english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Accueil arrow newsitems arrow Trump: Wide OutReach in USSenate Vote on DoD Bill Veto incl Cruz/Paul/Sanders/Warren=+53% Voters R+D

Trump: Wide OutReach in USSenate Vote on DoD Bill Veto incl Cruz/Paul/Sanders/Warren=+53% Voters R+D

Ecrit par ACM
Friday, 01 January 2021

trump__wide_outreach_in_key_senate_vote_cruzpaulsanderswarren_etc_senate__eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- US President Don Trump's Key Ideas (See Infra) UnExpectedly Attracted Today the Votes of various Leading Senators, including those representing a Total of More than +70% of the People voting in Primaries' Presidential Elections, of Both GOP and Dems Parties, Spreading as Large as from Ted Cruz (important Republican, 2nd Front-Runner in the latest GOP's Presidential Primary), all the way up to Bernie Sanders (Independent + Twice 2nd Front-Runner in Dems' Presidential Primaries of Both 2016 and 2020), as well as Elisabeth Warren (former 3rd Dems' Candidate in the Presidential Primary 2020), and Rand Paul, (Famous Libertarian GOP Senator, son of a former Many Times Independent Presidential Candidate), etc.

This Surprizing Event took place during Today's USA Senate's "Hot" Vote on Trump's Veto to a Controversial Version of a Bill on DoD's Annual Budget for 2021, which had Erased his Main, Original Calls for an Investigation on the alleged 2020 US Presidential Election Fraud/Gross Irregularities, Against UnControlled  Censorship of Citizens at the Internet by "Big Tech" Oligo-Monopolies, (such as "Twitter", "YouTube/Google", "FaceBook", etc), as well as for Peaceful Withdrawal of USA Soldiers from various Foreign Countries accross the World, (including from Afghanistan, Somalia, Germany, etc), added to the Protection of Historic Monuments' Denominations, (etc), that he considered Related also to the Security, Sovereignity, Independence and Freedom of the Country and its People.

It's Not Yet Clear What really Attracted the Main Interest of Bernie Sanders (one of USA's most "Admired" Men, Together with ...Dalai Lama, Elon Musk, Bill Gates = 1%, etc, according to the Latest "GALLUP" : See ... ), But it's Logical and very Probable that he Agreed with Trump's wish to Protect People's Freedom of Speech at the Internet, (a Notoriously Topical Issue, where, inter alia, Also Sanders' ally, Leftist Dissident Journalist Glenn Greenwald has just Warned against a Risk of "Growing Authoritarianism" by Dems/"Socialists"), as well as with the Peaceful Withdrawal of USA Military Troops from Foreign Countries accross the World, ("Peace" Attempts against "Warlike" Aggressions being Also another Favorite of Greenwald too). And something like this Could, Naturaly, Interest Also Elisabeth Warren.

=> Together, Sanders and Warren got more than + 35% of Votes in Dems' Primaries for Presidential Candidates (Compared to Biden's 51%), and Cruz has got More than +25%, (Added to Trump's Initial 45% Back on 2016, with Much More on 2020), i.e. Totaling, approximately, more than = 105/2 = at least + 52,5% Crystal-clear Absolute Majority of actively Voting People, Nowadays !

+ To this must be Added also "Libertarian" Senator Rand Paul, who had got +4,5% at the Latest GOP's Presidential Primaries in 2016 before withdrawing, as well as Experienced Former Democrat and Later Republican Senator John Kennedy from Luisiana, Together with Young and Active Senators Tom Cotton, from Arkansas, and Josh Hawley, from Missouri, while Senior Senator Lindsay Graham, who has Strongly Supported Trump to Fight against the 2020 Electoral Fraud/Gross Irregularities, abstained.

Trump has, Already, Eyed towards Sander's Socio-Economic Electoral Base, consisting Mainly of Disadvantaged People, and Black or Hispanic Minorities, etc., as Early as Since his Landmark 2016 Cleveland Speech at Ohio's GOP Gathering for his Nomination as Official Candidate for the USA Presidency, as well as in his Inauguration Speech, on January 2017 at Washington DC, that he Also Highlighted, inter alia, in his 1st, Short but Dense Speech at the White House's Lawn, Immediately After his Surprizing Return from the Hospital, just Cured from COVID-19 Deadly Virus' Infection, aquiring Natural Immunity, right in the Middle of the Crucial 2020 US Presidential Election, (See, f.ex., at: ... + ... + ..., etc).

