english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Inicio arrow newsitems arrow France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022

France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022

Escrito por ACM
09.04.22

zemmour_trocadezro_overall_lmonumental__web__eurofora_400_01 

 *Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- Acccording  to UnExpected developments, Outsider,  popular former Anti-Establishment Journalist Eric Zemmour, may become a Game Changer in the forthcoming Presidential  and/or Parliamentary Elections, (4 - 6/2022) recent Polls, Public Meetings, Press Statelents, Political Evznts, Votes and Results, bringing various Impacts in National,, European, and/or Global, big Topical Issues.

zemmour_trocadezro_close_web__eurofora_400 

    Zemmour aims to Overcome a Division of thz Right, which has, practicaly, been Exploited by the Left and/or the Center, in order to Seize the Governemztt, several times in the Past, even with a Minority, against a Lack of Unity of the Right, through a systematic Diabolisation of all Rightsts, Provoking Abstention, Socio-Political Troubles, and Degradation of Democracy, Incompatible with the Respect to Citizens and importance of Public Debates, required by the nature, stakes and complexity of Issues handled by Modern Public Decision-Making, at most levels.

    Out-going President Emanuel Macron (Centrist-former "Socialist") and Top Chalenger Marine Le Pen (Rightist), the 2017 Finalists,  Surf again at the Top of Polls, on a Similar Rank. But Mecron recently Lost some Groud, apparently because of a Heavier than expected  Dependency from UK-USA on the Ukranian Division of Europe, added to ab Eye-Blink towards Turkey, as also to Consecions to Lobbies on BioEthics (Bio-Technocrats + LBGTI°) and Fake-"Vaccines" against the Virus' Pandemic, Twice Headqurtered in the EU, with some Harsh or Restrictive Measures. Almost Simultaneysty, Le Pen's Family's notorious Incompatibility with Center-Left Voters, reportedly seems to have somewhuat diminished, added to a more Fair stance for the PanEuropean area with Russia on Ukraine, Ameliorating Marine's alleged Prospcts.

    Top Outsiders Jean-Luc Melancon, at the Left side, and Eric Zemmour, on the Right side, may be, more or less, Blocked from Criss-Crossing, But only Melancon looks Excluded from Mainstream Left of the Establishment, while, on the Contrary, Zemmour appears Fluidly Moving accross All the Right, which currently holds a Majority among French Voters :

    - Indeed, Zemmour has just bee accredited by Recent Polls for a Bigger Number of potential Voters than Valerie Pecresse, the current Head Cadidate of the Mainstream, Center-Right Party of "Republicaans", from which he reportedly has Already reached a Deal with its Chief  at EU Paliament, MEP Bellamy, ( a BoEthics supporter), added to former Minister Mariani, present Chief oi the Right and Biggest Fraction of the Party : Ciotti, former "Numbr 2" Pelletier, and probably former Secretary General Wauqiez, (current succesful President of Region in the latest Elections), etc.

    -  Moreover, he is Also Supported, inter alia, by Rightist Le Pen's "National Rally" Party's 3 Key Leading EU Parliament MEPs, including their former Chief, Bey, aad current President, Riviere, as well as her own sibling, Director of Political Science Instutute, Marion Le Pen-Marechal, etc.

zemmour_trocadezro_overall_long_web__eurofora_400 

    + Eric Zemmour's Public Meetings Nowadays seem to have  gathered a Huge Number of Participants, both at the Internet and Physicaly, (f.ex. at Trocadero, in Paris, where they Recently revendicated about "100 Thousands" Demonstrators).  

    =>  On the main Topical Issues, Faithful to the Historic General De Gaulle, and Presidents Jacques Chirac plus Nicolas Sarkozy, Zemmour recently pronounced himself  in Favour of a "Great Europe", including Russia, even after the latest Ukranian conflict provoked on 2022, withOut Dividing our Continent in a CounderProductive and Da,ngerous way.

    On BioEthics, he stays Opposed to Controversial and ImPopular "Same Sex" Marriage between Homosexuals, which leads towards massive Artificial Fabrication of Children through Technocrats' Labos, prefering Traditional Marriage, between a Man and a Woman, (as even CoE's PanEuropean Convention on Human Rights disposes), i.e. with Natural Births.

    Concerning the always "Barning" and Topical Issue of Foreign Mass Migration, Zamour is strictly Against imposed "Population Replacement" theories and/or practices, as well as against massive "Islamisation' in French Society, (believing that Europe has its own Potential to Generate a sufficient Working Force). Instead, he proposes full and authentic Cultural "Assimilaton" to the Historic French and European Civilisation, (Based on Greco-Roman and Renaisance Philosopjy, as well as in Judeo-Christian Values, etc).

    ++ In order to realise such Aims, Eric Zemmour has just created a fully fledged, brand New Political Party, with Record-High Participation, which intends t challenge the forthcomoing Parliamentary Elections of June 2022 and well Beyond in the  fpreseable Future, (with the European History landmark Name of "Reconcista").

    *** Last, but not least, he clearly vowed, if nccessary, to Stand by Marine Le Pen, at the imminnt 2d RFound of crucial Presidential Elections, on April 24. Thi is the 2nd (and probably Biggest) Party to join a possible large Coalition af All the Right Side of France's Political spectrum, (as it had been done, Earlirn f.ex. in Norway, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, etc), After a First such move by the small Party of atypical Neo-Gaulist Dupont-Aignan on he Previous Elections of 2017 (+3%).

    It goes without saying that if, this time, Zemmour soon Adds a More pr less Significant Popular Swift for a Unity of the Right in France, then, this could Result in a Growing cascade of various socio-Political Repercussions, which can have Manifold Effects of a real "Game Changer". Particularly if he succeeds to Bypass the score of Pecresse, (generally considered as closer to the Establishment, among Various Republicans)...

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

____________________

 

 

StartUpEU

Statistics

Visitantes: 56182048

Archive

Login Form

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Mostrados

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.