

Virus Drug: BaseLess EUCom Conditional OK for Costly Remdesivir as French HCQ, Russian Avifavir Wait

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- While the Pandemic Spreads, Twice-Failed, (initialy for "Hepatitis", Later for "Ebola"), and Now for "COVID-19" Virus, too Costly "Remdesivir" IntraVenous Drug, Patented by US MultiNational Corporation "Gilead", surprisingly got a "Conditional" OK from EU Commission, Limited to 1 Year, and Subject to Answer on Still Open Questions on its alleged "Efficiency" and "Side Effects", (that USA's "FDA" has Recently Asked to Show to the Public in a Long List at a "Note"),
Curiously withOut any New, Nor Decisive Trials' Study, except from an Old and UnReliable Paper (See Facts Infra), Funded by Controversial Dr. Fauci's NIAID, (a Technocrat who did Propaganda for "Remdesivir" Already Since ...February/March, and Again Exploited a White House visit to make unsolicited Publicity for the Same, also on April, See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/misleadingclaimsonvirusdrug.html),
WithOut Even Daring Claim that "Remdesivir" might, Perhaps, Reduce Mortality at all (sic !),
and, therefore, WithOut any Explanation for Brussels' Sudden Hurry to serve USA's "Remdesivir",
But, on the Contrary, Cheap, Simple, apparently More Performant, and Claiming to Save Human Lives, European Drugs, as mainly French "HCQ+" (including Recent Publications), mainly British "DexaMethaSone" (for Grave Cases, Awaiting to be Published, for the 1st Time), and mainly Russian "AviFavir", etc. are still Waiting...
-----------------------------------
- The EU Commission's astonishingly Exceptional Laxism on USA's "Remdesivir" came with an "Accelerated" Procedure of just ONE (1) Week After EMA's Consultation, Instead of ...almost TEN (10) Weeks, "Normally", an Official Press Release Boasted.
>>> But, such a Hurry, for a MultiNational Private Company's Expensive, UnCertain, and Controversial (See Infra) Merchandise, Surprisingly Contrasts greatly with the Scandalous DELAY for EU Commission to Push Measures to Protect European Citizens from being Massively Infected by that Deadly Virus coming from China, and, even More, from North-Western Italy since February, Until it Became Too Late, since the EU had been, Meanwhile, Transformed in ..."EpiCenter" of a World's "PanDemic", as the "WHO" notoriously Announced on March, (See: ... + ... + ... + ..., etc)
- EU Commissioner for Health and Food Safety, Stella Kyriakides reportedly Claimed that the Fact that such a Conditional Authorisation was Granted ..."Less than 1 Month After (Gilead's) Application was Submited", would "Show... clearly the EU (Commission)'s Determination to Respond Quickly, Whenever New Treatments Become Available".
=> Why, then, Nothing Similar WasN't yet done by EUCom., Neither for "HCQ+", mainly Supported by Chinese, French and recently USA Trial Studies, particularly by Professor Didier Raoult, Ford Foundation, etc., Nor for the more Recent Russian "AviFavir" Drug, (which has been Already Officialy Authorized by Moscow's Government) ? Perhaps, also "DexaMethaSone", Backed by the UK Government and the WHO for Grave Cases, at Respirators/Oxygen intake, (with a 1st Publication reportedly Imminent)..
It's Not a Secret that, Both Kyriakides and EU Commission's current President, Von der Leyen, are Notoriously Known for being Personaly Linked to Big "Bio-Medical Tech" Lobbies, since a Long Time Ago. But, most People, naively thought that these would be, mainly, European... But, in "Remdesivir"'s case, "Gilead" Company's Interests are Obviously North American !
>>> However, according to Recent Global Data, "HCQ+" is currently Tested in almost as Many as 400 Trials around the World, while "Remdesivir" Only in about 20 (sic !)...
+ DexaMethaSone" (DMS) has Recently been "Aproved" by the UK Government, and Included in the "Standard" Treatment in Hospitals of the National Health Service. Even if it is Dangerous for the Immune System, a UK Scientific study is reportedly Imminent, for Patients in Grave situation, with Life-Saving promisses.
++ And "AviFavir" has Already been Distributed for Large Use in Russia, Belarus, and Kazakstan, and is currently "Ready for Exports", while "5O Other Countries" accross the World have reportedly Expressed their interest to be Provided with...
- "Gilead" reportedly Claimed that there were "Also" some Other Countries which would be "Using" "Remdesivir" accross the World, including f.ex. the "United Arab Emirates", which, Nevertheless, have More than the ...DOUBLE Number of Deaths from the Virus, than their Equivalent and Neighbouring Qatar, (even with Only the ...HALF Number of Infections Compared to it)...
-----------------------------------------
As for the Rest of EU's Bio-Tech. vis a vis the Virus, it seems that it Risks to be a Mess : Apparently, Far Away from f.ex. French President Macron's Dream about European Scientists' alleged Potential to Discover the precious "Antidote" to that Deadly Virus, on the Contrary, Recent Press Reports show that the Biggest French and German Companies are Not really United, in some Great EU Projects for Cures or Vaccines, But, UnFortunately, Walk ... Separately, Each one Associated to a Different ...USA Company !
Moreover, Recently, all the "3 Biggest" EU Countries, (Germany, France, and Italy, etc), apparently went to ...Post-BREXIT UK, in order to Pass Command for a Brittish expected Vaccine...
*** Here, probably, the Incoming EU President-in-office, German Chancellor Angie Merkel, as well as French Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire, etc, are Right to Criticise some EU Buraucracy's OutDated, and/or UnFit for Nowadays' World, so-called "Competition" Restrictive Rules, which practicallly and Excessively Hinder the Necessary Creation of Big "European Champion" Companies, Able to Struggle and Win against even Huge Competitors in the Global Arena ! (We saw various Similar unacceptable Problems, mutatis-mutandis, on Cars, even on BioTech, on High-Speed Trains, etc).
However, Sometimes it Risks to be more Pernicious : - What Happened with that "Promissing" EU Bio-Tech Company, previously Tooted by US President Trump, which had, Earlier, an American CEO, and Risked to be Bought by the USA, reportedly "Saved" by EU Commission's "Fast" Move to immediately Give ... 400 Millions €, in order to Keep it inside the EU, particularly during the Fight against the Virus ? In Fact, Today, After Too Many Months withOut any Important News coming from that Affair, Most People ...do Not even Remember Whether its Project was about a Drug or a Vaccine, and even Less What was this Company's Name... As for the Name of its Supposed Product/Project, perhaps, it might be Only ...the Accountant having Send that Voucher, who could Remember precisely ! Some, Recently, only said that it would Plan to ..."Start" (sic !) some "Tests" from ...July, withOut Any Clear Indications about When it Might, Eventually, Conclude...
___________________________
>>> But, Meanwhile, for USA's "Gilead" Multinational Company, Business is Business... The COST for its "Remdesivir" is Huge : According to "Wall Street Journal", it intends to Charge 520 $ per Vial Dose, i.e. about 3.120 $ for a Typical 5 Days' Treatment of One Patient, (with 2 Vials the First Day), and, in consequence, up to... 6.240 $ for a Possible 10 Days Cure !
=> On the Contrary, "HCQ+" would reportedly cost Only ...about 7,3 $ in the USA, (according to "Wikipedia", which does Not Clarify the precise Dose), or "10 $" (according to a Group of Doctors), perhaps up to 18 € for 5 Days, and 36 € for 10 Days, (with 500 mg per Day, according to Dr. Raoult's formula). I.e., Comparatively, almost "Nothing"...
+ "DexaMethaSone" is, also, "Comparatively Low Priced, and Available Worldwide", according to the Brittish Government. It might Cost just about 1 or 3 € each Daily Dose, (depending on the Quantity purchased : f.ex. per 120 or 30), approximatively. I.e. an Average around 7,5 or 15 €, for 5 or 10 Days...
++ As for "AviFavir", Russia reportedly Left it "Free" inside its National Health System. However, even in "Export" it shouldn't cost much more than "HCQ+", Because Both are No more "Patented" (i.e. Subject to "Authorisation" by a Patent-Owner) Nowadays, but "Generic" (i.e. Free to be Produced by Any Company which Wishes to do so) Drugs, ("HCQ+" since Decades, "AviFavir" since 2019).
On the Contrary, "Remdesivir" is a Patented Drug, with "Gilead" Company Holding (and Exploiting) an Exclusive Patent...
=> In Consequence, the Difference is ..."Explosively" Huge, Both for Individual Patients, and for a Collective, National Health Protection System ! The Same, also, for Risks of Public Officials' eventual "Corruption", which Obviously are Very Big...
_____________________________
*** But, at Least, Does "Remdesivir" really "Worth" it ? Is it Really so "Efficient" for Health, that Anything should be done in order to Use it ?
>>> FACTS are Crystal-Clear : NO ! NO ! and NO ! That's the Biggest SCANDAL : Apparently, "Remdesivir" is NONE of That...
+ On the Contrary, Many Concrete Data, Even show that "Remdesivir" seems INFERIOR to, and/or MORE DANGEROUS than Both "HCQ+" and "AviFavir" !
---------------------------------
* FIRST of all, "Remdesivir" is a ... RECIDIVIST LOSER !
- It was, reportedly, Created, Initialy, during Former POTUS Barack Hussein Obama (a "Socialist"/Liberal), Back on 2009, in an Attempt to Face HYPATITE C. But, it FAILED... + Later, (Always during Obama's era), Back since 2015, it was send to Africa to Face "EBOLA" Virus, (and Supported with a Lot of Public, Federal Money, Even from the PENTAGON, particularly of the US Navy Force)...
But, Again it FAILED, (the Last African "Guinea Pig" Tested Patient, reportedly ...Escaping by Running Out, Probably because of "Remdesivir"'s Heavy "Side-Effects" - See Infra- and the Congolese Government sent a Letter confirming that, at least 2 Other Drugs were much Better, than that) !
- Nowadays, the "Socialist"/Liberal Former POTUS Jimmy Carter - Appointed, Long-Time CEO of USA's "NIAID" Network, Dr. Anthony FAUCI, (a Member of the National Team of Experts who Advise the "White House" on the Virus, and Notorious "Pal" of the Most Fanatic Anti-Trump Medias of the "Socialist"/Liberal Establishment : CNN, WAPO, NYT, etc, Because he Often Contradicts him openly), has been Pushing "Remdesivir" in order to be used against COVID-19 Virus, this time, Already since ...February/March 2020. + Fauci Recidivated, anew, Later on April 2020, when he Exploited a random Visit to the "White House" in order to, Suddenly, ...make Publicity for "Remdesivir" to the Press ! (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/misleadingclaimsonvirusdrug.html, etc). ++Moreover, it is, again ... Fauci's "NIAID" that Funded the Only Trial "Study" which Claims that "Remdesivir" Might, eventually, have, at least Some "Positive" Effects, (Even if this does Not Concern the Continuing Mass Killing of Innocent Human Lives, ...on the Contrary !), which reportedly was What gave the Main Pretext to EU Commission to take that Controversial Decision Today. But, Facts show that this is Due to Fail, Here Again, (See Infra).
---------------------------------------------
- On the Contrary, "HCQ+" has been, Notoriously, Continuously Used, very Successfully, During Many Decades in the Past, Until Now, (and Still does, Nowadays), in order to Efficiently Fight Against several Serious Illnesses, such as Malaria, Lupus, ArtheroSclerose, etc, almost Since the 2nd World War !
+ And, even "AviFavir", is a Variation which stems from a Japanese Drug, Previously used Frequently, Since 2014, against certain Forms of "Serious" Flu, with Succesful Results...
(For "DexaMethaSone", a UK Publication is, reportedly, due asap, particularly on its alleged Immune System suppressing effects, which might be OutWeighted in Grave Cases of this Deasly Virus only, with due attention).
=> So that Both these last 2 Drugs, ("HCQ+" and "AviFavir"), are, Already, Well Known, and, their Eventual "Side Effects" have been Found, Studied, Publicized, Largely Tested, and Neutralized, since Many Years Ago, so that they can Easily be considered, Nowadays, as "SAFE" Drugs, Whenever the Established Precautions are taken.
(F.ex. on "HCQ+" and Patients with some Heart Conditions, and on "AviFavir" about Pregnant Women and Foetus/Young Children, etc).
- On the Contrary, "Remdesivir", due to its Repeated "Failures" (Comp. Supra), had Not Yet, until Now, Any Real Opportunity to be Sufficiently Tested and/or Widely Used, in order to Clearly Know All its Eventual "Security" Problems, and/or Negative "Side Effects", as well as How Exactly to Prevent or Neutralize them....
=> That's, by the way, Why, EU Commission issued Now Only a "CONDITIONAL" Approval, for "EXCEPTIONAL" Use, Just in "Serious" Cases f.ex. of "Pneumonia" and/or "Oxygen Need" Problems with the Virus, Adding that this Could Not be Extended for More than 1 Year, Unless the Current UnCertainties on "SAFETY" and/or "SIDE EVENTS" are Lifted Earlier. (AME Even, initially, had Asked for a "Side-Effects" Input "on August" 2020)...
+USA's FDA on REMDESIVIR's NEGATIVE SIDE-EFFECTS :
+ Just a Few Days Earlier, on Mid-June 2020, in Addition, USA's "FDA" Reminded the Fact that Failed former Hypatitis/Ebola Drug "REMDESIVIR, which has Not Yet been FDA Approved+0, has got Just "an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in May 2020, allowing for Remdesivir ... to be administered IntraVenously, By health care Providers, as Appropriate, to treat ...COVID-19 in ...patients Hospitalized, with Severe Disease" Only. On the Contrary, Eventual "Safety and Efficacy of Remdesivir for ...COVID-19" in general, Still "Continue to Be Evaluated".
=> In Consequence, (and given Recent Critical Studies, f.ex. from China, etc), "the EUA Requires that Fact-Sheets about using <<Remdesivir>> in treating COVID-19, be made available to Health care Providers and to Patients and Caregivers" :
+ >>> I.e., "Including information on POSSIBLE "SIDE-EFFECTS", such as: increased levels of Liver enzymes, (which may be a sign of Inflammation or Damage to cells in the liver); and Allergic reactions, which may include low Blood Pressure, high" or "low Heart Rate, Shortness of Breath, Wheezing, angio-Edema (f.ex, lip or tongue Swelling), Difficulty Swallowing, Rash, Nausea, Vomiting, Sweating, Shivering, and Respiratory Distress."
- What a Long List... => Enjoy !
---------------------------
+ Concerning Health "Safety", in Addition, "Remdesivir" has Also a Problem by the mere Fact that, this Obama's Era Controversial, Twice Failed Drug (Comp. Supra), is Also BASED on ...GENETIC MANIPULATIONS, (Contrary to "HCQ+" and "AviFavir" : See Infra) :
- F.ex., its alleged Target is to Penetrate Human Cells and DISRUPT the RNA/DNA Process (and/or Protein) which ensures the Virus' Replication. I.e., - "It Enters Inside [a Cell] and Acts Directly on its Genes", as notes French Newspaper "La Croix", too.
=> But, such Moves Might, Eventually, Provoke, also, Various Other, still UnKnown and/or UnDesirable Changes inside the Human Genome, perhaps Resulting in Several Health Problems, including, f.ex. Cancer, and/or Many Other Dangerous Consequences, (as, f.ex., it was Already seen in the case of "Clonning", since 1998+, and more Recently, during Controversial "Gene Editing" Techniques, After 2016-2017+, not to speak about the Monstruous Risks of "Heritable" Gene-Editing, Automatically Transmissible to all Future Generations, since a 1st known Incident on October 2018, that CoE's PanEuropean Convention on Bio-Ethics OutLaws, and Many Critics Want, Nowadays, to clearly "Ban" also at a Global Level : See, f.ex., ... + ..., +..., etc).
- On the Contrary, "HCQ+" has been Already Used Since a Long Time BEFORE the Discovery of the DNA, Back on 1953, (and is Rather, Supposed to Boost the Natural Human Immunity System), while even "the Mechanism" of "AviFavir" is mainly Based on "Bio-Chemical" effects, "does Not Inhibit RNA or DNA Synthesis in ...Cells", "and is Not Toxic to them", (according to "Wikipedia", speaking of that Drug's "Ancestor" : the Japanese "Favipiravir" [of 2014 : Comp. Supra], from which it Stems).
