english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

Parašė ACM
Friday, December 11, 2020
us_elec_fraud__hocus_pocus_or_scotus_potus_2021_walt_disney_movie__eurofora_patchwork_400_01

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo (MLaw "Excellent")/- USA's Supreme Court, withOut pronouncing itself at all on the Substance of the Notorious "Hot" Controversy about USA's 2020 Presidential Election's alleged Fraud and Irregularities, Legaly Denounced by 19 Member States, and Backed by Growing Evidence (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usa2020electoralfraudproofgrows.html, etc), apparently estimated, This Evening, that there is No Interest Now (11/12/2020) for Texas (Leader of that Group of States) to pursue a Legal Complaint against Biden Eventualy Arriving (Contrary to +20 States' and +74 Millions Voters' Wish) at the Top Job of POTUS towards the End of January Next Year (2021).

This, still Enigmatic SCOTUS' Ruling, which got Various Interpretations, has Not yet been publicly Signed by Any Known Judge, and is Opposed Both by the vice-President of USA Supreme Court, Justice Thomas, as well as experienced Justice Alito, who Published a Dissenting Opinion, stressing that the Court should, on the Contrary, "Grant the Motion to File the bill of Complaint" lodged by Texas and 18 other States.

At its Extremely Brief Ruling, SCOTUS did Not clearly Explain its Reasons. It Only Claimed that Texas had "Not Demonstrated a Judicialy Cognisable Interest" yet, "in the manner in which another State conducts its elections". Why ? In What Sense ? This May have Two Different Meanings :

It's Obviously Illogic to Pretend that Texas and the Other 18 GOP States (which Backed the Complaint) might Not be Affacted at all by "the manner in which" those "Swing" States (the Defendants) "conducted their Elections" (i.e., mainly, an UnPrecedented Laxism in "Absentees" and particularly "Mail-in", "Drop Box", "Park", plus "Late", controversial "Dominium" Electronic System, etc. Voting Rules, set up by the Wrong Authorities: Executive and/or Courts, Instead of Legisltative, as the US Constitution asked). Because that made Fraud Easier, Influencing the Choice of the Future US President for All. (Mutatis-mutandis, As in the Case "Arkansas v. California", on Sharing Colorado River Waters, reminded by Justice Alito, the way some States treated their part of its Waters, Affected the Waters remainig for Other Neighbouring States, and even aborigen Indians' reserves).

Therefore, one is obliged to Think that this SCOTUS' Ruling might, Perhaps, Mean that, in Fact, the imminent 1st Meeting of the Great Electors, on December 14, 2020, would Not necessarily Determine the Future US President, who will be, Definitively, Chosen, Officialy, Only Later, on January 6, 2021, by the US Congress, entrusted by the US Constitution to "Read" Officialy the Election's Final Outcome, when it's Not Theoretically Excluded a priori that Senators and Representatives, gathered Together, might, Eventually, Decide Otherwise, (as Trump Team's Young Lawyer Jenna Ellis, Claims that SCOTUS would have, Indeed, Acknowledged, meanwhile). So that Biden might, perhaps, Not take over After January 20, but Trump might stay, instead. In that case, Naturally, the 19 GOP States backing the Legal Complaint, would Not Yet have Yet, Already from Now, a Certain Legal "Interest" on What had happened in those "Swing" States, in the recent Past... Otherwise, Justice Alito's Dissending Opinion, which observes that SCOTUS' Case-Law would Oblige to Judge in "a case that falls within our (Supreme Court's) Original Jurisdiction", (i.e., mainly US Constitutional Issues, as the present one about Who Decides on Elections' organisation), should prevail.

+ Moreover, a Surprizing Addition of 1 more Line on anOther Issue, but at the Same SCOTUS' Page which Announces Today's Ruling on the "Texas"' Legal Complaint (Comp. Supra), Appears Intriguing :

>>> It Concerns a Small-Medium Stakeholders' (f.ex. Teachers' Retirement, etc) Collective Legal Complaint (via "Class Action") against "Goldman Sachs" Big Mulltinational Corporation, on anOther, alleged Financial "Fraud", (related to alleged "Conflicts of Interest" and/or Corruption about "Inflation" of Stock-Market Values for "Hedge Funds", which, would have, Reportedly, Triggered and/or, partly or wholy, Provoked the Earlier Global Economic Crisis throughout the World, (as, mutatis-mutandis,  Nowadays, the Virus' Pandemic), where that Other Collective Action was Admitted by SCOTUS...  

