english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow French Consumers Minister Hamon to EuroFora: Transparency key for Meal Safety beyond EU Imports

French Consumers Minister Hamon to EuroFora: Transparency key for Meal Safety beyond EU Imports

Written by ACM
Tuesday, 12 March 2013

 

minister_hamon_reply_to_agg_quest_400

*Strasbourg/EU Parliament/Angelo Marcopolo/- Transparency is of key importance in order to solve Food Safety problems, as those of the recent Scandal on Horsemeat which affected Millions of EU Consumers, and this implies, f.ex. to impose the obligation to Mark the Origins of a Food product even if it has been transformed into a prepared meal in an EU Country, contrary to what was the situation in this regard until now, observed in substance the new French French Minister for Social Economy and Consumption, Benoit Hamon, in reply to a question by "EuroFora", which raised also the issue of Imports from Third Countries, located outside of the EU :

       - "It's a European problem", stressed Minister Hamon in reply to "EuroFora"s question, which already affected more than 4 Millions 500 Thousand EU Consumers in the current case of Horsemeat disguised and paid as Beef, as he denounced earlier.

 

-------------------------------------------

hamon_points_to_agg


- "Obviously, the recent problem, as you said, concerns what happens inside EU's area, even if its origins are located around its external borders" (i.e. mainly towards the Black Sea region, f.ex. reportedly towards Lithuania, Poland and Romania, etc), "EuroFora" observed, referring to earlier Hamon's statements.


-  "But, quid about the (EU) Consumers' protection concerning Food products imported from Foreign (Non-EU) Countries. Should we (EU) reinforce the system of the overall protection also in this regard ?", we asked the competent French Minister.

agg_quest_pn_food_products_imported_into_the_eu

-----------------------------------


- "I think that, it's Obligatory to Mark the Origins (of Food Products) whenever they come from any Third Country located outside of the EU" , Hamon from the outset in reply.

20130312_184454_400


- But, "inside EU Countries, (this obligation)  disappears,  when that (food product : here = meat) is even slightly Transformed", he critically observed :


 - F.ex., "if you buy at a Butcher's shop a fresh piece of Beef, you can know the Origins of that fresh meat".


 - "But, it's enough to just cook a bit that product, f.ex. merely by boiling it with a bit of olive oil, and some seeds, etc., so that when it becomes transformed, then, there is No more any Obligation to Mark the Origins of that meat !", he denounced.


=> - "This is precisely what we want to Change, so that, Tomorrow, for all Prepared Meals, including with Beef, but not only for beef, the Origins of that meat will be Marked", the competent French Minister anounced in reply to "EuroFora"s question.
-----------------

benoit_hamon_reply_to_agg_quest_400
 

    Naturally, this goes even more when the origin of a Food product might come mainly from Foreign, Non-European Countries, even if, at least "at this Stage", in the present case,  "we (EU) didn't find yet any Non-EU actor, ..until Today", as Hamon observed, concerning those prepared meals.

    - However, a relative Uncertainty seems to exist on this point, for the moment, since, - "Now, concerning what comes from areas Outside of the EU, I don't remember exactly what's the situation about EU's (Food) Supplies, in prepared meals, and whether it's very Important" or less, the Consumers' Minister honestly replied, after vainly trying to interrogate the 2 experts who accompagnied him.

    - "But, at any case, we consider that Efforts should be made on Meals with meat Prepared (i.e. treated) inside the EU", Hamon stressed, as a matter of general principle.


    - Thus, at least for the time being, "at any case, this Crisis didn't highlight yet  the problems of Supplies with unmarked meat originating out of the EU", he carefuly reserved his final and exhaustive answer for after a more thorough examination of all the relevant Facts, later on.

hamon_speaks_to_js_agg_in_pe_400


    - "But, (as it stands now), it's rather a problem of Economic Fraud inside the EU", he observed.
-------------------------------------
     + In general, when there are too many Intermediaries between Production and Consumption, it's difficult to be Transparent. So, it's preferable to have Short Networks, instead of Long and complex ones, and that's why the Big Agro-Food Businesses in France have just committed themselves to use "VBF", i.e. beef meat produced in France, with a special Add informing consumers, Hamon also added.


     - "And there, it's much more Difficult to commit Fraud", he estimated.
-----------------
    The French Minister's Press Conference this afternoon followed an earlier, short but urgent Debate at EU Parliament on such Problems in the Food Supply Chain, seen in the context of the recent Horsemeat issue,  with the competent, Health and Consumers' EU Commissioner Tonio Borg, in the Morning, who is also due to speak at a Conference organized by EU's Economic and Social Committee later this same week in Brussels.

