "But, f.ex., if you travel in a Country which needs a Visa, that Visa will go in your (UN) Laissez-passez with which you are travelling on Official Business", UNO's Spokesman added.     

               
- "It simply Identifies a Person as an Official of the UN, or, for Officials of other Specialized Agencies, then it identifies them as Officials of those specialized organizations" (as f.ex. IMF). - "That's simply a (UN) Document which goes with you when you are Travelling on Official Business : That's what it's for", he reiterated.
------------------------------
- But, as for the Question that many Media ask (See supra), i.e. "why (DSK) came to New York for one Day (See supra) ?", UNO's Spokesman at first declined to give any reply, advising  "EuroFora" twice that we "need to ask the IMF why he came to New York".

the_united_nations_building_new_york_heaquarters_400_01

-  "IMF already said that it was on Private Business", "EuroFora" reminded, pointing at several other Media. But, at least, "was there any useful business for the UN" itself, "any UN activity on the 13th" of May in New York, which might have involved DSK ?, we went on to ask specifically.


+  "EuroFora" also reminded Nesirky that IMF Top Official was among the participants to a UNO Conference on Development, in Istanbul, Turkey, almost at the same moment that CoE's Committee of (Foreign) Ministers was convoked there by its (out-going) Turkish rotating chair, on May 11th, at the eve of his suprising, last-minute decision  to get an Airplane Ticket for a 1 Day trip back and forth to New York, (See supra).


 -"It was about the Least Developed Countries ... I was there (at Istanbul, Turkey, on May 10-11), with the (UNO) Secretary General", Ban Ki Moon. - But this was "an entirely Different business", the UN Spokesman clarified.

least_developed_countries_in_istanbul_turkey_400


- Nevetheless, "given the Fact that he (DSK) was involved in a UN Conference just before, the question is if there might have been any kind of useful UN activity" for him also (in UN Headquarters' City New York) "on the 13th" of May, or not, "EuroFora" wondered, noting that many Media ask what might have (suddenly) brought (IMF's Head, DSK) there.


IMF's head was due to visit the EU for crucial Financial decisions including on Public Debt provoked in Greece (after a 1999-2001 deal to exchange Turkey's unpopular EU bid with Greece's entry into €uroZone earlier than normal, i.e. before Reforms needed to cut the excessive Number of Public Sector's cushy job holders accumulated since the Nepotism of the 1980ies : See "EuroFora"s earlier Publications).


The move came just before Elections in Cyprus (May 22) and Turkey (June 12), closely followed by a Top meeting with UNO's Secretary General at nearby Geneva on July 4, where some want to decide an International Conference for a Solution to Cyprus' issue, including on Greek Cypriot Refugees' Family Homes, Private Properties and Ancestral Land, that Turkey, which still occupies the Northern part of Cyprus since the 1974 Invasion of Ankara's Military, notoriously aims to keep, without Restoring nor really Paying them, despite ECHR's Judgements supposed to be executed under the supervision of CoE's Foreign Ministers, that IMF's Head crossed in Istanbul (see Supra).       

                                             
- But, "I have not the slightest idea" about DSK's "Itinery", after his departure from that UN Conference in Turkey, and the reasons for which he came at UN Headquarters' City, New York just before flying back accross the Atlantic ocean to Europe. - "It's really for them (IMF) to say".- Because this, apparently, had ..- "Nothing to do with the UN", Nesirky strongly denied in conclusion.

 imf_build__logo_400

If it's indeed the case, it's obviously not clear whether the use of a UN "Laissez-Passez" at JFK Airport by DSK, right after the Sofitel incident, (as he asked his Lawyer to stress : See supra), might have been justified, or rather not.

dsk_in_court_all_400

The supplementary fact that IMF's Chief, DSK, returning from a UN Conference on "Least Developed Countries", at Istanbul (Turkey), is accused by NY Police to assault a poor African Woman, immigrant precisely from one of these Poorest Countries in the World : Guinea, Mother and Widow, obliged to work as cleaning Hotel Maid, in a 3.000 $ per night luxuous suite at New York, inevitably looks even more upsetting. -------------------------


At any case, at least the additional fact that the NY island-prison where DSK was reportedly kept, served that day, ... "Turkey  burgers, with Smashed potatoes", as NY-based "Bloomberg-News" noted with dubious humour, should probably be due to a mere coincidence...

***

 

Multi-lingual Interface

Statistics

Visitors: 56420433

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.