english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Inicio arrow newsitems arrow Merkel points at EF Query for Different Vaccines (Not Only Genetic Manip) that EMA didN't Clear yet

Merkel points at EF Query for Different Vaccines (Not Only Genetic Manip) that EMA didN't Clear yet

Escrito por ACM
25.06.21

 

euc_summit__merkel_ebs__eurofora_400 


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/-
In a Surprizing but Interesting Move on a More Crucial Issue that it seems at First Sight, Experienced 17 Years German Chancelor Angie Merkel (2005-2021), pointed Today at the Direction of "Eurofora"s recent Query on Various Other, Different Vaccines, against the Deadly Virus' Pandemic, that EU Medical Experts' Body "EMA" has Not Yet Authorized (Neither Rejected), by Curiously Avoiding, until now, to Officialy Pronounce itself, leaving 500 Millions of European People to Depend Only from 1, Genetic Manip., Novel and UnTested Yet, Controversial (See Infra) Technology Vaccines, whose Limits, Question Marks, and/or Flaws are just Starting to be Revealed Recently...

------------------------------------

    - "Eurofora" had mainly Asked, during the EU Council's Video-Press Briefing at the Eve of the current EU Heads of State/Government's Summit in Brussels (24-25/6/2021), why, in order to Boost Vaccinations, the EU does Not Authorize Any Other, Different Vaccine among the Many and Various Already Existing accross the World, which might Alleviate Fears among some People in Europe and elsewhere.

    Among several Possible Examples, we had mentioned also that of reportedly "4 Vaccines Authorized by the Government" in China, according to Recent Official Annuncemnts by the competent Authorities of that Key Country, (as well as 2 from Russia, etc).

    => The main thrust of a Top EU Council's Official's Reply to our Question was to practicaly consider as inconceivable that EU's competent Experts' Group EMA would ever Deprive EU Citizens from Any Efficient Vaccine which meets the required Conditions, in order to Save threatened Human Lives,  (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/eucofficialondifferentvaccines.html, etc).

    >>> But, apparently in order to seriously Clarify the real Situation regarding this kind of "Hot" Issues, just 2 Days Later, Chancelor Merkel, in her Concluding Press Conference at the End of this EU Summit, took the Initiative to Evoke such a Matter :

    -"We (EU Leaders) have dealt with the question: what about the Vaccines for which there is No Authorisation from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) ? Here, too, we have asked the (EU) Commission to make a coordinated Proposal, so that it can be implemented Equally in the internal Market", she announced.

    And, these Same Days, f.ex., even Italian Prime Minister Dragi was cited trying to Compare the Efficacy of a Chinese Vaccine with that of the Few Vaccines already Authorized by EMA...

    However, Chinese Authorities Published, Twice, these Days Too, that Beijing has authorized (and already Uses in real Practice) not 1, But 4  Vaccines, among which, 3 are of the Classical Technology, (i.e. that Invented by Pasteur, and Tested during several Generations), which, as they Claim, uses a Method of Fabrication Easily Adapted to Various, eventual, "Mutations" of the Virus...

    This was Added also to a Recent Suggestion, by the German Minister of Healh, Jens Spahn (CDU), to eventualy Authorize in the EU at least Some "Classic" Technology Vaccines against that Virus, in order to Convince several People, who are still Hesitating, to Accept to be vaccinated.

    China Also took the Initiative to Just Publish an Interesting Overview of All the Different Kinds of Technologies used for the Currently Existing Vaccines against this Pandemic's Virus, Already Invented and Produced by Various Countries throughout the World Nowadays, (Even if, "Eurofora" observed that, probably, there might be some More than that coming, sooner or later, f.ex. in Russia, France, Cuba, etc).

    + Meanwhile, Various Recent Incidents about the Few Vaccines already Authorized by EMA in the EU, have Notoriously Affected, more or less, their Reputation :

    - F.ex., "Astrazeneka" seems quite Discredited, by some (even Deadly) UnExpected Dangerous Side-Effects, ...to the point that several Countries had even to Donate their UnUsed Doses to more Poor Nations, (f.ex. Serbia to Other Western Balkan States, etc) !

______________________________________________

 

virus_uk_infections_itv__eurofora_400
 

virus_uk_infection_cases_rise_anew_june_2021_who__eurofora_400_01 

    - As for the Turkish-USA BNT-"Pfizer" (and partialy Armenian-USA "Moderna"), a real "Shock" surfaced These Days, when it was Revealed that Even  The Most Vaccinated European Country : the UK, as well as Israel, (probably the Most Vaccinated in the World), have Suddenly Faced serious Setbacks, by a "Sharp Augmentation of the Number of Infections..., (an Astonishing Fact that Merkel also Pointed out Today). In the Case of Israel it's, reportedly, even the ...50% of New Infcctions which, Astonishingly, affected People Already Vaccinated by BNT-Pfizer !

    + Meanwhile, in Addition to an, already, quite Long List of "Side Effects" (eventualy including "Allergy", particularly for the 2nd Dose), those 2 "mRNA" Novel Vaccines were Recently Criticized Also for Risks to Provoke Blood "Thrombosis", "Dermatic" Problems, and Now (June 2021) even "Heart" Problems (in 2% of the recipients)...

    ++ Probably the Most Dangerous : Already Since they were Authorized, Curiously, there was Not Any Guarantee at all that Such a Kind of Novel "Vaccines" (See Infra) might Ensure, or Not, that the Individual recipients would Stop Infecting Other People, (Otherwise Inevitably acting like Jombie-"Silent Killers", Infecting UnAware and UnProtected Victims, Lured by their False Appearance as "Vaccinated"...), with Obvious Grave Risks for the Entire Society ! Contrary to All "Classic" Vaccines, indeed, this Crucial Function was, Astonishingly, Not Even Checked when those  Novel Medical Tools were Presented for Authorisation by USA and EU Experts, and Still Nowadays, Despite some Misleading and Inaccurate Recent Clumsy Attempts to Claim the Contrary, in Fact, the 1st serious Study, due to be Peer-Revised, duly Controled, and Integraly Published, is Expected to eventualy arrive Only some ...Months' Later from now ! ("Eurofora" had Already Warned about such a Big and Exceptional Lacuna, as Early as Since 2020, at the Eve of the 1st Authorisations by the FDA and EMA, and anew Afterwards, including by Raising Questions at Key EU Video-Press Briefings, competent Top Press Spokesmen for Healh, Publishing relevant Articles, etc., and this UnPrecedented Novel Problem was, Afterwards, Acknowledged Even by Top EU Officials, etc. : See, inter alia, Also, f.ex.: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/eusummitonvaccinesquestions.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pseudovaccinespassportstohell.html, etc).     

    Last, but Not Least, ...All those 3 or 4 "Vaccines", which are the Only to be Available to 500 Millions of European People, in Face of the Threat to be Killed by that Virus Otherwise, Curiously use some "Novel" Technologies, Never Seen Before in Human History, and Affecting the Human "Genome" (by DNA and/or RNA Manipulations),, as it's Obvious, and Clearly Reminded, inter alia, also by that interesting Global Overall Review of All Kinds of Currently Available "Vaccines", just Published by China's Public Health Authorities, (Comp. Supra). This Inevitably Excludes, as things stand Nowadays, Any Previous Chance to Thoroughly Verify any Eventualy Negative Side-Effect on Human Health, which Might Appear Only After several Months or Years. (Including, f.ex., perhaps, Cancer-provoking, or Not, which, in Many Cases of various Genetic Manipulations on Human Embryos Artificialy Fabricated in Labos, Notoriously Appear Only quite Late, Long Afterwards, as Even Supporters of Artificially Fabricated Babies have Acknowledged, also in Recent Important Collective Studies, Published f.ex. on 2020, etc).

Such Facts have Already provoked several Concerns, among the People, Both in USA and the EU, as well as Elsewhere in the World. But Moreover, to this is Added also a Fear of some Critics that Such Novel Technologies Affecting the Human Genome might, Eventualy, be Abused by some Maveric Technocrats or Bio-Terrorists, Bio-War Weapons, etc., in order to Alter the Genomes of one or more Persons, perhaps Groups of People, and/or of All or Different Parts of an Overall Population, (including perhaps Exploiting Frequent so-called "Vaccine-UPDATES", etc), for Dark Aims of Manipulation of those Persons and/or of a whole Society... That's, f.ex., one of the Main Reasons for which, inter alia, Also French Professor Christian Perronne, Long-Time Director of Infectiology Departments in Paris' Hospitals, and Connaisseur on Vaccines in general, Refused Even to Name such Novel Medical Tools as "Vaccines", Simply Because, all Normal, Classic, Real Vaccines, All the Way from their Inventor : Pasteur, (Researcher and University Professor in Strasbourg on the 19th Century), Always Protected the Society Against Infections by those who had Received a Real Vaccine. But Professor Perronne was Brutaly Attacked and ...Fired from his Job, shortly After Denouncing such Genetic Manipulation Risks by those mRNA Pseudo-"Vaccines", also in a substantial Critical Article Published on December 2020 at a Marginal but Serious Global Media, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html). However, Replace a  necessary Democratic Scientific Dialogue, by Brutal Oppression, does Not Convince Anyone ! On the Contrary...

Certainly, European Science should Have the Capacity required in order to Not Abandon Half a Billion of European People to the Risk of an Eventual Blackmail to "Choose" Between being Killed or Geneticaly Manipulated by Foreign gadgets !

Unless Europeans Succeed, Despite everything, to Find a Way to Survive, Inspired from their Ancient Heroe, Ulysse's World-Famous Legend of "Skyla-Haribdi"...

---------------------------------

 virus_hungary_infections_data_2021_who__eurofora_400

 virus_hungary_deaths_data_2021_who__eurofora_400

Among various Other Possibilities, f.ex., small Hungary's Successful, Last-Minute Diversification of Vaccines, and/or Big Australia's Brillant Achievement, already During more than 10  Months now, (from September 2020 up to June 2021, included), to Jump from just another Banal Error in too Hasty DeConfinement, as Most Other Countries, to a Rare Freedom from Both Infections and Deaths, (almost Disappeared), imply by Following China's Succesful Example of Public Health Protection Measures, are Rock-Solid Facts.-

virus_australia_infections_data_2020__2021_who__eurofora_400

virus_australia_deaths_data_2020__2021_who__eurofora_400

-----------------------

As for French President Macron's initial Dream for a real European Cure and/or Vaccine against the Pandemic, it may Always Inspire People...

 

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------------

 

 

EUPartnersInvestors

Statistics

Visitantes: 56202042

Archive

Login Form

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

swed_eu_400

    The incoming Swedish EU Presidency (July-December 2009) may still remain in favour of Turkey's controversial EU bid, despite June 2009 EU Elections' results, but it has "very strong demands on Turkey"'s obligation to respect EU Rules, said the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, to "EuroFora", reacting to critical Press reports.

    - "I know (that) the link is often made also to Sweden's position on Turkey"'s controversial EU bid. Indeed, "we (Swedish EU Presidency) are very much engaged in the future membership of Turkey, but not without fullfiling all the Criteria".

    - "It's very clear that we (Swedish EU Presidecny) have very Strong Demands on Turkey, in a sort of concept for Future membership of the Union, ...which will be a Long Process...", she stressed.

    This means, in particular, "the Copenhagen Criteria (on Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law), and also the adaptation to the Acquis of the European Union".

     - "If you listen to what Mr. Bildt (the Swedish Foreign Minister) says on Turkey at different occasions, it's very clear : We want Turkey to become part of the Union, in the Future. But we want it to fullfil all the Criteria : The Acquis of the European Union. That's very clear", she concluded.

    The Senior Official of the Swedish Foreign Ministry was reacting to critical Press Reports, from Brussels' Journalists invited by EU Commission's secretariat to Stockholm, who claimed that Bildt was abusing of a ..."Whip" (sic !) against Cyprus, by "threatening" the presence of UNO's Peace-keeping force at the "Green line" which separates the island's Government-controlled areas from the territories occupied by Ankara's army, if Nicosia didn't accept any political solution, regardless of Turkey's demands, before the end of 2009.

        Governing AKEL Party's new Secretary General, Andros Kyprianou, reacted by declaring that no-one can threat the People of Cyprus : -"We shall decide for our Future, and nobody else",  he reportedly said, asking to "keep calm". "In order to find a Solution soon, certain basic Principles must be respected", he stressed, calling those who feel an urgency to use their influence on Turkey. Other Political Parties were more critical.

    This was a reference to recently reported statements by Turkish Minister Bagis, Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan and Turkey's National Security Council (a Military-Political body), accused to push towards a partitionist "2 States" solution, contrary to UNO SC Resolutions for Cyprus' reunification.

    December 2009 is a crucial moment for EU's appraisal of Turkey's controversial EU bid, because EU Council has decided to review then Ankara's compliance with the European position on the recognition of Cyprus' Government, which was clearly set out by an EU reply of 21 September 2005 to Turkish Prime Minister Tayip Erdogan's claims, refusing to recognize even the existence of EU Member Cyprus, in controversial statements he made to London (former EU chair) on July 29, 2005.

    EU Parliament's latest Resolution on Turkey, adopted on March 2009 in Strasbourg, warned Ankara that "the non-fulfillment of Turkey's commitments... by December 2009, may further seriously affect the process of Negotiations" with the EU.

    In practice, the issue boils down to Ankara's "embargo" against Ships and Airplanes using Cyprus' seaports or airports at the strategic EU island, which traditionaly hosts one of the World's biggest Shipping flags. EU has already "freezed" 6 relevant Chapters in EU - Turkey Negotiations since December 2006, after Ankara refused to fullfil a commitment it had undertaken when EU had decided to open controversial "accession" negotiations with Turkey, back on December 2005.

    - "As far as EU - Turkey relations are concerned, it's clear that Turkey needs to fullfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the additional Protocol (to "EC-Turkey Association Agreement"),  This is an important issue....and should be addresseed as soon as possible as it clearly affects the pace of the accession negotiations.Issues covered by the Declaration of September 2005 will continue to be followed up, and progress is urgently awaited", warned earlier in Strasbourg the out-going Czech EU Presidency (former vice-Prime Minister Alexander Vodra).

