english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow GALLUP: Trump 3 Times More Popular than Biden as USCongress/SCOTUS/OSCE/OAS Verdict on Election=asap

GALLUP: Trump 3 Times More Popular than Biden as USCongress/SCOTUS/OSCE/OAS Verdict on Election=asap

Pisac ACM
29. 12. 2020.
don_trump_most_popular_in_2020_gallup_newsmax__eurofora_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/(Partly UpDated)- As the Time for Decisive Fights around the Controversial 2020 US Presidental Election approaches in the US Congress, the Federal Supreme Court, at Internatioal Organisations' Final Reports (as OSCE and OAS, etc), added to Popular Mass Demonstrations, etc., a Gallup's Poll surprized by Finding US President Don Trump as ... 3 Times More Admired by the People than Former Vice-President Joe Biden, Despite the Later's Claims (Blindly and Oppresively Backed by most of the Establishment, including by Medias' obvious Biais and Notorious Censorship at the Internet, etc) to have snatched regularly that Vote, Nonobstant un Growing Number of Various Converging Gross Irregularities, Suspect Incidents, and/or Massive Fraudulent moves from the Dems, (to which they have Never Dared Clearly Reply to Republicans' numerous Facts and Arguments, with Other Facts and Arguments, until now, Fleeing any Serious Public Debate, Political or Judicial, on that "Hot" Issue) :

Indeed, Trump scores the Top Result of 18%, Compared to Biden's far Lower ...6% Only, (i.e. just 1/3), according to Gallup's Latest Poll.

Thus, Trump's Popularity Bypasses, for the Year 2020, Everyone Else's alleged impact, coming First, with Former POTUS Obama Lowering Down to 15%, Biden 6%, Dr Fauci and Pope Francis with 3% and 2%, Dalai Lama, Bernie Sanders, Elon Musk ("Tesla"'s CEO), and Bill Gates (Microsoft) 1%, etc.

Among Women, Michelle Obama comes First, with 10%, (i.e. also Lower), Followed by Kamala Harris, Melania Trump, and Oprah Winfrey with 6%, 4% and 3% respectively, Merkel, Hillary and Queen Elisabeth with 2%, new SCOTUS Judge Amy Coney Barrett and Global Warming activist Thunberg 1% each.

Gallup's Poll surveyed 1.018 People, between 1 to 17 December 2020 , with a margin of error +/- 4%. Therefore, it included the Controversial Certification and "Votes" of Biden's Candidate Electors, as well as that of Trump's Alternative Slates of Electors, who were prepared and met in Parallel throughout All the 6 Crucial "Swing" States, (to which was Added, meanwhile, also New Mexico !), in view of the January 6, 2021, Official "Reading" by US Congress' meeting, Before the Official Inauguration (currently Scheduled for January 20) of Whoever might, eventualy, Become USA's President for the 2021-2024 Period.

USA's Federal Supreme Court has fixed January 22 for the First ever Trump's Legal Complaint at the Highest Federal level, lodged on December 20, 2020 on Pennsylvania alleged WideSpread Fraud/Gross Irregularities. + In the MeanTime, Trump's Team lodged Also a 2nd Legal Complaint at SCOTUS Level,, o December 30, 2020, against Wisconsin's Controversial Vote, among 6 Crucial "Swing" States. USA's Supreme Court has Not yet Examined, Nor Discussed, Neither Pronounced itshelf on the Merits of Any Case concerning these Controversial US Election, until Now.  These 2 First Cases, on Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, if they are Won by Trump, would provide Sufficient Electors for a Trump's eventual Win of the oberall Presidential Election, (with More than 270 Electors, Adding some among the above-mentioned Alternative Slates of Electors, which are already Ready, Since Mid-December 2020 : Comp. Supra).

+ In Addition, Meanwhile,  the competent and experienced International Organisations of OSCE and OAS prepare their Crucial, Final Reports on the Controversial 2020 US Presidential Election, which are Expected to be Published at around the Middle of January 2021, with possible Postponements for Later-on, if Developments on the Electoral Process (Including the way to Handle Legal Complaints), require to do so, as "Eurofora" learned, (See, f.ex. : ..., etc). Their Preliminary Reports and/or Press Conferences, since the immediate Aftermath of the November 3, 2020 Controversial US Presidential Elections, contain some First Critical points, (even if Real Problems had Insufficiently Surfaced yet at that Early Moment, Appearing mainly Later-on, as, f.ex., Statistical Big Anomalies, Sudden DisProportionate Last-Minute U-Turns After MidNight, Videos, Signed Testimonies and EyeWitnesses, "Dominion" Machines/Network Scandal, Lorry Full of New York Ballots, Observers Hindered, Attempts to Hide Data, Establishment Press' Biais and Web Censorship by "Big Tech", Systematic Courts' Refusals to Examine and Discuss Evidence, much More Votes than Voters, etc).

In a Recent, 2019 Precedent, it's just a Short but Sharp Criticism by OAS' Observers Mission on the Presidential Elections in Bolivia, that gave a Signal for a Series of Popular Demonstrations against Morales ("Socialist", like Biden), until he was Practicaly Obliged to Resign, some Weeks, a Month or so Later, when a Key Part of the Army and the Police Refused to Oppress the People, and reportedly Suggested, in a Press Conference, that it would be Better for the Country if he Left... And that, Despite the Fact that the Supreme Electoral Court had Examined, previously, and Rejected on the Merits, All Legal Complaints by the Opposition) !... For the Rest, the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities' overall Pattern was Strikinkgly Similar, on 2019, to that of USA's on 2020, (f.ex., mainly Sudden DisProportional U-Turns in Vote-Counting After MidNight, Huge Statistical ImProbabilities, etc).

