

German Chancelor Merkel at Constitutional Court: Human Dignity in 21st Century = more EU+BioEthics ?

New, crucial issues on Europe, Human Righs, BioEthics, and their political conditions, marked the visit of German Chancellor Angie Merkel at the Constitutional Court in nearby Karlsruhe, together with President Horst Köhler, on the occasion of a "change of guard" between its former chair, professor Papier, and its new one, professor Fosskuhle, shortly after the Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVG) issued a judgement on EU funds lend to the Greek Government in order to protect EuroZone, and just a month before it deals with another thorny issue on Genetic Technology on June.
The Key word, that resumes well the main substance of this event's exceptional character, not only for Germany, but also for Europe and perhaps for the World, was at the conclusion of Chancelor Merkel's speech, when she stressed that the common duty to protect "Human Dignity", (explicitly enschrined at the 1st Article of the German Constitution in a healthy reaction to the Nazi regime, based on the same inspiration as the European Convention of Human Rights), "must guide us also in the 21th Century".
-------------------
What is really at stake is much more than an implicit reference to the obviously interesting fact that a previous, controversial candidate for BVG's chair, initially proposed by the Socialist Party, Dr. Dreier, was reportedly refused by both the ChristianDemocrat CDU/CSU Majority and the "Greens", etc., after being strongly criticized for having taken in Public a dangerous stance which could apparently lead towards diminishing the protection of Human Embryo vis a vis Genetic a.o. Manipulations, while also allegedly opening a risky window even to "Torture" in certain cases, as it was hotly debated since 2008 in the German Press.
Such core Human Rights issues, which have a particularly large echo in modern Germany, whose People were the first to suffer from, and witness a Nazi regime's atrocities, are also topical today for all Europe and even the World, as it clearly results, f.ex. from the debates starting for the forthcoming 2010-2011 Review of the French Law on BioEthics, or US President Obama's controversial 2009 decision to unfreeze funding for Genetic research manipulating Human Embryos, contrary to his predecessors' (both democrat party's Bill Clinton back in 1993, and republican party's George W. Bush on August 2001) earlier decisions to protect the Human Embryo from potentially dangerous and/or unethical Genetic interventions, as well as from the current, 2010 CoE's discussions on a probably Historic new Reform of the European Court of Human Rights after the February 2010 PanEuropean Conference at Interlaken, during the Swiss CoE presidency, (See "EuroFora"'s NewsReports from Interlaken).
So, after an overall introduction by BVG's longt-tme Member and new vice-President professor Kirchof, it wasn't a surprise that, during the Karlsruhe ceremony, German President Horst Koehler, hailed, inter alia, the Constitutional Court's contribution for the protection of "Freedom of Expression", etc., particularly in view of the special importance that takes in the present context its role to defend the main characteristics of "a Democratic Society" "in a Globalized World".
Experienced out-going BVG's former President, prof. Papier, pushed the move even further by stressing the 2 new parallel trends of "Globalization and Europanization", particularly "on Human Rights", where, after the "Interlaken" 2010 CoE's Ministerial Conference (See supra), "National Supreme Courts" are more and more entrusted with the task to "integrate" ECHR's case-law in their national area, after CoE decided to make a greater use of this principle of "Subsidiarity", by making a strong appeal to all CoE Member States' competent National Authorities to act for the respect of ECHR's principles, creating a New Challenge.
Already, as ECHR's German EuroJudge Renate Jaeger earlier told "EuroFora", the "secret" for the exceptionaly "low" percentage of German cases at ECHR, compared to other Countries, is largely due to the fact that the nearby Karlsruhe Constitutional Court provides a rather satisfying remedy for many applicants.

Seizing that ball on the air, new BVG's President, prof. FossKuhle anounced his wish to, indeed, "further intensify relations with the ECHR and EU's Court of Justice", located in nearby Strasbourg and Luxembourg respectively, and, for that purpose, to start also "translating (BVG's) Judgements in French, English and Spanish".
President Fosskuhle also stressed that BVG should judge "only on Legal arguments", without "any Political" motivation, and promissed that the body will work "Collectively", according to the spirit of its Headquarter Building's well known "Architecture (symbolizing) Efficiency and Transparency". (A particularly interesting promisse for the European Press, since even German Government's Press Officers at Berlin were surprised from the unusual fact that, as BVG's Spokeswoman, Anja Kesting, confirmed to "EuroFora", while kindly providing practical information on how to follow the event, there was "exceptioally no Press accreditation procedure" for this unquestionably European interest event at nearby Karlsruhe, just a few minutes' distance from Strasbourg's European Court of Human Rights)...
- "There is No Alternative to European Integration", sharply and topically stressed also German Chancellor Angie Merkel, adding references to EU's Lisbon Treaty, which has just entered into force since December 2009. together with EU's New "Charter on Fundamental Freedoms" for EU Citizens.
Moreover, "based on the Principles enshrined in the Constitution", an harmonious "interaction and cooperation between all the Constitutional bodies : Government, President, Constituitional Court and Senate, ... provides the Stability which is at the Foundations of a Peaceful and Democratic living-together for our Society", she observed.
- "It's Wonderful that at this important Day, it's clear for all of us, that cooperation and Stability in our Country is shaped by our joint obligation to respect our Constitution, and particularly its 1st Article on Human Dignity : - This should guide us also in the 21st Century", Merkel stressed in conclusion.