    Topically, this key issue of Food Safety move is raised at the eve of an important EU Parliament's plenary public Debate and Vote on the Future of EU's Common Agriculture policy, Tomorrow in Strasbourg, which will give a Mandate for imminent Negotiations between MEPs and Governments at EU Council on a Strategic crossroads affecting Europe's Economy, Society, Health, Security and Independence, as well as relations of trust with EU Citizens.

(../..)

***

(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already send, earlier, to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors. A more accurate, full Final Version may be published asap).

***
EUDigitalForum

Statistics

Visitors: 60275805

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

swed_eu_400

    The incoming Swedish EU Presidency (July-December 2009) may still remain in favour of Turkey's controversial EU bid, despite June 2009 EU Elections' results, but it has "very strong demands on Turkey"'s obligation to respect EU Rules, said the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, to "EuroFora", reacting to critical Press reports.

    - "I know (that) the link is often made also to Sweden's position on Turkey"'s controversial EU bid. Indeed, "we (Swedish EU Presidency) are very much engaged in the future membership of Turkey, but not without fullfiling all the Criteria".

    - "It's very clear that we (Swedish EU Presidecny) have very Strong Demands on Turkey, in a sort of concept for Future membership of the Union, ...which will be a Long Process...", she stressed.

    This means, in particular, "the Copenhagen Criteria (on Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law), and also the adaptation to the Acquis of the European Union".

     - "If you listen to what Mr. Bildt (the Swedish Foreign Minister) says on Turkey at different occasions, it's very clear : We want Turkey to become part of the Union, in the Future. But we want it to fullfil all the Criteria : The Acquis of the European Union. That's very clear", she concluded.

    The Senior Official of the Swedish Foreign Ministry was reacting to critical Press Reports, from Brussels' Journalists invited by EU Commission's secretariat to Stockholm, who claimed that Bildt was abusing of a ..."Whip" (sic !) against Cyprus, by "threatening" the presence of UNO's Peace-keeping force at the "Green line" which separates the island's Government-controlled areas from the territories occupied by Ankara's army, if Nicosia didn't accept any political solution, regardless of Turkey's demands, before the end of 2009.

        Governing AKEL Party's new Secretary General, Andros Kyprianou, reacted by declaring that no-one can threat the People of Cyprus : -"We shall decide for our Future, and nobody else",  he reportedly said, asking to "keep calm". "In order to find a Solution soon, certain basic Principles must be respected", he stressed, calling those who feel an urgency to use their influence on Turkey. Other Political Parties were more critical.

    This was a reference to recently reported statements by Turkish Minister Bagis, Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan and Turkey's National Security Council (a Military-Political body), accused to push towards a partitionist "2 States" solution, contrary to UNO SC Resolutions for Cyprus' reunification.

    December 2009 is a crucial moment for EU's appraisal of Turkey's controversial EU bid, because EU Council has decided to review then Ankara's compliance with the European position on the recognition of Cyprus' Government, which was clearly set out by an EU reply of 21 September 2005 to Turkish Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan's claims, refusing to recognize even the existence of EU Member Cyprus, in controversial statements he made to London (former EU chair) on July 29, 2005.

    EU Parliament's latest Resolution on Turkey, adopted on March 2009 in Strasbourg, warned Ankara that "the non-fulfillment of Turkey's commitments... by December 2009, may further seriously affect the process of Negotiations" with the EU.

    In practice, the issue boils down to Ankara's "embargo" against Ships and Airplanes using Cyprus' seaports or airports at the strategic EU island, which traditionaly hosts one of the World's biggest Shipping flags. EU has already "freezed" 6 relevant Chapters in EU - Turkey Negotiations since December 2006, after Ankara refused to fullfil a commitment it had undertaken when EU had decided to open controversial "accession" negotiations with Turkey, back on December 2005.

    - "As far as EU - Turkey relations are concerned, it's clear that Turkey needs to fullfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the additional Protocol (to "EC-Turkey Association Agreement"),  This is an important issue....and should be addresseed as soon as possible as it clearly affects the pace of the accession negotiations.Issues covered by the Declaration of September 2005 will continue to be followed up, and progress is urgently awaited", warned earlier in Strasbourg the out-going Czech EU Presidency (former vice-Prime Minister Alexander Vodra).

