english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow PACE shoots itself on the foot:2 Months more Russia Sanctions=1 year CoE replaced by OSCE on Ukraine

PACE shoots itself on the foot:2 Months more Russia Sanctions=1 year CoE replaced by OSCE on Ukraine

Written by ACM
Wednesday, 28 January 2015

*Strasbourg/CoE/Angelo Marcopolo/- A Divided PanEuropean CoE Assembly seems to have shot itself on the foot, by provoking, practically, its prolonged Exclusion from forthcoming efforts to find a Political Solution to the crucial Ukranian conflict, to the profit of the Trans-Atlantic OSCE, which had already started to seriously profit from COE's practical absence on Ukraine, since last Year, (2014 : See Infra).

Droping, at the last minute, an initially agreed Compromise to restore Russian Delegation's credentials at COE's Assembly and give it Time until June 2015 in order to advance towards a Settlement of the Ukranian conflict, a controversial move inside the PanEuropean Parliamentary body of Strasbourg pushed to prolonge further, on the contrary, serious Sanctions which already deprived Russian MEPs from their Rights to Vote and participate in PACE's leading organs, at least until April 2014, asking Moscow to make a long series of serious Concessions before restoring its full Rights here.

This immediately Triggered, as the Leadership of the Russian Delegation had already Warned clearly since last week, (Comp., f.ex. : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/dumasnaryskinandpacesbrasseurdiscussukraine.html), a Sharp Reaction from the Russian MEPs, (exceptionaly Headed by Duma's President, Naryshkin, himself : Comp. Supra : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/dumapresidentforcoeunityagainstislamistterrorism.html ), who anounced officialy their Decision to Suspend any Participation to the PACE for one more Year, and, instead, focus, during all 2015, to the OSCE Organisation, headquartered at Vienna, which has already started to play a role of Growing Importance on efforts to settle the Ukranian issue, since last year, when it was chaired by Switzerland's President and Foreign Minister Burkhalter, (Comp. "EuroFora"s NewsReports from the latest Annual OSCE Summit, December 2014, at nearby Basel : f.ex. http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/oscechairburkhalteronukraineandsecuritysystem.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/oscesgzannieronshanghaiorganisation.html ).

 It seems that the assurances and formal declarations, by most, if not all, CoE Assembly's Political Leaders, these Days in Strasbourg, that they stand for inclusive Dialogue on Ukraine towards Peace, might have been pushed aside, in real practice, by a Group of MEPs eventually following other orientations and/or from elsewhere...


Already, since a 1st round of controversial PACE Sanctions against Russian MEPs, which provoked their departure from the Beginning of April 2014, notoriously started a real Civil War inside Ukraine's Eastern area, with many  Military Attacks using Heavy Weapons against the Autonomist Regions of Lugansk/Luhansk, which has Killed more than 5.400 People and Wounded more than 10.500, according to UNO's  official estimates, including many Civilians, particularly amon the Lugansk/Luhansk population.

However, the specific Added Value of the CoE was recently demonstrated, when, after a 1st succesful Counter-Offensive from the Autonomists of Lugansk/Luhansk regions, from August 24, PACE President Anne Brasseur invited Russian Duma's President Naryshkin, for the First Time, in Paris for Top Talks with the Chairs of all the Political Groups of MEPs, on the 1st and 2nd September 2014, and invited him to a High-Level Conference of all CoE Member States' House Speakers in Norway, later this Month, inditrectly but surely facilitating the September 5 Agreements among  protagonists of the Ukranian conflict at Minsk, (Belarusia), which opened, also, for the 1st time, a Hope for a sustainable Cease-Fire and a series of reciprocal Steps towards Peace.


The Opposition inside PACE, from various MEPs who Disagree with Sanctions versus Russia, is unquestionably Strong, as Tonight's data reveal :

CoE's competent Rapporteur himself, Shenach from Austria, (who also Chairs PACE's Monitoring Committee),  voted against what he denounced as "Destroying a Compromise", contrary to what had been initially agreed at the level of the competent Committee, (where the last-minute move for prolonging Sanctions reportedly passed with "only 1 vote" difference)...

Most MEPs from Serbia, (which Chairs, throughout all the Year of 2015 the OSCE, fully engaged in the Ukraine issue), also voted against. As did also their collegues from Armenia and Azerbaidjan, etc.

They were joined by Cyprus' MEPs, who voted against, while all Greece's MEPs were notoriously obliged to be Absent, because of last Sunday's crucial National Elections, (even if the New Majority leader, Alexis Tsipras, already gave a clear indication by denouncing in public the fact that an EU Council's very critical anouncement versus Russia, published in the name of all EU Heads of State/Government, reportedly hadn't taken into account the Greek Goverment's critical remarks.

By irony of the sort, most Greek MEPs appeared, exceptionaly, in agreement, at least on this point, with most (even if not all) Turkish MEPs, who voted against Sanctions, (apparently fearing that their turn might come shortly afterwards)...

In addition, most Italian MEPs, and particularly All those coming from the 1st Party of the Country, that of the "5 Stars Movement" of Bepe Grillo, notoriously against Sanctions to Russia, were alo obliged to be Absent, because of an imminent Election of the Country's new President.

Those exceptionaly obliged to be Absent, Greek and Italian MEPs, could have added more than 20 Votes against Sanctions, which would have grown Higher than 80+ Votes all together, just by that. Added also to the 18 Russian MEPs, who were exceptionaly Hindered to Vote in this case, the overall Opposition to Today's controversial PACE move to prolonge Sanctions, might have normaly reached around 100 MEPs, together with 6 Abstentions, revealing a sharply Divided PACE.

Significantly, mainstream Center-Right MEPs from France's main Opposition Party, UMP, headed by former President Nicolas Sarkozy, (member of the ChristianDemocratic/EPP Group),  as f.ex. Mariani and Ponzo di Borgo (new President of PACE's Committee on the Fight against Terrorism, topically important in front also of the recent Massacre of French Journalists and other Civilians by Extremist Islamist Terrorists), faithful to a Gaullist spirit of "Great Europe", voted against.

The former President of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group, Italian MEP Volonte, appeared also favorable to a more balanced and fair treatment of the Russian Delegation to the PACE, (judging from what he said yesterday at a Meeting with Duma's President Naryshkin).

Paradoxically, they were joined by several German MEPs, mainly of the SPD, as well as by the President of PACE's Socialist Group, experienced mainstream MEP Andreas Gross, followed by a number of Socialist MEPs from various other Countries (except French SP), and even by almost All MEPs of the "EuroLeft" Group, from many Countries.

In addition to the Presidents of the Socialist and EuroLeft Groups, Gross and Cox, it's also a 3rd President of a Political Group of MEPs : Jordi Xucla from Spain, chairman of Liberals, who did Not Vote for Sanctions, but prefered to abstain, followed by 3 other Liberal MEPs, while a 4rth one, Destexhe from Belgium (the current CoE's rotating Chair) voted Against.

This didn't hinder several Rightist MEPs, (particularly from Austria, but also Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, etc) to vote also against, (and this would have certainly augmented a lot the "No" Votes, if France's Biggest Party at the latest Elections (those or May 2014 for EU Parliament), i.e. the "National Front"'s rightists, had started to have a normal representation at the National French Parliament, (which appoints its representatives to the PACE).


=> Therefore  -and given the Importance for all Europe, of what is at Stake around the Tragic and Dangerous Ukranian issue- nobody can exclude, a priori, possible Changes in CoE Assembly's stance, towards a more consequent, balanced, fair and efficient modus-vivendi and modus-operanti.

Otherwise, out-going US President Barack Obama's reported pressure these days to ... "Isolate diplomatically Russia" (sic !), might have managed to manipulate too easily the PanEuropean CoE, in order to Cut it Off from crucial Political Developments on Ukraine, to the benefit of the Trans-Atlantic OSCE, with a much Wider participation of Member Countries, including USA, so that Strasbourg's Organization and PanEuropean Unity may pay a too High Price for what could finaly look as a useless provocation or even a serious Blunder, as the precedent of 2014 already showed, (Comp. Supra).

Unless OSCE's 2015 Presidency by Russia-Friendly Serbia, (followed from 2016 by heavy-weight Germany and afterwards Austria, preceded by an active Switzerland), finaly proves that Moscow might find in Vienna also some interesting perspectives for it, after all...  

Will some PACE's members regret and rectify their Hasty move Soon enough, in order to allow the unique PanEuropean Institution, that of Strasbourg's CoE, to catch-up, before it becomes too late ?



("DraftNews", as already send to "EuroFora" Subscribers/Donors, earlier. A more accurate, full Final Version, might be published asap).




Visitors: 29232005


Login Form

Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account


RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3

Other Menu


Former "Green-Red" German government's Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's job at the controversial Turkish pipeline "Nabucco" was denounced as "not proper", "very bad", and "incompatible with Democracy", by the new President of EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group, German Lothar Bisky, replying to an "EuroFora" question.

For once, criticism of Joschka Fischer's doings with Turkey affecting Europe, didn't come only from the Center-Right of the political spectrum, but even from his Left side : The experienced Bisky, who has been chairing all over 1993-2009 the PDS - Die Linke party :  

- "Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer got involved in dealings with oil-gaz business in a foreign country, Turkey, and its controversial Nabucco pipeline. This raises questions about Democracy, also because of the well known problems of Human Rights violations in that country. Do you thing that this might be abused in order to cover up and close EU's eyes on Human Rights violations ?", "EuroFora" asked Bisky.


- "Nabucco pipeline is (only) at the planning stage". And "there are some difficulties",  he observed from the start. But "'I don't want to get into the details of Nabucco pipeline, because I don't think that there is any point for it at the moment".
At any case,  "we  (EU Parliament's EuroLeft Group) strongly believe that Politicians should not get involved in the Energy Business, and all these commercial transactions", President Bisky declared on the Joschka Fiischer's affair.

- "We feel that it's something that shouldn't be done. It's not proper !"           

- "We don't think that it's compatible with Democracy either, and it gets politics into a very Bad track", Bisky went on to denounce.
- "EuroLeft  and "Die Linke" always spoke against that, saying that politicians should not get directly into the arms of private enterprises"

- "It is pretty bad if a former Minister takes a job f.ex. in a major Energy producer. So, it's an issue if a Minister who may have seen excellent opportunities, subsequently gets personally grasp of them, in very serious parts of the economy, once he has given up his (Government) job."

- "It doesn't really make politics in general look any better'", Bisky concluded.


Earlier, this week in Strasbourg, other Journalists had also raised critical questions on former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's involvement in the conroversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline to the President of his own EuroParty : Kohn-Bendit of the "Greens", who, contrary to Bisky, tried to find excuses for Fischer, while criticizing his long-time partner, Schroeder for having done a similar move :

- "Shroeder was chancellor", and he "negociated" with "Russians", who gave him a job only "3 Months" after he resigned from the Government. While "Joschka Fischer", on the contrary, got a job with the controversial Turkish Nabucco pipeline only "4 Years after" he left the Government. "He didn't negociate Nabucco", so I have "no objection", Kohn Bendit claimed.

But, many Facts indicate the contrary :

Joschka Fischer was Foreign Minister in Germany from 1999 up to 2005 : I.e. from the year that EU took the controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, until he year it started controversial "accession negotiations, (later declared "open-ended" after Sarkozy-Merkel's arrival from 2005-2007).

During that period was prepared the controversial so-called "Annan" Plan (in fact, drafted by others and attributed afterwards to the former UN SG) on Cyprus, which failed after a Popular Referendum said "No" on 2004 with a large Majoriy of 3/4 : 75%. Mainly because it was criticized for making too much concessions to the Turkish side :  Particularly by restricting Greek Cypriot Refugees' Human Right to return to their ancestral Land and/or get restitution of their Familiy Homes and private properties, usurpated by Ankara's Army since the 1974 militay invasion and continuing occupation of the northern part of Cyprus. And by weakening the Central Government, leaving to 2 "constituent States" so much powers and separate interests that more conflicts appeared inevitable, provoking the danger of a break-down in the foreseable future, with more crisis, troubles, perhaps bloodshed, etc., instead of creating an harmoniously integrated, really one federal State.

The controversial Plan was finalized on March-April 2004 at Burgenstock (Switzerland), curiously in the presence of an Envoy by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany, then governed by Joschka Fischer, but in the absence of a French and not even an European Union's Envoy, contrary to what was usually practiced on similar occasions in Switzerland (fex. in 1997 at Montreux, in 2000 at Geneva, etc).

Turkey notoriously exploited the failure of the "Annan" Plan in order to convince the EU to decide to start accession Negotiations on December 2004. This provoked an unprecedented series of Institutional Crisis inside the EU, shortly afterwards, when French and Dutch People rejected, 2 popular EuroReferenda by a majority "'No" vote to the EU Constitutional Treaty on 2005, aggraveted in 2004 a Majority Abstention to EU Elections, etc., followed by the recent Irish "No", etc.

"Nabucco" Gas pipeline was notoriously planned since ..2002. It follows an even earlier idea, for an Oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhun, which started to be prepared on 1999-2001 and was meanwhile recently completed.  

So, facts indicate that what is now at stake is based on decisions made during Joschka Fischer's term as former Foreign Minister, closely interested in Turkey's controversial EU-bid.

To the point that he now practically ...switched jobs with a poliician from Turkey, (the State which pays today openly Joschka Fischer), Mr. Ozdemir, who came earlier in Germany, got fast the nationality, and became EiuroMP in a few years, continuing now as head of the "Greens" in Germany, i.e. in Joschka's former job !...

Such astonishing facts risk, unfotunately, to give to German politician Lothar Bisky's criticism of  representative Democracy a topical meaning :

 - "We (EuroLeft Group) think that what is really at stake is Democracy. It's not only about Gas Pipelines or Energy sources", President Lothar Bisky went on to add in his reply to "EuroFora"'s question on Joscka Fischer's personal interests in the controversial Turkish "Nabuco" pipeline.

Such facts, "make People get more distance from Politics. ...People had had enough, and they are fed up !".

- "That's why we (EuroParliament's "EuroLeft" Group) want to strengthen Direct Democracy in Europe. Citizens should be involved in the (EU) Decision-making. In the end of the day, it's not going to help anyone if Politicians are always taking decisions, without involving Citizens. We want to give a voice to the People of Europe. They've got to have their say in the decisions that are taken. That's one of our absolutely fixed and steadfast views. We want more Direct Democracy in Europe. That's how it can become more effective and stronger", he concluded.




2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?


SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.