"Human Dignity" is not only considered to be at the base of all Human Rights, but is also the main key-word frequently used to designate the protection of Human beings fboth from Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatments, and from dangerous Genetic a.o. Manipulations.
This obviously put the finger, indirectly but clearly, at what was mainly at stake from the choice that the Socialist party was finaly obliged to make for Prof. Fosskuhle from Bavaria, after ChristianDemocrats, Greens and other political and social forces refused to back the initial SPD's candidate, Dr. Dreier, reportedly because of his controversial statements on BioEthics and Torture (See supra).

A first, important "Test" for the new BVG's Chairman, prof. Fosskuhle, to show his sensitivity on BioEthic issues, will be shortly given on June 2010, when Germany's Federal Constitutional Court has already scheduled to deal, on Wednesday the 23th of June, with a "Law on Genetic Technology"...

However, in case, eventually, that the new BVG's Chairman might prove to be, in fact, not really differend from Dr. Dreier's controversial views, then, it will become obviously interesting, if not necessary, for all those who opposed such dangerous claims on BioEthics, Torture, etc. to consider opening new ways of political coalitions, particularly focusing on crucial BioEthics issues, as, f.ex. that between ChristianDemocrats and "Greens", who have already met often together in various struggles against Genetic and other Manipulations of Human beings, both at National and at EU level, (fex. inside EU Parliament) until recent years, and have already started to build even some national or local coalition governments, as, f.ex. in certain Regions in Austria, etc.
Naturally, this shouldn't be confonded with some obviously Opportunist infiltrations of the German "Greens" movement, f.ex. by Turkish lobbyists coming and going in and out of the Socialist or even other Parties ("Left", CDU, etc) according to their own selfish interests. (As that businessman reportedly linked with a deadly Air crash in Turkey and a Kidnapping Scandal in Brussels, who had been initially elected by "Green" voters but betrayed them by passing over to the "Socialist" party. Or another former assistant of former Socialist Minister of Defence, Rudolf Sharping, who left for the "Greens" after Sharping had to quit, among various Scandals, and got a Top job, but almost failed to be re-elected at the latest, 9/2009 Elections !)
On the contrary, an eventually necessary to boost Christian-Democrat - true "Greens" cooperation, at least on certain Crucial key-points of exceptional importance, (f.ex. BioEthics and other Human Rights, development of Environment and Climate-friendly Technologies, Financial adjustment on "Carbon"- Dumping from Foreign Countries which don't respect Environmental Legislation at EU's External Borders, etc), could also include other political and social players, (f.ex. many Liberals, and even certain exceptional Socialists, such as f.ex. the current EU Parliament's Environment Committee's Chairman MEP Joe Leinen, apparently sensitive on BioEthic issues, etc), and might become interesting in the foreseeable Future, punctually or even structurally, according to developments, not only in Germany, but also, perhaps, in France and other Countries, in EU Parliament, etc.
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Visitors: 59793713Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

