english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Accueil arrow newsitems arrow SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

SCOTUS Enigma: Texas+ no interest yet as Biden unsure for POTUS 2021?=>"We the People" Class Action?

Ecrit par ACM
Friday, 11 December 2020
us_elec_fraud__hocus_pocus_or_scotus_potus_2021_walt_disney_movie__eurofora_patchwork_400_01

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo (MLaw "Excellent")/- USA's Supreme Court, withOut pronouncing itself at all on the Substance of the Notorious "Hot" Controversy about USA's 2020 Presidential Election's alleged Fraud and Irregularities, Legaly Denounced by 19 Member States, and Backed by Growing Evidence (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usa2020electoralfraudproofgrows.html, etc), apparently estimated, This Evening, that there is No Interest Now (11/12/2020) for Texas (Leader of that Group of States) to pursue a Legal Complaint against Biden Eventualy Arriving (Contrary to +20 States' and +74 Millions Voters' Wish) at the Top Job of POTUS towards the End of January Next Year (2021).

This, still Enigmatic SCOTUS' Ruling, which got Various Interpretations, has Not yet been publicly Signed by Any Known Judge, and is Opposed Both by the vice-President of USA Supreme Court, Justice Thomas, as well as experienced Justice Alito, who Published a Dissenting Opinion, stressing that the Court should, on the Contrary, "Grant the Motion to File the bill of Complaint" lodged by Texas and 18 other States.

At its Extremely Brief Ruling, SCOTUS did Not clearly Explain its Reasons. It Only Claimed that Texas had "Not Demonstrated a Judicialy Cognisable Interest" yet, "in the manner in which another State conducts its elections". Why ? In What Sense ? This May have Two Different Meanings :

It's Obviously Illogic to Pretend that Texas and the Other 18 GOP States (which Backed the Complaint) might Not be Affacted at all by "the manner in which" those "Swing" States (the Defendants) "conducted their Elections" (i.e., mainly, an UnPrecedented Laxism in "Absentees" and particularly "Mail-in", "Drop Box", "Park", plus "Late", controversial "Dominium" Electronic System, etc. Voting Rules, set up by the Wrong Authorities: Executive and/or Courts, Instead of Legisltative, as the US Constitution asked). Because that made Fraud Easier, Influencing the Choice of the Future US President for All. (Mutatis-mutandis, As in the Case "Arkansas v. California", on Sharing Colorado River Waters, reminded by Justice Alito, the way some States treated their part of its Waters, Affected the Waters remainig for Other Neighbouring States, and even aborigen Indians' reserves).

Therefore, one is obliged to Think that this SCOTUS' Ruling might, Perhaps, Mean that, in Fact, the imminent 1st Meeting of the Great Electors, on December 14, 2020, would Not necessarily Determine the Future US President, who will be, Definitively, Chosen, Officialy, Only Later, on January 6, 2021, by the US Congress, entrusted by the US Constitution to "Read" Officialy the Election's Final Outcome, when it's Not Theoretically Excluded a priori that Senators and Representatives, gathered Together, might, Eventually, Decide Otherwise, (as Trump Team's Young Lawyer Jenna Ellis, Claims that SCOTUS would have, Indeed, Acknowledged, meanwhile). So that Biden might, perhaps, Not take over After January 20, but Trump might stay, instead. In that case, Naturally, the 19 GOP States backing the Legal Complaint, would Not Yet have Yet, Already from Now, a Certain Legal "Interest" on What had happened in those "Swing" States, in the recent Past... Otherwise, Justice Alito's Dissending Opinion, which observes that SCOTUS' Case-Law would Oblige to Judge in "a case that falls within our (Supreme Court's) Original Jurisdiction", (i.e., mainly US Constitutional Issues, as the present one about Who Decides on Elections' organisation), should prevail.

+ Moreover, a Surprizing Addition of 1 more Line on anOther Issue, but at the Same SCOTUS' Page which Announces Today's Ruling on the "Texas"' Legal Complaint (Comp. Supra), Appears Intriguing :

>>> It Concerns a Small-Medium Stakeholders' (f.ex. Teachers' Retirement, etc) Collective Legal Complaint (via "Class Action") against "Goldman Sachs" Big Mulltinational Corporation, on anOther, alleged Financial "Fraud", (related to alleged "Conflicts of Interest" and/or Corruption about "Inflation" of Stock-Market Values for "Hedge Funds", which, would have, Reportedly, Triggered and/or, partly or wholy, Provoked the Earlier Global Economic Crisis throughout the World, (as, mutatis-mutandis,  Nowadays, the Virus' Pandemic), where that Other Collective Action was Admitted by SCOTUS...  

