english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Inicio arrow newsitems arrow EURapporteur Gomes to EuroFora:No Deadlines in Fight v. Corruption impacting Human Rights+3rd States

EURapporteur Gomes to EuroFora:No Deadlines in Fight v. Corruption impacting Human Rights+3rd States

Escrito por ACM
08.10.13
 
eup_rapporteur_reply__sml_to_ag_quest_400
  

*Strasbourg/EU Parliament/Angelo Marcopolo/- The Fight against Corruption, particularly when it seriously affects Human Rights and even other Countries, must not be limited by narrow Time Deadlines, if the EU wants to be Credible and Efficient, without, otherwise risking to cover up even serious crimes, especially at present when EU Citizens become increasingly aware of the negative role that played various big Errors of the Past, practically supported EU Parliament's Rapporteur on Corruption, both in the Public and Private sector, and its Impact on Human Rights and 3rd Countries, former Ambassador and experienced MEP from Portugal, Ana Gomes, in reply to "EuroFora"s questions, at a Press Conference today, shortly after EU Parliament's Plenary voted to adopt her Report, after discussing it yesterday evening in Strasbourg, following its quasi-Unanimous adoption by the Foreign Affairs Committee, earlier in Brussels, with 28 Votes in favor, 2 Abstentions (by UK's ECR, as she reminded), and Zero against.

-------------------

agg_quest_to_eu_rapporteur_on_corruptionb__hr__400

- "Sometimes, there are Revelations, which might be correct, or not, but must be checked, concerning events which extend a long way into the Past"; "EuroFora" observed from the outset.

euparliaments_anticorruption_rapporteurs_hearing_agg_quest_400

=> - "if this is serious and worthwhile, (i.e.) when Corruption has a serious impact on Human Rights and Third Countries, how far, do you think that we can and should go, from an EU point of view ?", we asked EU Parliament's Rapporteur.

agg_quest_on_corruptiob__time_deadline_400

---------------------------------------

- "I don't think that we (EU) set a ny kind of (Time) LImits", she immediately replied to "EuroFora"s Question.

- Because, "sometimes, things that go long in the Past, can be disclosed Today, and be the source of Attention Nowdays", MEP Gomes observed, in this regard.

eup_rapporteur_to_agg_400

=> - "So, we don't set any kind of (Time) Limits, in this respect : Retroactivity is not limited", concluded EU Parliament's Rapporteur in Reply to the above-mentioned Question raised by "EuroFora".

- "I give you some Examples", she went on to add :

- F. ex., "Yesterday (Monday Evening), when I was introducing the Report, I mentioned the case, where exactly the Time established a link, between what happened in 3rd Countries, and also in the E : I mentioned ... a case that is still on-going in Spain, making the Citizens stunned with the level of Corruption that was going on" there in the Past, "in the Political Parties", even those "in Government", MEP Gomes reminded.

- While, "in Greece, yesterday it was the Day when a Former MInister" was "convicted for Corruption in a case involving Trans-National Corruption throughout Europe", at about 1999-2002", she added.

- "And I actually pointed at the situation in Portugal, where there is also a case", "that is being investigated by the Public Prosecutor. But the two main, Politically responsible Government Officials, so far, have not even been heard by Justice, despite the fact that the 1st case was opened in 2005, and that in Germany there are already Courts' decisions pronouncing people Guilty of Corruption related to Portugal and Greece", so that "Portuguese Prosecutors' are going on in their Investigations for Corruption : fictitious Off Shores in this case", etc. "And this case, dating from 2004, is very much of our Concern, of course", she concluded, speaking in 2013.

>>> In many such cases, "here also, you have examples where there are all sorts of "Standards", which are not in line with EU Values, and clearly prevent us (EU) from being seen as credile Partner in Fighting Corruption and for Human Rights outside of the EU", the competent European Parliament's Rapporteur found, in reply to "EuroFora"s relevant Question (Comp. Supra).

eup_rapporteurs_to_agg_

---------------------------------------------

However, in various other such cases, concerning f.ex. the exceptionaly Heavy Debt provoked in Greece, which seriously affected both Human Rights of many People, but also many Other Countries, from Cyprus up to the entire €uroZone, and, indirectly but surely, even 3rd Countries' corporations and citizens, like Russians, etc., notoriously, the worst Corruption incidents go as far as 1999-2001, concerning attempts to Hide the growing Debt, and even since the Decade of 1980ies, cripled by various Scandals, during which has mainly provoked that excessive and continuing Public Debt, particularly by massively hiring a disproportionate number of many Counter-Productive Cushy-job holders and/or abusive Political Lackeys, scandalously appointed by former Clientelist and/or Nepotist Governments, mainly of PASOK, etc, who now threaten to even get .. "Pensions", etc., for many more Years, without doing anything, risking to out into serious Danger or even practically Nullify all the Economic Progress that the Country may have made meanwhile, (f.ex. on Competitiviness, Primary Budget Surplus, etc), thanks to Grave Sacrifices from productive Businesses and Poor People suffering from various deprivations, unless something is done in order to at least Fire the worst cases among them, put (Financial and/or other) Sanctions on those who illegaly/imegitimately usurpated (and still continue !) 30 Years of undeserved Salaries, Summer Holidays, Social Security, Primes, etc., find and Punish those who are Responsible, before it becomes too late. I.e. any satisfactory and just Solution obviously implies Investigators' Freedom to review all the relevant developments related to Corruption affecting Human Rights, between 1981-2011+, without obstacles.

---------------------------------------------

- But "EU cannot be Credible in the World, if we don't also fight Corruption inside the EU itself, and if we don't make the link with Human Rights' Violations", denounced earlier EU Parliament's Rapporteur, concerning various such kinds of cases.

- Because, today, EU "Citizens are Aware that one of the reasons for which we are here is also Corruption, particularly during the totaly Unregulated Financial sector period of the recent Past, while also a lot of so-called "Security" Compagnies were floating around often without respecting any rules, etc., MEP Gomes added earlier.

=> In consequence, "the EU must have a Strategy" vis a vis such cases of aggravated Corruption, and this Report adopted by EU Parliament' s Plenary was made in order to inspire for adequate Action also other competent EU Parliament's Committees, but even EU Commission, and EU Member States' authorities, she stressed during this same Press Conference in Strasbourg.

----------------------------------------

 

(../..)

 

(NDLR : References helping to Identify Persons were Omitted here, as far as possible).

 

***

 

("DraftNews", as already sent to "EuroFora"s Subscribers/Donors earlier. A more accurate, full Final Version might be published asap).

 

***

 

EUDigitalMedia

Statistics

Visitantes: 56807032

Archive

Login Form

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

swed_eu_400

    The incoming Swedish EU Presidency (July-December 2009) may still remain in favour of Turkey's controversial EU bid, despite June 2009 EU Elections' results, but it has "very strong demands on Turkey"'s obligation to respect EU Rules, said the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, to "EuroFora", reacting to critical Press reports.

    - "I know (that) the link is often made also to Sweden's position on Turkey"'s controversial EU bid. Indeed, "we (Swedish EU Presidency) are very much engaged in the future membership of Turkey, but not without fullfiling all the Criteria".

    - "It's very clear that we (Swedish EU Presidecny) have very Strong Demands on Turkey, in a sort of concept for Future membership of the Union, ...which will be a Long Process...", she stressed.

    This means, in particular, "the Copenhagen Criteria (on Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law), and also the adaptation to the Acquis of the European Union".

     - "If you listen to what Mr. Bildt (the Swedish Foreign Minister) says on Turkey at different occasions, it's very clear : We want Turkey to become part of the Union, in the Future. But we want it to fullfil all the Criteria : The Acquis of the European Union. That's very clear", she concluded.

    The Senior Official of the Swedish Foreign Ministry was reacting to critical Press Reports, from Brussels' Journalists invited by EU Commission's secretariat to Stockholm, who claimed that Bildt was abusing of a ..."Whip" (sic !) against Cyprus, by "threatening" the presence of UNO's Peace-keeping force at the "Green line" which separates the island's Government-controlled areas from the territories occupied by Ankara's army, if Nicosia didn't accept any political solution, regardless of Turkey's demands, before the end of 2009.

        Governing AKEL Party's new Secretary General, Andros Kyprianou, reacted by declaring that no-one can threat the People of Cyprus : -"We shall decide for our Future, and nobody else",  he reportedly said, asking to "keep calm". "In order to find a Solution soon, certain basic Principles must be respected", he stressed, calling those who feel an urgency to use their influence on Turkey. Other Political Parties were more critical.

    This was a reference to recently reported statements by Turkish Minister Bagis, Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan and Turkey's National Security Council (a Military-Political body), accused to push towards a partitionist "2 States" solution, contrary to UNO SC Resolutions for Cyprus' reunification.

    December 2009 is a crucial moment for EU's appraisal of Turkey's controversial EU bid, because EU Council has decided to review then Ankara's compliance with the European position on the recognition of Cyprus' Government, which was clearly set out by an EU reply of 21 September 2005 to Turkish Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan's claims, refusing to recognize even the existence of EU Member Cyprus, in controversial statements he made to London (former EU chair) on July 29, 2005.

    EU Parliament's latest Resolution on Turkey, adopted on March 2009 in Strasbourg, warned Ankara that "the non-fulfillment of Turkey's commitments... by December 2009, may further seriously affect the process of Negotiations" with the EU.

    In practice, the issue boils down to Ankara's "embargo" against Ships and Airplanes using Cyprus' seaports or airports at the strategic EU island, which traditionaly hosts one of the World's biggest Shipping flags. EU has already "freezed" 6 relevant Chapters in EU - Turkey Negotiations since December 2006, after Ankara refused to fullfil a commitment it had undertaken when EU had decided to open controversial "accession" negotiations with Turkey, back on December 2005.

    - "As far as EU - Turkey relations are concerned, it's clear that Turkey needs to fullfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the additional Protocol (to "EC-Turkey Association Agreement"),  This is an important issue....and should be addresseed as soon as possible as it clearly affects the pace of the accession negotiations.Issues covered by the Declaration of September 2005 will continue to be followed up, and progress is urgently awaited", warned earlier in Strasbourg the out-going Czech EU Presidency (former vice-Prime Minister Alexander Vodra).

    But the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, dismissed "interpretations" by "some" that Foreign Minister Carl Bildt was reportedly "threatening" Cyprus with consequences on the UNFICYP, if it doesn't accept any solution until December 2009, while Turkey is reportedly delaying in an attempt to impose a partitionist "2 States" solution.

    On the contrary, Julin, stressed that "Sweden has strong demands on Turkey'"s respect of "Copenhagen Criteria and EU Acquis".

    Meanwhile, Sweden  is "concerned" about the risk of "Stalemate" in Cyprus' Talks, but is well aware that "the main responsibilities lie with the two leaders and the UNO", Europe playing only a role of "facilitator".

    After carefully verifying, the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, stressed to "EuroFora" that Bildt's reference to UNFICYP "was not linked to a Threat", and dismissed those who "interpreted" it so.

    On the contrary, the Swedish EU Presidency acknowledged the fact that Peace Talks are mainly for the UN and the leaders of the Cypriot communities, EU's role being limited into that of a "facilitator".

    As for Turkey's reported attempts to impose a "2 States' solution", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service sharply replied by stressing that Turkey must respect the "EU Acquis" rules.

    In particular :

    - "Basically he (Bildt) underlined that it's the leaders of the two communities in Cyprus and the UN that have the main responsibilities for solving the problem", started to say the Swedish Senior Official to "EuroFora", referring to the above-mentioned "briefing".

    - "But the EU had a role in sort of pointing out the benefits and facilitating a little bit the outcome for the settlement of the whole Cyprus' issue", she added.

    - "And he did state the Fact, that the rest of the World (i.e. USA, etc) will, of course, look at the differend issues which are at the table, and the future of the UN Peace keeping force is part of what is at the table", she admitted.

    - "I understand that some have interpreted that as a Threat, by the Swedish Minister" "But", in reality, "it's a statement of a Fact, that, when we'll look at the differend issues, one of the issues on which we shall have to take a stand on, is the future of the UN Peace keeping force in Cyprus".

    Indeed, one of the questions usually raised for a Solution of Cyprus' issue is what International and/or European or other Guarantees, by a Peace-keeping force, might be needed afterwards, eventually for a transitory period.

    Questioned anew by "EuroFora" whether (according to critical Press Reports) this could be taken as a veiled warning that, if Cyprus didn't accept any Turkish demand for any solution whatever, it might be left alone to face Ankara's Military Invasion/Occupation, she denied :

    - "He (Bildt) didn't say it in that way"... "It was not linked to a threat, or anything like that", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service stressed.

    On the contrary, "he (Bildt) underlined that the main responsibility lies with the parties concerned on the island". "The EU can try to facilitate and show the benefits of reaching a settlement. But also, when the EU and the rest of the World (i.e. USA) will have to look at it, they will look at all the Facts on the table, and the presence of the UN Peace-keeping force is one".

    And "he (Bildt) didn't speak about that at all", she replied to "EuroFora" question on Turkey's reported attemps to impose, in one way of another, a partitionist "2 States solution".

    Asked whether Bildt's aim was to incite both parties to move forward efficiently, she agreed :

    - In fact, "the EU is really very concerned with the Stalemate in the situation. Yes !", the Head of Sweden's Foreign Ministry's Press Service anounced. That's why Bildt "was hoping for the two parties (i.e. for Turkey's also) to engage and break, a little-bit, the present stalemate, come to a solution of the issue" of Cyprus.

    But, replying  to a "EuroFora"s question on the risk, denounced by several politicians in case of strict Time Deadlines, for Turkey to provoke a stalemate and wait for the time to come to impose a partitionist "2 States' solution", she reacted by pointing at Turkey's obligation to respect "EU Acquis" :

    - "Turkey must fullfil the EU Acquis : That's clear !", the Swedish Senior Official stressed.

    More details are expected when Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt will debate his Programme with new MEPs at EU Parliament's plenary mid-July in Strasbourg, that he has visited already in 2008.

    Foreign Minister Carl Bildt became familiar with Strasbourg's CoE last year, when Sweden chaired the PanEuropean organization of Human Rights. As EU chairman-in-office, he will also chair the 27-member States strong EU Group inside the 47-member States strong CoE.

    Minister for EU affairs, Cecilia Malmstrom is well known at EU Parliament, where she has been an active MEP of the Liberal Group for many years, following also Press Freedom issues.

    Both have already made various statements at "EuroFora", on differend topical matters.

    ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Mostrados

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.