People in Europe and the World expect from CoE to make a succes of its "Monitoring" for Human Rights and Democracy, despite difficulties, said Finland's President Tarja Halonen to "EuroFora" at a crucial moment for the mecanism built 15 years ago by the paneuropean organization which celebrates its 60th Anniversary in 2009.
Halonen, known as "Mother" of CoE's "Monitoring" mecanism, a long-time MEP and former Foreign Minister before becoming Finland's President, holds a long experience in the mattter, after also serving twice as CoE and EU Chairwoman in the past. That's why she is well placed to judge how CoE's "monitoring" should deal today with some crucial issues of importance both to CoE and to the EU.
The move came just a Month before a crucial, last visit to Turkey, scheduled for June, by the President of CoE''s "Monitoring" Committee, Ukranian MEP Serge Holovaty, to finalize his Report on Ankara, the CoE Member State with the longest Monitoring procedure. From its results depends its overall credibility.
This is a Test-case, because, in fact, it's in order to avoid Sanctions threatened against Turkey by a CoE's Assembly's April 1995 Resolution for grave Human Rights violations, Democracy gaps, the continuing Military Occupation in Cyprus, the unresolved Kurdish problem, Aegean differend with Greece, etc., that MEPs decided to create, for the 1st time on April 1996, a "Monitoring" proces, allegedly destinated to check, without excluding Countries who did not fulfill all CoE's standards.
In the Past, the obliged withdrawal of Greece's Military regime and of its "Civil" cover-up out of the CoE had helped bring back Democracy in 1974. But, on the contrary, since April 1996, the idea was to "monitor" Human Rights' respect while keeping most concerned Countries inside the CoE. After Turkey's oldest example, this was extended also to several former "Eastern" European Countries, even if CoE's Assembly has imposed to some of them (fex. Ukraine, Russia, etc., after Belarus, Serbia, etc) various "Sanctions", that Ankara always avoided. Curiously more succesful even than .. USA itself, (a CoE "Observer" since 1995), which has been at least threatened with sanctions some years ago..
EU-effects of CoE's Monitoring process became obvious between 2001-2008, since the "closure" of this procedure, when CoE felt that a Country had met most of its Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law obligations, (i.e. the "Copenhagen Criteria" for the EU), helped trigger Negotiations with the EU for "Accession" or other closer relations : This occured already before the 2004 and 2007 EU Enlargements to former "Eastern" European Countries, as well as for the commencement of "accession" negotiations with Croatia, and of "open-ended" negotiations with Turkey in 2005.
But a stricking new development are Holovaty's recent findings that on core Human Rights issues as Torture and Freedom of Expression, Turkey, even "5 Years after" CoE closed its "Monitoring", back in 2004, inciting EU to start accession Negotiations in 2005, still presents grave problems.
His findings are of crucial importance after a 2008 CoE Resolution called, "if need be", to "seriously consider the possibility of Re-Opening the Monitoring procedure for Turkey" : A move which might affect Ankara's controversial EU bid, since EU Accession Negotiations are based on the Hypothesis that the Candidate fullfils the "Copenhagen Criteria" (See above)..
-------------------------
Holovaty expressed his will to check "Matters still Outstanding" and those that he "didn't have an opportunity to discuss" at an earlier visit this year, "in order to discuss the more complex issues in greater depth", at his forthcoming New Visit to Ankara, before the December 2009 EU Summit. This is all based on the 2004 CoE Resolution which stresses that, CoE "will continue.. post-monitoring Dialogue with the Turkish authorities,...in addition to a 12-points list,..and on any Other Matter that might arise in connection with Turkey’s Obligations as a CoE member state".
CoE's Resolution also asks from Turkey "to secure the proper Implementation of Judgements, particularly in the Cyprus v. Turkey InterState case", of 2001, which concerns also the plight of many Hundreds of MISSING People. It adds Turkey's obligations to "execute" ECHR's Judgements in the Loizidou case,..and in particular adopt General Measures to avoid repetition or continuation of Violations found by the Court" to the detriment of Refugees.
Nevertheless, Holovaty said to "EuroFora" that "MISSING" persons,"might be included" and cannot be excluded, but he has yet to examine the situation "to find out which issues will be raised" to the Turkish Government.
Therefore, "EuroFora" asked Halonen, as the Historic "Mother" of CoE's Monitoring mecanism, if she thought that, "whenever there are grave Human Rights Violations, as fex. "MISSING" persons, attested even by ECHR's judgements, they should be always checked by a Monitoring process. Or could they be forgotten ?"
- "We (CoE) must be, at the same time, Fair, Realistic, but not in the mind that "now we have Forgotten", etc., replied to "EuroFora"'s question Halonen, speaking as a matter of general principle.
- "When we think of those People that are suffering from the lack of Democracy, of Human Rights, and of the Rule of Law", "we should find a base on how to deal with the (Monitoring) system more rapidly"', she stressed.
- "Sometimes it's very difficult to combine Transparency and Effectivenes together, particularly in this specific case", she went on to say. But, "I have not found a (CoE Member) Country who could be insensitive in this sens", Halonen answered concerning grave Human Rights violations attested by the ECHR.
- "I have no ready-made answer. I have the expectations that you, in the CoE, will, step by step, find the different types of the monitoring systems."