=> This Exceptional SCOTUS' Reference, Here and Now, at a Partly Similar (in Legal Procedural Technics), but Different Case,, with an Opposite Outcome, Might Mean one out of two Possible things :

- Either, some inside SCOTUS, Provocatively Boast that this Washington DC-Based Institution Can, and Intends, to do whatever a Powerful Corrupted Establishment likes, Even an eventualy Blatant and Arbitrary InJustice, (as Many Perceived that Ruling on "Texas" v. "Swing States" Legal Complaint, just Droped for Formal, Procedural Pretexts only : Comp. Supra).

us_elec_fraud_cover_up_scotus_for_sale_nyt__eurofora_patchwork_400 

I.e. became as Tragi-Comic as the InFamous US Writer Dos Passos' 1920 Novels Denounced in an Alcapone's Dark Past, Followed by Bertolt Brecht - Kurt Weil's 1930 Opera "Rise and Fall of Mahagony City", located in a USA of that same Past, known for its Caricatural "Alabama Song", by a bunch of Whores for Sale, (Parody of a pre-NAZI era), where the Culminating Point is, precisely, a Big InJustice Committed by a Corrupted Pseudo-"Court", which Aquits the Killer of 5 Victims, Returning him Back even the Loaded Gun with which he Killed them, just because he Bribed the so-called "Judges" with a lot of Money, While, on the Contrary, it Condemns a Poor Worker from Alaska's Mines in Prison for Life and Even to Death, by Accusing him to have ...lured the Chief of the Whores and Not Paid 3 Glasses of Whisky... Such a Heavy Crime, InJustice and Discrimination by a Corrupted "Court" trampling underfoot Human Dignity and even Elementary Human Right Values, throws that Mythic "Mahagony City" into a Socio-Political Chaos, Marking its Decline and End. (See More at: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usasupremecourtandvotefraud.html, etc).

brecht__mahagony__the_court_berlin_1977_video__eurofora_patchwork_400

(Brecht -Rise and Fall of Mahagony/Alabama - The Court + EF Patchwork)

---------------------

- Or, on the Contrary, someone inside SCOTUS, indirectly but surely wants to Urge all those who Struggle to Find and Prove the Truth about that 2020 US Presidential Election's huge Fraud and Irregularities, blatantly Seeking to Deprive the American People from its Fundamental Right to Freely and Fairly make a Honest Vote to clearly Chose its President, in full Transparency and Legality, to Prefer, instead of an Intra-States' Complaint, to Rapidly Launch, f.ex., an adequate "Class Action", (as in the Above-mentioned example : Comp. Supra), by a kind of "We the People" Gathering, among President Don Trump's Uncontested 75 Millions, Historic Record-High, Group of Legal Voters !

scotus_sunrise_eurofora_patchwork_400_01 

=> The forthcoming Weeks/Month will Prove, in Real Practice, whether this "Supreme Court" will be Honest, Intelligent and Brave enough in order Stand Up for American People's Constitutionaly Guaranteed elementary Rights, (Proving that it Really Worths that Historic French Author Alexis de Tocqueville's apraisal as being the Most Original Expression of USA's Democracy, since Centuries,

scotus_people_1213.12.2020_ntd__eurofora_400 

us_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screennshot_400 

usa_elec_fraud_12.12.2020_wdc_march_scotus_ntd_video__eurofora_screenshot_400 

(Partly UpDated)

____________________________________

 

or, on the Contrary, another Sign of Decline and End, (as Denounced Brecht's "Rise and Fall of Mahagony" Opera, with its Infamous "Alabama Song", from a pro-NAZI era belonging to a Dark Past : Comp. Supra).

brecht__weil__alabama_song__welcome_to_mahagony_salzburg_1998__eurofora_2020_400_01  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-3aUFHxQd8

-----------------------------------------


In Brief, it's Now a Crucial Enigma, which one, among SCOTUS Building's Part : the Show-off ... of its External "Alabama" Marble, or, on the Contrary, it's Heart's "Vermont" Marble, from nearby Oxygen-Full Green Mountains near the Great Lakes, that will Win, in this Hard but Important (Both for USA and Many Other Countries thoughout All the World) Decisive Struggle for an Elementary Respect of Human Dignity and People's Sovereign Freedoms ?

Texas and 18 Other States' Joint Legal Complaint against serious Vote Irregularities versus the US Constitution, lodged at the SCOTUS, Helped to Bring the Issue at the foreFront of Public Opinion, Nationwide, at a moment when various Evidence of Fraud, Exploiting such Lacunas, was Growing. 

Now, the main point is to Launch Fast and Strong Moves in that Area, so that the Real Dimension of that Blatant Fraud, (of which just some Parts have Surfaced until Now, Most Ignored by the People), right in Front of USA Supreme Court's a.o. Judges, as well as All the National and International Pubkic Opinion, in order to Transform that in Concrete, Energetic Results towards a Fair and Free, Real ReCount or ReVote.                                   

 It's Obviously Not Normal, after All this Time, and taking into Account all relevant Converging Facts of Growing Key Indications and Evidence of Historic Proportion of Big Abnoralities in that 2020 Massively Rigged Vote, that Neither the President Don Trump's Legal Team, Nor "We the People" among those 75 Millions of Americans (an All-Times Historic Record High) who Uncontestedly Voted for Trump, have Not Yet had Any Real Chance to Present and Discuss any Comprehensive, Overall Legal Complaint on US Constitution's Serious and Massive Violations in front of Any Important Judges, and particularly the USA Supreme Court, at all, (Not Even, in Fact, in front of the Public Opinion, given a Scandalous Censorship and blatantly Anti-Deontological, quite Fascist Biais by Establishment's Medias), until this Time (12/12/2020) !

 

(../..)

 

("DraftNews")

 

-------------------------------------

 




EUPartnersInvestors

Statistics

Visiteurrs: 52349054

Archive

Login Form





Se souvenir de moi

Perdu votre mot de passe?
Pas encore de compte? Enregistrez-vous

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

imag0218_400_01

(Opinion).

 In Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs, as the New EU Parliament's President, new EU Commission's President (+ probably EU Council's President, EU Foreign Minister, etc) should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies.

At the heart of the biggest EU Countries, in France and Germany, EU Citizens clearly voted for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe based on Values, declared explicitly incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

This main choice was also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries, such as Austria (cf. promise of a Referendum), Spain (cf. EPP program's reservations vis a vis Enlargment), etc., while EPP Parties won also in Poland, Hungary, Cyprus, etc.

In other Countries, whenever Governing coalitions didn't make these choices or eluded them, continuing to let a Turkish lobby push for its entry into the EU, they paid a high price, and risked to damage Europe, by obliging EU Citizens to massively vote for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to offer a possibility to promise  real change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU :

It's for this obvious reason that British UKIP (IndDem) succeeded now (after many statements against Turkey's EU bid) to become Great Britain's 2nd Party, unexpectedly growing bigger even than the Governing Labour Party, as well as the Liberal party  ! Facts prove that it's not an isolated phenomenon : A similar development occured in the Netherlands, where Geert Wilders "Party for Freedom" (PVV) became also the 2nd biggest in the country, (after EPP), boosting the chances of a politician who had withdrawn in 2004 from an older party "because he didn't agree with their position on Turkey". And in several other EU Member Countries, even previously small parties which now focused on a struggle against Turkey's controversial demand to enter in the EU, won much more or even doubled the number of their MEPs (fex. Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, etc).

On the contrary, whenever Socialist and oher parties were explicitly or implicitly for Turkey's controversial EU bid, they obviously lost Citizens' votes and fell down to an unprecedented low.

In consequence, EU Citizens clearly revealed their main political choices, in one way or another : They voted to change for less Bureaucracy, but more Politics and Values in a Europe really open to EU Citizens, but without Turkey's controversial EU bid.

Recent political developments are obviously different from the old political landscape which existed in the Past of 1999-2004, when Socialists based on Turkish 1% vote governed undisputed not only in Germany, but also in the UK, Greece and elsewhere, France followed old policies decided when it had been divided by "cohabitation", before the 3 "NO" to EU  Referenda since May 2005, before Merkel, before Sarkozy, etc.... before the surprises of 7 June 2009 new EU Elections.

If the current candidates to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, OK.

Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People.

The beginning of crucial, final Decisions are scheduled for the 1st EU Parliament's plenary session in Strasbourg, in the middle of July, and they could be completed towards the October session, when Lisbon Treaty's fate will have been fixed.


See relevant Facts also at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/2009electionsandturkey.html
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/daulelections.html
http://www.eurofora.net/brief/brief/euroelectionresult.html

 ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Résultats

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.