    But the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, dismissed "interpretations" by "some" that Foreign Minister Carl Bildt was reportedly "threatening" Cyprus with consequences on the UNFICYP, if it doesn't accept any solution until December 2009, while Turkey is reportedly delaying in an attempt to impose a partitionist "2 States" solution.

    On the contrary, Julin, stressed that "Sweden has strong demands on Turkey'"s respect of "Copenhagen Criteria and EU Acquis".

    Meanwhile, Sweden  is "concerned" about the risk of "Stalemate" in Cyprus' Talks, but is well aware that "the main responsibilities lie with the two leaders and the UNO", Europe playing only a role of "facilitator".

    After carefully verifying, the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, stressed to "EuroFora" that Bildt's reference to UNFICYP "was not linked to a Threat", and dismissed those who "interpreted" it so.

    On the contrary, the Swedish EU Presidency acknowledged the fact that Peace Talks are mainly for the UN and the leaders of the Cypriot communities, EU's role being limited into that of a "facilitator".

    As for Turkey's reported attempts to impose a "2 States' solution", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service sharply replied by stressing that Turkey must respect the "EU Acquis" rules.

    In particular :

    - "Basically he (Bildt) underlined that it's the leaders of the two communities in Cyprus and the UN that have the main responsibilities for solving the problem", started to say the Swedish Senior Official to "EuroFora", referring to the above-mentioned "briefing".

    - "But the EU had a role in sort of pointing out the benefits and facilitating a little bit the outcome for the settlement of the whole Cyprus' issue", she added.

    - "And he did state the Fact, that the rest of the World (i.e. USA, etc) will, of course, look at the differend issues which are at the table, and the future of the UN Peace keeping force is part of what is at the table", she admitted.

    - "I understand that some have interpreted that as a Threat, by the Swedish Minister" "But", in reality, "it's a statement of a Fact, that, when we'll look at the differend issues, one of the issues on which we shall have to take a stand on, is the future of the UN Peace keeping force in Cyprus".

    Indeed, one of the questions usually raised for a Solution of Cyprus' issue is what International and/or European or other Guarantees, by a Peace-keeping force, might be needed afterwards, eventually for a transitory period.

    Questioned anew by "EuroFora" whether (according to critical Press Reports) this could be taken as a veiled warning that, if Cyprus didn't accept any Turkish demand for any solution whatever, it might be left alone to face Ankara's Military Invasion/Occupation, she denied :

    - "He (Bildt) didn't say it in that way"... "It was not linked to a threat, or anything like that", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service stressed.

    On the contrary, "he (Bildt) underlined that the main responsibility lies with the parties concerned on the island". "The EU can try to facilitate and show the benefits of reaching a settlement. But also, when the EU and the rest of the World (i.e. USA) will have to look at it, they will look at all the Facts on the table, and the presence of the UN Peace-keeping force is one".

    And "he (Bildt) didn't speak about that at all", she replied to "EuroFora" question on Turkey's reported attemps to impose, in one way of another, a partitionist "2 States solution".

    Asked whether Bildt's aim was to incite both parties to move forward efficiently, she agreed :

    - In fact, "the EU is really very concerned with the Stalemate in the situation. Yes !", the Head of Sweden's Foreign Ministry's Press Service anounced. That's why Bildt "was hoping for the two parties (i.e. for Turkey's also) to engage and break, a little-bit, the present stalemate, come to a solution of the issue" of Cyprus.

    But, replying  to a "EuroFora"s question on the risk, denounced by several politicians in case of strict Time Deadlines, for Turkey to provoke a stalemate and wait for the time to come to impose a partitionist "2 States' solution", she reacted by pointing at Turkey's obligation to respect "EU Acquis" :

    - "Turkey must fullfil the EU Acquis : That's clear !", the Swedish Senior Official stressed.

    More details are expected when Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt will debate his Programme with new MEPs at EU Parliament's plenary mid-July in Strasbourg, that he has visited already in 2008.

    Foreign Minister Carl Bildt became familiar with Strasbourg's CoE last year, when Sweden chaired the PanEuropean organization of Human Rights. As EU chairman-in-office, he will also chair the 27-member States strong EU Group inside the 47-member States strong CoE.

    Minister for EU affairs, Cecilia Malmstrom is well known at EU Parliament, where she has been an active MEP of the Liberal Group for many years, following also Press Freedom issues.

    Both have already made various statements at "EuroFora", on differend topical matters.

    ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING