english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Trump:Hear People's Voice+Jan 6 Rally=Wild+Special Counsel on Fraud+SCOTUS Delay=Bolivia/Morales/OAS

Trump:Hear People's Voice+Jan 6 Rally=Wild+Special Counsel on Fraud+SCOTUS Delay=Bolivia/Morales/OAS

Pisac ACM
24. 12. 2020.
 trump__american_people_must_make_their_voice_heard_trump_video__eurofora_screenshot_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- Trump's landmark latest Speech Urges that "it's Time for the American People to Raise their Voice", while Jan. 6 Popular Rally is expected to get "Wild"... In Parallel, there is talk about Naming a "Special Counsel" to Investigate 2020 US Presidential Election Fraud/Irregularities, while SCOTUS' Decisiion Dates may Delate, as an HyperActive Trump gets Refuge to Florida for 10 Days, amidst Rumours about "2 Lines" competing on Strategy and Tactics, all along various Evolving Law Suits... (etc). Could, all this, Boil Down also to a kind of ..."OAS v. Morales", Bolivia 2019 Presidential Election Fraud precedent's Remake, mutatis-mutatis in a 2020-2021 USA Brand New Version ? (Indeed, OAES' Principles mainly remain UnContestable, favoring Trump, while a Late Criticism of their Application on Data in Morale's case, canNot be Exploited by Biden, But, on the Contrary, Condemns him ... : See Infra).

In Substance, All this Facts-Based Speculative Equation may basicaly Confirm Famous late Justice Scalia's View, that controversial Counting of "Questionable Legality Votes" Threatens to Alienate People's "Trust", and, therefore, Hamper "Democratic Stability", as "Eurofora" has Warned, since November (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usasupremecourtandvotefraud.html, etc). In Conclusion, therefore, to put it in a Nutshell, Instead of a Controversial ..."Hocus-Pocus"' "Diabolic Witchcraft"'s Fraud for Biden on 2020, wouldn't it be Better to have a ... "Scotus'-Potus" Justice for Trump in 2021 ?....

--------------------------------------

us_2020_elecs_fraud__navarro_report_graphic_1_navarro_report__eurofora_screnshot_400

(1 among 5 Parts of Navarro Report on Election Fraud+Irregularities in 6 Swing States)

---------------------------

    It all Started with an Overall View of Wide-Spread Fraud and Gross Irregularities' Growing Findings on the Most Controversial Ever US Presidential Elections of 2020, particularly in 6 Key "Swing" States, Recently resumed in a Synthetic Report Published by White House's Experienced Adviser Peter Navarro, usualy in charge of Trade, which is ironically TItled : "Immaculated Deception"...

    In Addition to the Impressive Total Volume of Various Converging Wrongdoings Denounced in his Report, Navarro clearly Pictures Also the Most Troubling Fact of a too Frequent Repetition of a Similar Worrying "Pattern" of Incidents Obviously Raising Questions on probable Fraud in Equivalent Ways, in Most or All of those 6 "Swing" States, which gave Biden the opportunity to usurpate that Election : I.e., mainly, a Sudden and Abrupt "U-Turn", Reversing a Trump's initialy Winning Trend, into a Losing one, through a Big Patch of Ballots for Biden, at AbNormaly Elevated Numbers, After an UnExpected Interruption of the Counting, in ihe Middle of the Night or at 4 to 6 am. Early Next Morning, (Often When Republican Observers had Gone)... Indeed, a Similar Phenomenon had Notoriously led OAS, back on 2019, to Denounce the Presidential Election in Bolivia as Flawed, (See Infra).

-----------------------

 trump_speech__call_for_peoples_voice_trump_video__eurofora_screenshot_400

https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/videos/219439113008326/

    + Trump Went on, soon Afterwards, Nowadays, with a Short but Dense and Sharp Speech, at the White House, giving a Crystal-Clear "UnDate" of the Fight against Fraud in the US 2020 Presidential Election, Resuming the most Scandalous Old and New Evidence Found, and Concluding by a Vibrant Call that "Now is the Time for the American People to Raise their Voice !", because "the Future of Democracy in our Country Depends on it"... (See relevant Video, attached herewith).

    => He, significantly, Stressed that, Shortly After having Just Published a relevant Tweet on the above-mentioned Navarro Report with an Overall view of All the Fraud/Irregularities Evidence Found until now, (Comp. Supra), which Concluded with an Exceptional Mention of a Forthcoming, Massive Popular Rally for Protest in Washington DC, which would be ..."Wild", as he Characteristicaly warned,

usa_elec_fraud__6_jan_pop_demo__logo__march_onj_congress__x3_milllion_maga_march__euroora_400 

    Pointing at the Crucial Date of "Jan. 6", 2021, i.e. the Same Day that the US Congress is due to hold an Official "Reading" of the Election's Result, presented by the Controversial Biden's "Great Electors", (Facing whom, GOP has Notoriously Chosen also its own Electors, at "Alternarive" Slates)... Mewnhile, the Number of Representatives and/or Senators reportedly Enclined to Question the Credebtials of Controversialy Chosen "Electors" at Fraud/Irregularities-striken "Swing" States, (Object, in Parallel, of the 1st Trump's Team Legal Complaint Now Docked at the US Federal Supreme Court), seems to be Rising, (f.ex. reportedly, with 25 Rep.s having Already Signed a Call to do so), even if it remains to be seen what could be, eventualy, done in order to Bypass the Lack of a pro-Trump Majority in the House, Contrary to what is Already the case in the Senate, in order to Simply Reject thoss Controversial so-called Electors' Credentials. Perhaps, Vice-President Pence's role as Senate's President, might Play a Role, (as some Suggested, being Re-Twitted by Trump), by Considering that No UnQuestionably Legaly Chosen Electors have Yet been Officialy Presented to him, so that such a Controversial Procedure might Not Yet go on as if Nothing happened... And there are, Also, Other relevant Developments which Could Evolve in the Meantime, (as we shall See Infra)...

 usa_rep_boebert__presente__on_jan_6_boebert__eurofora_400

usa_elec_fraud__6_jan_pop_demo__logo_milllion_maga_march__euroora_400

 us_2020_elec_fraud__for_popular_demonstation_of_jan_6_million_maga_march__eurofora_400                                               

    >>> At any case, President Trump's Call for a Jan. 6 Big Popular Rall, Immediately Became "Viral" at the Web, with Many and Various NGOs, Journalists, Activists, etc., Echoing and Blowing Further that Initial Invitation, Starting by "NTD", "Million Maga March" and "Trump March", (by "Women for Trump", who Organise Now a Bus Tour Not from Florida, as Before, But mainly from Texas, as well as California and Other States, towards Wash. DC, added to MMM's Collective Transport Network, Centered between Tenessee, Alabama, Michigan and Boston, linked to WDC), and Soon Joined also by "Stop the Steal", "Women for America First", and Other Groups, (including a Welcomed "Protection" by the "Proud Boys" against Brutal Aggressions by "Antifa" or other Violent Leftist Extremists, as in the Past), etc. Already, RDV are given for as Early as since "7 a.m." at the Capitol, for the US Congress, followed by "12 a.m." at Wash. DC's large "Plaza", etc. Soon, inter alia, f.ex. Significant of the overall Ambiance, Popular Alex Jones' "Info-Wars" Web News, Launched also a Vibrant Call to Enlarge that Rally into a ..."10 Millions" (sic !) People Massive Move to ..."Occupy" ("Peacefully") Washington DC, as he Urged !

usa_2020_elec_fraud__6_jan_demo_mmm_roads_network_millionmagamarch__eurofora_400

us_2020_elec_fraud__jan_6_march_for_trump__map_mft__eurofora_400 

 

 usa_elec_fraud__6_jan_pop_demo__video_with_trump_text_superbe__milllion_maga_march__euroora_400

https://twitter.com/i/status/1341866672861409292

(Video with Exceptional, Wonderful short Text...)

 ---------------------------------------------

us_2020_elec_fraud__tribute_to_free_america__ebaixanda_resistencia_video__eurofora_screenshot_400

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdDFcDHdPtY&feature=youtu.be

+Some People are Dreaming at "the Genesis of the New Revolution of Information" !

[See in Fine]

---------------------------

    + Meanwhile, an Interesting Development is that such Moves Coincided Also with a Sharp Call, Endorsed by President Trump himself, to Meet the "Need" for a "Strong, Fast, and Fair SPECIAL COUNSEL" to seriously Investigate "the massive Voter Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election", ..."IMMEDIATELY !", as he tweeted. A "Special Counsel" is quite Difficult to Remove Afterwards by Opposed Forces, Even by a New US President, (Perhaps Biden), as Muehler's Precedent, for the Notorious "Witch-Hunt" in the alleged "Russian Interference in US Election" of 2016, which Durated as Long as Until ...2019, Obviously shows. And Lawyer Sydney Powell, (as, f.ex; General Flynn has suggested), hershelf a former Attorney, would Certainly be Motivated and probably Keen to Investigate Efficiently for the Truth in that Fraud and Irregularities' Row at the Controversial US 2020 Presidential Election. But, it Remains, still, to be seen Who might Replace her as Lawyer in the Legal Complaints that she has Already Launched Independently, representing Interested Simple Citizens, (Starting by 2 among the 6 "Swing" States : Pennsylvania and Georgia, whose Electors' Number would be Sufficient for Trump to Reach a 270 Majority in order to WIn). - -"Americans must be able to have complete Faith in the confidence of their Elections. The Fate of our Democracy Depends upon it", stressed President Trump in its above_mentioned Latest Speech, (Comp. Supra). "We canNot allow a completely Fraudulent election to stand" Against People's “Sacred Right to Vote.”

    - But, in the meantime, the US Federal Supreme Court, which has just Docketed the 1st Legal Complaint by Trump's team against alleged Fraud and Gross Irregularities, First of all in Pennsylvania's case, (the "Swing" State with the Biggest Number of Electors), did Not Yet take any other Timely Action, Urgently Asked by the Plaintifs, on December 22 or 23, against the Controversial Certification of pro-Biden Electors, (in order to be Ready at the Jan. 6 Official "Reading" by the US Congress : Comp. Supra), Leaving that Key Matter "in libo", at least for the moment, while its Clerk's Office even Noted ..."Jan. 22" as a Date for the Respondent State to Reply, i.e. After Even the usually Scheduled "Inauguration" of the US President for the 2021-2024 Period, as Obervers noted. Even if Attorney Eastman reportedly Pointed out that, in Fact, the Judges themselfs have Not Yet Decided what Date they shall "Order", and that They Can, Still, Do do, at one or another Moment, Independently of that "Mechanical", quasi-Automatic 30 Days Time Deadline, Routinely Noted by the Clercs at Any Ordinary Case, Nevertheless, this Still Open Question of the Right Timing for Efficiency, Obviously makes Also Thing What Might Happen, indeed, in the Foreseable Future, IF, Eventually, the Jan. 6 and Jan. 20 Deadlines (Comp. Supra) were, Perhaps, crossed by SCOTUS...

    + However, Recently, there is Also a Fast-Growing Legal and Practical Struggle about Preserving or, on the Contrary, Destroying Precious Factual Evidence on What Really Happened during these Controversial 2020 US Presidential Election, since Local Dems, Curiously, More and More Oppose, quasi-Systematiclly, almost All Republicans' Efforts to SafeGuard and Access Material Proof, Both on Paper and/or in Digital form (f.ex. in Electronic Voting Machines, Copies of Counting, etc), which could be of invaluable importance in order to Find the Truth in case of Any Serious and Thorough Investigation. Already, Various but Converging Refusals, Rejections, and Other such Procedural Obsracles, were Opposed, By Local Authorities (mainly Controled by Dems) and/or Local Courts, (in their Large Majority following "Partisan" lines, as the TransAtlantic International Organisation of OSCE, which had send a Monitoring Mission to Check the 2020 US Elections, Clearly Denounced at its "Preliminary Report" of 4 Nov., on the Occasion of More than ...400 Legal Cases against Dems' UnPrecedented Push to Radically Lower Security Threshholds, by Accepting Various Controversial and Dangerous ways to Vote : f.ex. "Mail-in" and/or Other "Absentees"' Ballots, including "Drop Boxes", Even at the Roads, "Parc" Ballots, "Drive Through" Voting, etc. Added to the Controversial "Dominion" Electronic Voting Machines, Non-Verification of Signatures, etc). Such currently Growing and Scandalous, Added Threats to Destroy Evidence and Hide the Truth, Must be Clearly Denounced and Strongly Eradicated, Before they cause Irremediable and Serious Harm to Democracy and People's Rights !

