english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Trump: Wide OutReach in USSenate Vote on DoD Bill Veto incl Cruz/Paul/Sanders/Warren=+53% Voters R+D

Trump: Wide OutReach in USSenate Vote on DoD Bill Veto incl Cruz/Paul/Sanders/Warren=+53% Voters R+D

Written by ACM
Friday, 01 January 2021

trump__wide_outreach_in_key_senate_vote_cruzpaulsanderswarren_etc_senate__eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- US President Don Trump's Key Ideas (See Infra) UnExpectedly Attracted Today the Votes of various Leading Senators, including those representing a Total of More than +70% of the People voting in Primaries' Presidential Elections, of Both GOP and Dems Parties, Spreading as Large as from Ted Cruz (important Republican, 2nd Front-Runner in the latest GOP's Presidential Primary), all the way up to Bernie Sanders (Independent + Twice 2nd Front-Runner in Dems' Presidential Primaries of Both 2016 and 2020), as well as Elisabeth Warren (former 3rd Dems' Candidate in the Presidential Primary 2020), and Rand Paul, (Famous Libertarian GOP Senator, son of a former Many Times Independent Presidential Candidate), etc.

This Surprizing Event took place during Today's USA Senate's "Hot" Vote on Trump's Veto to a Controversial Version of a Bill on DoD's Annual Budget for 2021, which had Erased his Main, Original Calls for an Investigation on the alleged 2020 US Presidential Election Fraud/Gross Irregularities, Against UnControlled  Censorship of Citizens at the Internet by "Big Tech" Oligo-Monopolies, (such as "Twitter", "YouTube/Google", "FaceBook", etc), as well as for Peaceful Withdrawal of USA Soldiers from various Foreign Countries accross the World, (including from Afghanistan, Somalia, Germany, etc), added to the Protection of Historic Monuments' Denominations, (etc), that he considered Related also to the Security, Sovereignity, Independence and Freedom of the Country and its People.

It's Not Yet Clear What really Attracted the Main Interest of Bernie Sanders (one of USA's most "Admired" Men, Together with ...Dalai Lama, Elon Musk, Bill Gates = 1%, etc, according to the Latest "GALLUP" : See ... ), But it's Logical and very Probable that he Agreed with Trump's wish to Protect People's Freedom of Speech at the Internet, (a Notoriously Topical Issue, where, inter alia, Also Sanders' ally, Leftist Dissident Journalist Glenn Greenwald has just Warned against a Risk of "Growing Authoritarianism" by Dems/"Socialists"), as well as with the Peaceful Withdrawal of USA Military Troops from Foreign Countries accross the World, ("Peace" Attempts against "Warlike" Aggressions being Also another Favorite of Greenwald too). And something like this Could, Naturaly, Interest Also Elisabeth Warren.

=> Together, Sanders and Warren got more than + 35% of Votes in Dems' Primaries for Presidential Candidates (Compared to Biden's 51%), and Cruz has got More than +25%, (Added to Trump's Initial 45% Back on 2016, with Much More on 2020), i.e. Totaling, approximately, more than = 105/2 = at least + 52,5% Crystal-clear Absolute Majority of actively Voting People, Nowadays !

+ To this must be Added also "Libertarian" Senator Rand Paul, who had got +4,5% at the Latest GOP's Presidential Primaries in 2016 before withdrawing, as well as Experienced Former Democrat and Later Republican Senator John Kennedy from Luisiana, Together with Young and Active Senators Tom Cotton, from Arkansas, and Josh Hawley, from Missouri, while Senior Senator Lindsay Graham, who has Strongly Supported Trump to Fight against the 2020 Electoral Fraud/Gross Irregularities, abstained.

Trump has, Already, Eyed towards Sander's Socio-Economic Electoral Base, consisting Mainly of Disadvantaged People, and Black or Hispanic Minorities, etc., as Early as Since his Landmark 2016 Cleveland Speech at Ohio's GOP Gathering for his Nomination as Official Candidate for the USA Presidency, as well as in his Inauguration Speech, on January 2017 at Washington DC, that he Also Highlighted, inter alia, in his 1st, Short but Dense Speech at the White House's Lawn, Immediately After his Surprizing Return from the Hospital, just Cured from COVID-19 Deadly Virus' Infection, aquiring Natural Immunity, right in the Middle of the Crucial 2020 US Presidential Election, (See, f.ex., at: ... + ... + ..., etc).

Ted Cruz is Now the Leader of Senators who have Just Launched a Written Petition for the Creation of a Bi-Partisan US Congress Committee, added to Supreme Court's Judges, in order to Investigate the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities in the 2020 Controversial US Presiderntial Election, and due to Challenge Biden's Contested Certification at US Congress' Official Session of January 6, 2021, (Parallel to a Huge Popular Demonstration at Wshington DC that Same Day, due to Express People's Protest : See .... + Infra).

+ In the MeanTime, anOther Key Draft Bill has been Tabled at USA's Federal Senate, some Days Earlier, which Adds into the Anti-Virus and Economic Stimulus Bill All Key Trump's largely Popular Ideas, which have Not Yet been adopted, including that of 2.000 $ for Each Person, (5.400 for a Typical Family), Instead of Only 600 $, among Poor/Middle-Class People, as well as the Above-Mentioned Amendments for the Creation of a Bi-Partisan Committee to Investigate alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities in the latest, 2020 US Presidential Election, and Measures to Protect People's Freedom of Expression from UnControled Censorship at the Internet by "Big Tech" Networks, (See: ..., etc). That Draft Bill was Not Yet put at a Vote in the Senate, which Postponed its Activities until Sunday, January 3, 2021, when the New Senate will Start working.

Moreover, USA's Federal Supreme Court has fixed January 22, (i.e. just After the Initial Date for the Official Inauguration, currently Scheduled for January 20, of Whoever might, eventualy, Become USA's President during the 2021-2024 Period), for the First ever Trump's Legal Complaint at the Highest Federal level, lodged on December 20, 2020 on Pennsylvania alleged WideSpread Fraud/Gross Irregularities. + In the MeanTime, Trump's Team lodged Also a 2nd Legal Complaint at SCOTUS Level,, o December 30, 2020, against Wisconsin's Controversial Vote, among 6 Crucial "Swing" States. USA's Supreme Court has Not yet Examined, Nor Discussed, Neither Pronounced itshelf on the Merits of Any Case concerning these Controversial US Election, until Now.  These 2 First Cases, on Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, if they are Won by Trump, would provide Sufficient Electors for a Trump's eventual Win of the oberall Presidential Election, (with More than 270 Electors, Adding some among the above-mentioned Alternative Slates of Electors, which are already Ready, Since Mid-December 2020 : Comp. Supra).

+ In Addition, Meanwhile,  the competent and experienced International Organisations of OSCE and OAS prepare their Crucial, Final Reports on the Controversial 2020 US Presidential Election, which are Expected to be Published at around the Middle of January 2021, with possible Postponements for Later-on, if Developments on the Electoral Process (Including the way to Handle Legal Complaints), require to do so, as "Eurofora" learned, (See, f.ex. : ..., etc). Their Preliminary Reports and/or Press Conferences, since the immediate Aftermath of the November 3, 2020 Controversial US Presidential Elections, contain some First Critical points, (even if Real Problems had Insufficiently Surfaced yet at that Early Moment, Appearing mainly Later-on, as, f.ex., Statistical Big Anomalies, Sudden DisProportionate Last-Minute U-Turns After MidNight, Videos, Signed Testimonies and EyeWitnesses, "Dominion" Machines/Network Scandal, Lorry Full of New York Ballots, Observers Hindered, Attempts to Hide Data, Establishment Press' Biais and Web Censorship by "Big Tech", Systematic Courts' Refusals to Examine and Discuss Evidence, much More Votes than Voters, etc).

In a Recent, 2019 Precedent, it's just a Short but Sharp Criticism by OAS' Observers Mission on the Presidential Elections in Bolivia, that gave a Signal for a Series of Popular Demonstrations against Morales ("Socialist", like Biden), until he was Practicaly Obliged to Resign, some Weeks, a Month or so Later, when a Key Part of the Army and the Police Refused to Oppress the People, and reportedly Suggested, in a Press Conference, that it would be Better for the Country if he Left... And that, Despite the Fact that the Supreme Electoral Court had Examined, previously, and Rejected on the Merits, All Legal Complaints by the Opposition) !... For the Rest, the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities' overall Pattern was Strikinkgly Similar, on 2019, to that of USA's on 2020, (f.ex., mainly Sudden DisProportional U-Turns in Vote-Counting After MidNight, Huge Statistical ImProbabilities, etc).

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

-----------------------------

 


Enterprise Europe Network

Statistics

Visitors: 45075030

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.