english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

Parašė ACM
Friday, December 11, 2020
us_elec_fraud__hocus_pocus_or_scotus_potus_2021_walt_disney_movie__eurofora_patchwork_400_01

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo (MLaw "Excellent")/- USA's Supreme Court, withOut pronouncing itself at all on the Substance of the Notorious "Hot" Controversy about USA's 2020 Presidential Election's alleged Fraud and Irregularities, Legaly Denounced by 19 Member States, and Backed by Growing Evidence (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usa2020electoralfraudproofgrows.html, etc), apparently estimated, This Evening, that there is No Interest Now (11/12/2020) for Texas (Leader of that Group of States) to pursue a Legal Complaint against Biden Eventualy Arriving (Contrary to +20 States' and +74 Millions Voters' Wish) at the Top Job of POTUS towards the End of January Next Year (2021).

This, still Enigmatic SCOTUS' Ruling, which got Various Interpretations, has Not yet been publicly Signed by Any Known Judge, and is Opposed Both by the vice-President of USA Supreme Court, Justice Thomas, as well as experienced Justice Alito, who Published a Dissenting Opinion, stressing that the Court should, on the Contrary, "Grant the Motion to File the bill of Complaint" lodged by Texas and 18 other States.

At its Extremely Brief Ruling, SCOTUS did Not clearly Explain its Reasons. It Only Claimed that Texas had "Not Demonstrated a Judicialy Cognisable Interest" yet, "in the manner in which another State conducts its elections". Why ? In What Sense ? This May have Two Different Meanings :

It's Obviously Illogic to Pretend that Texas and the Other 18 GOP States (which Backed the Complaint) might Not be Affacted at all by "the manner in which" those "Swing" States (the Defendants) "conducted their Elections" (i.e., mainly, an UnPrecedented Laxism in "Absentees" and particularly "Mail-in", "Drop Box", "Park", plus "Late", controversial "Dominium" Electronic System, etc. Voting Rules, set up by the Wrong Authorities: Executive and/or Courts, Instead of Legisltative, as the US Constitution asked). Because that made Fraud Easier, Influencing the Choice of the Future US President for All. (Mutatis-mutandis, As in the Case "Arkansas v. California", on Sharing Colorado River Waters, reminded by Justice Alito, the way some States treated their part of its Waters, Affected the Waters remainig for Other Neighbouring States, and even aborigen Indians' reserves).

Therefore, one is obliged to Think that this SCOTUS' Ruling might, Perhaps, Mean that, in Fact, the imminent 1st Meeting of the Great Electors, on December 14, 2020, would Not necessarily Determine the Future US President, who will be, Definitively, Chosen, Officialy, Only Later, on January 6, 2021, by the US Congress, entrusted by the US Constitution to "Read" Officialy the Election's Final Outcome, when it's Not Theoretically Excluded a priori that Senators and Representatives, gathered Together, might, Eventually, Decide Otherwise, (as Trump Team's Young Lawyer Jenna Ellis, Claims that SCOTUS would have, Indeed, Acknowledged, meanwhile). So that Biden might, perhaps, Not take over After January 20, but Trump might stay, instead. In that case, Naturally, the 19 GOP States backing the Legal Complaint, would Not Yet have Yet, Already from Now, a Certain Legal "Interest" on What had happened in those "Swing" States, in the recent Past... Otherwise, Justice Alito's Dissending Opinion, which observes that SCOTUS' Case-Law would Oblige to Judge in "a case that falls within our (Supreme Court's) Original Jurisdiction", (i.e., mainly US Constitutional Issues, as the present one about Who Decides on Elections' organisation), should prevail.

+ Moreover, a Surprizing Addition of 1 more Line on anOther Issue, but at the Same SCOTUS' Page which Announces Today's Ruling on the "Texas"' Legal Complaint (Comp. Supra), Appears Intriguing :

>>> It Concerns a Small-Medium Stakeholders' (f.ex. Teachers' Retirement, etc) Collective Legal Complaint (via "Class Action") against "Goldman Sachs" Big Mulltinational Corporation, on anOther, alleged Financial "Fraud", (related to alleged "Conflicts of Interest" and/or Corruption about "Inflation" of Stock-Market Values for "Hedge Funds", which, would have, Reportedly, Triggered and/or, partly or wholy, Provoked the Earlier Global Economic Crisis throughout the World, (as, mutatis-mutandis,  Nowadays, the Virus' Pandemic), where that Other Collective Action was Admitted by SCOTUS...  