-------------------------------------

 oas__eurofora_400_01

    => For All those Reasons, the Time has Come for a Comparison with the Recent Case of Bolivia's 2019 Presidential Election's alleged Fraud, concerning the Main Principles used by the Organisation of American States (OAS), which Notoriously Slamed that Controversial Vote, Helping, thus, to Sanction those considered to be Responsible, and Causing a Full Political Change, a Few Months After that Event, for Reasons Astonishingly Similar to a Key Part of the Present, US 2020 Presidential Elections :

 oas_initial_press_release_on_2019_bolivia_election_us_congress__eurofora_400

    >>> Indeed, as Both OAS' immediate "Press Release", then, and its "Final Report", as well as Several Official Statements attest, as well as Many Old and Recent, comprehensive, Press Articles, Both those which Criticise and those which Support its Findings, the Main Points for which that International Organisation (which has Monitored Also the US 2020 Elections) notoriously Expressed its "Concern" and "Surprize" for those 2019 Bolivian Election, were a Sudden, Last-Minute, too Abrupt Reversal of the Initial Results, added Also to alleged "Statistical Improbabilities" of the Final Outcome presented by those who Backed the Controversial then fomer President Morales, (who had been Re-Elected too Many Times in the Past, to the Point that he had to Seek an AnOrthodox Way in order to be Able to put, Again and Again, his Candidature, at the Margins of Legality)...

oas_findings_in_bolivia_pres._election_of_2019_oas__eurofora_400

    - And, Precisely, as it's Well Known, Both these 2 Key Issues : A Sudden and too Abrupt Reversal of the Initial Results of the Voting Day, by Late, OverNight Submitted, and Controversial Patches of Ballots ad Counting Pushing at an Opposite Direction, Added to Various Astonishing "Statistical ImProbabilities" at the Final Official but Controversial alleged "Results", are Also at the Heart of this 2020 US Presidential Election Row Too ! (See, f.ex., among Many Others, also : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usaelectionaftermath1.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usa2020electoralfraudproofgrows.html, etc). Interestingly, Except those 2 Key Points, which Obviously Made that Election too, Look Suspicious for Fraud, there were, Practicaly, Not Any other Direct "Proofs" or Blatant Evidence of Fraud, then, but Only Some Additional Discrepancies or Punctual Irregularities, according to OAS' Final Report, And that was Enough !

    => The Consequence, then, in Bolivia, was that OAS' Criticism, and mainly its Final Report, Published Later-on, By Strongly Criticizing that Controversial Election as Heavily Suspect for Fraud and Gross Irregularities, Added to Many Popular Demonstrations by the Numerous Supporters of the Candidate who had been UnJustly Evicted, as well as Notable Press Criticism inside and Outside of the Country, (etc), repotedly Led, at least a Part of the Police to Later Abstain from Oppressing the Protesters, and Finally, several Weeks After Morales was fraudelously "Inaugurated" as President, a Key Part of the National Army's Leadership Refused to Strike Against the Growing Wave of Popular Demonstrations, apparently Indicating to Morales that he Should Drop that, too Controversial and Apparently "Stolen" Presidency, by Withdrawing from the Political Leadersip of the Country, in order to Prepare New and UnQuestionably Fair Elections, the soonest possible. That's Exactly what he did, Choosing, at his own Initiative, to Flee Abroad, Initialy to Mexico, But Soon After to Argentina, where he stayed Until Recently, when he just Returned Back to Bolivia, as a Private Person, Going to live in a Remote Region known for having Many of his Fans there, (Even after his Former Party, Later Came Back in Power, But with AnOther, Different Candidate for Presidet Nowadays)...

-----------------------------

evo_morales__biden_eurofora_patchwork_400 

    >>> The Most Important Fact, in Comparison with the 2020 US Presidential Election, is that the Above-mentioned, Relevant Denonciation by the OAS, was, and Still is, Both Back on 2019 and Even this Year 2020, Until Nowadays, "Hotly" Debated in the Medias, including of the USA, with those Standing at the Left Side, usualy Criticizing OAS' Conclusions as Allegedly, unFounded, and those Standing at the Right Side, usualy Defending OAS' Denonciations, as Well Founded and Just. But, 1 Key Point is Universaly Shared by Both Sides, in this case : Indeed, Nobody Ever Contested, until now, the PRINCIPLES, the MAIN CRITERIA, on which OAS had been Based in order to Challenge  Morales' Controversial Election, Suspected for Fraud, (which were mainly 2, as we saw Above). And this Includes Even Notorious "Left"-leaning, Mainstream Medias, such as UK's "Guardian", and USA's "Washington Post" or "New York Times", etc, But Also Other, Morales' Supporters in Latin America, etc. The Only thing that Leftist Critics Contested was, in Fact, the Way that OAS reportedly Applied those Principles and Criteria, to the Concrete Data of that Morales' case, Claiming, that, according to Their ownn Analysis of those Facts, the Real Situation in Bolivia, then, would Not Contradict OAS' above-mentioned Principles...