Also "because this is a part of the UN's Post-Conflict system, (fex. when it comes to Cyprus' MISSING persons), and it's a more Global system". So that, "If we make a succes in Europe, the others will follow", throughout the World. "But they expect that we (Europe) are this opportunity, this Opportunity to make a Succes", Halonen concluded.
In addition, she advised to extend CoE's Monitoring to all its 47 Member States, "because, as long as we hear that, all these monitoring systems are "OK for the neighbor, but not for me", "it's very difficult" to understand. Something which could make easier to Compare...
Finnish MEP Jaako Laakso, former CoE Rapporteur on the Occupied Territories of Cyprus and one of the 5 Signatories of the Historic CoE's call to create the "MONITORING" mecanism since 1996, was more specific : - "We (CoE Assembly) have to find a way for the issue of Cyprus' MISSING People to be better followed", he stressed, anouncing his intention to "speak to Mr. Holovaty" about that. "There might be also other ways", added Laakso.
- The 2008 "Year had been a very Bad one for Turkey with regard to Human Rights in general, and Freedom of Expression in particular", denounced, meanwhile, Holovaty's preliminary Post-Monitoringh Draft Report by Holovaty, published by the CoE on April 2009.
"Amnesty International believes that freedom of expression is not guaranteed given the various articles of the Criminal Code that restrict it. .. "For example, 1,300 Websites are said to have been closed down by the (Turkish) authorities in 2008" ! While "the new Turkish Criminal Code was used to bring a total of 1,072 proceedings between June 2005 and April 2008, and led to the conviction of 192 people", for expressing views. "Representatives of the Özgür Gündem newspaper, which specialises in Kurdish affairs, ..complained about Numerous Attacks on their Freedom of Expression ...as was everyone who advocated a settlement to the question by means other than the intervention of the army" "According to their figures, 19 Newspapers had been suspended 43 times between 4 August 2006 and 4 November 2008" !...
Moreover, on 2008, CoE's "Ministers adopted its 4rth Resolution on the execution of the judgments of the ECHR, ...and outstanding issues regarding 175 Judgements and decisions relating to Turkey delivered between 1996 and 2008... concerning Deaths resulting from the excessive use of force by members of the Security forces, the failure to protect the right to life, the DIisappearance and/or death of individuals, Ill-Treatment and the Destruction of property". CoE's " Ministers urged the Turkish authorities ...to ensure that members of Security forces of all ranks can be prosecuted without administrative
authorisation" for "serious crimes". Holovaty reminded.
"Nonetheless", Holovaty heard anew of "Several cases of Violence committed last year (2008) by the (Turkish) security forces". Amnesty International speaks of Many Cases of ill-treatment and Torture in the prisons and by the police". "Including, fex."'the death of Engin Ceber, a young man of 29 who died on October 2008 as a result of the TORTURE allegedly inflicted on him by police officers, prison staff and members of the gendarmerie. He was part of a group of people arrested on September 2008 during a demonstration and Press Conference in Istanbul'. Proceedings against suspects are "on-going" in this case.
- " I therefore noted an Obvious Contradiction between the Government’s stated “zero tolerance” policy.... of Torture and other forms of ill-treatment, and the different testimonies given", denounced CoE's Rapporteur. Turkish "authorities must make considerable efforts to guarantee that proper investigations are carried out into allegations of abuses by members of the security forces and that perpetrators are effectively punished" "In this respect, I have requested detailed Statistics on the number of Investigations, acquittals and convictions in cases involving allegations of abuse in order to show the positive impact of the measures taken to date", Holovaty said, repeating a permanently unsatisfied CoE's demand to Turkey since a Decade...
- "The Political Crisis that shook the country in the spring of 2008 highlighted the Weaknesses of the (Turkish) Constitution", which comes from the Military regime of 1982, "and the Urgent Need of Reforms", stressed from the outset CoE's Rapporteur in 2009. In particular, "the ...Democratic functioning of state institutions, including the independence of the judicial system, are crucial", he observes.
But, "the Electoral system and the ways in which it is circumvented do not appear to give those elected complete Legitimacy, and tend to pervert the course of direct universal suffrage", denounces Holovaty, observing that, even 5 Years later, Turkey did not yet change the 10% nationwide Threshold for a party to take any seat, which is "far higher" than the "3%" maximum in Europe and already condemned as contrary to European Standards by the CoE.
+ Moreover, EU Parliament's 2009 Report on Turkey, drafted by Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten and adopted in Strasbourg on March, expresses "Concern over the Failure of the (Turkish) Judiciary to prosecute cases of Torture and Ill-treatment, the Number of which is Growing". EU also "is concerned about continuing Hostility and Violence against Minorities" in Turkey. It also "calls on the Turkish Government to launch, as a matter of Priority, a Political Initiatve favouring a lasting Settlement of the Kurdish issue, (while "condemning violence.. and terrorist groups"). EU "regrets that No progress has been made on establishing full, systematic Civilian suprevisory functions over the (Turkish) Military".
The final results of Holovaty's 2nd and last visit to Turkley will be known later this year, and, at any case, before EU's December 2009 Summit.