=> In Consequence, they DoN't seem to have, at all, Similar "Safety" and other Problems as those of "Remdesivir", which were Mentioned Supra, mainly Due to its Risks of Abuse of Genetic Manipulations...
----------------------
+ Moreover, "Remdesivir" currently is an "INTRA-VENOUS" Infusion - administered Drug, which Needs to be Used "in a Hospital", and under "Close Monitoring".
=> From this Fact, already Result several "Limitations", in real Practice, as 2 Scientists Recently Observed at a Critical Article in "NEJM" Review...
Proposals and/or Promises to, Eventualy, try to Make it Also Usable, perhaps, "by Aerosol", have surfaced Recently, (f.ex. by some MEPs and/or even "Gilead" Company itself, But, they Need Previous Tests, which would Only "Start" from August (sic !), and, at any case, it Also seems Difficult to Use Human Respiration as a Gate-Way for Patients who, precisely, are considered to have Serious Problems to Breath ! (Comp. Supra)...
- On the Contrary, Both "HCQ+" and "AviFavir" can Easily be taken through Simple Pils, (while "DexaMethaSone" reportedly allows Various Ways of InTake).
----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Remains, Now, the MOST IMPORTANT of all : WHAT Might those Drugs do to SAVE HUMAN HEALTH and LIVES ?
- Astonishingly, "Remdesivir"s Alleged Potential (Despite its Expensive Price : Comp. Supra), is Both subject to CONTROVERSY, i.e., in Fact, UnCertain Yet, (See Infra), and, at Any Case, EXTREMELY LIMITED and quite UnReliable !
=> First of all, Even the Most Favorable "Studies" on "Remdesivir", and some of its Bigger Supporters (as USA's Dr. Fauci : Comp. Supra), do NOT DARE, Nowadays, CLAIM that it Might SAVE Human LIVES : NO, there is NOT (yet ?) ANY Serious STUDY Claiming that !... (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/misleadingclaimsonvirusdrug.html, etc)
+ On the Contrary, there is, Even, a Chinese Trial STUDY (Initialy Mentioned by the WHO, and Published earlier at the "LANCET"), which Found that, a Group of Patients who had Taken "Remdesivir" faced ...MORE DEATHS, than those who had Not ! Indeed, its Results Noted about ...+1,2% MORE DEATHS with Remdesivir, than withOut !
(But the Size of that Difference, in Percentage, was estimated to be Not Statisticaly Significant, because reportedly Small).
------------------------------------
+=> Moreover, in General, the Overall Final Conclusion of that 1st Study, made in China, in a Crystal-Clear way, Denounced the Fact that "Remdesivir was NOT associated with ...Clinical Benefits", and "has NOT been proven EFFECTIVE for treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)" at all.
Even the 2nd Study, on which is Mainly Based the present Controversial EU Commission's Decision, (and its Fan, Dr. Fauci), Admits that Remdesivi "has NOT reached Statistical SIGNIFICANCE" on Death or Life matters...
+ Moreover, Astonishingly, that Controversial Study Reveals that its Authors are Even..., Still "aWAITING FINAL ...DATA (etc), ...AFTER which an UPDATE of the RESULTS WILL be provided" (sic !)
=> In other words, its NOT even KNOWN Nowadays IF the FINAL RESULT might, Eventually, be, Perhaps, ...MORE DEATHS with Remdesivir, than withOut ! (Comp. Supra).
>>> That's the Reason, for which, EU's Experts at EMA had ASKED from "Gilead' to provide "FINAL DATA on MORTALITY", at the LATEST "on AUGUST 2020"...
(For the CAUSE of such a Strange Phenomenon, See Infra).
-----------------------------------
+ Even WORSE concerning Health : Remdesivir seems to have Many Serious "ADVERSE" Negative "EFFECTS", to the Detriment of several Petients who Suffer from them :
- Indeed, Already, Earlier, that 1st, Critical Study in China, Published by THE LANCET, (Comp. Supra), found that ...+6,5% More Patients treated with Remdesivir, than those who took only a Placebo, faced "ADVERSE EVENTS" which made them ..."STOP Early" these Tests, and Go Away...
Among the "Most common" such Adverse Effects" of Remdesivir, it's mainly "Nausea and ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE" (sic !), which were Cited by "Gilead" itself.
+ Moreover, Even that 2nd Study, on which was Mainly Based EU Commission, Pubished by NEMJ, ADMITS that, Inter Alia, "the most Common ADVERSE events in the Remdesivir group were ... + acute KIDNEY INJURY, decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance, or increased BLOOD Creatinine (40 events [7.4%], as Compared with 38 [7.3%]) [for the Placebo Group]; PYREXIA (27 events [5.0%], as compared with 17 [3.3%]); HYPER-GLYCEMIA or increased Blood GLYCOSE level (22 events [4.1%], as compared with 17 [3.3%])" (in Placebo Group)...
++ Even Worse : => In Consequence,, at the USA, the Powerful "FDA", Recently pointed out that "the EUA Requires that FACT-SHEETS about using <<Remdesivir>> in treating COVID-19 be made available to Health care Providers and to Patients and Caregivers". "Including information on ¨Possible SIDE-EFFECTS, such as:"
>>>" increased levels of Liver enzymes, which may be a sign of Inflammation or Damage to cells in the liver; and Allergic reactions, which may include low Blood Pressure, high" or "low Heart Rate, Shortness of Breath, Wheezing, angio-Edema (f.ex, lip or tongue Swelling), Difficulty Swallowing, Rash, Nausea, Vomiting, Sweating, Shivering, and Respiratory Distress."
- What a Long List ! "Enjoy"...
=> All this Fits with, and might Explain, Moreover, the Wider Fact that, apparently, People doN't run to Test Remdesivir at all, but, rather, prefer to Go Away : F.ex., +2 Other Tests, previously Scheduled in China, were, Finally ...Abandoned, because almost Nobody was found Willing to Participate as Guinea Pig to them !
Such Facts inevitably Remind, Also, a Previous "Flop" that Remdesivir notoriously Faced Already in the Past, when, after having been Initially Presented as a Drug against African "EBOLA", it was Finally Rejected by Congo as "significantly LESS Effective than (Other) Treatments"; while, among the (Only) 2 Last Patients reportedly still remaining at a Congo Hospital for Remdesivir Trials, at least 1 (i.e. ...50%), suddenly RUN AWAY...
-----------------------------------------------------
- So that, the ONLY main CLAIM made by that Controversial Srudy in favor of this Drug is that, reportedly, "Patients in the remdesivir group had a Shorter Time to Recovery than patients in the placebo group (median, 11 days, as compared with 15 days)", i.e. an Allehed Difference of about 4 Days.
But, something Similar had Already been Noted by the Previous, Chinese Study (Comp. Supra), which had Found a Difference between 21, instead of 23 Days, i.e. Only -2 Days Earlier". An alleged Small Distance of Only 2 Days, which had been Dismissed as "Statistically NON Significant"... So that it had, Finally, Concluded that Remdesivir was "Unable to demonstrate Any Statistically Significant clinical Benefits" at all...
On the Contrary, by Claiming anOther +2 Days Earlier, that 2nd Study, Funded by Dr. Fauci-related Sources, immediately Argued that this would be a reportedly "Important" thing, Basing all its Revendications on that... To the point that its sponsor, "Gilead" Company even ...Abused of that Claim as an Excuse for the Excessively Heavy Price that it Asked to be Paid for Remdesivir's alleged Higher "Cost" (Comp. Supra), arguying that Hospitals would Save some Cure's Money !
But, at least, has this been really "Proven" Beyond Any Legitimate Doubt ?
>>> The Answer, as things stand until now, cannot be but a crystal-clear "NO !"...
Simply Because the "DATA" Presented by that pro-Remdesivir Study are, in Fact, Too UNRELIABLE to hold Such Claims, and this, for MANY REASONS !
