english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Franco-German motor stirs EuroZone Solution on Greece+ but keeps main Decision power for later Stage

Franco-German motor stirs EuroZone Solution on Greece+ but keeps main Decision power for later Stage

Written by ACM
Friday, 26 March 2010
eurozone_deal_in_brx_400

EU's Franco-German motor, supported by other EU Member States, succeeded to find a solution out of the Crisis provoked in EuroZone Member Greece by Past Errors of previous Socialist Governments in key Countries during the 1999-2001  "Turkish deal" backed by the US,  (alias : "Close your eyes on Turkey's Candidature for EU Accession, even if Ankara doesn't meet the Copenhagen Criteria on Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law, and we get you in EuroZone earlier than normal, even if you don't meet yet the Maastricht Criteria, i.e. without previously doing the necessary Economic Reforms).


Prepared initially at a Bilateral meeting between French President Sarkozy and German Chancelor Merkel, followed by EU President Van Rompoy, who presented the draft to EuroZone Heads of State/Government for final acceptance, (simplifying successive Formats, as "EuroFora" warned : See Wednesday's Publication),  the Formula aims to ensure that Greece, as any other EuroZone Member State, if needed, could borrow money at normal prices, in Majority from coordinated bilateral loans by EuroZone Countries, and the rest from IMF, as an ultimum remedium, if there is no sufficient supply in the Markets, (i.e. if Speculators ask for "extravagant" rates, as Sarkozy explained afterwards).


Once the Greek Government decided to take measures that EU Commission and ECB find credible for "Stability", EuroZone should show its "Solidarity", stressed in substance both Van Rompoy, Sarkozy and Merkel, reminding a Principle hihghlighted since the February 11 unofficial EU Summit.


But, even if the EuroZone Solution to such Crisis certainly is an achievement of the Franco-German cooperation, artfuly moving accross EU, ECB and EuroZone's institutions to broker larger agreements, (using the fact that the Treaties haven't yet fixed procedural Rules for EuroZone's Heads of State/Governments' Summits, simplifying formalities and facilitating fast moves), however, in the particular situation provoked in Greece since 1999-2001 and unveiled only in 2009, apparently, this is "Not the End of the Story" :


As "EuroFora" already warned, earlier, (See yesterday's Publication), Facts show that the "Process" continues to evolve in several "Stages", since the EuroZone Member Countries wisely kept a Discretionary margin for the Final, concrete Decision, to accept to trigger this Mechanism, or not, when and how exactly, according to a given situation at a precise moment :


- "Today No Decision has been taken to activate the ...Mechanism", since "the Greek government has not requested any financial support", notes the official "Statement by the Heads of State and Government of the Euro Area".  

rompoy

- "In the World of Finance, you cant' calculate everything beforehand  : We (EuroZone) must judge all the elements existing at one moment, and take a Decision", as EU President, Herman Van Rompy replied to journalist's questions.
However, added also to ECB's "important decision" to continue to accept itself Greece's "collateral" papers at favorable rates, EuroZone's decision to not let Greece down as long as it keeps to a credible Reform plan, should calm down the Markets and even spare us from having to use this new mechanism, he ensured.


The formula was welcomed as "very satisfactory" by the new Prime Minister of Greece, George Papandreou, who hailed "the establishment of a European mechanism", "with a Minority IMF intervention", which" guarantees the protection of  Financial Stability in EuroZone".

gp

But, even if he agreed on the ECB point, the leader of Greek opposition,  President of New Democracy party (ChristianDemocrats/EPP), fomer MEP/Foreign Minister, Antonis Samaras, warned that, "the fact that the Final Decision (on EuroZone's new Mechanism) must be taken Unanimously by all (16) Member Countries, in Practice, ..might mean New Requirements".

samaras 

The new Mechanism also asks "strong Conditionality" and prepares "Sanctions" for disrespect of EuroZone's rules , while reactions  grew on the unsettled  issue of Responsibilities for the 1999-2001 shady deal (See supra), with German Chancellor Merkel reportedly speaking about "Deliberate Violations", EU President Van Rompuy denouncing "Fraud", and EU Parliament extending further on April its Hearings on the problems provoked in Greece,  (Comp. previous "EuroFora"'s Publications), etc, and even simple EU Citizens callin, at various Media websites, for sanctions against those who set up the 1999-2001 "EuroZone-accession-in-exchange-of-Turkey's-EU-candidacy" shady deal, (including, reportedly USA's Goldman Sachs, some former "Socialist" Governments and EU Officials, etc), which threatened to undermine EuroZone after delaying EU's institutional development for years.

All this might eventually evolve, ("in the forthcoming Weeks" as Van Rompoy said f.ex. for the Legal precisions of EuroZone's decision), towards a strongly-backed demand for an elementary Investigationon what really happened and who was really responsible (See infra).

Sarkozy, smiling, dismissed a speculation by a journalist in Brussels that IMF's involvement might be a covert "attempt to bring back to EU and French politics" its SG, former Socialist Straus-Kahn, (proposed to IMF by Sarkozy himself), via the Financial problems of US-born International Socialist's Chair Papandreou, after Merkel was pressured by a Media campaign led by "Bild", which has close links with UK and US Media as CNN-Times WB and controversial Turkish Media tycoon Dogan of "CNN-Turkey", as it showed recently, (See one of "EuroFora"s 2009 NewsReports from Berlin). But this could be a double-edged knife and backfire as a "boomerang", since it might trigger an Investigation on the 1999-2000 shady deal (See supra) which could reveal responsibilities of several former Socialist ao. officials.

sarko 

The French President prefered to focus on "Serious issues" of both Urgent and Historic importance, which can strenghen the Core of EU's Integration, by the creation, for the 1st time, of "an EuroZone  Mechanism for support in times of Crisis", together with the preparation of measures to reinforce Budgetary surveillance at EU level, as well as a decision to advance towards a closer "Coordination of Economic Policies" by the Council, and discuss on how to prepare a European Economic Governance.

Indeed, after an Historic 1st EuroZone Heads of State/Government Summit which started to fight against the Global Crisis on October 2008 during the French EU Presidency in Paris (See "EuroFora"'s NewsReports from the event at Elysee palace), it was now the 2nd time that EuroZone's Heads of State/Government met together to take exceptional decisions defending EuroZone's Stability, this March 2010 in Brussels, as EU President Van Rompoy observed.

The main thing for Sarkozy was "to get out of the Crisis in Greece by trying to ameliorate the European mechanisms", and this was "facilitated by a close Franco-German Cooperation", "in agreement with EU President Van Rompoy and the rotating EU Chairman (Spanish Prime Minister) Zapatero", as he concluded.

merkel_2 

German Chancellor Merkel also stressed that there are "two sides of the medal" : "EuroZone's Members don't allow it to be destablized", but "show Solidarity", while also "drawing Long-term conclusions".

EU Commission's President Barroso hailed the symbolic coincidence between the Anniversaries of  "EU's birth", back on "March 25th", and "Greece's National Day", as he said, speaking at the eve of Merkel's forthcoming visit to Turkey, which is the 2nd since she became Chancelor, but the 1st since she brillantly won the June 2009 EU Elections and got, on September 2009 National Elections, the New Majority Governemental coalition she had wished for.

 Cyprus is due to be one of the main issues for discussion during her 2 meetings with Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, German Officials told the Press, the same day (Friday) that Reports from Brussels denounced that new Socialist EU Commissioner Füle reportedly tabled at EU Parliament, without warning neither EU Commission's President Barroso, nor EU Council's rotating Chairman-in-office Spanish  Prime Minister Zapatero, a  highly controversial draft Regulation threatening to open "Direct Trade" with the Turkish Occupied Territories of Cyprus, held by Ankara's Foreign Army, and from which the Majority of its ancestral Greek Cypriot inhabitants have been forced to flee and hindered to return since the 1974 Turkish Military Invasion, their Family Homes and Properties still being illegaly usurpated contrary to ECHR's Judgements, with the risk to stir Separatist tendencies and to provoke an indirect recognition of the illegal breakaway occupation regime that UNO's Resolutions clearly condemn. On the contrary, Turkey repeatedly asks to impose such a controversial "Direct Trade" to the Occupied Territories, since the year 2000.


Ankara  seems eager to hastily "close" the Cyprus' issue before a June 2010 EU check on its persisting failure to fullfil its 2005 commitment to stop discrimination against Cyprus-related Ships and Airplanes, but, with a few slight exceptions, it doesn't seem ready yet to make compromises on the main, substantial issues for a real reUnification of Cyprus, giving the impression that it expects from a pro-Turkish lobby to impose its views and its controversial EU bid to Europe, probably exploiting the Financial problems provoked to the Greek Economy by the shady deal which pushed Ankara's controversial "Candidacy", over EU Citizens' Heads,  back in 1999-2001.

------------------------------
    Almost at the same period, there are also several other more or less exceptional moves around the evolving Cyprus' issue, including various visits to the US, to Turkey, etc.,  crucial Political Decisions which were  anounced as imminent just now, visit of Greece's new Prime Minister Giorgos Papandreou to Cyprus, etc.

   Is there any Danger for Cyprus, Human Rights, EU's Enlargement or Identity and Future, and/or any other important EU stake, to became the next object of another such Shady Deal as it already happened, back in 1999-2001, (by mixing up Turkey's controversial EU bid with Greece's unprepared and too early entry into EuroZone), which provoked problems to EuroZone and delayed EU's institutional development for years ?
 