=> This Exceptional SCOTUS' Reference, Here and Now, at a Partly Similar (in Legal Procedural Technics), but Different Case,, with an Opposite Outcome, Might Mean one out of two Possible things :

- Either, some inside SCOTUS, Provocatively Boast that this Washington DC-Based Institution Can, and Intends, to do whatever a Powerful Corrupted Establishment likes, Even an eventualy Blatant and Arbitrary InJustice, (as Many Perceived that Ruling on "Texas" v. "Swing States" Legal Complaint, just Droped for Formal, Procedural Pretexts only : Comp. Supra).

us_elec_fraud_cover_up_scotus_for_sale_nyt__eurofora_patchwork_400 

I.e. became as Tragi-Comic as the InFamous US Writer Dos Passos' 1920 Novels Denounced in an Alcapone's Dark Past, Followed by Bertolt Brecht - Kurt Weil's 1930 Opera "Rise and Fall of Mahagony City", located in a USA of that same Past, known for its Caricatural "Alabama Song", by a bunch of Whores for Sale, (Parody of a pre-NAZI era), where the Culminating Point is, precisely, a Big InJustice Committed by a Corrupted Pseudo-"Court", which Aquits the Killer of 5 Victims, Returning him Back even the Loaded Gun with which he Killed them, just because he Bribed the so-called "Judges" with a lot of Money, While, on the Contrary, it Condemns a Poor Worker from Alaska's Mines in Prison for Life and Even to Death, by Accusing him to have ...lured the Chief of the Whores and Not Paid 3 Glasses of Whisky... Such a Heavy Crime, InJustice and Discrimination by a Corrupted "Court" trampling underfoot Human Dignity and even Elementary Human Right Values, throws that Mythic "Mahagony City" into a Socio-Political Chaos, Marking its Decline and End. (See More at: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usasupremecourtandvotefraud.html, etc).

brecht__mahagony__the_court_berlin_1977_video__eurofora_patchwork_400

(Brecht -Rise and Fall of Mahagony/Alabama - The Court + EF Patchwork)

---------------------

- Or, on the Contrary, someone inside SCOTUS, indirectly but surely wants to Urge all those who Struggle to Find and Prove the Truth about that 2020 US Presidential Election's huge Fraud and Irregularities, blatantly Seeking to Deprive the American People from its Fundamental Right to Freely and Fairly make a Honest Vote to clearly Chose its President, in full Transparency and Legality, to Prefer, instead of an Intra-States' Complaint, to Rapidly Launch, f.ex., an adequate "Class Action", (as in the Above-mentioned example : Comp. Supra), by a kind of "We the People" Gathering, among President Don Trump's Uncontested 75 Millions, Historic Record-High, Group of Legal Voters !

scotus_sunrise_eurofora_patchwork_400_01 

=> The forthcoming Weeks/Month will Prove, in Real Practice, whether this "Supreme Court" will be Honest, Intelligent and Brave enough in order Stand Up for American People's Constitutionaly Guaranteed elementary Rights, (Proving that it Really Worths that Historic French Author Alexis de Tocqueville's apraisal as being the Most Original Expression of USA's Democracy, since Centuries,

scotus_people_1213.12.2020_ntd__eurofora_400 

us_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screennshot_400 

usa_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screenshot_400 

(Partly UpDated)

____________________________________

 

or, on the Contrary, another Sign of Decline and End, (as Denounced Brecht's "Rise and Fall of Mahagony" Opera, with its Infamous "Alabama Song", from a pro-NAZI era belonging to a Dark Past : Comp. Supra).

brecht__weil__alabama_song__welcome_to_mahagony_salzburg_1998__eurofora_2020_400_01  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-3aUFHxQd8

-----------------------------------------


In Brief, it's Now a Crucial Enigma, which one, among SCOTUS Building's Part : the Show-off ... of its External "Alabama" Marble, or, on the Contrary, it's Heart's "Vermont" Marble, from nearby Oxygen-Full Green Mountains near the Great Lakes, that will Win, in this Hard but Important (Both for USA and Many Other Countries thoughout All the World) Decisive Struggle for an Elementary Respect of Human Dignity and People's Sovereign Freedoms ?

Texas and 18 Other States' Joint Legal Complaint against serious Vote Irregularities versus the US Constitution, lodged at the SCOTUS, Helped to Bring the Issue at the foreFront of Public Opinion, Nationwide, at a moment when various Evidence of Fraud, Exploiting such Lacunas, was Growing. 

Now, the main point is to Launch Fast and Strong Moves in that Area, so that the Real Dimension of that Blatant Fraud, (of which just some Parts have Surfaced until Now, Most Ignored by the People), right in Front of USA Supreme Court's a.o. Judges, as well as All the National and International Pubkic Opinion, in order to Transform that in Concrete, Energetic Results towards a Fair and Free, Real ReCount or ReVote.                                   

 It's Obviously Not Normal, after All this Time, and taking into Account all relevant Converging Facts of Growing Key Indications and Evidence of Historic Proportion of Big Abnoralities in that 2020 Massively Rigged Vote, that Neither the President Don Trump's Legal Team, Nor "We the People" among those 75 Millions of Americans (an All-Times Historic Record High) who Uncontestedly Voted for Trump, have Not Yet had Any Real Chance to Present and Discuss any Comprehensive, Overall Legal Complaint on US Constitution's Serious and Massive Violations in front of Any Important Judges, and particularly the USA Supreme Court, at all, (Not Even, in Fact, in front of the Public Opinion, given a Scandalous Censorship and blatantly Anti-Deontological, quite Fascist Biais by Establishment's Medias), until this Time (12/12/2020) !

 

(../..)

 

("DraftNews")

 

-------------------------------------

 




EUHorizonSMEtool

Statistics

Lankytojai: 64888855

Archive

Login Form





Prisiminti mane

Pamiršote slaptažodį?
Nesate prisiregistravęs? Prisiregistruoti

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Rezultatai

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING