english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Virus + 5G Networks : Is there a Pyromaniak hidden inside the UNO PressNews area ?...

Virus + 5G Networks : Is there a Pyromaniak hidden inside the UNO PressNews area ?...

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 22 April 2020


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- The Question becomes Inevitable, after seeing the latest Astonishing Facts on alleged "links" between Deadly CoronaVirus' Spread ...and new "5G" Networks, considering the Incredibly Clumsy Way with which tried to "Refute" them someone Anonymus inside our UNO's PressNews machinery, provoking UnExpected Concerns and Bad Surprizes to Astonished, objective People, instead of ReAssuring them !

A UNO's Press Release noted that "5G Phone Masts have reportedly been damaged or Destroyed in several European Countries", "particularly ...in the UK" and related EU Member States, "including Ireland (with Obvious links to the UK), Cyprus (which hosts 2 UK Military Bases, previously affected by an UnRelated issue about Giant Antennas and Inhabitants' Health, discussed also in the CoE), and Belgium (Geographically Neighbour to the UK, and notoriously related since Waterloo Battle). This "Problem" was "underlined when a Phone Mast ..., in the major British city of Birmingham, was reportedly Set Alight in April" 2020.

- It seems that this was Due to an alleged "Theory of a Link between 5G and COVID-19", which "is a Hoax that has No technical Basis", according to an "ITU Spokesmerson", "Monika Gehner", cited by UN News.

- But, "the Latest generation of Fast Broadband, commonly known as 5G, is in No way Responsible for the Spread of the COVID-19 Virus, the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) – the UN’s agency for Information and Communication technologies – Confirmed", UNO reported : - "The coronavirus is Not being Spread by Radio Waves”, Gehner stressed, Denouncing such views as "a real Shame" and "False Rumours".

 + "The Scale of the Problem prompted" even "the WHO ... to Add the 5G Conspiracy to its COVID-19 <<Myth Busters>>", UNO News added, under the Headline : "5G Mobile Networks DO NOT Spread COVID-19", with 2 Arguments cited as Proof :

(1) "Viruses canNot Travel (sic !) on Radio Waves/Mobile Networks",

(2) "COVID-19 is Spreading in Many Countries that do Not have 5G Mobile Networks".

"Eurofora" is InCompetent to Judge the 1st Argument, (Even if it's Obvious that it slightly Deviates from its Headlines, which Speak, Widely, about "Spread", while it speaks only about "Travel on", that is Not necessarily the Same Thing, since a Spread might, eventually, be Facilitated also through Other Various Ways, if not in this, at least in other cases).

But it's a Fact that, Obviously, WHO's 2nd Agument Flops, since there are Many, (if not Most) "Countries that do Not have 5G Mobile Networks", which are Exceptionally Less or almost Not seriousl Impacted by the Virus, until Nowadays... Including, f.ex., Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Kambodia, Mongolia, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Slovakia, Montenegro, Malta, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Bhutan, Shri Lanka, Maldives, Myanmar, Syria, Libya, Jordan, Lebanon, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Jamaica, Uruguay, Bahamas, Haiti, Nicaragua, Kenya, Gabon, Madagascar, Togo, Uganda, Somalia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Central Africa, Angola, Seychelles, (etc).


+ Most Important, that UNO's Press Release points Also at an Interesting official "Statement" of "the WHO", according to which, in General :

(A) “to date, and after much Research performed, No Adverse Health Effect has been causally Linked with exposure to Wireless Technologies” ;

(B) and, “provided that the overall Exposure remains Below International Guidelines, No Consequences for public health are anticipated”.

However, there is a Series of Problems with those Claims, (Published on "February" 2020) :

- The First speaks widely about "Exposure to Wireless Technologies" in General, while the Second, on the Contrary, is Limited Only to those cases where it is "provided that the overall Exposure remains Below International Guidelines". Obviously, these are Not the Same thing...

- The WHO Skips Any cases, of (Perhaps Numerous or not) eventual Coincidences between "Adverse Health Effects" and "Exposure to Wireless Technologies", at one or another area, If there is Not enough Proof yet that they are "Linked" with them, and even with an Analysed and clearly Explained "Causal(ity)". Otherwise, Even if there might be too many Sick People or Deaths in Proximity, it would Not Count here, under Pretext that No "Causal Link" was found and proven until now...

- But the Most Important is that Key reference to "International Guidelines" on the Level of "Exposure" to such Wireless Networks, Under which, People could, reportedly, be Safe, (Comp. Supra).