=> This Exceptional SCOTUS' Reference, Here and Now, at a Partly Similar (in Legal Procedural Technics), but Different Case,, with an Opposite Outcome, Might Mean one out of two Possible things :

- Either, some inside SCOTUS, Provocatively Boast that this Washington DC-Based Institution Can, and Intends, to do whatever a Powerful Corrupted Establishment likes, Even an eventualy Blatant and Arbitrary InJustice, (as Many Perceived that Ruling on "Texas" v. "Swing States" Legal Complaint, just Droped for Formal, Procedural Pretexts only : Comp. Supra).

us_elec_fraud_cover_up_scotus_for_sale_nyt__eurofora_patchwork_400 

I.e. became as Tragi-Comic as the InFamous US Writer Dos Passos' 1920 Novels Denounced in an Alcapone's Dark Past, Followed by Bertolt Brecht - Kurt Weil's 1930 Opera "Rise and Fall of Mahagony City", located in a USA of that same Past, known for its Caricatural "Alabama Song", by a bunch of Whores for Sale, (Parody of a pre-NAZI era), where the Culminating Point is, precisely, a Big InJustice Committed by a Corrupted Pseudo-"Court", which Aquits the Killer of 5 Victims, Returning him Back even the Loaded Gun with which he Killed them, just because he Bribed the so-called "Judges" with a lot of Money, While, on the Contrary, it Condemns a Poor Worker from Alaska's Mines in Prison for Life and Even to Death, by Accusing him to have ...lured the Chief of the Whores and Not Paid 3 Glasses of Whisky... Such a Heavy Crime, InJustice and Discrimination by a Corrupted "Court" trampling underfoot Human Dignity and even Elementary Human Right Values, throws that Mythic "Mahagony City" into a Socio-Political Chaos, Marking its Decline and End. (See More at: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usasupremecourtandvotefraud.html, etc).

brecht__mahagony__the_court_berlin_1977_video__eurofora_patchwork_400

(Brecht -Rise and Fall of Mahagony/Alabama - The Court + EF Patchwork)

---------------------

- Or, on the Contrary, someone inside SCOTUS, indirectly but surely wants to Urge all those who Struggle to Find and Prove the Truth about that 2020 US Presidential Election's huge Fraud and Irregularities, blatantly Seeking to Deprive the American People from its Fundamental Right to Freely and Fairly make a Honest Vote to clearly Chose its President, in full Transparency and Legality, to Prefer, instead of an Intra-States' Complaint, to Rapidly Launch, f.ex., an adequate "Class Action", (as in the Above-mentioned example : Comp. Supra), by a kind of "We the People" Gathering, among President Don Trump's Uncontested 75 Millions, Historic Record-High, Group of Legal Voters !

scotus_sunrise_eurofora_patchwork_400_01 

=> The forthcoming Weeks/Month will Prove, in Real Practice, whether this "Supreme Court" will be Honest, Intelligent and Brave enough in order Stand Up for American People's Constitutionaly Guaranteed elementary Rights, (Proving that it Really Worths that Historic French Author Alexis de Tocqueville's apraisal as being the Most Original Expression of USA's Democracy, since Centuries,

scotus_people_1213.12.2020_ntd__eurofora_400 

us_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screennshot_400 

usa_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screenshot_400 

(Partly UpDated)

____________________________________

 

or, on the Contrary, another Sign of Decline and End, (as Denounced Brecht's "Rise and Fall of Mahagony" Opera, with its Infamous "Alabama Song", from a pro-NAZI era belonging to a Dark Past : Comp. Supra).

brecht__weil__alabama_song__welcome_to_mahagony_salzburg_1998__eurofora_2020_400_01  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-3aUFHxQd8

-----------------------------------------


In Brief, it's Now a Crucial Enigma, which one, among SCOTUS Building's Part : the Show-off ... of its External "Alabama" Marble, or, on the Contrary, it's Heart's "Vermont" Marble, from nearby Oxygen-Full Green Mountains near the Great Lakes, that will Win, in this Hard but Important (Both for USA and Many Other Countries thoughout All the World) Decisive Struggle for an Elementary Respect of Human Dignity and People's Sovereign Freedoms ?

Texas and 18 Other States' Joint Legal Complaint against serious Vote Irregularities versus the US Constitution, lodged at the SCOTUS, Helped to Bring the Issue at the foreFront of Public Opinion, Nationwide, at a moment when various Evidence of Fraud, Exploiting such Lacunas, was Growing. 

Now, the main point is to Launch Fast and Strong Moves in that Area, so that the Real Dimension of that Blatant Fraud, (of which just some Parts have Surfaced until Now, Most Ignored by the People), right in Front of USA Supreme Court's a.o. Judges, as well as All the National and International Pubkic Opinion, in order to Transform that in Concrete, Energetic Results towards a Fair and Free, Real ReCount or ReVote.                                   

 It's Obviously Not Normal, after All this Time, and taking into Account all relevant Converging Facts of Growing Key Indications and Evidence of Historic Proportion of Big Abnoralities in that 2020 Massively Rigged Vote, that Neither the President Don Trump's Legal Team, Nor "We the People" among those 75 Millions of Americans (an All-Times Historic Record High) who Uncontestedly Voted for Trump, have Not Yet had Any Real Chance to Present and Discuss any Comprehensive, Overall Legal Complaint on US Constitution's Serious and Massive Violations in front of Any Important Judges, and particularly the USA Supreme Court, at all, (Not Even, in Fact, in front of the Public Opinion, given a Scandalous Censorship and blatantly Anti-Deontological, quite Fascist Biais by Establishment's Medias), until this Time (12/12/2020) !

 

(../..)

 

("DraftNews")

 

-------------------------------------

 




EuroStars-Eureka

Statistics

Lankytojai: 52349010

Archive

Login Form





Prisiminti mane

Pamiršote slaptažodį?
Nesate prisiregistravęs? Prisiregistruoti

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Rezultatai

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.