english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow MEPS + EU Commission v.President Reding to EuroFora: Fight Corruption in order to help Growth !

MEPS + EU Commission v.President Reding to EuroFora: Fight Corruption in order to help Growth !

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
20121120_161931_400


*Strasbourg/EU Parliament/Angelo Marcopolo/- EU Commission's vice-President, Viviane Reding, speaking today to "EuroFora", after a Press Conference on Legal matters (see Infra) in Strasbourg, anounced a Series of New Measures in order to Fight efficiently against Corruption, and her action was Timely completed by a parallel move, earlier today, by 3 mainstream MEPs who play leading roles mainly in EU Parliament's brand new Committee against Organized Crime, timely pointing also to what Corruption costs in terms of Growth :

----------


Questioned by "EuroFora" if she is currently preparing something in face of the current need to definitively end up with widespread Corruption in certain sectors aggravated amidst the Global Crisis, which upset more and more EU Citizens who feel many among its consequences, the competent EU Commissioner in charge of Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship was positive :


- "Yes, we (EU Commission) have already put on the table a Proposal on the Corruption against EU Budget", replied Reding to "EuroFora"s query.
- In fact, it's "Commissioner (Algirdas) Semeta (in charge of Audit and Anti-Fraud, etc) and myself, (who are) proposing Criminal Law" Measures, the EU Commissioner explained.


+ "And we are going to continue working on this, towards moving in the end to a an effcient European Policy action against Corruption and Criminality, but for (protecting) the (EU) Taxpayers Money", she promissed.


However, since such moves are destinated to guarantee a better EU "Future", as the competent EU Commissioner acknowledged, meanwhile, the obviously welcome initiative of Reding (an experienced former MEP herself), could find a timely Complementary action from EU Parliament :

3_meps_400


- Three mainstream MEPs from the biggest €uroArea Countries, Manfred Weber from Germany, Veronique Mathieu from France, and Salvatore Iacolino from Italy, who are working inside EU Parliament's New Commission against Organized Crime, in a Press Conference in Strasbourg focused on "the Fight against Corruption in Europe", anounced a series of proposed, drastic Measures to help the EU act efficiently also on Present and/or continuing cases, (which might also involve on-going consequences of acts which started to be committed in the past) :


The 3 MEPs denounced, inter alia, the fact that Corruption Costs to the EU more than +1% of GD Growth, while, according to other estimations, this costs could bypass more than + 170 Billions €..  At the same time, Polls (f.ex. by EuroBarometer, etc) show that 75 % of EU Citizens feel today "Anxious" about Corruption...


=> Therefore, they intend to push towards the introduction of concrete Measures including, among many others, also the Facilitation of "WistleBlowers" ready to denounce Corruption, more practical Safeguards particularly on Public Procurments, etc., and even Sanctions against those who knew the existence of various cases of Corruption, f.ex. in the Public Sector, etc., but failed to do their Duty to reveil it, by reporting such damaging and unlawful acts, instead of Covering them up...
-------------------


The topical case of Greece is, in this regard, a good, concrete Example :


Most Greek People, both SMEs and other productive Businesses, as well as Poor and/or fragile Persons, bear a heavy burden just in order to continue to pay a disproportionate number of State and Public Sector civil servants, many among whom have notoriously been scandalously appointed in unproductive, cushy jobs, some being abusive political lackeys of Past regimes, and certain being even involved in Corruption and/or other Crimes, after receiving permanent financial a.o. advantages during a 30 Years period (1981-2011+) with several Clientelist and/or Nepotist former Governments, which has notoriously provoked the excessive Debt, initially hidden during 1999-2002 but suddenly busted by the 2008-2010 Global Crisis etc., so that, now, it's mathematically impossible to persist paying them during even more Decades, (f.ex. by early "Retirements", i.e. for doing absolutely Nothing !), simply because this obviously risks to lead to an aggravated Deadlock by extending (instead of reducing) a "Structural Deficit" in the Public Sector, while also the question of Responsibilities and Sanctions (financial, administrative and/or penal) for at least some more or less serious cases of Corruption and/or other Crimes, which remain scandalously unpunished since the 1980ies, has become today Of Crucial importance, both for Economic Efficiency and Social Justice/Healthy Political Democracy reasons, strongly felt by a wide, cross-party Majority of Citizens who sincerely wish a kind of "Renaissance" of the Greek State, needing an adequate Anti-Corruption campaign.


Otherwise, i.e. as long as persists the  Public Sector's Structural Deficit (notoriously provoked mainly by Corruption in the Past), the Debt problem risks to become too complicated to solve. While, on the contrary, a Healthy "cure d' amaigrissement" of that Public Sector, mainly via an adequate Anti-Corruption campaign (comp. Supra), could succeed to make a Just and Efficient Solution much more Simplified...


---------------------------------------------

 

(../..)

***

(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent earlier to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors. A more accurate, full Final Version may be published asap).

***
Enterprise Europe Network

Statistics

Visitors: 60275006

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0218_400_01

(Opinion).

 In Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs, as the New EU Parliament's President, new EU Commission's President (+ probably EU Council's President, EU Foreign Minister, etc) should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies.

At the heart of the biggest EU Countries, in France and Germany, EU Citizens clearly voted for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe based on Values, declared explicitly incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

This main choice was also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries, such as Austria (cf. promise of a Referendum), Spain (cf. EPP program's reservations vis a vis Enlargment), etc., while EPP Parties won also in Poland, Hungary, Cyprus, etc.

In other Countries, whenever Governing coalitions didn't make these choices or eluded them, continuing to let a Turkish lobby push for its entry into the EU, they paid a high price, and risked to damage Europe, by obliging EU Citizens to massively vote for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to offer a possibility to promise  real change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU :

It's for this obvious reason that British UKIP (IndDem) succeeded now (after many statements against Turkey's EU bid) to become Great Britain's 2nd Party, unexpectedly growing bigger even than the Governing Labour Party, as well as the Liberal party  ! Facts prove that it's not an isolated phenomenon : A similar development occured in the Netherlands, where Geert Wilders "Party for Freedom" (PVV) became also the 2nd biggest in the country, (after EPP), boosting the chances of a politician who had withdrawn in 2004 from an older party "because he didn't agree with their position on Turkey". And in several other EU Member Countries, even previously small parties which now focused on a struggle against Turkey's controversial demand to enter in the EU, won much more or even doubled the number of their MEPs (fex. Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, etc).

On the contrary, whenever Socialist and oher parties were explicitly or implicitly for Turkey's controversial EU bid, they obviously lost Citizens' votes and fell down to an unprecedented low.

In consequence, EU Citizens clearly revealed their main political choices, in one way or another : They voted to change for less Bureaucracy, but more Politics and Values in a Europe really open to EU Citizens, but without Turkey's controversial EU bid.

Recent political developments are obviously different from the old political landscape which existed in the Past of 1999-2004, when Socialists based on Turkish 1% vote governed undisputed not only in Germany, but also in the UK, Greece and elsewhere, France followed old policies decided when it had been divided by "cohabitation", before the 3 "NO" to EU  Referenda since May 2005, before Merkel, before Sarkozy, etc.... before the surprises of 7 June 2009 new EU Elections.

If the current candidates to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, OK.

Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People.

The beginning of crucial, final Decisions are scheduled for the 1st EU Parliament's plenary session in Strasbourg, in the middle of July, and they could be completed towards the October session, when Lisbon Treaty's fate will have been fixed.


See relevant Facts also at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/2009electionsandturkey.html
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/daulelections.html
http://www.eurofora.net/brief/brief/euroelectionresult.html

 ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING