newsitems
COESpokesman Holtgen to ERFRA: Ukraine vPM Zubko+COESG Jagland deal Helps DeCentralisation +Dialogue
COESpokesman Holtgen to ERFRA: Ukraine vPM Zubko+COESG Jagland deal Helps DeCentralisation +Dialogue

*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/- A 1st Step towards the Crucial for Peace Decentralisation Reform in Ukraine, signed Today by CoE's Secretary General Thornbjorn Jagland and Kiev's vice-Prime Minister Henaddi Zubko, could Help and implies Talks between the Government and the People of Donetsk/Luhansk Autonomist Regions, notoriously needed for the Peace process, replied in substance CoE's Spokesman and Director of Communication, Daniel Holtgen, to a relevant "EuroFora"s Question, just a few Days before an Appreciation of the Minsk Agreements' implementation, is to be made, by the 4 Foreign Ministers of the Normandy Format, (i.e. of France, Germany, Ukraine and Russia), while also the PanEUropean Organization's Parliamentary Assembly is due to Dicuss, next Week in Strasbourg, the latest developments on the Ukranian Issue.
------------------------------
The Signature of the Official Documents between the CoE and Ukraine took place during the session of CoE's "European Committee for Democracy and Governance", chaired by Belgian Paul-Henri Philips, from the country which currentl Chairs the PanEuropean Organisation and whose King, as well as its Foreign Minister Reynders, are both due to actively participate at COE Parliamentary Assembly's 2015 Spring Session next week in Strasbourg, discussing probably also about recent developments on the Ukraine issue : "It's an important moment in the European Political Life", Chairman Philips said.
----------------------------
- Recently there were many Denunciations against alleged Kiev's Refusals to Talk together, Consult eachother, particularly on the content and/or the implementation of the DeCentralisation and mainly on the Special Regime for Donetshl/Luhansk Autonomist Regions, the forthcoming Local Elections (due on October 2015), etc. But, from the point of view of COE's Secretary General, what CoE is doing on DeCentralisation in Ukraine, might, eventualy, contribute to a kind of Dialoguebetween all sides involved, or not at all ?", "EuroFora" asked Jagland's Spokesman.
- "There is No Blockade. DeCentralisation is going Forward", while he agreed, nevertetheless, that on related crucial issues, such as f.ex. the Local Elections, the February 2015 Minsk Deal asks for a kind of Dialogue. "My Understanding of Today is that Ukraine is Moving Forward on DeCentralisation, they are progressing both on DeCentralisation and also on Local Government's Reform", (i.e. f.ex. ./.. ), the CoE is Helping, and there was no mention of any blockage or anything like that" during the Jagland - Zubko meeting, earlier Today in Strasbourg, as he said.
- "They also mentioned that the Peace Process involved Consultation with Civil Society and the Population in the Regions", he stressed.

CoE's Director of Communications, Daniel Holtgen, with OSCE's Press Director Cathie Burton, (herself an experienced former CoE Press Officer), at OSCE's latest Summit in Basel, smila to "EuroFora": OSCE - CoE PanEuropean Cooperation going smoothly on Ukraine ?
------
+ Asked by "EuroFora" to make it clear "if that includes also the the Donetsk/Luhansk Regions' Autonomists", his Reply appeared Positive :
- "They want to Include in this DeCentralisation (consultation process) also all the Regions in the Donbass, correct ! With Talks, with them, but also with the Population".
- "That was the Spirit and the Understanding" of Today's meeting, "and it's also reflected in the Document that they Signed", Holtgen concluded.