=> Who and Why Pushes the USA to Become ...Less Democratic than Bolivia ?

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------

european sme week (since 2009)

Statistics

Posetioci: 52348889

Archive

Login Form





Upamti me

Izgubili ste lozinku?
Nemate nalog? Napravite nalog

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 

pace_freeze_meps_400_01

They voted to "freeze" UK Government's draft to put People in jail for 42 Days on "anti-terrorist" suspicion without charge, or they abstained. Don't they look suspect ?
-------------------------

CoE's debate on UK controversy stirs PanEuropean check of anti-terror suspects' imprisonment

Former Leftists of the Sixties would boil in hot water if they heard PACE's debate on the controversial 42 days detention without charge, currently drafted by the British Government :

A "Socialist" Government, a Socialist PACE Rapporteur and a Socialist Chair of PACE's Legal Committee, opposed a .. "Conservative" amendment (supported by .. Liberals, Democrats, etc), to freeze the measure, in order to protect Citizens' Freedom, by "waiting" until CoE's Venice Committee checks its conformity with Human Rights' principles.

"Left"'s support to Conservative-Lib.Dem's criticism, wasn't enough to obtain a majority, nor to make things as they were back in the good old days, when "Left" and "Right" had a clear meaning, as "liberty" and "restrictions"...

Conservatives and most Democrats were joined by the Left in voting for the "freeze", as well as Liberal Paul Rowen, while Socialist MEP Ivan Popescu, an experienced MEP from Ukraine (PACE Member since 1996-2008) abstained. But most Socialists, added to a few Liberals and EPP's Right, voted against.

Fortunately, someone inside PACE had the wise idea to shorten the Debate for less than 1 Hour, and put it on the Agenda only at the end of an exceptionally busy day, towards the end of the Evening, when most MEPs had already gone to taste wins and foods at various Receptions all around Strasbourg's "European" area : As a result, not even 42 MEPs weren't present..

Socialist Lord Tomlinson accused the leaders of the PanEuropean Assembly, in its highest body : the "Bureau", to "lack wisdom" by deciding to hold a Debate on an issue that neither the Socialist Chair of the Legal Committee, nor its Socialist "reluctant Rapporteur", did "not want to do", ...

tomllinson

Finally, everybody (critics and supporters alike) was happy to agree, in substance, that the controversial measure "may" gravely violate Human Rights, and therefore, PACE asked Legal Experts of Venice Commission to check UK Government''s plans.

But this might take more than .. 42 Days to do, since PACE's Rapporteur asked the Experts to enlarge their study in a PanEuropean comparison of all that is happening on "anti-terrorism" legislation in 47 CoE Member Countries, including Russia, Turkey and Azerbaidjan..

Bad lack : "The existing 28 days’ detention without charge in the UK is, in comparison with other CoE member countries, one of the most extreme : In Turkey, the period is 7,5 days, in France 6 days, in Russia 5 days, and in .. the U.S. and Canada just 2 and 1 days respectively", denounced Democrat MEP Ms WOLDSETH from Norway..

woldsteth

"Numerous respected human rights organisations, including Liberty and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious concern" "The proposed legislation ...could easily lead to extensive abuses. ...Detention for 42 days means six weeks in which one is taken away from one’s family, friends, home and livelihood only to be let off without being charged. That will destroy lives and isolate communities", she added.

- "3 years ago, the UK Government sought to increase the period of pre-charge detention from 14 days to 90 days. Not long before that, it had been only 7 days. There was a vigorous debate ...and a ...compromise was reached of 28 days. We have to ask whether there are proper safeguards in place to extend the period to 42 days. I suggest that there are fatal flaws", reminded British Conservative Clappison.

- "What sort of society holds someone in detention for 42 days and does not have to tell the person who is in prison why they are there, or explain the suspicions that arose and led to their detention? What sort of society believes that that is the way to treat its citizens? That is an appalling injustice, ...A 42-day detention period will not make the UK safer. Instead, it will be the first step to giving in to terrorists; it is saying that we are prepared to sacrifice our democratic rights and the principles for which we have stood for centuries", criticized British Liberal Michael Hanckock

hancock

"Comments made ...by Norwegian delegates are unfortunate", replied British Socialist MEP Ms.Curtis-Thomas, accusing them to "besmirch the reputation of our police force, which is one of the Best in the World", as she said, believing that "there are significant safeguards ...to ensure that individuals are not subjected to unlawful detention"

curtis

PACE "has serious doubts whether ...the draft legislation are in conformity with the ...case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. A lack of ..safeguards may lead to arbitrariness, resulting in breaches of ... liberty and ...right to a fair trial". PACE "is particularly concerned that: ..the judge ..may not be in a position to examine whether there exist reasonable grounds for suspecting that the arrested person has committed an offence;"; that "... representation by a lawyer may be inappropriately restricted or delayed;" that "information on the grounds for suspicion of a person ...may be unduly withheld.. ;" that this "may give rise to arrests without the intention to charge;", and; in general, that "prolonged detention without proper information on the grounds for arrest may constitute inhuman treatment", says Klaus De Vries' Report, adopted with 29 votes against zero.

vries

Records don't say if it took him 42 Days to draft his Report, but, at least, he knew why...

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Rezultati

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.