    => But, this is, in Fact, a Big and Precious "Boost" (by ...Both those Leftist Critics and Rightist Supporters of that OAS' stance on the Bolivian 2019 Election) in Favor of US President Don Trump's position, Nowadays, as far as the present, 2020 US Presidential Election Controversy is concerned ! Simply Because Both Admit that important "Statistical Improbabilities", and a too Abrupt, Last Minute Reversal of an Election's Initial Results, withOut Any Known Convincing Explanation, added to some Converging Irregularities, in Principle, are Sufficient Proof that an Election has been Rigged, Stolen, withOut Asking to "Prove" Nothing More...

    + Moreover, Even if we Go to the Detailed, Concrete Facts of Each Case, ...Again Trump's main position Clearly Wins ! Indeed, the Leftist pro-Morales Critics of OAS basicaly Claim that there would be an alleged "Lack of Any Big Jump, (sic !) in support for Morales after the Halt" of Votes' Counting, OverNight, Back on 2019, as "Washington Post" Claims. However, in the case of Biden, on 2020, it's Not about Simple ..."Jumps", as in the case of Morales. But, in Fact, about Big ... "Rocket" Launches, that it is, i.e. a, Comparatively, very Different Situation, concerning Much Bigger Dimensions... Indeed, while, in Morales' case, the Maximum Quantity of Last-Minute Ballots Counted, reportedly was about 52% or 58%, on the Contrary, in the case of Biden, it is about ...78% or 80%, (according to Biden himself, speaking of Pennsylvania, on Nov. 4), if not even 90% of the Votes (according to Lawyer Powell, in some Other cases). At Pennsylvania, OverNight, People were reportedly Shocked by an UnBelievable, Sudden ... 99,5% v. 0,5%, (giving Biden 570.000 Votes and to Trump Only 3.200, according to GOP's Representatives, noted Rep Mastriano, cited by "Newsmax") ! And that, withOut Clear Explanation on How Bidden could, Also, Guess, at a Moment When the Late Counting was Still Going on, at the Morning of Nov. 4, Boast in Public that he would Even Continue to Find such a Blatantly DisProportional, Last Minute Super-Majority, as almost 80% (Comp. Supra) for All or Most the Remaining Ballots, BEFORE they were Counted, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usaelectionaftermath1.html, etc)...

    => I.e.  Facts in BIDEN's case of Fraud Risks, Obviously Appear as Much More WORSE than that of MORALES, (Considering, Also, the Manifold Additional Gros Problems in this Exceptional 2020 US Presidential Election, whete, Notoriously, "Mail-in" Ballots, "Drop Boxes", "Parc" Boxes, "Drive Through" Voting, No Verification of Signatures, etc, Added Even to the Notrious, and still Evolving, Controversial "Dominion" Electronic Machines' System, and Various Other, Converging Exceptional, UnPrecedented Dimensions of Discrepancies)... It's Enough to Compare what alleged Facts most Mainstream, even Leftist Medias (including, f.ex., NYT, WAPO, Guardian, BBC, etc) were Talking about, in that Condemned 2019 Bolivian Election, with What we can all See in these, Much More Suspected for Massive Fraud US 2020 Presidential Election, in order to Easily Realize that Nowadays' Problem is Scandalously, and, Obviously, by Far, the Worst !

    >>> In Consequence, it Could be very Interesting to Observe Also What would be the Final Reports' Conclusions, this time, on these very Controversial 2020 US Presidential Elections, (Compared with Bolivia's 2019 Case : Comp. Supra), f.ex. in the OAS, OSCE (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usasupremecourtandvotefraud.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/euosceoascoeonusaelectionrow.html), etc., as well as the potential Findings of an Eventual "Special Counsel" for an Investigation on Massive Fraud/Gross Irregularities' alllegations in that Vote (Comp. Supra), Naturally Added to a US Federal Supreme Court expected Judgement on the Merits of Law Suits Sufficient to Cover the Real, Overall Problematic Situation in the 6 "Swing" States, in order to See whether the Same Basic Principles will be Applied in this 2020 USA case, as in that Recent Precedent of Bolivia's 2019 case, and if there would be "Double Standards", or, on the Contrary, at least an Elementary Justice for American People's Right to Vote for their Leaders in Free and Fair Elections, or Not.