-------------------------------
- COE's "Committee of Ministers has decided on an overall Action Plan for Ukraine, including Reforms of the Judiciary, on the Parliament, in the Anti-Corruption Fight, etc, and containing an Important part on DeCentralisation. In this framework, the Document signed Earlier Today is a 1st Step, particularly concerning the Creation of a Centralized Network of Regional Offices, which are due to accompagny the Territorial Reform Process, collect Local Communities' views on the planned Changes, and, afterwards, explain them what would have been decided meanwhile. This may concern also Regionalisation, even if it' might not be so much on the Agenda, but it's important, at least at the end. ... This is not yet absolutely clear, simply because it depends mainly on the Constitutional Reforms, which will be finaly decided". + In parallel of course, there is also the Minsk Trilateral Contact Group, which is due to Consult also the Donetsk/Luhansk People, that I didn't mention here, because it wasn't officialy foreseen as such, even if it may be facilitated, in one way or another, meanwhile, resumed in substance the experienced Director of CoE's European Committee on Democracy and Governance, Alfonso De Salas, speaking to "EuroFora".

----------------------------------------------
+ Indeed, in their signed Written "Joint Statement", which "Acknowledges" from the outset "the Need for Decentralising Power, in full Compliance with the international Obligations of Ukraine and in line with European Standards and Best practice", they explicitly "understand... that Such Reform can only be Successful, if it is Inclusive and creates the conditions for Stakeholders to be Informed and to Actively Participate in its Preparation and Implementation".
=> For that purpose, the CoE and the Ukranian Government officially "affirm their Common Intention", "for the furthering of local government reform and decentralisation of power", inter alia, also, f.ex., to "Monitor.. the implementation of the Reform at the Regional level, collecting information on Problematic Issues and submitting Proposals for their Solution to the Government".
This will be done, among others, also by "a Network of 25 Offices on Local government Reform and Decentralisation of Power", where "the COE, jointly with the Ministry, shall identify and appoint one senior Expert per Office, and train and supervise the quality of his or her work", shall support "the organisation of a Communication campaign on Goals and Impact of the Reform", as well as "set up an Expert Group at the Central level (the Central Office) to ensure Co-operation with the Regions", (in addition to CoE "Expert support to improving Legislation on .. Decentralisation", "a Communication campaign on .. the Reform", "Opinion Polls" conducting, etc.
+According to an official COE's Press release, such "Regional .. Offices", which "will be Set up in Early May" 2015, "will act as a hub, bringing Together ... local authorities (hromadas), elected Representatives and Civil Society. They will also provide Feedback from Regional Stakeholders on Draft Laws", etc.
- "“These Regional Hubs will Help pave the way for Decentralisation, which we know will be Crucial to Ukraine’s lasting Political Stability", COE's Chief Jagland said. “Decentralising power has become the reality for virtually all Modern European States. The lesson from Europe is that these arrangements are most Successful when they are Locally-Owned, and Shaped by the Creativity and Enthusiasm of ordinary Citizens".
- For Ukranian vice-Prime Minister Zubko, such moves "will help facilitate the Decentralisation Reform at the Local level, and make sure that All Stakeholders are Informed about the decentralisation, and Actively Participate in its Preparation and Implementation", as he promised.
+ CoE's "Action Plan for Ukraine for 2015-2017", "which was approved by CoE's Committee of Ministers on 21 January 2015", as the Jagland - Zubko document reminds, contains; among many other interesting points, "CoE's intention", "in the forthcoming period", to "Focus on Local Self-Government and Decentralisation, including ... Participatoy Democracy", also by "aiding ...Stakeholders in improving institutional Dialogue", as well as "to enable Reform of Local Self-Government .. in line with Principles and Standards of Local and Regional Democracy".
--------------------------

- "The Decentralisation process, foreseen in Ukraine, is Indispensable for transforming Ukraine into a Modern and solid State. Let's Hope that it can, also, be a Contribution in a Political Settlement of the Crisis in Eastern Ukraine", stressed from the outset COE's Secretarry General, Thornbjorn Jagland, during that event where "EuroFora" was present.
- "The Signature of Today's Statement is an Important 1st Step for the Decentralisation process, and .. a Part of a Larger Package, which the CoE has wraped up for Ukraine". "We (CoE) have been Present now in Kiev, with a very Big Office of more than 40 Persons, for many Years", and "we (CoE) have just Adopted a New Action Plan for Ukraine, which is the Biggest one in COE's History !", Jagland observed, adding also the recent fact that "COE has been Invited to participate in the Constitutional Committee set up by (Ukranian) President Poroshenko", mainly for Drafting Crucial Reforms incuding Decentralisation of Power, notoriously considered as a Key for a Peacefuk Solution to the Political Confict. - Indeed, "Decentralisation process is a very Important thing for consolidating the Ukranian State and its Independence in the Future", he added.
