english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

Parašė ACM
Friday, December 11, 2020
us_elec_fraud__hocus_pocus_or_scotus_potus_2021_walt_disney_movie__eurofora_patchwork_400_01

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo (MLaw "Excellent")/- USA's Supreme Court, withOut pronouncing itself at all on the Substance of the Notorious "Hot" Controversy about USA's 2020 Presidential Election's alleged Fraud and Irregularities, Legaly Denounced by 19 Member States, and Backed by Growing Evidence (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usa2020electoralfraudproofgrows.html, etc), apparently estimated, This Evening, that there is No Interest Now (11/12/2020) for Texas (Leader of that Group of States) to pursue a Legal Complaint against Biden Eventualy Arriving (Contrary to +20 States' and +74 Millions Voters' Wish) at the Top Job of POTUS towards the End of January Next Year (2021).

This, still Enigmatic SCOTUS' Ruling, which got Various Interpretations, has Not yet been publicly Signed by Any Known Judge, and is Opposed Both by the vice-President of USA Supreme Court, Justice Thomas, as well as experienced Justice Alito, who Published a Dissenting Opinion, stressing that the Court should, on the Contrary, "Grant the Motion to File the bill of Complaint" lodged by Texas and 18 other States.

At its Extremely Brief Ruling, SCOTUS did Not clearly Explain its Reasons. It Only Claimed that Texas had "Not Demonstrated a Judicialy Cognisable Interest" yet, "in the manner in which another State conducts its elections". Why ? In What Sense ? This May have Two Different Meanings :

It's Obviously Illogic to Pretend that Texas and the Other 18 GOP States (which Backed the Complaint) might Not be Affacted at all by "the manner in which" those "Swing" States (the Defendants) "conducted their Elections" (i.e., mainly, an UnPrecedented Laxism in "Absentees" and particularly "Mail-in", "Drop Box", "Park", plus "Late", controversial "Dominium" Electronic System, etc. Voting Rules, set up by the Wrong Authorities: Executive and/or Courts, Instead of Legisltative, as the US Constitution asked). Because that made Fraud Easier, Influencing the Choice of the Future US President for All. (Mutatis-mutandis, As in the Case "Arkansas v. California", on Sharing Colorado River Waters, reminded by Justice Alito, the way some States treated their part of its Waters, Affected the Waters remainig for Other Neighbouring States, and even aborigen Indians' reserves).

Therefore, one is obliged to Think that this SCOTUS' Ruling might, Perhaps, Mean that, in Fact, the imminent 1st Meeting of the Great Electors, on December 14, 2020, would Not necessarily Determine the Future US President, who will be, Definitively, Chosen, Officialy, Only Later, on January 6, 2021, by the US Congress, entrusted by the US Constitution to "Read" Officialy the Election's Final Outcome, when it's Not Theoretically Excluded a priori that Senators and Representatives, gathered Together, might, Eventually, Decide Otherwise, (as Trump Team's Young Lawyer Jenna Ellis, Claims that SCOTUS would have, Indeed, Acknowledged, meanwhile). So that Biden might, perhaps, Not take over After January 20, but Trump might stay, instead. In that case, Naturally, the 19 GOP States backing the Legal Complaint, would Not Yet have Yet, Already from Now, a Certain Legal "Interest" on What had happened in those "Swing" States, in the recent Past... Otherwise, Justice Alito's Dissending Opinion, which observes that SCOTUS' Case-Law would Oblige to Judge in "a case that falls within our (Supreme Court's) Original Jurisdiction", (i.e., mainly US Constitutional Issues, as the present one about Who Decides on Elections' organisation), should prevail.

+ Moreover, a Surprizing Addition of 1 more Line on anOther Issue, but at the Same SCOTUS' Page which Announces Today's Ruling on the "Texas"' Legal Complaint (Comp. Supra), Appears Intriguing :

>>> It Concerns a Small-Medium Stakeholders' (f.ex. Teachers' Retirement, etc) Collective Legal Complaint (via "Class Action") against "Goldman Sachs" Big Mulltinational Corporation, on anOther, alleged Financial "Fraud", (related to alleged "Conflicts of Interest" and/or Corruption about "Inflation" of Stock-Market Values for "Hedge Funds", which, would have, Reportedly, Triggered and/or, partly or wholy, Provoked the Earlier Global Economic Crisis throughout the World, (as, mutatis-mutandis,  Nowadays, the Virus' Pandemic), where that Other Collective Action was Admitted by SCOTUS...  