Ted Cruz is Now the Leader of Senators who have Just Launched a Written Petition for the Creation of a Bi-Partisan US Congress Committee, added to Supreme Court's Judges, in order to Investigate the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities in the 2020 Controversial US Presiderntial Election, and due to Challenge Biden's Contested Certification at US Congress' Official Session of January 6, 2021, (Parallel to a Huge Popular Demonstration at Wshington DC that Same Day, due to Express People's Protest : See .... + Infra).

+ In the MeanTime, anOther Key Draft Bill has been Tabled at USA's Federal Senate, some Days Earlier, which Adds into the Anti-Virus and Economic Stimulus Bill All Key Trump's largely Popular Ideas, which have Not Yet been adopted, including that of 2.000 $ for Each Person, (5.400 for a Typical Family), Instead of Only 600 $, among Poor/Middle-Class People, as well as the Above-Mentioned Amendments for the Creation of a Bi-Partisan Committee to Investigate alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities in the latest, 2020 US Presidential Election, and Measures to Protect People's Freedom of Expression from UnControled Censorship at the Internet by "Big Tech" Networks, (See: ..., etc). That Draft Bill was Not Yet put at a Vote in the Senate, which Postponed its Activities until Sunday, January 3, 2021, when the New Senate will Start working.

Moreover, USA's Federal Supreme Court has fixed January 22, (i.e. just After the Initial Date for the Official Inauguration, currently Scheduled for January 20, of Whoever might, eventualy, Become USA's President during the 2021-2024 Period), for the First ever Trump's Legal Complaint at the Highest Federal level, lodged on December 20, 2020 on Pennsylvania alleged WideSpread Fraud/Gross Irregularities. + In the MeanTime, Trump's Team lodged Also a 2nd Legal Complaint at SCOTUS Level,, o December 30, 2020, against Wisconsin's Controversial Vote, among 6 Crucial "Swing" States. USA's Supreme Court has Not yet Examined, Nor Discussed, Neither Pronounced itshelf on the Merits of Any Case concerning these Controversial US Election, until Now.  These 2 First Cases, on Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, if they are Won by Trump, would provide Sufficient Electors for a Trump's eventual Win of the oberall Presidential Election, (with More than 270 Electors, Adding some among the above-mentioned Alternative Slates of Electors, which are already Ready, Since Mid-December 2020 : Comp. Supra).

+ In Addition, Meanwhile,  the competent and experienced International Organisations of OSCE and OAS prepare their Crucial, Final Reports on the Controversial 2020 US Presidential Election, which are Expected to be Published at around the Middle of January 2021, with possible Postponements for Later-on, if Developments on the Electoral Process (Including the way to Handle Legal Complaints), require to do so, as "Eurofora" learned, (See, f.ex. : ..., etc). Their Preliminary Reports and/or Press Conferences, since the immediate Aftermath of the November 3, 2020 Controversial US Presidential Elections, contain some First Critical points, (even if Real Problems had Insufficiently Surfaced yet at that Early Moment, Appearing mainly Later-on, as, f.ex., Statistical Big Anomalies, Sudden DisProportionate Last-Minute U-Turns After MidNight, Videos, Signed Testimonies and EyeWitnesses, "Dominion" Machines/Network Scandal, Lorry Full of New York Ballots, Observers Hindered, Attempts to Hide Data, Establishment Press' Biais and Web Censorship by "Big Tech", Systematic Courts' Refusals to Examine and Discuss Evidence, much More Votes than Voters, etc).

In a Recent, 2019 Precedent, it's just a Short but Sharp Criticism by OAS' Observers Mission on the Presidential Elections in Bolivia, that gave a Signal for a Series of Popular Demonstrations against Morales ("Socialist", like Biden), until he was Practicaly Obliged to Resign, some Weeks, a Month or so Later, when a Key Part of the Army and the Police Refused to Oppress the People, and reportedly Suggested, in a Press Conference, that it would be Better for the Country if he Left... And that, Despite the Fact that the Supreme Electoral Court had Examined, previously, and Rejected on the Merits, All Legal Complaints by the Opposition) !... For the Rest, the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities' overall Pattern was Strikinkgly Similar, on 2019, to that of USA's on 2020, (f.ex., mainly Sudden DisProportional U-Turns in Vote-Counting After MidNight, Huge Statistical ImProbabilities, etc).

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

-----------------------------

 


EUDigitalForum

Statistics

Visiteurrs: 54900140

Archive

Login Form





Se souvenir de moi

Perdu votre mot de passe?
Pas encore de compte? Enregistrez-vous

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Résultats

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.