- At the same time, it corresponds also to something that is currently "going on in all Modern European States : i.e. Give more Power there where People are living. Of course, they are part of Nation - States. But they are living in Local Communities, where they get their Health Services, they go to School, they are working there, getting elderly care, etc., so it's important to pay attention to the Local Communities to which People are attached. This is not something Specific for Ukraine". On the contrary, it's something Natural, which is going on in all European Countries". But this is also an integral Part in the process of Consolidating a Democratci, Independent Ukraine with full Respect for its Territorial Integrity", Jagland concluded.
------------
+ "As of Today, the Means for Settling the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine, and Stopping the mutual Aggressions, are the Reforms, which have to be done in Ukraine, in order to reach the Turning point which will show Political Will and that Ukraine has chosen its path", (including by adopting the necessary Anti-Corruption Reforms), observed from the outset the Ukranian Deputy Prime Minister Hennadii Zubko, (whos is a Poroshenko faithful, having served until the End of Last Year at the Presidential Administration, before becoming a New Member of the Government since December 2014).
- "We (the Kiev's National Government) consider that No Scenario of Transnistria or of Ossetia (i.e. of "Frozen Conflicts", Non Recognized Entities), should be done in Ukraine", he stressed.
- "That's why we have also adopted in the Parliament that Law about the specificity of Self-Governing of the secessionist territories on the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions, .. that will help us to Cooperate Together".
=> - "Right Now, what we Need is to Withdraw the Russian Troops (a claim that Moscow notoriously Denies as False, speaking of privae "Volunteers") from our Territory, to have the Control of the Ukranian Government on the whole Territory of our Country, and to make necessary Reforms", as Deputy Prime Minister Zubko pointed out Concluding, in a series of 3 steps, which curiously, .. forgot the forthcoming Local Elections in Donetsk/Luhansk Autonomist Regions...
The point is of Crucial Importance Today, because Kiev's Government was Accused by Donetsk - Luhansk Autonomists to have unilateraly Postponed the entry into force of the promised Special Status for the Autonomist Areas to the precondition to hold, before that, Local Elections according to Ukranian Laws, and reportedly some other Kiev's demands, contrary to the Minsk Agreements of February 2015. Such a controversial move would seriously Aggravate the already Hard Humanitarian Problems provoked to the detriment of the 4,6 Millions Population of Donetsk/Luhansk regions, f.ex. by Hindering them to sell legaly their own products. Curiously, it would even Deepen the Negative Consequences of a Division of Ukraine, inter alia, also by Obstructing the preexisting Economic Complementarity between Kiev and Donetsk/Luhansk, since the Coal produced in Eastern Ukraine could no more be sold to the rest of the Country, which notoriously Needs it for the production of Electricity, (etc).
In addition, the signed "Joint Statement" also "recognizes .. that one of the major Obstacles to Decentralisation is the excessive Municipal Fragmentation of Ukraine and that Municipalities Need to be Consolidated BEFORE they can receive and efficiently implement New Competencies", as it says, without going into concrete details.
+ Moreover, Kiev Authorities would now Refuse to Negotiate, not even to hold serious Talks with the Donetsk/Luhansk Autonomists, claiming that they would be just some kind of illegal "Terrorists", etc, so that both the Crucial DeCentralisation Reforms, as well as the preparation of the conditions for Local Elections, and/or the Control of Ukraine's Borders vs a vis Russia, etc., would be seeked without any compromise agreement between the two sides, contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the latest Minsk Deal, Critics have reportedly denounced recently.