    But the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, Cecilia Julin, dismissed "interpretations" by "some" that Foreign Minister Carl Bildt was reportedly "threatening" Cyprus with consequences on the UNFICYP, if it doesn't accept any solution until December 2009, while Turkey is reportedly delaying in an attempt to impose a partitionist "2 States" solution.

    On the contrary, Julin, stressed that "Sweden has strong demands on Turkey'"s respect of "Copenhagen Criteria and EU Acquis".

    Meanwhile, Sweden  is "concerned" about the risk of "Stalemate" in Cyprus' Talks, but is well aware that "the main responsibilities lie with the two leaders and the UNO", Europe playing only a role of "facilitator".

    After carefully verifying, the Head of Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service, stressed to "EuroFora" that Bildt's reference to UNFICYP "was not linked to a Threat", and dismissed those who "interpreted" it so.

    On the contrary, the Swedish EU Presidency acknowledged the fact that Peace Talks are mainly for the UN and the leaders of the Cypriot communities, EU's role being limited into that of a "facilitator".

    As for Turkey's reported attempts to impose a "2 States' solution", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service sharply replied by stressing that Turkey must respect the "EU Acquis" rules.

    In particular :

    - "Basically he (Bildt) underlined that it's the leaders of the two communities in Cyprus and the UN that have the main responsibilities for solving the problem", started to say the Swedish Senior Official to "EuroFora", referring to the above-mentioned "briefing".

    - "But the EU had a role in sort of pointing out the benefits and facilitating a little bit the outcome for the settlement of the whole Cyprus' issue", she added.

    - "And he did state the Fact, that the rest of the World (i.e. USA, etc) will, of course, look at the differend issues which are at the table, and the future of the UN Peace keeping force is part of what is at the table", she admitted.

    - "I understand that some have interpreted that as a Threat, by the Swedish Minister" "But", in reality, "it's a statement of a Fact, that, when we'll look at the differend issues, one of the issues on which we shall have to take a stand on, is the future of the UN Peace keeping force in Cyprus".

    Indeed, one of the questions usually raised for a Solution of Cyprus' issue is what International and/or European or other Guarantees, by a Peace-keeping force, might be needed afterwards, eventually for a transitory period.

    Questioned anew by "EuroFora" whether (according to critical Press Reports) this could be taken as a veiled warning that, if Cyprus didn't accept any Turkish demand for any solution whatever, it might be left alone to face Ankara's Military Invasion/Occupation, she denied :

    - "He (Bildt) didn't say it in that way"... "It was not linked to a threat, or anything like that", the Head of the Swedish Foreign Ministry's Press Service stressed.

    On the contrary, "he (Bildt) underlined that the main responsibility lies with the parties concerned on the island". "The EU can try to facilitate and show the benefits of reaching a settlement. But also, when the EU and the rest of the World (i.e. USA) will have to look at it, they will look at all the Facts on the table, and the presence of the UN Peace-keeping force is one".

    And "he (Bildt) didn't speak about that at all", she replied to "EuroFora" question on Turkey's reported attemps to impose, in one way of another, a partitionist "2 States solution".

    Asked whether Bildt's aim was to incite both parties to move forward efficiently, she agreed :

    - In fact, "the EU is really very concerned with the Stalemate in the situation. Yes !", the Head of Sweden's Foreign Ministry's Press Service anounced. That's why Bildt "was hoping for the two parties (i.e. for Turkey's also) to engage and break, a little-bit, the present stalemate, come to a solution of the issue" of Cyprus.

    But, replying  to a "EuroFora"s question on the risk, denounced by several politicians in case of strict Time Deadlines, for Turkey to provoke a stalemate and wait for the time to come to impose a partitionist "2 States' solution", she reacted by pointing at Turkey's obligation to respect "EU Acquis" :

    - "Turkey must fullfil the EU Acquis : That's clear !", the Swedish Senior Official stressed.

    More details are expected when Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt will debate his Programme with new MEPs at EU Parliament's plenary mid-July in Strasbourg, that he has visited already in 2008.

    Foreign Minister Carl Bildt became familiar with Strasbourg's CoE last year, when Sweden chaired the PanEuropean organization of Human Rights. As EU chairman-in-office, he will also chair the 27-member States strong EU Group inside the 47-member States strong CoE.

    Minister for EU affairs, Cecilia Malmstrom is well known at EU Parliament, where she has been an active MEP of the Liberal Group for many years, following also Press Freedom issues.

    Both have already made various statements at "EuroFora", on differend topical matters.

    ***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Mostrados

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.