english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Αρχική arrow newsitems arrow Trump: Wide OutReach in USSenate Vote on DoD Bill Veto incl Cruz/Paul/Sanders/Warren=+53% Voters R+D

Trump: Wide OutReach in USSenate Vote on DoD Bill Veto incl Cruz/Paul/Sanders/Warren=+53% Voters R+D

Έχει γραφτεί από ACM
Friday, 01 January 2021

trump__wide_outreach_in_key_senate_vote_cruzpaulsanderswarren_etc_senate__eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- US President Don Trump's Key Ideas (See Infra) UnExpectedly Attracted Today the Votes of various Leading Senators, including those representing a Total of More than +70% of the People voting in Primaries' Presidential Elections, of Both GOP and Dems Parties, Spreading as Large as from Ted Cruz (important Republican, 2nd Front-Runner in the latest GOP's Presidential Primary), all the way up to Bernie Sanders (Independent + Twice 2nd Front-Runner in Dems' Presidential Primaries of Both 2016 and 2020), as well as Elisabeth Warren (former 3rd Dems' Candidate in the Presidential Primary 2020), and Rand Paul, (Famous Libertarian GOP Senator, son of a former Many Times Independent Presidential Candidate), etc.

This Surprizing Event took place during Today's USA Senate's "Hot" Vote on Trump's Veto to a Controversial Version of a Bill on DoD's Annual Budget for 2021, which had Erased his Main, Original Calls for an Investigation on the alleged 2020 US Presidential Election Fraud/Gross Irregularities, Against UnControlled  Censorship of Citizens at the Internet by "Big Tech" Oligo-Monopolies, (such as "Twitter", "YouTube/Google", "FaceBook", etc), as well as for Peaceful Withdrawal of USA Soldiers from various Foreign Countries accross the World, (including from Afghanistan, Somalia, Germany, etc), added to the Protection of Historic Monuments' Denominations, (etc), that he considered Related also to the Security, Sovereignity, Independence and Freedom of the Country and its People.

It's Not Yet Clear What really Attracted the Main Interest of Bernie Sanders (one of USA's most "Admired" Men, Together with ...Dalai Lama, Elon Musk, Bill Gates = 1%, etc, according to the Latest "GALLUP" : See ... ), But it's Logical and very Probable that he Agreed with Trump's wish to Protect People's Freedom of Speech at the Internet, (a Notoriously Topical Issue, where, inter alia, Also Sanders' ally, Leftist Dissident Journalist Glenn Greenwald has just Warned against a Risk of "Growing Authoritarianism" by Dems/"Socialists"), as well as with the Peaceful Withdrawal of USA Military Troops from Foreign Countries accross the World, ("Peace" Attempts against "Warlike" Aggressions being Also another Favorite of Greenwald too). And something like this Could, Naturaly, Interest Also Elisabeth Warren.

=> Together, Sanders and Warren got more than + 35% of Votes in Dems' Primaries for Presidential Candidates (Compared to Biden's 51%), and Cruz has got More than +25%, (Added to Trump's Initial 45% Back on 2016, with Much More on 2020), i.e. Totaling, approximately, more than = 105/2 = at least + 52,5% Crystal-clear Absolute Majority of actively Voting People, Nowadays !

+ To this must be Added also "Libertarian" Senator Rand Paul, who had got +4,5% at the Latest GOP's Presidential Primaries in 2016 before withdrawing, as well as Experienced Former Democrat and Later Republican Senator John Kennedy from Luisiana, Together with Young and Active Senators Tom Cotton, from Arkansas, and Josh Hawley, from Missouri, while Senior Senator Lindsay Graham, who has Strongly Supported Trump to Fight against the 2020 Electoral Fraud/Gross Irregularities, abstained.

Trump has, Already, Eyed towards Sander's Socio-Economic Electoral Base, consisting Mainly of Disadvantaged People, and Black or Hispanic Minorities, etc., as Early as Since his Landmark 2016 Cleveland Speech at Ohio's GOP Gathering for his Nomination as Official Candidate for the USA Presidency, as well as in his Inauguration Speech, on January 2017 at Washington DC, that he Also Highlighted, inter alia, in his 1st, Short but Dense Speech at the White House's Lawn, Immediately After his Surprizing Return from the Hospital, just Cured from COVID-19 Deadly Virus' Infection, aquiring Natural Immunity, right in the Middle of the Crucial 2020 US Presidential Election, (See, f.ex., at: ... + ... + ..., etc).

Ted Cruz is Now the Leader of Senators who have Just Launched a Written Petition for the Creation of a Bi-Partisan US Congress Committee, added to Supreme Court's Judges, in order to Investigate the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities in the 2020 Controversial US Presiderntial Election, and due to Challenge Biden's Contested Certification at US Congress' Official Session of January 6, 2021, (Parallel to a Huge Popular Demonstration at Wshington DC that Same Day, due to Express People's Protest : See .... + Infra).