An often repeated variant of such pro-Kiev claims sometimes goes as far (particularly in Public Debates, including at the Internet, etc) as to openly admit that, in fact, one of its real Aims would be to practicaly ...Change Interlocutors at Donetsk/Luhansk, before any Talks might, eventually, start taking place f.ex. on the crucial issue of DeCentralisation of Power, etc, by replacing them by some more lenient, if not pro-Kiev, substitutes, after giving a try to Marginalize the current Political Leaders of the Autonomists, through a particularly Adverse for them set of so-called "Conditions" for Local Elections "according to Ukranian Law", and/or by having, previously, Totally Surounded the pro-Autonomy areas, and Totaly Isolated them from any Free Contact wtth the Outside World, by attempting to take, ptreviously, over the Military Control of all External Borders...
However, according to the Official, collective Conclusions of the latest EU Heads of State/Governments' Summit in Brussels, as early as since, already, the End of March 2015, it's only as "the Last point of the Peace Plan", scheduled only for "the End of 2015", that "Ukraine's regain of Control over its Borders in the East", is supposed to start being "implemented" : I.e. only after the Decentralisation Reform, the Local Elections (scheduled for October 2015), etc., (all that haaving, in principle, to be prepared and set up after relevant Debates and in Dialogue between Kiev's Authorities and Donetsk/Luhansk's Autonomists, (etc).
Thus, already on April 1, 2015, when Ukranian Prime Minister Yatsenyuk, while visiting Berlin to meet with German Chancelor Merkel, claimed, inter alia, also that, in his view, "for the fulfillment of the Minsk Convention", "We (Kiev) will Not Negotiate with Terrorists, (as he called the current Leaders of the Donetsk/Luhansk Autonomists), "but, in order for us to speak, there must be a legitimate, elected authority on site. Therefore, these (local) Slections must be in accordance with Ukrainian legislation, with the Standards and the OSCE" Monitoring, (etc), he added. Such "PreConditions for ... Tansparent and free Elections must be created, so that they them can be Recognized" not only "by the International Community", but also "Recognized by Ukraine" Authorities, as he said then. Otherwise, "Differend so-called Elections had been conducted" in the Past at the pro-Autonomy Donetsk/Luhansk Regions, (back on November 2014), in "a way to Legitimize the Russian-steered Separatists", as Yatsenyuk called them, but, "We (Kiev's Authorities) woN't go this way", Yatsenyuk warned. On the contrary, now, "heavy Weapons must be displaced, so that a Cease-Fire is carried outn, and the Troops must be Withdrawn" : Only "then, it can be a matter of conducting (Local) Elections", Yatsenyuk had stressed, (i.e. using a Format very Close, even if not identical, to that of Zubko Today : Comp. Supra).
- But, on the Contrary, German Chancelor Angie Merkel, Replying to relevant Press Questions during the Same Press Conference as Yatsenyuk in Berlin, on April 1, 2015, (Comp. Supra), observed that, according to the Minsk Deal, in fact, it's the Other way round : I.e., f.ex., Local "Elections are a Prerequisitive for" the Final "Goal", i.e. "that Ukraine recovers its Territorial Integrity, that is to say, has also Access to its own Borders, (in particular) the Russian-Ukranian Border", (which, the Minsk Agreements clearly place at the End of the current Peace process).
So that, for the Local Elections, the main "Prerequisitive" was just that "the Withdrawal of Heavy Weapons" would be "Completed in a Transparent manner", thanks to an official "Statement of the SMM, OSCE's Special Monitoring Mission. "The Preparations for the (Local) Elections" would "Start .. if we have this (OSCE) Statement", Merkel had noted on April 1st, (without asking anything more) and this was, indeed, done, meanwhile.
=> In consequence, since, as she had stressed in substance, Local "Elections (including at Donetsk/Luhansk Autonomist Regions) are a Prerequisitive" for "Ukraine to recover .. Access to the Russian-Ukranian Border", at the End of the current Peace Process, according to Minsk Agreements, then, "I think, that it's in Everyone's interest that these Elections can also take place as Soon as possible", Merkel stressed in Conclusion, (obviously urging, indirectly but surely, all sides involved, including Kiev's Authorities, to Avoir raising more PreConditions, in order Not to Risk to Delay or Block the current Peace Process)...
Meanwhile, as Merkel had also hinted, the above-mentioned "Hot" Issues to settle for the Peace process in Ukfraine, are due to be Discussed at first inside certain "Contact Groups", expected to be set up according to "Minsk" Agreements, with Representatives from Both Sides, under the auspices of OSCE Envoy, Swiss Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini. Such Minsk's Trilateral "Contact Group's Thematic Sub-Groups" have been reportedly prepared on a series of issues, such as : "Humanitarian", "Economic", "Security" and "Politics". Kiev's Authorities have recently appointed their Representatives to those Groups, as well as the Donetsk/Luhansk Autonomist Regions, but they are reportedly complaining that Kiev has been Delaying to Launch the work of Minsk's "Contact Group's SubGroups, despite the fact that they might facilitate agreed Solutions.
But the Minsk Agreements, concluded on Fabruary 2015, under the auspices of 4 Heads of State/Government from France, Germany, Ukraine and Russia, are Crystal-clear :
- They demand to "Launch a Dialogue", (immediately after the Withdrawal of Heavy Weapons, which has already been achieved), "on modalities of Local Elections", "and on the Future Regime of the.. Areas" (of Donetsk and Luhansk Regions' autonomists), i.e. on the planned Decentralisation, (Article 4, of the "Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsi Agreements").
+ The official Texts also ask, "promptly, ...no later than 30 Days after" the Minsk Agreements, (i.e.at about Mid-March 2015), to "Adopt .. a Resolution of the Parliament of Ukraine specifying the Area (already) Enjoying a Special Status" - and Not : "which Will Enjoy" in any other, Postponed Future, (ibid).
- It's only "After the Local Elections", "and .. After the Comprehensive Political Settlement (i.e. ..... Constitutional Reform), to be Finalized by the End of 2015", that Kiev's Authorities will be able to "Reinstat full Control of the State Border by the Government of Ukraine throughout the conflict Area", (Article 9, ibid).
+ But this is Conditional : I.e. "Provided that, ... in Consultation with, upon Agreement by Representatives of certain Areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions, in the Framework of the Trilateral Contact Group", will have "Carried out Constitutional Reform in Ukraine, with a New Constitution entering into Force by the End of 2015", including "Decentralisation as a Key element", (with "the Specificities of certain Areas in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, Agreed with the representatives of these areas), as well as adopting Permanent Legislation on the Special Status of certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions", (Article 11 of the same text).
It should be done "in line with Measures as set out" in a Special Note contained at the Minsk Agreements, "until the End of 2015", (such as, f.ex., Amnesty, "Linguistid Self-Determination", "Participation ... in the appointment of heads of public Prosecution offices and Courts", "Agreements" and/or "State supports" of "the Economic, Social and cultural Development", "Cross-Border Cooperation .... with ..the Russian Federation", "Creation of the people’s Police units by decision of local councils", etc).
I.e., in other words, Borders' Control is due to be not at all an intermediary, but only a Final Stage conclusion, to be reached at the End of the Peace process, which should almost always advance in Consultation and in agreement between Kiev and the Autonomists, according to the Minsk Deal.
---------------------
As for Today's surprizing repetition of Kiev Authorities' claim about a supposed existence of Regular "Russian Troops" inside Ukraine, (Comp. Supra : Something that Moscow notoriously Denies, and for which No sufficient and unquestionable Proof was yet published, at least at our knowledge, while the Russians admit only a presence of some Private Individuals among the various "Volunteers" who notoriousmy exist on Both Sides of the Ukranian Conflict), certainly, the Arrival of several Hundreds of USA's Military Troops, these Days, for the 1st Time in History in Ukraine, for so-called "Army Training", etc., is Not the Best Moment to try to convince critical thinkers...
Comparatively, until Today, even EU Member Country, with some 3.000 Years of History, as Cyprus, doesn't have so many Difficulties to ...prove the notorious existence of more than 45 Thousands of Turkey's Invasion Army Troops, in several Military Camps at the Occupied Territories of the island, and/or accross the Demarcation's "Green Line", as well as in provocative Armed Parades, at a Huge Flag painted on the Mountain visible Kms away, even inside the Capital City of the Country, Divided in 2 Parts Separated by Barbed Wire, etc.
As for the ritual Obligation, for the Demoratically Elected President of the Country, voted by the Large Majority of Citizens at the Free Areas, to ... sit down personaly, for many Years, and even in front of UNO's Secretary General and/or his Envoy, together with the Separatists' alleged Chief, in order to try to "Negotiate" a Political Solution to the Problem of the imposed Division of the island, with someone who can't even pretend to represent a Minority of Separatists, since he can't be voted according to even elementadu Democratic principles in a Terriroty notoriously Invaded and still Occupied by a Foreign Army, from where the vast Majority of its lawful Inhabitants have been Brutaly Chassed Away, and are still Hindered to Return, their Homes and Properties have been Massively Usurpated, in repeated blatant Violations of ECHR's case-law, while even the Minority of local Separatists is Threatened to be progressively "Replaced" by a Growing Influx of Foreign "Settlers" massively Imported from another, Occupying Country (Turkey), i.e. committing what, according to the International Criminal Court's Statute is generaly considered to be "a War Crime". Despite all that, nevertheless, Cyprus' Direct Talks between the two sides, thanks God, are conducted, generaly, in a quite Correct, Kind, and sometimes even "Friendly" atmosphere, without anyone ever Refusing even to Speak between them, or calling names his/her interlocutor, accused to be f.ex. a "Terrorist" (sic !), etc., as it, unfortunately, happens Now in Ukraine, (Comp. Supra)...
-----------------------------------
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Visitors: 62831059Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

Recent developments proved that Europe can suceed to overcome challenges by aiming at great objectives, and this is needed also in 2009, said EU chairman, French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
- "It's in the name of Great Ideas, Projects, Ambition and Ideals, that EU can overcome" challenges, stressed Sarkozy at EU Parliament in Strasbourg, in conclusion of a dense 7 months EU Chairmanship. "It's even easier for Europe to have Great projects, able to overcome national egoism, instead of limiting itself only to small projects" (unable to do alike), he observed.
- "Europe must remain Ambitious and understand that the World needs her to take Decisions". "The World needs a Strong Europe", which "thinks on its own, has convictions, its own responses, its imagination" : "A Europe which does not limit itself into following" others, (as it did in the Past, when it followed USA, f.ex. on Bosnia). On the contrary, "Europe should undertake its own responsibilities", he said, after a series of succes in stopping the War between Russia and Georgia, and organizing the 1st EuroZone's Summit in Paris, which incited the Washington DC G-20 Summit to extend similar decisions World-wide.
- "When you sweep it all under the carpet, prepare yourself for hard tomorrows", he warned. "What hinders decisions is the lack of Courage and Will, the fading away of Ideals", he stressed before EU Parliament's 2008 debate on Human Rights and Sakharov prize on Freedom of thought attributed by MEPs to Chinese cyber-dissident Hu Jia, followed by an EU - Turkey meeting on Friday.
- "I don't abandon my convictions" and "I will take initiatives" on EU level also in 2009, Sarkozy announced later. "France will not stop having convictions and taking initiatives" on Europe. + "It's an Error to wish to pass over the Heads of those who are elected in their Countries" : "It's an integrism I always fought against"', he warned.
---------------------
French EU Presidency faced 4 unexpected Crisis :
- An institutional crisis, with the Irish "No" to EU Lisbon Treaty, just before it started. A geopolitical crisis, wth the threat of War between Russia and Georgia risking to throw Europe back to Cold-war divisions, on August. A World-wide Financial and Economic crisis, arriving at a bad moment before crucial 2009 EU elections. And even a Strasbourg's mini-crisis, with EU Parliament's roof curiously falling down, from unknown reasons, in a brand new building on August, provoking an unprecedented transfert of the 2 September Plenary Sessions...
But it wasn't enough to stop Sarkozy ! On the contrary, it stimulated him...
---------------------------------------
- "The better way to deal with the recent problems of EU institutions (as the "3 NO" by France, the Netherlands and Ireland) is to take them as a "Test" in order to find solutions closer to Citizens' concerns", said later in Strasbourg Sarkozy's new choice as Ministe for EU affairs, Bruno Le Maire.
- On the Institutional front, Sarkozy gave Time to the Irish to think about it, and stroke on December a deal including a New Referendum after the June 2009 EU Elections, in exchange of a promise to keep the rule of "one EU Commissioner for each EU Member Country", and some opt-outs on Defence and Fiscal EU policies, Abortion, etc. If the Irish get a "Yes" Majority, then the institutional package could be completed in 2010 or 2011 on the occasion of Croatia's probable EU accession.
He was accused in Strasbourg to upgrade EU Council and downgrade EU Commision, but he replied that "strong Political initiatives by EU Council reinforce also the more technical role of EU Commission, under the political-technical leadership of its President", all 3 "working together with EU Parliament".
- But, meanwhile, Sarkozy energetically spearheaded an Historic 1st Summit of EuroZone's 15 Heads of State and Government at EU's core, exceptionally enlarged to a partial participation of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on October 12 in Paris' Elysee palace, which started to tackle succesfully the growing world Financial crisis.
It also paved the way for its endorsement by a subsequent Brussels' 27 EU Member States' gathering, before it all come to Washington's G-20 Summit. And "Europe was united, it asked for the 1st G-20 Summit, and it will also organise the next G-20 Summit on April in London", he observed.
But a Conference with EU, Russia, African and other Developing Countries, hosted in Strasbourg shortly after Washington G-20 Summit by the French EU Presidency, took a Resolution asking to enlarge participation to Global Economic Governance. Many found, indeed, illogic and unacceptable that f.ex. states as Turkey were given a seat at G-20 level, while all African Countries, and even the African Union itself, representing the greatest Continent on Earth, were excluded...
Meanwhile, even USA''s "Paulson No 3" Plan, was, in fact, inspired by Europe's No 1 Plan", Sarkozy observed, largelly applauded by MEPs.
And "Europe showed Solidarity" by mobilizing some 22 Billion credit for Hungary, 1,7 billion for Ukraine, as we do nowadays for Baltic States, etc., he added.
The move on Economy was extended on December by an EU stimulus' plan totalling some 200 billion Euros, including 5 Billions released by EU Commission for big Projects, as well as various parallel National plans for Economic revival, (fex. 26 billions in France alone). They might appear limited, compared to USA President-elect Obama's reported plan to boost the American economy with 800 billion $, but at least succeded to overcome Europe's divisions for the first time on Economic governance, opening new horizons.
- The French President stressed even harder the unique role of an active EU Council's chairmanship, when he moved swiftly and efficiently, at the beginning of August, to succesfully stop War between Russia and Georgia, at the last minute, which threatened to bring Europe back to Cold War division.
"We (EU) also wanted to avoid a situation like in Bosnia, in the Past, when EU was absent, so that our American friends took their responsibilitues, and EU only followed", despite the fact that the conflict took place in Europe. Now, it was the EU who took its responsibilities".
A roadmap towards a new PanEuropean Security policy, before which all unilateral moves to place new Missiles (from USA or Russia) would be freezed, was proposed by Sarkozy after a meeting with Russian president Medvedev, at the eve of Washington DC's G-20 Summit.
Ukraine's "European" character was stressed at a Sarkozy - Jushenko Summit, September in Paris, while EU adopted on December an "Eastern policy", in which, "I'm convinced that our (EU's) future is to find with our Neighbours the conditions for Economic Development. Peace and Security, by explaining them that.. they must respect (Human Rights') Values, and adopt behaviors different from the Past", explained Sarkozy in Strasbourg.
Meanwhile, the "Union for the Mediterranean" was created, since July's Summit if 45 Heads of State and Government in Paris, as "an organisation for a permanent Dialogue, that we need", mainly in order to tackle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, by bringing together, for the 1st time, Israelis and Arabs, where "Europe must be present, in order to avoid a frontal clash".