=> This Exceptional SCOTUS' Reference, Here and Now, at a Partly Similar (in Legal Procedural Technics), but Different Case,, with an Opposite Outcome, Might Mean one out of two Possible things :

- Either, some inside SCOTUS, Provocatively Boast that this Washington DC-Based Institution Can, and Intends, to do whatever a Powerful Corrupted Establishment likes, Even an eventualy Blatant and Arbitrary InJustice, (as Many Perceived that Ruling on "Texas" v. "Swing States" Legal Complaint, just Droped for Formal, Procedural Pretexts only : Comp. Supra).

us_elec_fraud_cover_up_scotus_for_sale_nyt__eurofora_patchwork_400 

I.e. became as Tragi-Comic as the InFamous US Writer Dos Passos' 1920 Novels Denounced in an Alcapone's Dark Past, Followed by Bertolt Brecht - Kurt Weil's 1930 Opera "Rise and Fall of Mahagony City", located in a USA of that same Past, known for its Caricatural "Alabama Song", by a bunch of Whores for Sale, (Parody of a pre-NAZI era), where the Culminating Point is, precisely, a Big InJustice Committed by a Corrupted Pseudo-"Court", which Aquits the Killer of 5 Victims, Returning him Back even the Loaded Gun with which he Killed them, just because he Bribed the so-called "Judges" with a lot of Money, While, on the Contrary, it Condemns a Poor Worker from Alaska's Mines in Prison for Life and Even to Death, by Accusing him to have ...lured the Chief of the Whores and Not Paid 3 Glasses of Whisky... Such a Heavy Crime, InJustice and Discrimination by a Corrupted "Court" trampling underfoot Human Dignity and even Elementary Human Right Values, throws that Mythic "Mahagony City" into a Socio-Political Chaos, Marking its Decline and End. (See More at: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usasupremecourtandvotefraud.html, etc).

brecht__mahagony__the_court_berlin_1977_video__eurofora_patchwork_400

(Brecht -Rise and Fall of Mahagony/Alabama - The Court + EF Patchwork)

---------------------

- Or, on the Contrary, someone inside SCOTUS, indirectly but surely wants to Urge all those who Struggle to Find and Prove the Truth about that 2020 US Presidential Election's huge Fraud and Irregularities, blatantly Seeking to Deprive the American People from its Fundamental Right to Freely and Fairly make a Honest Vote to clearly Chose its President, in full Transparency and Legality, to Prefer, instead of an Intra-States' Complaint, to Rapidly Launch, f.ex., an adequate "Class Action", (as in the Above-mentioned example : Comp. Supra), by a kind of "We the People" Gathering, among President Don Trump's Uncontested 75 Millions, Historic Record-High, Group of Legal Voters !

scotus_sunrise_eurofora_patchwork_400_01 

=> The forthcoming Weeks/Month will Prove, in Real Practice, whether this "Supreme Court" will be Honest, Intelligent and Brave enough in order Stand Up for American People's Constitutionaly Guaranteed elementary Rights, (Proving that it Really Worths that Historic French Author Alexis de Tocqueville's apraisal as being the Most Original Expression of USA's Democracy, since Centuries,

scotus_people_1213.12.2020_ntd__eurofora_400 

us_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screennshot_400 

usa_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screenshot_400 

(Partly UpDated)

____________________________________

 

or, on the Contrary, another Sign of Decline and End, (as Denounced Brecht's "Rise and Fall of Mahagony" Opera, with its Infamous "Alabama Song", from a pro-NAZI era belonging to a Dark Past : Comp. Supra).

brecht__weil__alabama_song__welcome_to_mahagony_salzburg_1998__eurofora_2020_400_01  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-3aUFHxQd8

-----------------------------------------


In Brief, it's Now a Crucial Enigma, which one, among SCOTUS Building's Part : the Show-off ... of its External "Alabama" Marble, or, on the Contrary, it's Heart's "Vermont" Marble, from nearby Oxygen-Full Green Mountains near the Great Lakes, that will Win, in this Hard but Important (Both for USA and Many Other Countries thoughout All the World) Decisive Struggle for an Elementary Respect of Human Dignity and People's Sovereign Freedoms ?

Texas and 18 Other States' Joint Legal Complaint against serious Vote Irregularities versus the US Constitution, lodged at the SCOTUS, Helped to Bring the Issue at the foreFront of Public Opinion, Nationwide, at a moment when various Evidence of Fraud, Exploiting such Lacunas, was Growing. 

Now, the main point is to Launch Fast and Strong Moves in that Area, so that the Real Dimension of that Blatant Fraud, (of which just some Parts have Surfaced until Now, Most Ignored by the People), right in Front of USA Supreme Court's a.o. Judges, as well as All the National and International Pubkic Opinion, in order to Transform that in Concrete, Energetic Results towards a Fair and Free, Real ReCount or ReVote.                                   

 It's Obviously Not Normal, after All this Time, and taking into Account all relevant Converging Facts of Growing Key Indications and Evidence of Historic Proportion of Big Abnoralities in that 2020 Massively Rigged Vote, that Neither the President Don Trump's Legal Team, Nor "We the People" among those 75 Millions of Americans (an All-Times Historic Record High) who Uncontestedly Voted for Trump, have Not Yet had Any Real Chance to Present and Discuss any Comprehensive, Overall Legal Complaint on US Constitution's Serious and Massive Violations in front of Any Important Judges, and particularly the USA Supreme Court, at all, (Not Even, in Fact, in front of the Public Opinion, given a Scandalous Censorship and blatantly Anti-Deontological, quite Fascist Biais by Establishment's Medias), until this Time (12/12/2020) !

 

(../..)

 

("DraftNews")

 

-------------------------------------

 




EUPartnersInvestors

Statistics

Lankytojai: 48390538

Archive

Login Form





Prisiminti mane

Pamiršote slaptažodį?
Nesate prisiregistravęs? Prisiregistruoti

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Rezultatai

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.