    It would, Indeed, become a Big Historic Scandal, with incalculable Socio-Political Repercussions in the forseable Future, if all those Interational Organisations, (as OAS, which reportedly attended Both Bolivian and USA Presidential Elections of 2019 and 2020, EU, which Watched Bolivia, But Not USA, OSCE, which is due to Publish its Final Report in the Middle of January 2021, etc), Mainstream National and International Medias, (which have abudantly Commented on Both those Bolivian and these USA Controversial Elections : Comp. Supra), USA's Federal Supreme Court, (which has Notoriourly, fully Heard a Long "Bush v. Gore" case, back on 2000, But Not Yet Any "Trump v. Biden" case on 2020 !), Logically Added to a Similar "Special Counsel" Investigation on Fraud and possible Foreign Interferences (f.ex. via Canada HQ and Europe + Latin America related "Dominion" Electronic Machines' Controversy, China and/or Ukraine etc., alleged Corruption Suspicions, etc), might, Perhaps, Finally Apply Blatantly "Double Standards" (particularly on Main Principles : Comp. Supra), in Comparison between these so close 2019 Bolivian and 2020 USA cases...

    => Is it really Possible, and would that be Acceptable by the American People, for USA's Democracy to Eventualy become Nowadays More Downgraded and Less Principled than that of Bolivia ?     

    The Crucial Next Weeks/Months Will Tell.-

 

us_elec_fraud__hocus_pocus_or_scotus_potus_2021_walt_disney_movie__eurofora_patchwork_400_02 

    >>> In this regard, Probably, a Positive Solution would be, Preferably, Not to Fall to the Trap of a 2020 "Hocus-Pocus", "Diabolic Witches"' Fraud Scandal around a Politicaly Weakened (by Fraud + Corruption + Establishment Controversies) Mr. Biden, (as some Obviously push to Impose, including  by an Unprecedented Establishment's Medias Biais and Censorship by Big-Tech. even of Citizens' Free Speech at the Internet, etc), But, Rather, to Find a much More Legal, pro-Democracy, and Citizen-Friendly PathWay, f.ex. through a kind of US Federal Supreme Court-backed "SCOTUS-POTUS" 2021 move, Near to Famous late Justice Scalia's Views on Not Counting "Questionable Legality Votes", in order to Safeguard People's "Trust" for "Democratic Stabiiity", (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/usasupremecourtforpeopleclassaction.html, etc), by Giving a Real Chance for the UnContested 75 Millions Votes, Historic Record -Backed President Don Trump, to, at last, become Free to Work for 4 Years on USA's Main Economic, Technological, Citizen-Friendly, Freedom of Speech in the Digital Age, a.o. Issues, as well as for more Peace (Not Other Wars) in the World.

 

biden__swing_states__snowwhite__7_dwarfs_fairy_tale__eurofora_patchwork_400_01 

    On the Contrary, an Eventual ... "Walt Disney" CEO pro-Biden remake "Fairy Tale" about ..."SnowWhite and the 7 Dwarfs" (Read : Biden's Controversial Claims on Fraud/Irregularities-stricken 6 "Swing" States plus New Mexico, which Also Send an "Alternative" slate of Great Electors to Washington DC's Jan. 6, US Congress Official Ceremony : See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/bidenliesinelectorsrowasfraudproofgrows.html), really does Not seem able at all to Convince a Mature, Developed, and Experienced American People, (Neither the International Opinion, Worldwide, which is carefuly Watching, and Registering what's Really going on in the USA Nowadays), at an obviously Historic Crossroads...

 

 2020_gets_not_the_last_word__crossing_church_video__eurofora_screenshot_400_01

 https://youtu.be/hpI_66v3QcE

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

----------------------------------

EUDigitalForum

Statistics

Posetioci: 60178779

Archive

Login Form





Upamti me

Izgubili ste lozinku?
Nemate nalog? Napravite nalog

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Rezultati

SMF Recent Topics SA

PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING 
PHP WARNING