    Turkey has repeatedly stressed at the CoE in Strasbourg since 1998-2003, that only the Price to pay for the 30 years-long illegal usurpation of some 190.000 many Greek-Cypriot Refugees' Family Homes and private Properties, according to ECHR's famous landmark Judgement in the Loizidou case, would be equivalent to more than 22 Billions €. And the problem provoked to Greece and EuroZone by the 1999-2001 shady deal (See supra) is now estimated at some 20, 30 or even 40 Billions € to be borrowed from Financial Markets, (at least as long as the Socialist Governments want to persist keeping a notoriously plethoric, counter-productive, often arbitrary or even corrupted, impopular Bureaucracy and expensive Media cronies set up since the 1980ies).
 
    In other words, the replies to such questions concern Stakes higher than 22 or 40 Billions €, while also inevitably affecting EU's Future... 
------------------
 - Does EuroZone's new Mechanism have a (necessary) Investigation-key ?
-----------------------------------
euroarea_25_march_statement_400_01
 
    Merkel, as well as  Sarkozy and Van Rompuy, referred to the experienced German Minister of Finance, Wolfgang Schäuble's various proposals to find ways to ensure that there will be no repetition of such Scandals and Problems in the Future, convincing EuroZone to set up a Working Group to prepare Measures to consider at the end of 2010.

    But, concrete Details for the Present situation became more clear when German Chancelor Merkel was asked in her Press Conference to explain "what it means Non-Subsidized Interest Rates", as a Condition for the EuroZone mechanism to work.

    Merkel replied, by "simply" referring to the EuroZone's official Statement  : - "The objective of this Mechanism will Not be to provide financing at Average Euro-Area Interest Rates, but to set incentives to return to Market financing as soon as possible by Risk Adequate pricing".

    - "That's very Clear", "everything is said" by that : This EuroZone Mechanism works "according to the Real Conditions corresponding to Real Market Conditions", she observed.

    In other words, for this EuroZone's Mechanism to be triggered, Financial Markets' Interest Rates should be not only Higher than the Average, but also Higher than a "Risk - Fair" estimation, i.e. Higher than what would be normal in order to cover Real Risks, revealing a purely Speculative exploitation. Otherwise, it is considered normal for Markets to take some precautions against real Risks when they lend Money.

    F.ex., at this point, Merkel said that she was "Glad" that the "Spread" on Greece had already started to be "lowered", just one Day after the EuroZone decision's anouncement that the 16 Countries decided to back Greece, and any other EuroZone Member, against Financial Speculation. (See supra).

    In consequence, it seems that it all depends on how this Clause might be interpreted in real Practice :

    - I.e. Nothing excludes that Markets might keep somewhat Higher Interest Rates as long as No Investigation is made to find and punish all those Reponsible for the 1999-2001 shady Deal, which had mixed Economic (EuroZone Conditions) and Political (Turkey's controversial EU bid) elements, between former Socialist Governments in Greece, France, Germany and other key EU Countries, notoriously including also some EU Commission and EuroStat former Officials, USA's Goldman Sachs, etc., (as several mainstream Media, MEPs and EU Citizens have already started to denounce).

    Obviously, such an Enquiry is a condition for Credibility, because, otherwise, there can be No Guarantee that the same, or similar networks wouldn't commit again another such damaging Politico-Financial Scandal in the Future. Something that EuroZone could no more tolerate,  particularly during the present times of Global Crisis.

    Naturally, if the Markets don't make this Condition Explicit, it might be hardly distinguished from purely Speculative attempts to exploit a difficult situation. Unless some Financial Actors speak out explicitlly, (as, f.ex. "S. and P." did now by publishing an announcement after EuroZone's decision).

    But, should Europe leave such an important issue for its Economic and Political Integration and Future up to unpredictable and uncontrolled International Financial Markets ? Obviously not.

    Therefore, it's logical to conclude that this could and should be done by an Explicit Statement which can be easily made by anyone among the 16 + 2 main European political Actors whose "Unanimity" is required for EuroZone's new Mechanism to be triggered :

    I.e. a simple, but clear Statement by any EuroZone Member State, the EU Commission or the Central European Bank, that much Higher than Average Interest Rates would be considered as justified, and therefore would not deserve an intervention from EuroZone's Support Mechanism against Crisis, as long as the elementary Condition for an effective Investigation to find and punish all those Responsible for provoking the current Problems in Greece and EuroZone, in order to ensure that similar scandals will never be repeated again in the Future.

    A move which is obviously possible, and easy to do, according to EuroZone's new mechanism.

    Normally, it's the simple Possibility for such a Statement to be made as a Condition for EuroZone's Mechanism to be triggered, which should already start to make People realize that such an Investigation is an elementary Precaution, a condition for Credibility, (and certainly much Cheaper than having to pay too High Interest Rates)..

    Is really EuroZone and EU's Franco-German "motor" not only efficient, but also smarter than some disguised anti-EU lobbies might have thought ?
 
sarko_merkel_up 

  
***
 
(NDLR : Text anew revised with 1 Addition).

 ***

European Entrepreneurial Region

Statistics

Visitors: 60327943

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING