english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Αρχική arrow newsitems arrow Syrian Kurd Leader Maslem to EF on Afrin after Turkish Army Invasion : Danger of Islamist Terrorism

Syrian Kurd Leader Maslem to EF on Afrin after Turkish Army Invasion : Danger of Islamist Terrorism

Έχει γραφτεί από ACM
Monday, 23 April 2018

syrian_kurdish_political_leader_salem_mohamed_maslem_to_eurofora_at_the_coe_400 
 
*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/- Invited anew by MEPs to the CoE, at a Side Event organized during the PanEuropean Organisation's Parliamentary Assembly's plenary session of Spring 2018, as also Back at Kobane City"s Siege by ISIS Deadly Islamist Terrorists on 2014 (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/syriankurdsheadtoeuroforaatthecoe.html), the Syrian Kurdish Political Leader, former co-Head of the "Democratic Union Party" (PYD  :  which notoriously helped the International Coalition to succesfully Fight against ISIS ' atrocious BeHeaders and Coward Killers Targetting innocent Civilian People), Saleh Mohamed Maslem, replying to an "Eurofora" Question, Warned that what the Turkish Army just did at the Syrian Kurdish Canton of Afrin, is "very Dangerous" for the Spread of Deadly Islamist Terrorism  : 

What happened to Afrin Canton was "a kind of Relief for ISIS" Deadly Terrorists, cowardly Targetting Civilian People, inter alia also because several Kurdish Fighters who were struggling against ISIS near Iraq borders, had to leave towards Afrin to face the Turkish Military Invasion/Occupation, and Terrorists already started to exploit that. 
 
 
coe_event__syrian_kurd_politician_conference_reply_to_agg_quest_eurofora_400 

Meanwhile, in Addition, "we don't know what Turkey is Planning there".

- "Is it trying to make a Capital of Terrorism at Afrin ?", he wondered. 

-"Why are all those Armed Radical Groups going there  ?", he wondered. Will they establish Radicalized Schools, and/or "Training centers"   ? 
  
+ And Afrin is just Neighbouring Idlib, where all Radicals and Terrorists have been concentrated, from all sides of Syria, both from ISIS, Al-Queda and their likes...Many are even Foreigners, (as, f.ex., Hundreds of Afghans, etc).

While, at the same time, there are about 130.000 Displaced People from Afrin already at a Camp, and around 200.000 Refugees in Total, who had to Abandon their Homes, Fields and Livelihood, needing now to Return under UN Safeguards.

We shouldn't also forget that, in the recent Past, f.ex, "the Turkish Consulate at Mosul, served in fact as ISiS' HeadQuarters for Years  !", he Denounced. 

=> So, "Yes, possibly, Everything shows" that, after what happened at Afrin, the Spread of Terrorism is very Dangerous" now, he concluded by a stern Warning. 
 
 - When he spoke, 3 Bloody Massacres Targetting Civilian People had just been committed anew in France, Germany and Russia, while a 4rth one was just added some Hours Later, on Canada, (After a Period of relative Calm, Before the Turkish Military Invasion/Occupation of the Syrian Kurdish canton of Afrin)...
 
 
(../..)
 

---------

Multi-lingual Interface

Statistics

Επισκέπτες: 28963305

Archive

Login Form





Να με θυμάσαι

Ξεχάσατε τον Κωδικό Πρόσβασης;
Δεν έχετε λογαριασμό ακόμα; Δημιουργία λογαριασμού

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML
imag0218_400_01

(Opinion).

 In Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs, as the New EU Parliament's President, new EU Commission's President (+ probably EU Council's President, EU Foreign Minister, etc) should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies.

At the heart of the biggest EU Countries, in France and Germany, EU Citizens clearly voted for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe based on Values, declared explicitly incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

This main choice was also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries, such as Austria (cf. promise of a Referendum), Spain (cf. EPP program's reservations vis a vis Enlargment), etc., while EPP Parties won also in Poland, Hungary, Cyprus, etc.

In other Countries, whenever Governing coalitions didn't make these choices or eluded them, continuing to let a Turkish lobby push for its entry into the EU, they paid a high price, and risked to damage Europe, by obliging EU Citizens to massively vote for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to offer a possibility to promise  real change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU :

It's for this obvious reason that British UKIP (IndDem) succeeded now (after many statements against Turkey's EU bid) to become Great Britain's 2nd Party, unexpectedly growing bigger even than the Governing Labour Party, as well as the Liberal party  ! Facts prove that it's not an isolated phenomenon : A similar development occured in the Netherlands, where Geert Wilders "Party for Freedom" (PVV) became also the 2nd biggest in the country, (after EPP), boosting the chances of a politician who had withdrawn in 2004 from an older party "because he didn't agree with their position on Turkey". And in several other EU Member Countries, even previously small parties which now focused on a struggle against Turkey's controversial demand to enter in the EU, won much more or even doubled the number of their MEPs (fex. Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, etc).

On the contrary, whenever Socialist and oher parties were explicitly or implicitly for Turkey's controversial EU bid, they obviously lost Citizens' votes and fell down to an unprecedented low.

In consequence, EU Citizens clearly revealed their main political choices, in one way or another : They voted to change for less Bureaucracy, but more Politics and Values in a Europe really open to EU Citizens, but without Turkey's controversial EU bid.

Recent political developments are obviously different from the old political landscape which existed in the Past of 1999-2004, when Socialists based on Turkish 1% vote governed undisputed not only in Germany, but also in the UK, Greece and elsewhere, France followed old policies decided when it had been divided by "cohabitation", before the 3 "NO" to EU  Referenda since May 2005, before Merkel, before Sarkozy, etc.... before the surprises of 7 June 2009 new EU Elections.

If the current candidates to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, OK.

Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People.

The beginning of crucial, final Decisions are scheduled for the 1st EU Parliament's plenary session in Strasbourg, in the middle of July, and they could be completed towards the October session, when Lisbon Treaty's fate will have been fixed.


See relevant Facts also at : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/2009electionsandturkey.html
http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/daulelections.html
http://www.eurofora.net/brief/brief/euroelectionresult.html

 ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Αποτελέσματα

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.