>>> Naturally, IF you Find Which might be those "International Guidelines"... Because, the Astonishing thing is that, UnExpectedly, it appears very Difficult, almost Impossible, Nowadays, to Find any clear and trustworthy Presentation of such Key "International Guidelines" on that crucial Level of "Exposure",  Neither in UNO's nor ITU's, Not even in WHO's Official Websites !

Indeed, f.ex. :

* WHO simply promises to "conduct a Health-Risk Assessment from Exposure to RadioFrequencies, ...including 5G", which is Expected "to be Published by 2022", i.e. only After 2 Years...

Does this mean that the famous "Precautionary Principle" risks to be Thrown to the Waste-Basket, since 5G Deployment has Already Started since 2019, while Health Tests and Observations would Only emerge After 3 Years Later, while the entire Population would have, practically, played the role of Guinea Pigs ?...

But WHO had Already Promised, in the Past,  since 2006, "a review on Cancer Risk from EF Fields in 2006-2007", "and ...an overall Health Risk Assessment for RF Fields in 2007-2008", (See: https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs304/en/), the eventual Results of which are still Not Visible Anywhere Nowadays, on 2020 !

 * UNO's Press Release Today (22 April 2020: https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/04/1062362) refers just to a Relevant WHO's "Statement Published on February" (2020), whose Headlines read : "5G Mobile Networks and Health".

Neverheless, even there, it's Impossible to Find Any useful reference to the Content of certain "International Guidelines" on the Level of "Exposure" nowadays !!... (See: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/5g-mobile-networks-and-health).

It Only tells you that "5G", ..."the Latest Wireless Mobile Phone Technology" Started to be "First Deployed in 2019". That it "Will Extend into Higher Frequencies, around 3,5 GHz and up to a few Tens of GHz". "5G" will also that "employ Beam-forming Antennas, to Focus signals ...towards the Device in use, Rather than having the signal Spread in Broad directions, as in Current base station Antennas".

So that, while "Currently, Exposure from 5G infrastructures at around 3.5 GHz is Similar to that from Existing Mobile phone base stations", on the Contrary, "with the use of multiple Beams from 5G Antennas, Exposure could be More variable as a function of Location of the users and their Usage", (i.e. Up to "Tens of GHz" : Comp. Supra).

 However, the real "Extent of any Change in Exposure to RadioFrequency fields is still UNDER INVESTIGATION", allegedly Because "the 5G Technology is Currently at an Early Stage of deployment" according to WHO (Ibid)...

Concerning Questions about "Potential Health Risks from 5G", Until "To Date", even if Not any "Adverse Health Effect" was ever "Causally Linked" (Comp. Supra) to the "Exposure to Wireless Technologies" in general, as WHO claims, nevertheless, "So Far, Only a FEW STUDIES have been Carried out at the Frequencies to be used by 5G", (i.e., apparently, between "3,5 GH" - "Similar to ... Existing Mobile phone base Stations"- and "TENS of GHz" : Comp. Supra), as the International Health Organisation Warns.  

At any case, "as the Frequency Increases" (Comp. Supra), Human "Tissue Heating", by "RadioFrequency Fields", is expected to act "Less ...into the Body", but "More ... to the ... Skin and Eyes", according to the WHO.

* But, when it comes, at last, to the Crucial Issue of "the International Exposure Guidelines" (Comp. Supra), a series of Surprizes start :

- First and Above all, Curiously, WHO does NOT even Mention WHAT these "Guidelines" Say on the Level of Exposure which would be Safe for Human Health !

It Merely notes that "Many Countries currently Adhere to the Guidelines recommended by" "2 International Bodies" : One apparently steming from Private Industry Business (the "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers", alias "IEEE"), and "the International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection", alias "ICNIRP", "a non-governmental organization, formally RECOGNIZED by WHO", (as it Clarifies at anOther Page, dedicated on "ElectroMagnetic Fields" in general : https://www.who.int/peh-emf/standards/en/). It's only at a 3rd Page, that WHO provides, at least, a Web Link to such Documents, WORKING, however, Only towards "ICNIRP", that it "Recognises" (Comp. Supra), But Not towards the "IEEE"... (See : https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs304/en/, about "Electromagnetic fields and public health").

- The Biggest and Worst Surprize is when it comes, precisely, to that "formaly Recognized" by the WHO, and the Only provided with a Web Link that Works (Comp. Supra), Organisation of "ICNIRP" : - It's a mere Reference to a Too OLD Text DATING FROM... "1998" (sic !)...

>>> But, on "1998" the Web had Just Started (since 1995-1996), the First Mobile Phones were only Beginning to Emerge, while "Smart-Phones" did Not even Exist Yet ! (One of the First, with Photo and Web Pages, was, on 2005, an Impressive NOKIA from Europe's Finland, with an UnForgetable Strange Look as an ...UFO, that "Eurofora" had the Chance to buy then, Before going to the USA for 2 UNO's Summits at New York)... As for Mobile Phones' Networks type "5G", People did Not even Know their Name then !

=> In Consequence, WHO's above-Mentioned, Unique "Recognized" and Workable Reference to an "ICNIRP" Report of "1998", (Comp. Supra), Claiming that it contained "International Guidelines" for "5G" Wireless Networks of 2020, cannot but be a Big Laugh !...

Such Facts could easily Explain, also, Why WHO curiously Ommits, Nowadays, Any concrete Mention of the Content of those supposed "International Guidelines" on the Level of "Exposure" Safe for Human Health (Comp. Supra)...

Sure, WHO had Warned that "Health-related Conclusions are drawn from Studies performed across the entire spectrum", with "So Far, Only a Few Studies ...carried out at the Frequencies to be used by 5G". And that "these Guidelines are Not Technology-Specific", but "they cover RadioFrequencies up to 300 GHz", (simply) "including the Frequencies under Discussion for 5G".

But, when some People's excessive Anxiety, amidst various Alarming Rumours withOut any Crystal-clear, Neither Convincing Answer, result even into Telecom Antennas going down amidst Arson Fires, as Recently in the UK and elsewhere, (Comp. Supra), then, in such Circumstances, some's Obviously too Clumsy, Irresponsible attempt, inside UNO's PressNews Service, to give so Vague and Hollow Pseudo-"Responses", in fact, so Empty as a Hoax, (Comp. Supra), is not just inefficiently "Playing the Fireman", But rather, behaving Dangerously, as a provocative ...PyroManiak !

UNO's overall Communication System certainly has the required Means in order to dispose of a much More Serious and Efficient Information policy and practice than that, even in the most complicated and/or thorny issues...










Enterprise Europe Network


Visitors: 41977078


Login Form

Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account


RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3

Other Menu


3 EU Parliament votes to boost EuroGroup !


After EuroZone Paris Summit's succes, Sarkozy calls to "think anew how to re-construct Europe !

"EuroZone and EU Institutional debates pave the way to 2009 discussions on EU Future, including Enlargment, Turkey etc. ?

23 October 2008

After EU Parliament strongly suppported in 3 successive Votes this week in Strasbourg French EU Chairmanship's move to boost Euro-Group at EU's core, while ideas on EU Institutional problems are awaited on December, "it's an open Question now" if this may lead to a debate on EU's Future, or not, told us French President, Nicolas Sarkozy''s Spokesman, Pierre-Jerome Henin.

MEPs voted on Thursday fresh Funds to support EuroGroup, after adopting on Wednesday a Resolution asking a "further Evolution" to "the 1st ever meeting of Heads of State and of Government of the Euro-Zone, taking decisions in that capacity", while earlier this week a Report asked "a stronger Institutional setting" for "EuroGroup", extended from "competitiveness/industry" to "environment, employment and education", with "increased powers for Political decision-making", according to a text drafted by French MEP Francoise Beres and German MEP Werner Langen, "10 Years after the creation of Euro" (1999 - 2009).

- Brussels' subsequent "EU Council ..(simply)..ratified the measures decided by EuroGroup on October 12" in Paris, which "were necessary to contain the current Financial Crisis", Resolution observes, expressing also support to the new process succesfully initiated by Sarkozy and due to be completed by agreements with USA and other countries at a Global level.

From now on, it's between two differend but parallel moves : EU's delay, and EuroZone's acceleration, that Enlargement and particularly Turkey's controversial EU bid, will have to search its way :

Indeed, EU's 27 expect a "Roadmap on how to deal with the Irish problem" on Lisbon Treaty ratification after December, risking to pass even 2009 Elections and next Commission with the old Nice Treaty of 2000, out-dated and unfit even for 2004's Enlargement...

On the contrary, EU's core launches a real "Economic Governance for EuroZone at the highest level of Heads of State/Government" of the 15, which started in Paris on October 12 and was strongly supported this week in Strasbourg by Sarkozy and EU Parliament.
- "It's a good idea, to launch such a debate ("on EU's Future") in EU Parliament in view of 2009 Euro-Election : Perhaps some MEPs will seize an opportunity", told us mainstream French MEP Alain Lamassoure, former EU Minister and EU Spokesman for France's governing party UMP.

- "All MEPs' debates on such EU Councils are also part of the larger debate on Europe's future : Now with EuroZone, and even more when, on December, Irish Prime Minister is due to table proposals in Strasbourg on how to deal with EU Treaty's ratification", replied earlier to our question EU Parliament's Press Director and Spokesman, Jaume Duch.
Sarkozy has formally anounced his intention to open EU Debates on Economy, Identity/Enlargement (i.e. mainly Turkey), etc. both linked to a popular Political view of Europe, since his Historic speeches on EU in Strasbourg, on February and July 2007, when he stressed that "Europe needs a New Renaissance". At the beginning of the French EU Presidency, on July 2008, replying to a MEP, he suggested that EU Parliament takes an active part in Debates on EU's Future.

- Now, in 2008, "Crisis are an opportunity to re-think how to re-construct Europe", Sarkozy stressed. At any case, the Historic 1st EuroZone Summit of Heads of State/Government, which started replying to the Financial crisis,"is a Turning Point : After that, Europe cannot be governed as before, but differently" : People "like a Europe with Strong Will".

- "We must make the System move !", "Europe needs Innovation" and free political debates. EU "Elections are in a few Months", Sarkozy warned.

He invited EU Parliament to fully play its role as "the Democratic Heart of the Europe we want : United, Independent and Voluntarist, because the World needs Europe's voice".

- "It's no more possible for Euro-Zone to continue without an Economic Government" at the Highest Level of Heads of State/Government, who provide "Democratic Legitimity" and can take important decisions, he announced, strongly supported by EU Parliament's Economic Committee which just voted to boost the "Institutional" aspects of "EuroGroup".

Plasticity offered by the current absence of a special Treaty on EuroZone's Institutions "made it easy to adapt the organization of the 1st Summit with imagination, to efficiently meet urgent needs", he observed, on the occasion of Brittish Prime Minister's exceptionnal presence at the greatest part of EuroGroup's Paris Summit.

- "In EuroZone we have the same Bank, the same Money, and, thus, a same duty for Unity" : "By bringing together EuroGroup's 15 members States we suceeded to find a solution and prepare a Giant Plan of 1.800 Billion euros", Sarkozy reminded of Paris' 1st Historic EuroZone's Summit.

Afterwards, Brussels' EU Council followed the move, and USA's Paulson II Plan was inspired from that. "Europe must promote the idea of Global Economy's Refoundation", he stressed.


- "I was frankly astonished when I found, at the EU, a rigid system, where any New Idea was seen from the outset as a sacrilege, while, on the contrary, Europe needs Innovation !", he described.

F.ex. ,"'When we first spoke about the "Union for the Mediterranean", it was misunderstood as something extraordinary.. When later we had the Russia -Georgia crisis, it seemed against EU's custom to act "in the middle of August", instead of staying a passive spectator ! And when, in front of the Financial ciris, we gathered the 1st EuroZone Summit of the "15", some thought of it as a lese-majesté", he denounced.
On Geo-Political Principles :
- But, by moving resolutely, "EU obtained the ...withdrawal of Occupation Troops in 2 Months !", reminded Sarkozy, observing that Russia "fulfilled its commitments", in the Georgian crisis, where a "disroportionate reaction" from Moscow followed a "totally inappropriate action" from Tbilisi's troops. "It would be crazy to reply by military means : EU should not become accomplice of another Cold War, imposed by lack of cool heads".. as he said.

In future, "the creation of a common European Economic Area with EU and Russia, would also obtain a raprochment on our Human Rights and Democratic Values", added Sarkozy, in a statement which should logically be applied, a fortiori, to controversial EU "candidate" Turkey..

Particularly when, the same week that EU Parliament voted 2009 EU Funds for Turkey's controversial EU bid, ECHR took a series of judgements condemning Turkey for grave Violations of Human Rights, such as : Torture, death of a political prisoner in unclear circumstances followed by failure to conduct a proper Investigation, "enforced Disappearance" of a youngster aged 17, Killing of a sepherd with Tank Shells, persecuting Journalists for articles on "Missing" People, even a former President of Human Rights' Association, (etc)

- "We (EU) can defend our ideas on respect of Sovereignity and territorial Integrity, on Human Rights and other differences ... without confrontation", Sarkozy stressed, on the occasion of Russian/Georgian conflict, reminding that : "we were only 2 steps from catastroph", when a Peace agreement brokered in Moscow prevented, at the last minute, Russian troops' advance towards Tbilisi.

