english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Accueil arrow newsitems arrow EU-Germany: Greens' controversial Push for More Migrants (+via Turkey) to End EU role on Migration ?

EU-Germany: Greens' controversial Push for More Migrants (+via Turkey) to End EU role on Migration ?

Ecrit par ACM
Friday, 17 November 2017

imi_numbers_in_german_jamaica_negotiations_400_03 

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- New Facts, which surfaced in Strasbourg, on the Sidelines of EU Parliament's full Plenary Session this week, and while "Hot" Political Negotiations unfolding in Germany on a New Government Coalition have reached a Crucial stage,


clearly indicate that, if they yielded to "Greens"' Controversial Demands for even More Irregular Migrants to Follow that UnPrecedented Big "Tsunami" of 1,5 Million Mass Asylum Seekers/Irregular Migrants which Suddenly Entered in Europe mainly via Turkish Smugglers on 2015-2016,


then, EU's current Competences on Migration Policy, Risk to come, sooner or later, to a full End, in the foreseeable Future.


----------------


Indeed, France's Biggest Opposition Party in the National Assembly, (which also holds a Majority in the Senate, and among Regions), that of the "Republicans", members of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group, the Biggest in Europe, Welcomed Yesterday in Strasbourg the obvious Frontrunner Candidate to their Presidency, (due to be Elected on December 2017), Laurent Wauquiez, who made certain Relevant Declarations :

- In particular, Revealing in Strasbourg one of the Main Reasons for which he finds Necessary to Put a Stop, as things stand Today, to any EU Competence on Foreign Migration policy, and bring it Back to its Member States, (Except for a Revised "Shenghen" system for EU Citizens), he Clearly Explained that this is due also to alleged "Different Situations in Germany and in France" :


- F.ex., concerning the Workforce's future, some in Germany push for even More Foreign Migration, while we, in France, can augment the Population by more Births inside the Country, he observed, in a well-Applauded Speech to the Militants of the Party, and after a Press-point with Journalists, including "Eurofora", (See also : ....).


Significantly, Wauquiez, (who Speaks German, as he Demonstrated here by Inviting a German Collegue at the Press-point to raise his Question "in Deutsch", Replying in the German Language), is an Experienced former Minister for European affairs, and, Afterwards, for Universities/Scientific Research, as well as f. Government Spokesman, (Comp. Various Replies that he has given, then, to "Eurofora"s Topical Questions, f.ex., at : ... + ..., etc).


+ Moreover, he said that just After having held a Meeting with EPP MEPs in EU Parliament, where he met also with the President of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Party, Joseph Daul, in addition to a Fast-track Round Trip even to Neighbouring Germany's Regional Headquarters at Stuttgart, (as "Eurofora" learned by well informed "Republican" Party sources), Capital of the Federated State of Baden-Württenberg, where a Coalition between Chancellor Angie Merkel's ChristianDemocrat/CDU and the local "Greens" of Chairman Kretschmann has already started to Govern recently, (See, f.ex. : ...).


Meanwhile, preparations and Political Debates about Strategis to follow in the Forthcoming European Elections of May 2019 (of Crucial Importance for Europe's Present and Future), are Already Starting, Nowadays, Both inside EU Parliament, and in Key Member States, as, f.ex., in France, etc., (before the Next Presidential Elections, normally scheduled for 2022).


>>> And this came Precisely while Delicate Negotiations in Berlin, for a New Government's Coalition, were, reportedly, Threatened by certain Stumbling Blocks, particularly Because of a Controversial Demand of "Greens"' representatives, who Ask for Even More Irregular Migrants to Enter inside the EU, even if they are Not Refugees at all, Neither their Family, but Only if one or another among their Parents might have managed to Enter in Germany during since the 2015-2016 Giant "Tsunami" of More than +1,5 Millions of Mass Asylum Seekers/Irregular Migrants' Sudden, UnPrecedented Influx via Turkey, and/or Afterwards.

Already, BEFORE that +1,5 Millions "Tsunami" of 2015-2016, according to OECD Data, More than 400.000 People had entered inside the EU, just in 1 Year (2015), by Legal means, through such a "Window". Therefore, both the GeoPoliticaly Exposed Bavarian "CSU" Party, Traditionally Close Ally to Merkel's CDU, and/or Various Other German Politicians, Experts, and/or other interested/affected People, Naturally Warn that the relevant Numbers, AFTER that 2015-216 UnPrecedented Big "Tsunami" of Massive Migration through Turkey, risks to be even Much Bigger : Logically, CSU estimates reportedly are up to 750.000 more !...


- Astonishingly, However, those "Greens" and/or other relevant intermediaries, reportedly Claimed, during the above-mentioned Negotiations in Berlin, that the above-mentioned Number of Additional (Non-Refugee) Migrants (to Add to all other kinds of Migrants), would be just around 30.000 or 60.000 per Year, according to them... Something that pushed various Mainstream German Medias (including "Die Welt" and others) to Warn about several ... "FAKE NUMBERS" on Migrants currently circulating around those Crucial Berlin Negotiations for an eventual "Jamaica" Coalition for a New Government, with Big "Power" Games being played there by some...

+ And an Additional, Important Fact, at this Point, Nowadays, is that, Contrary to what Europe had Already Experienced in its Long History in the Past, Too Many among that UnPrecedented, Sudden "Tsunami" of 1,5 Millions of Mass Asylum Seekers/Irregular Migrants imported in Europe mainly by Turkish Smugglers on 2015-2016, (and, reportedly, systematically..."Selected", with Socio-Cultural, Religious and/or Education level counter-Criteria by the Turkish Authorities, according to an EU Experts' Report leaked in Brussels and Published by many Mainstream Medias in Germany and elsewhere on 2016), look very Different from all Other, previously Known Migrants :

F.ex. being too largely Non-Europeans, Nor Christians (a notoriously Oppressed Minority around several Middle-East Countries, which is, Curiously, Under-Represented among those so-called "Refugees", Despite even ISIL's and other Islamist Terrorists' Brutal Aggressions there, etc), Don't speak at all any European Language, many Do Not seem to really wish to "Integrate" the Host European Societies and Culture, most are Heavily "Islamized" (if not Radicalized), some Brutaly Aggressive, among whom is notoriously Hidden even an unknown Number of former Deadly Islamist Terrorists' members or fans, etc.

So that these "Integration Problems", exceptionaly Risk to become much more Difficult and Worse than what Europe had witnessed in the Past, (as even a ... Swedish, "Socialist", CoE's Expert, with Experience in Human Rights/Democracy, etc., has Acknowledged to "Eurofora" in Strasbourg).


And, Meanwhile, various relavant Popular Reactions from European Union Citizens are notoriously Growing, Both from recent Security Risks (after an Extending Number of Deadly Attacks by Islamist Terrorists cowardly Targetting innocent Civilian People, throughout all Europe, including Many Times inside Germany and France, etc), and Social Cohesion Problems, (particularly Felt by Poor People, obliged to live their Private and Family Everyday Lives in some Poor or Impoverised Neighborhoods, recently threatened to be transformed in Cultural a.o. "Gettos", since they are Affected much more by that kind of "New" Mass Migration through Turkey a.o., which, in Fact, makes Life more Difficult also for Other, Older Immigrants, from various Different Origins and Pathways to Europe, who were, Comparatively, Less Difficult to Integrate : F.ex. in Schools, Housing behavior, etc).


+ In Addition, the Number of MPs Democratically Elected by the European People recently, (particularly in Germany, but also in France and in Other EU Countries), have Already Reached (or Approach) a Net Majority very Critical against such an uncontrolled and persisting Massive Immigration of this kind, (which, by the way, has also Nothing to do with the Average Population even of Syria itself, which appears very Different from what some Turkish a.o. Smugglers curiously chose to import in Europe suddenly on 2015-2016+)...

_____________________


Moreover, when Opposition's New Party of the "Alternative (Rightists) has, reportedly, just presented a Proposal, in the Bundestag in Berlin, for a planned Return Back to Syria of about 500.000 Irregular Migrants who are Not real Refugees, Now that the War has been Declared almost Finished, (on Condition that it occurs in Safe Areas, and Free of Charge, with Amnesty for those who Deserted the Army, etc), as Mainstream Newspapers published in Germany, the overall Difference between Opposed Political Choices on the Overall Number of such Irregular Migrants apparently Jumped (500.000 + 400.000, etc) up to almost .. 1 Million (or more : Comp. Supra) during a year, in Germany alone : I.e. a quite Different Germany and Europe, according to People's choices !


Meanwhile, concerning the above-mentioned Claim about alleged Needs for the Workforce in the foreseeable Future, (Comp. Supra), the Numbers which had been Published by the JHA Minister De Mezières, just a few Years ago, had Revealed that, in Fact, the Intra-European Migrants were Becoming the Biggest Group of Foreign Workers in German, bypassing Both the Turks and any Other Group from 3rd Countries : Isn't that Enough, and (particularly) much Better (f.ex. from the Triple point of view of Security, Productive Capacities, and Socio-Cultural Integration ?


Or, perhaps, some might, eventually, push Massively for Jobs withOut Any Qualification, Reduced in a few repetitive, simplistic moves that Anybody could do, so that they would result in Too Low-Paying occupations, and/or in so Harsh Conditions, that even most Poor Europeans would Not Accept, so that there would be a Need for Desperate and Ignorant Masses of Non-European, Foreign Migrants to be practically Obliged to Accep that. But, If that might be, or become the case, then, the obvious Question Raised, is of Fundamental Importance :  - "What kind of Europe should be Built for the Future ?"

 

-------------------------
 

And, as Laurent Wauquiez repeatedly Warned, on the occasion of his Visit to Strasbourg, yesterday, (Both in an Interview to "Figaro" Newpaper in Paris, and in 2 Press-points here, as well as in a Long Speech to a Public Meeting of ChristianDeocrat/EPP Militants of his "Republican" Party : the same as that of former French Presidents Nicolas Sarkozy, Jacques Chirac and of the General de Gaulle, as he reminded, while Confirming to "Eurofora" that he is "for a Strong France, inside a Strong Europe") :


- In order "to Build Europe", we "canNot Ignore the Will of the People !"...

(../..)


-------------------------------------
 


Enterprises' Competitiveness for 2014-2020

Statistics

Visiteurrs: 25993880

Archive

Login Form





Se souvenir de moi

Perdu votre mot de passe?
Pas encore de compte? Enregistrez-vous

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Résultats

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.