- "If Europe doesn't take its part for Peace in the Middle-East, nobody else will do that in our place", Sarkozy stressed.
-----------------------
Meanwhile, other EU Agreements were brokered during the French EU Presidency on Immigration, (fex. common Asylum rules, etc), and Climat- Energy :
- On Climat-Energy, the 2007 German EU Presidency had fixed a triple 20% aim for 2020 (20% renewable Energies, 20% reduction of CO2 emmission, 20% energy efficience/economies), and the 2008 French EU Presidecny realized that, making the necessary compromises in order to modernize EU's industry, but without throwing some former Central-Eastern European Countries into abrupt Economic break down risking "social explosion".
- Defence-Security EU policy was mainly postponed for April 2009, since both German chancellor Merkel and French president Sarkozy want to strike a deal with the new American president Obama in Strasbourg's NATO Summit.
However, with all these 4 unexpected Crisis diverting attention to other urgencies, People wil wonder now, what happened to the famous deal proposed by freshly-elected French President Sarkozy on Turkey's controversial EU bid, back on August 2007, to continue EU - Turkey negotiations, but on the double condition that core chapters, intrinsequally linked with EU Membership, will be excluded, and that a collective Reflexion and Debate on Europe's future would start before the end of 2008.
It was meant to reply to the crucial question : What kind of Europe do we want in 10 or 20 Years from now : A large Market, or a Political Europe, with a popular identity ? In Sarkozy's thinking, presented in his 2 landmark speeches on Europe in Strasbourg, shortly before and after the 2007 Elections, (on February and July 2007), Turkey's controversial EU bid would be incompatible with the second choice.
It's true that EU Commision's Chairman, Jose Barroso, (who had notoriously declared, as former Portuguese Prime Minister, that he found "nonsense" the idea that Europe might become equal to the US), had repeatedly tried to avoid that Sarkozy's criticism on Turkey might start winning a larger audience in Europe, preferring a discrete "wismens' committee" work. And that most of the personalities later chosen in order to participate in a Committee on Europe's Future, are too much linked with Socialist parties and/or American policies, to be really critical of USA's notorious wish to impose Turkey to the EU, as Sarkozy had noted himself since March 2007..
- "It's on EU Council's presidency to take political initiatives. EU Commission has other competences", stressed Sarkozy. The "European Ideal" is to "build Europe with the States, not against them". "Ask Europeans to chose between their countries and Europe won't work. You don't choose between your two parents : We must add them together".
"France and Germany have an Historic Duty to work together, precisely because of what happened to the Past. We have to work hand by hand. We cannot be separated.It goes beyond me and Mrs Merkel today, Mr Schroeder and Mr. Chirac yesterday. It's not a choice, it's a duty to Europe and to the World". "We need Germany, as Germany needs Europe". Compromise is inevitable, here as everywhere, and each one made some steps towards eachother's positions.
But "it's true that Mrs Merkel didn't chose her Socialist partners, while I chose mine", Sarkozy said, in an indirect hint that the Socialist Minister of Finance in Germany might be a cause of minor past disagreements in Economy, which were overcome in recent negotiations.
"We (France and Germany) have particular duties in Europe", but "in a Europe of 27 Member States, it's not enough for France and Germany to agree between them.
"I always thought that Great Britain has a special role to play in Europe. ... Now, everybody "saw what it cost payed the UK for having been too exclusively open towards the US (and) Financial services. Europe needs the UK, but also the UK needs Europe" :- "We were able to face the hardest moment of the Financial crisis because the UK clearly chose Europe", stressed Sarkozy, reminding Gordon Brown's exceptional participation to the Historic 1st Heads of State/Government Summit of EuroZone, October 12 in Paris (See EuroFora's Reportage from Elysee Palace then).
- "Some look at Europe with old glasses aged 30 years ago. While we must look at her in relation to what it will be in 30 years" in the Future, Sarkozy concluded.

