Indeed, Among (Many) Others Failures and Misgivings :
--------------
- (1) -
First of all, that Study had been, in Fact, Published, Already Since ...MAY, But, Curiously, those EU Commission's "Experts" Presented it, about ...2 Months Later, on JULY, As If it would have been, rather, a kind of "New" Development..., which would, Allegedly, Show that, some in Brussels, at last, Started to "Move Fast" (sic !) on Health Issues... I.e., an Obviously Excessive, or even UnSubstantiated Claim.
------------------------------
- (2)-
This Shaky and Obviously InSufficient "Study", (Signed, at First, by a Simple "Medical Doctor", Mr "Beigel", a.o.) was Pubished at Nowadays "NEJM", i.e., a Notoriously ...Fanatic "Anti-HCQ" Paper, Recently taken over by a Controversial Chief Editor, (See Facts already Published by "Eurofora", also at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/msmediagogagaonhcq.html, etc)...
+ In Addition, it has been FUNDED Mainly by "NIAID" and "NIH" Sources, which, in Fact, Depend from the Most Vociferous Propagandist of "Remdesivir", the Controversial "Dr. FAUCI" HimSelf, who had, Already, Singled out and Praised "Remdesivir" as a "Promising" Drug, as Early as ...Since Three (3) Months Ago, from the very Beginning of March !
He Later Abused of an UnRelated Opportunity at a POTUS Trump's meeting with some Journalists at the White House, (where he's one among the Members of its "Experts"' Team on the Virus), in order to Loudly Claim that this Controversial "Gilead" Company's 2nd Study would have ..."Proven" (sic !) that Remedesivir "can Block (re-sic !!) this Virus", so that " We Now Have the Capability of Treating (re-re-sic !!!)" it, as he Boasted...
Controversial Dr Fauci, (Notorious for having Repeatedly Criticized US President Trump and others, always Against the popular HCQ Anti-Virus Treatment, a cheap Competitor to expensive Remedesivir), had been Initially Hired at USA's Federal Administration during Former "Socialist/Liberal" Dems' Party POTUS Jimmy Carter's era, (while being also reportedly Familiar with controversial Millionaire Soros, Bill Gates Sr., and the Bilderberg circle). Since then, he has been reportedly continuing Research for a "Vaccine" against HIV, withOut Finding Any, since the 1980ies : i.e. During about "40 Years" !
Fauci's latest "Prognosis" for an eventual Vaccine against the CoronaVirus, currently is, at the Best, around 1,5 Years... But, Meanwhile, too Many innocent People are Dying, throughout the Whole Planet, by that Deadly Virus, Every Day...
----------------------------------
+ After the "LANCET-Gate" Scandal, also anOther "MEHTA" on the HCQ - Remdesivir Row ?
------------------------------------------------
+Last, but Not Least, by an Extraordinary "Coincidence", among the Leading Authors of that Controversial "Study" for Remdesivir, figures Aneesh Kumar MEHTA : A MD with the Same Family Name (and Same Origin, Job, etc) as the Number 1 Leading Author of the Notorious "Fake" Study abused Against the "HCQ" Cure supporters, (Biggest Competitor to Remdesivir), which resulted to a Unique in History "LANCET-GATE" World-wide SCANDAL, and was Retrieved, After it was Proven that it was Based on UnVerifiable and Falsified "Data", Following a 1st comprehensive Denonciation, by "Eurofora", Dated 23 May 2020, which Revealed a "Bogus Study" with "11 Big Flaws", (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/bogusmoveagainsthcqdrugvvirus.html, etc). Obviously, Both "Mehtas"' Controversial "Studies", objectively Serve the Same Interests, (Against HCQ, but For Remdesivir, as Virus' Cure)...
Aneesh Kumar MEHTA (MD) studied Medicine at Emory (private) University, Georgia, (BS, and MD at Oklahoma), where he was, Suddenly propulsed as Appointed "Assistant Professor" on 2009, (withOut any PhD and Not Even any Master), i.e. "Socialist/Liberal" Former POTUS Barack Hussein OBAMA's 1st Year in Office, (when he Allowed Federal Funding for Genetic Manipulations on Human Embryos [Previously Forbidden], as novel Deadly Virus H1N1 Pandemic Started). On 2012 Emory University "apologized" for having "Intentionally MisReported Data" on its "Students' ...Scores and Class Rankings, between 2000 and 2012". Its Students' Absolute Majority is "Non-White" 58% versus 42%, anf Former "Socialist/Liberal" POTUS Jimmy CARTER was among them, (Wikipedia). Mehta has Specialized particularly on Organ Transplantation-related issues, (Against Natural Immune System's Barriers), and on "Ebola" Virus, (etc). By the 1st, he is Related also to that Other "Mehta", of the Anti-HCQ Scandal. While, by the 2nd, he is Related even to "Gilead"'s Remdesivir Drug. Bill GATES' Foundation is Funding several activities at Emory, where NIH Funds, among Many Others, also a Project to Link "Vaccines" with "Genetic Engineering and BioTech" in India, (in fact, Both Aneesh Kumar Mehta, and Mandip Mehta's names stem from a Pakistan-Neighbouring Indian Region, Largely Islamized : Comp. http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/bogusmoveagainsthcqdrugvvirus.html, etc).
-----------------------------------------
-(3)-
Even More Grave : That Key pro-Remdesivir Controversial "Study", (where EU Commission and Others just Based Exceptional Decisions : Comp. Supra), is Only a ..."PRELIMINARY Report", which Merely "Summarizes the Preliminary results from this OnGoing Trial", as is own Text Acknowledges...
- Indeed, "Even Though the Trial was (Still) Ongoing" and UnFinished, InComplete, Nevertheless, its Authors Moved to "UnBlind the ("Preliminary") Results to the Trial Team Members from the NIAID (Linked to Dr. FAUCI: Comp. Supra), Who, subsequently, Decided to make the (Preliminary) Results Public" (By Dr. FAUCI Himself : Comp. Supra), just because They Believed, themselves, that "these Findings were Deemed to be of Immediate importance", (in reality, in order To Back "Gilead" Big Pharma Company's Demand for a FDA partial and provisional Approval..), that Text Admits !
- in Fact, that Controversial "Study" is Limited Only to ...the 1st HALF of its Planned Work, covering just about 14 or 15 Days, Instead of ...29 or 30 Days, which were its Official Aim... (See Infra).
- That's Why, f.ex., the FDA Noted, on this occasion, that this Controversial Remdesivir "Study"'s real Results, Still "CONTINUE to Be Evaluated". And EU's Experts at EMA, Asked "Gilead" Company to Present its "FINAL RESULTS", particularly "on Mortality", (i.e. the Most Important matter), "at the Latest, on AUGUST".
=> As a Consequence, that Controversial "Study" Itself, clearly WARNS that "Additional analyses of Outcomes ... Will be conducted, After the Full cohort has Completed 28 days of follow-up, and May provide Additional Insight", (still UnKnown Nowadays).
- "We are aWAITING FINAL visits, DATA entry, Monitoring, and data lock, for the Last of the 1063 Patients enrolled, After which an UPDATE of the Results WILL be provided", Promish that Controversial "Study"s Authors.
>>> In particular, Not Even "the ...Estimates of Mortality (the Crucial Point) by 28 Days, are Not reported in this Preliminary analysis, given the Large Number of Patients that Had Yet to Complete Day 29 visits",... (Comp. Supra)
In other words, Nobody still Knows, (at least, Not Officially), Whether Remdesivir might, perhaps, Limit somewhat the Number of Dead, (Even if its Fans do Not Claim such a thing : Comp. Supra), or Leave it practically Equal to Placebo Group, (as this "Study" sees, (Comp. Supra), or, may be, Even Worse, it MIGHT ... AGGRAVATE the Situation, by Resulting at a BIGGER NUMBER OF DEAD, THAN what had been the case BEFORE, (as, already, a Previous Chinese Study had Found : Comp. Supra) !
__________________________________________
-(4)-
++ In Fact, there was Even 2 Exceptional "CHANGES to the (Overall) Trial DESIGN", on which, "the NIAID (i.e., ultimately Dr. FAUCI : Comp. Supra) Made all Decisions", as that Controversial "Study" Acknowledges :
=> Indeed, First of all, "INITIALLY", the "Primary Outcome", "When the Trial was Designed", Back "in February", had been "Defined as the ...Clinical Status .. at DAY 15", Since the Beginning of that Trial. But, Later-on, a "CHANGE was proposed on March" and "Finalized on April 2", "in response to Evolving Information, ...indicating that Covid-19, May have a MORE PROTRACTED course, Than Previously Estimated", (as that Controversial "Study" Claims). So, the Trial's overall Duration was EXTENDED, "FROM a Comparison ...on DAY 15, TO a Comparison ..up to DATE 29", i.e. almost the DOUBLE of what had been "Initially" Scheduled !
+ Moreover, in Addition, a "Review ...ORIGINALY PLANNED (Only) as an INTERIM Analysis, ...WHILE Follow-up was STILL ON-GOING", i.e. "Based on DATA CUT-OFF DATE of APRIL 22", Nevertheless, was "Provided to...(the) NIAID", (i.e. pacticaly to Dr. FAUCI), and "Subsequently MADE PUBLIC" so Early... (Comp. Supra).
BUT, on the Contrary, it's ALONE "The treating Physician (who) could Request to be made AWARE of the Treatment ...of Patients who had not COMPLETED DAY 29", and that, Only "IF Clinically REQUIRED"...
=> As a Consequence, Practically, THE PUBLIC (including even the EU itself) Still IGNORES what happened during the 2nd STAGE of that Trial, i.e. Between 15 and 29/30 Days (Comp. Supra) ! So that, Even if, f.ex., Mortality and/or Adverse side-Effects, might, perhaps, have had a Worse FINAL RESULT with Remdesivir at the End, than with Placebo, (as, f.ex., the Earlier Chinese Study had Found : Comp. Supra), nevertheless, such a Crucial Fact would remain CONCEALED to the Public, until now !
At any case, the Period Between the "Data CutOff Date of April 22", for that "Preliminary Report" on this Trial, and EU Commission's Decision of Today (July 3), i.e. about ...2,5 MONTHS (sic !), Obviously is TOO LONG, so that the present DELAY of the Full, Real FINAL RESULTS seems Doubtful and UnJustified...As for EU Experts' EMA's above-mentioned Demand for Gilead to show is Final Results at the Latest ON AUGUST" 2020, (i.e. ...More than 4 MONTHS Afterwards !), it's Blatantly EXCESSIVE.
-----------------------------------------------
-(5)-
Finally, probably the Most Grave FLAW of this Controversial "Study" is that its DATA appear Very UNRELIABLE, and that, from Many Points of View !
--------
- (a) TOO MUCH DISPERSION
First of all, that Trial reportedly included "1.063 PATIENTS", SEPARATED, around Various Hospitals, at "73 SITES" (sic !), and, in Addition, DISPERSED throughout ... TEN (10) Different COUNTRIES accross the World ! (From USA and the UK, up to Germany, Denmark, Spain and Greece, as well as Japan, Korea, and Singapore, even Mexico)...
=> So that, Obviously, it becomes Too Hard, or even quasi-IMPOSSIBLE, in real Practice, to Ensure (among Others) EQUIVALENT Conditions between the Remdesivir and Placebo Groups, all along some 30 Days !
How could the Organizers of such a Trial Seriously CONTROL, be well INFORMED of, DECIDE, and VERIFY, in a really Unified Way, the Manifold Concrete Aspects and Developments of such a Delicate and Complex "Study", Despite an Obviously Excessive Dispersion ? (See also Infra).
---------------------------------------------------
- (b) + Even ... "REMOTE MONITORING" !!!???...
Particularly During a Global Crisis as the current Deadly Pandemic, such a Dispersion (Comp. Supra), Provoked a lot of Exceptional and Serious Problems for Such a Trial :
- Indeed, "Numerous Challenges were Encountered during This Trial", its Organizers Admit. Inter alia, f.ex., it "was implemented during a Time of Restricted Travel (among 10 Countries in 3 Continents of the World), and Hospitals (among 73 Different Sites) Restricted (even) the Entrance of (so-called) Non-Essential Personnel", as they found in practice...
=> Consequently, among various others, f.ex., "Training, Site Initiation Visits, and (Even) MONITORING visits, OFTEN were performed REMOTELY" (sic !), they Reveal.
But, is it Serious to Pretend really CONTROL All the Delicate and Complex, often Unforeseen and/or Life-Threatening Medical Developments in the Health Situations of More than a Thousand of Patients, Dispersed accross 73 Different Hospitals, throughout 10 Countries at 3 separate Continents with Various Time-Frames, During 24 Hours Each Day throughout a Whole Month, (Comp. Supra), ...Merely BY PHONE Calls, and/or EMAILS, or VIDEO-CONFERENCES, just Sitting at your Office, during US Working-Hours ?...
Obviously Not.
--------------------------------------------
- (c) + Too Big DIFFERENCES Between Various + Many HOSPITALS
+ Moreover, the InEqualities between 73 Hospitals in 10 Countries, inevitably, proved to be Too Serious, in real Practice, as the Authors of that Controversial "Study" Recognized themselves :
- Indeed, inter alia, f.ex., "Research Staff were Often assigned Other clinical Duties, and staff illnesses Strained research Resources", as they bitterly found...
++ In Addition, "Many (sic !) Sites did Not have adequate supplies of personal Protective Equipment, and (Not Even) Trial-related Supplies, such as swabs" !
=> In Such Circumstances, it's Obviously Impossible to Guarantee really "Equivalent Conditions" for Serious "Comparison" Between all Remdesivir or Placebo Groups of 1.063 Patients.
-------------------------------------------------------------
- (d) +"OTHER THERAPIES" in VARIOUS HOSPITALS ?!...
Perhaps the Most Decisive FLAW, which, Normaly, should be Enough in order to Definitively DISCREDIT this, already Controversial, "Study", is that of a so-called ..."Adaptive-Design Platform" (sic !), as they nick-named it, which, in Plain English, Scandalously means that ...ANY among 73 HOSPITALS COULD GIVE to those 1.063 Patients, practically, ANY TREATMENT THEY LIKED !
- Such an UnBelievable SCANDAL was, Indeed, Revealed, by a Note in that Controvesial "Study", where its Authors Confess the Incredible Fact that They had "Allowed participants to receive (Also) OTHER THERAPIES for Covid-19, that were PERMITTED BY THEIR Home INSTITUTIONS", (i.e. 73 Hospitals, in 10 Countries and 3 Continents)...
- "IF (NDLR : i.e. They DoN't Even Know, and, apparently, doN't give a damn, about Who, What, Whether and When Might, Eventually, Do Any Such thing !) A HOSPITAL had a written POLICY or Guideline For use of OTHER TREATMENTS for Covid-19, (then) Patients COULD RECEIVE those (perhaps Absolutely DIFFERENT) Treatments", that incredible Text acknowledges !
=> - Naturally, "It WILL (i.e. at an UnIdentified Future...) be Important to IDENTIFY these CO-THERAPIES and Any EFFECTS they Might have on the Results", Obviously, they were Obliged to add, briefly, (in Catimini)...
>>> In Other Words, to Put it Plainly, in a Nutshell, EVEN IF, f.ex., A HOSPITAL USED ..."HCQ+Az+Zinc" (and/or Any Other Drug, f.ex. the Russian "AVIFAVIR", etc), in order to Obtain the RECOVERY of Patients Considered to be IN a "REMDESIVIR" GROUP, the Authors of that Controversial "Study", in fact, DIDN'T MIND so much !
=> In front of a so BIG SCANDAL, (largely UNHEARD of, in Other Trials), it's NOT ONLY the (Still "Expected" : Comp. Supra) "FINAL Results" of this Controversial "Study", BUT EVEN the current "PRELIMINARY Report" (Comp. Supra), which Should, Normally, be Straightly REJECTED, and Thrown to a Waste-Basket,
(Unless, perhaps, it might be Preciously kept as a ..."Collectors' Item" of an Historic Record-Breaking "BOGUS" Fake-"Study", Even More Ridiculous than that, co-Signed by just anOther "Dr. Mehta", which Notoriously Provoked Recently the World-wide "LANCET-GATE" Scandal Against "HCQ+" : Comp. Supra, and ..., etc)...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AVIFAVIR :
On the Contrary, the much Cheaper, Simple, and apparently Safe Russian Drug "Avifavir" (Comp. Supra), reportedly COULD SAVE some HUMAN LIVES, since a Recent Trial found that it was paticularly "RAPID":
- In Just "5 Days", it had Already "Eliminated" the Virus "in 77,5% of Patients", while, "Also" at "14 Days" there was "a Significant Difference" between that "Avifavir" Group of Patients and anOther Group receiving "Standard ...Therapy".
+ More Recent Trials (UPDATED) found that, in Just "4 Days", the "Virus Disappeared in approximately 62,5% of Patients, While this occured in Only 30% of cases in the Control Group" (receiving Standard Drugs). And "by the 10th Day", there were No more Virus' Traces "in 90%" cases, Compared to "80% in a Placebo Group".
----------------------------------------------
HCQ+
Concerning HydroxyChloroQuine, (with Azythromycine, and Zinc), the Latest Published study of Dr. Didier Raoult, revendicates an Astonishing, Record-High, 99,5% SURVIVAL, if it's taken at an Early Stage, (After Only 0,9% of Cessations of Treatment for Adverse Effects, Mainly Gastro-Enterologic), Based on a Retrospective Analysis of the Results of Treatments on 3.747 Patients (separated in Various Groups), at Marseille (France), Only a Small Number of whom had been Oriented to Standard Treatments for Safety reasons, according to a Publication at the current edition of TMID Review (Elsevier). See also : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/hcqazrtopsurvivalcontravirus.html, etc).
--------------------------------
DEXAMETHASONE
This UK-sponsored, Cheap and Simple, but Partly Delicate, Substance was Credited, at a Seriously Advanced State of the Virus' Infection, to, reportedly, REDUCE MORTALITY by about 1/3 for Patients on Ventilators, and about 1/5 for those requiring Only Oxygen, according also to the WHO.
Thus, it seems that it might, eventualy, serve as Complementary, mainly to "HCQ+", (which acts at Early Stages and much More Widely), but, perhaps, also to "Avifavir", (Comp. Supra),
------------------------------------------------
=> Taking into account, also, those apparently Serious "European" Competitors, (Comp. Supra), and Hoping that even more might soon emerge, Nowaday's EU Commission's Hurry towards USA Compagny Gilead's controversial Remdesivir, ill-based on what really seems to be just another ..."Bogus" Fake-"Study", as "Eurofora"s Critical Analysis just Proved, (Comp. Supra), appears very Strange, and, at any case, UnSustainable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF_xdvn52As
(../..)
("Draft-News")
----------------------------------
Main Menu
Αρχική Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Multi-Lingual FORUM Subscribers/Donors Συχνές ερωτήσεις Η άδεια του Elxis Σύνθετη αναζήτηση EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In Brief European Headquarters' MAPs CoE Journalists Protection PlatformBRIEF NEWS
- 00:00 - 02.06.2021
- 00:00 - 18.10.2020
- 00:00 - 19.06.2020
- 00:00 - 18.05.2020
- 00:00 - 20.04.2020
- 00:00 - 02.02.2020
- 00:00 - 09.12.2019
- 00:00 - 27.11.2019
- 00:00 - 16.11.2019
Popular
- Yes, we could have prevented Ferguson riots says World Democracy Forum's Young American NGO to ERFRA
- Spanish People Elect CenterRIGHT Majority with 1st Party and Total of 178 MPs (6 More than the Left)
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Source Conseil d'Europe à ERFRA: Debatre Liberté d'Opposants à Loi livrant Mariage+Enfants à Homos ?
- Head of BioEthics InterGroup, MEP Peter Liese : "Embryonic stem cell research reaching its END" !?
- Spain: Jailed Turkish Terror suspect with Explosive,Drones,Chechen accomplices stirs Merah+ Burgas ?
- UN Head Ban Ki Moon at CoE World Democracy Forum : - "Listen to the People !"
Latest News
- Test Photos (f.ex.+ Invit to EU + Korea Peace meeting)
- EUOmbudsmen Conference 2022: Digital Gaps affect People's Trust threaten EF Project on EU Future ?
- French Election : Black Out on Virus, but Obligation for Fake 'Vaccines" Challenged
- Both French Presidential Candidates point at "Humanism" in crucial times...
- France : Zemmour = Outsider may become Game Changer in Presidential + Parliamentary Elections 2022
Statistics
Επισκέπτες: 60243014Archive
Login Form
Other Menu
La Turquie, test-clé d'Independance de l'Europe face aux USA, les aménant de chercher en commun des nouvelles idées pour se mettre d'accord ?
Le débat, amical mais clair, entre les Présidents Américain et Français, Obama et Sarkozy, la veille des elections européennes du 7 juin 2009, a montré que la question controversée sur la démande de la Turquie d'entrer dans l'Europe est actuellement le point central et le test le plus pertinent de l' indépendance de la France et de l'Europe par rapport aux Etats Unis.
Les electeurs européens, aussi bien en France qu'ailleurs en l'UE, auront une seule chance à trancher, ce dimanche 7 juin 2009, en choisisant leurs eurodéputés pour la période 2009 - 2014, car après ca risque d'être trop tard, vu que tous ceux qui suivent les affaires européennes dépuis des décennies savent qu'en réalité, le moment des décisions sur la Turquie viendra au plus tard en 2013, date rétenue dépuis longtemps pour une importante révision des "Perspectives Financières" de l'UE qui reflètent des choix Politiques fondamentaux.
Le Président français, (récement encore représentant de l'UE, dans laquelle il joue un rôle important, ensemble avec la chancelière allemande Merkel, et autres leaders européens, ayant une influence notable auprès des Citoyens Européens, comme les derniers sondages montrent), réagissant à la repétition, par le nouveau Président Américain de la vieille position traditionelle de l'Washington poushant toujours vers la démande de la Turquie d'entrer dans l'Europe :
- "Je ne peut pas laisser détruire l'Europe, (qui) est un élément de stabilisation du Monde", réponda Sarkozy. "J'ai dit au Président Obama que pour moi il était très important que l’Europe ait des Frontières", a-t-il souligné, confirmant la position Franco-Allemande commune, récemment rappellée ensemble avec la Chancellière Merkel.
- "Il y a une différence (entre France/EU et les USA)... sur les modalités. La position traditionnelle des Etats-Unis d’Amérique, c’est l’intégration" de la Turquie au sein de l'UE. "C’était la position du Président Bush, du Président Clinton, de tous les présidents américains".
- "La mienne vous la connaissez : Ce n’est pas l’intégration dans l’Union Européenne. Mais j’ai proposé que nous réfléchissions, l’Europe, la Russie, la Turquie à la création d’un Espace Economique et de Sécurité en commun", a ajout Sarkozy rappelant son invitation de créer quelque chose de neuf et mieux adapté.
Mais, "cela ne veut pas dire qu’il faut repousser la Turquie dans les ténèbres. La Turquie est un allié dans l’OTAN, (et) une Passerelle entre 2 Mondes, voilà quelle est la meilleure modalité. C’est cela dont nous avons parlé", revela-t-il. Si "nous avons une Différence sur les Modalités, nous n’avons pas une différence sur l’Objectif : Faire de la Turquie un élément de Pont entre l’Orient et l’Occident", Sarkozy assura Obama.
- "Laissez-nous au moins une légère divergence sur un sujet, cela vous permettra de bien réfléchir pour les prochaines échéances", ajouta Sarkozy en réponse à un journaliste de l'opposition Socialiste qui avait soulevé la question de la Turquie, en la melant (comme un lobby turc notoirement essaie de faire pour exploiter la manipulation de quelques Arabes, la Civilisation Historique desquels fût pourtant detruite par l'ex-empire Ottoman-Turc) avec une question tout à fait différente : celle de la voile islamique (!), avec laquelle elle n'a rien à voir.