An EU Parliament Resolution adopted Wednesday in Strasbourg on the occasion of Russia - Georgia conflict, outlines a set of Principle which apply elsewhere too, (particularly when EU Rapporteur for Russia and Turkey is one and same person ; Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijtanen !)

Clearly rejecting any "military solution to the conflicts", MEPs "condemn ..all those who resorted to force and violence". They denounce a "disproportionate military action", "as well as (an) unilateral decision to recognise the independence" of brekaway regions, "calling.. to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity" of the concerned country, "and the inviolability of its borders recognised by all EU Member States". They warn that "EU must review its policy towards" a 3rd Country, "should .(it)...not comply with its commitments", and "stress that the withdrawal of.... troops from the areas ....is an essential additional step".

EU Parliament "calls for the safe and quick return of refugees, (accepted by Russian President Medvedev) accompanied by the deployment of EU observers on the ground", and "regrets ...that ..EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) is not allowed to enter the ...breakaway regions". Moreover, "It's important to ensure that persons and NGOs ..engaged in defending human and civil rights can operate". "Until ...all remaining issues (are) resolved..., and notably the continuing ...Military presence", "relations with the EU ..cannot be fully normalised", MEPS warned.

As nobody likes to be accused to practice "Double Standards", this should be regarded as "Principles" applicable to any Third Country at EU's Neighborhood.. No ?


On Economy :

- "When Financial crisis shook US and EU's Banks, without result from the 1st (American) Paulsen plan, it was the common reply of the 1st EuroZone's Summit, involving some 1800 Billion euros, which started a positive move in the markets, soon strengthened by the follow-up of the US Paulson 2 Plan, noted Sarkozy.

- "Europe should not be only on the defensive, but, if necessary, know also how to take an offensive", he said, brushing away hesitationsto act on Economy: - "I'm for a refondation of Capitaliism, but against Speculators, who betray its values" : "Lack of Rules was profitable to speculators, Not to businessmen !" We must make sure to prevent any such crisis in future". "We, the rest of the World, cannot continue to bear the deficits of the 1st World power without saying anything !", the French President said, applauded by EU Parliament. All this needs "a New Global Governance", on which EU Parliament must debate. That's why "we proposed together with USA, several Summits from mid-November", to which G-8, enlarged to China, India a.o. countries, should participate. UNO's SG; Ban Ki Moon, the IMF, etc.

Financial crisis lowered shares' prices even for healthy companies, sometimes to 1/3 of their initial price, so that strangers might buy EU industries for only a portion of their real value, and Europeans may wake up one day with their main industries sold out to foreigners !

That's one of the reasons for which EU should debate about creating "Golden Shares" for States to jointly take Strategic participations to help European Industries until the end of the Crisis, particularly against distording competition, he suggested, pointing at USA's 35 billion $ plan for American Car Industry."We shall struggle for Europe to be able to build Airplanes, Ships, Trains, Cars, because we need a strong Industry", he concluded.

"F.ex. as we did back in 2004, when as Finance Minister, we bought Alsthom's shares for 800.000 euros, and, after restructuring, we sold them for 2 Millions : Help a company and make money is not so bad"...

As for the UK, "when Ireland announced that it would guarantee only Irish Banks, London City emptied from liquidities in 24 hours : It's the EU which helped to restore the situation, Not the UK alone !", reminded Sarkozy to nationalist British MEP Nigel Farage.


On the contrary, in a last-minute attempt for the EU to catch-up with its Institutional delay "before the European Elections" of June 2009, MEPs simply voted a call for a "set of proposals" to be made for the "Irish public opinion" at the end of the year...

- "As long as Lisbon Treaty is not ratified by all 27 EU Member States, there is an unanimous decision to stop Enlargement, reminded Wednesday in Strasbourg the French Minister for EU affairs, Jean-Pierre Jouyet..

Added to an indirect but clear warning that, without Lisbon Treaty, all 27 EU Member Countries may not have a Commissioner in the 2009 resuffle, MEPS in the Constitutional/Foreign affairs Committees applauded hoping that this might motivate their Irish friends..



2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?


SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.