+ In the MeanTime, anOther Key Draft Bill has been Tabled at USA's Federal Senate, some Days Earlier, which Adds into the Anti-Virus and Economic Stimulus Bill All Key Trump's largely Popular Ideas, which have Not Yet been adopted, including that of 2.000 $ for Each Person, (5.400 for a Typical Family), Instead of Only 600 $, among Poor/Middle-Class People, as well as the Above-Mentioned Amendments for the Creation of a Bi-Partisan Committee to Investigate alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities in the latest, 2020 US Presidential Election, and Measures to Protect People's Freedom of Expression from UnControled Censorship at the Internet by "Big Tech" Networks, (See: ..., etc). That Draft Bill was Not Yet put at a Vote in the Senate, which Postponed its Activities until Sunday, January 3, 2021, when the New Senate will Start working.

Moreover, USA's Federal Supreme Court has fixed January 22, (i.e. just After the Initial Date for the Official Inauguration, currently Scheduled for January 20, of Whoever might, eventualy, Become USA's President during the 2021-2024 Period), for the First ever Trump's Legal Complaint at the Highest Federal level, lodged on December 20, 2020 on Pennsylvania alleged WideSpread Fraud/Gross Irregularities. + In the MeanTime, Trump's Team lodged Also a 2nd Legal Complaint at SCOTUS Level,, o December 30, 2020, against Wisconsin's Controversial Vote, among 6 Crucial "Swing" States. USA's Supreme Court has Not yet Examined, Nor Discussed, Neither Pronounced itshelf on the Merits of Any Case concerning these Controversial US Election, until Now.  These 2 First Cases, on Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, if they are Won by Trump, would provide Sufficient Electors for a Trump's eventual Win of the oberall Presidential Election, (with More than 270 Electors, Adding some among the above-mentioned Alternative Slates of Electors, which are already Ready, Since Mid-December 2020 : Comp. Supra).

+ In Addition, Meanwhile,  the competent and experienced International Organisations of OSCE and OAS prepare their Crucial, Final Reports on the Controversial 2020 US Presidential Election, which are Expected to be Published at around the Middle of January 2021, with possible Postponements for Later-on, if Developments on the Electoral Process (Including the way to Handle Legal Complaints), require to do so, as "Eurofora" learned, (See, f.ex. : ..., etc). Their Preliminary Reports and/or Press Conferences, since the immediate Aftermath of the November 3, 2020 Controversial US Presidential Elections, contain some First Critical points, (even if Real Problems had Insufficiently Surfaced yet at that Early Moment, Appearing mainly Later-on, as, f.ex., Statistical Big Anomalies, Sudden DisProportionate Last-Minute U-Turns After MidNight, Videos, Signed Testimonies and EyeWitnesses, "Dominion" Machines/Network Scandal, Lorry Full of New York Ballots, Observers Hindered, Attempts to Hide Data, Establishment Press' Biais and Web Censorship by "Big Tech", Systematic Courts' Refusals to Examine and Discuss Evidence, much More Votes than Voters, etc).

In a Recent, 2019 Precedent, it's just a Short but Sharp Criticism by OAS' Observers Mission on the Presidential Elections in Bolivia, that gave a Signal for a Series of Popular Demonstrations against Morales ("Socialist", like Biden), until he was Practicaly Obliged to Resign, some Weeks, a Month or so Later, when a Key Part of the Army and the Police Refused to Oppress the People, and reportedly Suggested, in a Press Conference, that it would be Better for the Country if he Left... And that, Despite the Fact that the Supreme Electoral Court had Examined, previously, and Rejected on the Merits, All Legal Complaints by the Opposition) !... For the Rest, the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities' overall Pattern was Strikinkgly Similar, on 2019, to that of USA's on 2020, (f.ex., mainly Sudden DisProportional U-Turns in Vote-Counting After MidNight, Huge Statistical ImProbabilities, etc).

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

-----------------------------

 


EUDigitalForum

Statistics

Επισκέπτες: 52293983

Archive

Login Form





Να με θυμάσαι

Ξεχάσατε τον Κωδικό Πρόσβασης;
Δεν έχετε λογαριασμό ακόμα; Δημιουργία λογαριασμού

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML
 bisky_center_400
 

Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.

For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :  

- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.

imag0025_400_01

- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties",  he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
 
At any case,  "we  (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.

- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"           

- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
                                                                                                                                                                        
- "EuroLeft  and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"

- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."

- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.

imag0935_400

Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :

- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.

But, many Facts indicate the contrary :

Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).

During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side :  Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.

The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).

Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.

"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.  

So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.

To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...

Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of  representative Democracy a topical meaning :

 - "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.

Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".

- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.

***





-

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Αποτελέσματα

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.