- "Sur la Turquie, Monsieur, vous appartenez à un journal ...qui a appelé à voter, au moment de la présidentielle, pour mon adversaire.... Quel était votre argument à ce moment-là ? Vous disiez : « Attention, Nicolas Sarkozy va trop s’aligner sur les Etats-Unis d’Amérique », et je vois que deux ans après vous dites : « Ah, il y a un sujet sur lequel le Président Obama et le Président Sarkozy ne sont pas d’accord » Cela devrait vous rassurer, Monsieur" , réponda-t-il, en faisant sourire même le président américain, (et laissant entendre que trancher définitivemen la controverse sur la Turquie pourrait être au coeur de l' Elections Présidentielle en France pour 2012 )
-------------------
- "Ce que les Etats-Unis peuvent faire, c’est encourager ....TOUT PROCESSUS qui permettra à la Turquie d’être convaincue qu’elle a des amis, que ce soit la France, les Etats-Unis ou l’Europe", réponda Obama, apparamment n'excluant pas, a priori, le point de Sarkozy sur la création d'un espace commun d' économie et sécurité entre l' UE, la Turquie et la Russie (v. supra).
"Les Etats-Unis ne sont pas membres de l’Union Européenne, nous ne pouvons pas dicter si un pays quelconque adhère ou n’adhère pas à l’UE"; Obama a admis, parlant de la "Turquie, (sur laquelle) le Président Sarkozy et moi nous sommes entretenus sur ce dossier avant". "Maintenant le Président Sarkozy représente un Etat membre de l’Union Européenne et il a une position différente", opposée à démande turque d' entrée dans l'UE.
"La Turquie par contre est un allié de l’OTAN très important. ...La Turquie a fait connaître son intérêt à une intégration croissante avec l’Europe et nous (USA) encourageons cette attitude. J’ai souvent dit que l’adhésion de la Turquie à l’Union européenne serait importante".
"Mais, (en tout cas) je crois qu’il est important de noter que le Président Sarkozy appuie fortement le travail que la Turquie fait au sein de l’OTAN et je crois qu’il s’intéresse à une intégration économique plus intense avec la Turquie". (Ce qui pourrait se faire, justement, avec un "parténariat privilegié" adéquat et/ou l'idée de créer un espace commun EU - Turquie - Russie : V. supra).
Est-ce que l'effort du Président de la France, soutenu par la chancelière Allemande et l'opinion publique de la plupart des Citoyens Européens la-dessus, de trouver un accord entre l' Europe et l' Amérique sur la Turquie, en proposant de sortir des chemins battus et créer du neuf, en etablissant "un Espace Commun d' Economie et Sécurité" (v. supra), suffira de calmer un lobby traditionaliste à quelques bureaucrates de Washington DC, datant dès l'époque de l' ex-"Guerre Froide", beaucoup plus ancien que le nouveau Président vénu de l' oxygen des "grands lacs" près de Quebec du Canada : Chicago, connu comme "la ville du vent" nouveau ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Le Prémier Ministre Fillon appele à "faire vivre le Rève Européen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seul l'avenir le dira. Mais, entre-temps, l' Europe ne peut plus attendre et perdre encore plus du temps et d'energie vitale sur la démande controversée de la Turquie, qui a notoirement menacé d'arrêter l'édification européenne dépuis 1999-2005 :
Comme le Premier Ministre François Fillon a clairement dit, un peu plus tôt cette semaine, dans un discours éloquent sur les enjeux de l' Election Européenne de ce juin 2009 (V. résumé envoyé aux adhérents d'"EuroFora"),

- "S' abstentir, c'est laisser à la Technocratie le pouvoir de dominer" la vie des Citoyens européens, qui devraient prendre l' Europe en branle le corps", et commencer d'agir par toutes les voies politiques démocratiques, prennant conscience que "l' Europe c'est Nous, (i.e. les Citoyens), et "Pas eux !" (i.e. les Technocrates), selon une image symbolique.
- "Je me souviens de l' Europe obligée de faire Silence, (au Passé), quand "les Grands" décidaient de son sort", rappela Fillon. "Je me souviens de l'Europe divisée, de l' Europe dominée" par d'autres, '"de l'Europe appauvrie""Je me souviens de Berlin occupé, muré, divisé comme un butin qu'on tire aux dès. Je me souviens du Silence de Varsovie. Je me souviens du Silence de Prague"..
- "Nous, les Européens, nous avons bien failli sortir de l' Histoire, et dévenir, pour du bon, les dès d'un jeu joué par d'autres".
- "C'est pourquoi je ne peux pas concevoir une Europe qui ne serait pas Souveraine, une Europe qui ne serait pas Maitresse d'êlle-même", aujourd'hui et démain, martella-t-il. "Le Monde s'est habitué trop longtemps à une Europe faible, que l'on pouvait traiter avec condescendence".
- "Le moment est venu de rélever le défi : Le moment est vénu de montrer que, nous les Européens, avons décidé d'être débout, et d"être nous-mêmes".
"Dépuis 2 ans (i.e. dès les Elections Présidentielles de 2007), avec Nicolas Sarkozy, nous avons oeuvrer pour relever notre Identité Nationale (de la France), dont nous sommes fiers. Et bien, l'' Identité Européenne mérite tout autant, elle qui prolonge les Génies de nos Nations".

- "Je crois à la présence d'une Civilisation Européenne", déclara Fillon, largement applaudi par des milliers de personnes ayant entendu une série des Musiques entremelées characteristiques de differents pays européens, et des images lumineuses géantes avec des extraits symboliques de Goethe, de Victor Hugo, de Shakespeare, et d'autres auteurs italiens, espagnols etc celebres à travers l'histoire.
- "L' Humanisme, la tolerance, la Liberté de la Conscience. La Solidarité. L' Etat de Droit. La confiance placée dans la Science, l' Innovation, le progrès. Toutes ces Valeurs, elles disent clairement où commence et où s'épanuit cette Europe" que nous voulons, observa-t-il.
En harmonie avec les positions soutenues par le Président du Parlement Européen, eurodéputé allemand, Hans Gert Poettering, et la Chancelière allemande, Angie Merkel, sur la "Dignité Humaine" au coeur des "Valeurs de l' Europe" moderne. Ce qui fait qu'" avec un Elargissement sans fin", même vers la Turquie, c.a.d. "sans Frontières, l' Europe Politique, l' Europe des Valeurs et l' Identité européenne" ne peuvent pas exister, comme a dit aussi le Président francais, Nicolas Sarkozy, recemment à Berlin.
Fait important : Cette observation de Fillon a été faite le jour-même que le Comité des Ministres du Conseil de l'Europe à Strasbourg concluait une semaine de réunion semestrielle sur les Droits de l'Homme, qui a examiné un grand nombre d'affaires des pires Violations (pex. Tuéries scandaleusement non elucidées, Persecutions et privations arbitraires de Liberté, personnes portées "Disparues", Tortures et "traitements inhumains et degradants", Usurpations illégales des Maisons et Patrimoines privées de Réfugiés, etc., pour lesquelles la Cour Européenne a condamné la Turquie dans plusieurs jugements, dont on attend toujours l' application)...
- "C'est pourquoi un Elargissement sans fin de l' Europe ne peu pas être un objectif en soi. Parce qu'il ne peut que diluer l' élan européen, et detruire l' Idéntité Européenne"
-" Voilà pourquoi nous disons, très sereinement, que nous ne sommes pas favorables à l' adhésion de la Turquie dans l'UE", conclua le Premier Ministre de la France; largement applaudi par des gens qui soulevaient le drapeau européen.

"Ce n'est pas un Slogan de meetings. Ce n'est pas la marque une "Hostilité" au régard de cette grande Nation (i.e. la Turquie), qui doit être étroitement associée à l' UE", pex. par un partenariat priviliegié, ou une autre formule adaptée.
- "Mais il lui faut des Frontères à l' Europe, il lui faut des Frontières stables, qui lui permettent de renforcer son Unité et son Identité", a-t-il expliqué.
- "Alors, c'est au nom de cette Europe charnelle, que je m'engage avec vous. Mais, cette Europe-là, ne peut avancer qu' à une seule Condition : celle de l' Europe Politique".
