english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow GALLUP: Trump 3 Times More Popular than Biden as USCongress/SCOTUS/OSCE/OAS Verdict on Election=asap

GALLUP: Trump 3 Times More Popular than Biden as USCongress/SCOTUS/OSCE/OAS Verdict on Election=asap

Автор ACM
Tuesday, 29 December 2020
don_trump_most_popular_in_2020_gallup_newsmax__eurofora_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/(Partly UpDated)- As the Time for Decisive Fights around the Controversial 2020 US Presidental Election approaches in the US Congress, the Federal Supreme Court, at Internatioal Organisations' Final Reports (as OSCE and OAS, etc), added to Popular Mass Demonstrations, etc., a Gallup's Poll surprized by Finding US President Don Trump as ... 3 Times More Admired by the People than Former Vice-President Joe Biden, Despite the Later's Claims (Blindly and Oppresively Backed by most of the Establishment, including by Medias' obvious Biais and Notorious Censorship at the Internet, etc) to have snatched regularly that Vote, Nonobstant un Growing Number of Various Converging Gross Irregularities, Suspect Incidents, and/or Massive Fraudulent moves from the Dems, (to which they have Never Dared Clearly Reply to Republicans' numerous Facts and Arguments, with Other Facts and Arguments, until now, Fleeing any Serious Public Debate, Political or Judicial, on that "Hot" Issue) :

Indeed, Trump scores the Top Result of 18%, Compared to Biden's far Lower ...6% Only, (i.e. just 1/3), according to Gallup's Latest Poll.

Thus, Trump's Popularity Bypasses, for the Year 2020, Everyone Else's alleged impact, coming First, with Former POTUS Obama Lowering Down to 15%, Biden 6%, Dr Fauci and Pope Francis with 3% and 2%, Dalai Lama, Bernie Sanders, Elon Musk ("Tesla"'s CEO), and Bill Gates (Microsoft) 1%, etc.

Among Women, Michelle Obama comes First, with 10%, (i.e. also Lower), Followed by Kamala Harris, Melania Trump, and Oprah Winfrey with 6%, 4% and 3% respectively, Merkel, Hillary and Queen Elisabeth with 2%, new SCOTUS Judge Amy Coney Barrett and Global Warming activist Thunberg 1% each.

Gallup's Poll surveyed 1.018 People, between 1 to 17 December 2020 , with a margin of error +/- 4%. Therefore, it included the Controversial Certification and "Votes" of Biden's Candidate Electors, as well as that of Trump's Alternative Slates of Electors, who were prepared and met in Parallel throughout All the 6 Crucial "Swing" States, (to which was Added, meanwhile, also New Mexico !), in view of the January 6, 2021, Official "Reading" by US Congress' meeting, Before the Official Inauguration (currently Scheduled for January 20) of Whoever might, eventualy, Become USA's President for the 2021-2024 Period.

USA's Federal Supreme Court has fixed January 22 for the First ever Trump's Legal Complaint at the Highest Federal level, lodged on December 20, 2020 on Pennsylvania alleged WideSpread Fraud/Gross Irregularities. + In the MeanTime, Trump's Team lodged Also a 2nd Legal Complaint at SCOTUS Level,, o December 30, 2020, against Wisconsin's Controversial Vote, among 6 Crucial "Swing" States. USA's Supreme Court has Not yet Examined, Nor Discussed, Neither Pronounced itshelf on the Merits of Any Case concerning these Controversial US Election, until Now.  These 2 First Cases, on Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, if they are Won by Trump, would provide Sufficient Electors for a Trump's eventual Win of the oberall Presidential Election, (with More than 270 Electors, Adding some among the above-mentioned Alternative Slates of Electors, which are already Ready, Since Mid-December 2020 : Comp. Supra).

+ In Addition, Meanwhile,  the competent and experienced International Organisations of OSCE and OAS prepare their Crucial, Final Reports on the Controversial 2020 US Presidential Election, which are Expected to be Published at around the Middle of January 2021, with possible Postponements for Later-on, if Developments on the Electoral Process (Including the way to Handle Legal Complaints), require to do so, as "Eurofora" learned, (See, f.ex. : ..., etc). Their Preliminary Reports and/or Press Conferences, since the immediate Aftermath of the November 3, 2020 Controversial US Presidential Elections, contain some First Critical points, (even if Real Problems had Insufficiently Surfaced yet at that Early Moment, Appearing mainly Later-on, as, f.ex., Statistical Big Anomalies, Sudden DisProportionate Last-Minute U-Turns After MidNight, Videos, Signed Testimonies and EyeWitnesses, "Dominion" Machines/Network Scandal, Lorry Full of New York Ballots, Observers Hindered, Attempts to Hide Data, Establishment Press' Biais and Web Censorship by "Big Tech", Systematic Courts' Refusals to Examine and Discuss Evidence, much More Votes than Voters, etc).

In a Recent, 2019 Precedent, it's just a Short but Sharp Criticism by OAS' Observers Mission on the Presidential Elections in Bolivia, that gave a Signal for a Series of Popular Demonstrations against Morales ("Socialist", like Biden), until he was Practicaly Obliged to Resign, some Weeks, a Month or so Later, when a Key Part of the Army and the Police Refused to Oppress the People, and reportedly Suggested, in a Press Conference, that it would be Better for the Country if he Left... And that, Despite the Fact that the Supreme Electoral Court had Examined, previously, and Rejected on the Merits, All Legal Complaints by the Opposition) !... For the Rest, the alleged Fraud/Gross Irregularities' overall Pattern was Strikinkgly Similar, on 2019, to that of USA's on 2020, (f.ex., mainly Sudden DisProportional U-Turns in Vote-Counting After MidNight, Huge Statistical ImProbabilities, etc).

=> Who and Why Pushes the USA to Become ...Less Democratic than Bolivia ?

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------

european sme week (since 2009)

Statistics

Посетителей: 56181925

Archive

Login Form





Запомнить меня

Забыли пароль?
Ещё не зарегистрированы? Регистрация

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Результаты

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.