"Nous avons longtemps douté qu'elle soit possible : Aux années 1970, Henri Kissinger (le notoire ex- Secretaire d'Etat Américain aux affaires etrangères, consideré, à tort ou à raison, comme chef d'orchestre du renversement du Président Allende en Chili, de l' invasion militaire de la Turquie à Chypre, etc), disait, avec une ironie blaissante : - "Ah, l' Europe ? : Quel numero de Télephone ?..." Pendant les 6 mois de la présidence française de l'UE, (7-12/2008), Henri Kissinger n'aurait aucune difficulté de rejoindre l' Europe !", observa-t-il en suscitant des nouveaux applaudissements nourris.

"J'au vu l' Europe Politique se dresser, et prendre ses responsabilités : L' Europe Politique c'est celle qui agit sans délai, et avant les Etats-Unis, pour stopper des faillites Bancaires qui s'enchaînent, qui nous auraint plongés dans une Depression pire que celles des années 1929. L' Europe Politique est celle qui, maintenant, doit mettre un fin à un Capitalisme Financier, qui a perdu sa boussole. L' Europe Politique est celle qui a réussi d'etablir le règles les plus ambitieuses au Monde dans la lutte contre le rechaufement Climatique. Samedi, nous celebrons l' anniversaire du debarquement de la Normandie, où nos amis Américains ont pris une part décisive à nôtre libération. Mais, en décembre 2009, à la Conference (Mondialle) de Copenhague, c'est nous les Européens, qui allons leur montrer le chemin vers cet avénir commun" pour la sauvegarde de l'Environement naturel. L' Europe Politique c'est celle qui, en août 2008, lorsque la Guerre faisait rase entre la Russie et la Géorgie, s'est interposée pour imposer la Paix. Et c'est elle qui doit, maintenant, se doter des moyens Militaires de se défendre par elle-même, pour elle-même", ajouta-t-il en évoquant clairement la création d'une Défense Européenn Autonome.
"L' Europe Politique c'est celle qui doit bâtir des grands champions Industriels Européens, comme nous avons fait, auparavant, pour (l'avion) Airbus ou (la fusée) Ariadne. C'est celle qui doit exiger la Reciprocité dans les rlations Commerciale avec nos grands partenaires", sans Dumping Social ou Environmental, ni autre Concurrence Deloyale. "C'est celle qui doit se doter comme objectif d'être "le Continent de l'Esprit", réunissant les plus grandes Universités du Monde, en multipliant les Connexions, entre Scientifiques et étudiants."
"Nous respecterons nos engagements, jusqu'au dernier", souligna le Premier Ministre de la France, peu après que les candidats-eurodéputés de la coalition Gouvernementale (UMP : Mouvement pour la Majorité Présidentielle) ont signé solennement, devant plusieurs milliers des Citoyens, une spectaculaire pancarte-géante avec "7 engagements" pour les Elections Européennes du 7 juin, auxquels figure aussi l'engagement de "s'opposer à l' adhésion de la Turquie dans l'UE".
- "Parcque ce respet des engagements est une exigence si nous voulons rétablir la Confiance entre les Responsables Politiques et les Citoyens", conclua Fillon, la veille de ces Elections Européennes de juin 2009, après les Abstentions Majoritaires de 1999 et 2004, suivies de 3 "NON" à 3 Euro-Réferenda dépuis 2005, (dates auxquelles, quelques gouvernements du Passé, avaient donné le statut d'un "Candidat" et commencé des "Négotiationa d'adhésion" avec la Turquie, suivies d'un blocage sans précedent de l' édification européenne)..

"Nore Europe n'est pas n' importe quelle Europe : L' UE Technocratique n'est pas la nôtre. ... L' UE sans Frontières n'est pas la notre. L' UE desincarnée n'est pas la notre". "Nous portons une idée de l'Europe" qui "n'est pas celle des Statistiques et des Bureaux(crates). L'Europe ce n'est pas qu'une Monnaie. Ce n'est pas qu'un Marché. économique".
- "L' Europe c'est d'abord une Culture. L'Europe c'est une Histoire", a-t-il dit, largement applaudi.

"L'Europe c'est une rencontre entre des Nations qui sont Millénaires et qui sont Brillantes. L'Europe c'est Paris. C''est Madrid. C'est Prague. C'est Londres. C'est Rome. C'est Varsovie. C'est Berlin. C'est Vienne. C'est Athènes : Quant on énonce ces Villes, alors on "sent" nos Héritages et nos Cultures entremelées qui circulent dans nos veines".
- "Je suis Européen, parcque profondément Français, je sais ce que je dois aux influences de l' Atlantique et de la Méditerannée. J'aime ces Traditions qui offrent à chacun des nos Nations leur éclat. .. J'aime ses saveurs, ses paysages divers. Ils sont également miens, ou, plus précisement, je suis également fait d'eux. Je suis Européen, car, Français, j'aime l' Europe ouverte vers l' Amérique, vers l'Orient, vers l' Maghreb. J'aime les quais de Vénise, ceux d'Amsterdam. J'aime les quais de Thamise où sont vénues pendant des siècles s'amasser les richesses et les nouveautés du Monde. J'aime l' Europe curieuse. L'Europe qui rêve des lointains : L' Europe de Vasco de Gama, de Magelan. de Bougainville, de Charcot, de Monot... Cette Europe qui, aujourd'hui, s'élance vers l' Espace. Je suis Européen parce que Français, j'aime l' Europe qui prospère et qui invente. J'aime l' Europe des Trains à Grande Vitesse. J'aime l'Europe des Satellites et des Fusées. L'Europe de la Mode et des Atéliers d' Artistes. L'Europe des Grands Laboratoires, des Ingéniers. des Entrepreneurs, des Grands Architèctes, des Traditions Ouvrières. Comme rançais, j'aime l' Europe qui dit "NON" à la Tyrannie et qui se soulève à l'appel de la Liberté", a-t-il dit en
"Je me sens lié à ces femmes et ces hommes sans nom, qui ont levé la tête, et qui ont sécoué le joug sous lequel .. on les avait fait pliér", dit-il en évoquant pex.. la Révolution Française de 1789, le Siècle des Lumières, l'appel du Général de Gaulle contre l'Occupation NAZI, et les pires heures obscures qu'un "Fascisme" ou "Communisme" devoyés, suivies de la Guerre Froide avaient plongé l'Europe au Passé.
"Ils sont des millions, ces Héros Anonymes de notre temps, que nous croisons sans le savoir dans nos rues et nos places. Et je ne peux pas concevoir l'Europe sans eux, et sans tous ceux qui poursuivent leur combat contre l'arbitraire et le fanatisme", ajouta Fillon. Faisant pex. rappeler un récent Film allémand, primé au Festival de Vénise, qui décrivait la vie d'un cadre à l'époque d'un régime oppressif, qui avait été chargé d'espioner la vie privée et familiale d'un couple soupçonné d'être dissidents politiques, mais, ému par leur honnêteté humaine et leur sacrifice pour sauver d'autres, a preferé risquer sa place et sa propre liberté pour les sauver, sans même qu'ils le sachent, condamné dépuis à faire un bas boulot d'anonyme perdu dans la foule..
"Quand je vois l'Europe moderne, je vois les résultats de l' Audace de ces hommes qui ont brisé les traditions de conflit et de violence. Je vois des nations soudées autour d'une monnaie unique et protectrice. Je vois 27 jeunesses appelées de grandir ensemble, sans défiance. Je vois 27 peoples unis, qui nous interdisent de jouer les blazés ou les indifférents".
Jettant "un régard lucide sur les errements de la construction européenne", Fillon a observé que "l' Europe n'a pas bésoin d'être idélisée pour être ce qu'elle est ; Cad. une aventure humaine, avec ses faiblesses et ses forces".
"Vous voulez que l' Europe agisse ? Fixez-lui des objectifs clairs. Vous voulez la Démocratie ? Agissez en Citoyens. Vous rédoutez la prétendue Bureaucratie des Bruxelles ? Alors renforcez, par votre Vote, les instances élues au Parlement Européen" qui sont chargés de la contrôler.
- "Si nous voulons faire vivre "le Rêve Européen", .. alors nous avons tous le dévoir de l' engagement", a-t-il conclu, appelant de "engager pour le drapeau tricolore et le drapeau étoilé, car ils symbolisent tous les deux la fierté de nôtre nation et la force de nôtre union".
