english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow Merkel points at EF Query for Different Vaccines (Not Only Genetic Manip) that EMA didN't Clear yet

Merkel points at EF Query for Different Vaccines (Not Only Genetic Manip) that EMA didN't Clear yet

Written by ACM
Friday, 25 June 2021

 

euc_summit__merkel_ebs__eurofora_400 


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/-
In a Surprizing but Interesting Move on a More Crucial Issue that it seems at First Sight, Experienced 17 Years German Chancelor Angie Merkel (2005-2021), pointed Today at the Direction of "Eurofora"s recent Query on Various Other, Different Vaccines, against the Deadly Virus' Pandemic, that EU Medical Experts' Body "EMA" has Not Yet Authorized (Neither Rejected), by Curiously Avoiding, until now, to Officialy Pronounce itself, leaving 500 Millions of European People to Depend Only from 1, Genetic Manip., Novel and UnTested Yet, Controversial (See Infra) Technology Vaccines, whose Limits, Question Marks, and/or Flaws are just Starting to be Revealed Recently...

------------------------------------

    - "Eurofora" had mainly Asked, during the EU Council's Video-Press Briefing at the Eve of the current EU Heads of State/Government's Summit in Brussels (24-25/6/2021), why, in order to Boost Vaccinations, the EU does Not Authorize Any Other, Different Vaccine among the Many and Various Already Existing accross the World, which might Alleviate Fears among some People in Europe and elsewhere.

    Among several Possible Examples, we had mentioned also that of reportedly "4 Vaccines Authorized by the Government" in China, according to Recent Official Annuncemnts by the competent Authorities of that Key Country, (as well as 2 from Russia, etc).

    => The main thrust of a Top EU Council's Official's Reply to our Question was to practicaly consider as inconceivable that EU's competent Experts' Group EMA would ever Deprive EU Citizens from Any Efficient Vaccine which meets the required Conditions, in order to Save threatened Human Lives,  (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/eucofficialondifferentvaccines.html, etc).

    >>> But, apparently in order to seriously Clarify the real Situation regarding this kind of "Hot" Issues, just 2 Days Later, Chancelor Merkel, in her Concluding Press Conference at the End of this EU Summit, took the Initiative to Evoke such a Matter :

    -"We (EU Leaders) have dealt with the question: what about the Vaccines for which there is No Authorisation from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) ? Here, too, we have asked the (EU) Commission to make a coordinated Proposal, so that it can be implemented Equally in the internal Market", she announced.

    And, these Same Days, f.ex., even Italian Prime Minister Dragi was cited trying to Compare the Efficacy of a Chinese Vaccine with that of the Few Vaccines already Authorized by EMA...

    However, Chinese Authorities Published, Twice, these Days Too, that Beijing has authorized (and already Uses in real Practice) not 1, But 4  Vaccines, among which, 3 are of the Classical Technology, (i.e. that Invented by Pasteur, and Tested during several Generations), which, as they Claim, uses a Method of Fabrication Easily Adapted to Various, eventual, "Mutations" of the Virus...

    This was Added also to a Recent Suggestion, by the German Minister of Healh, Jens Spahn (CDU), to eventualy Authorize in the EU at least Some "Classic" Technology Vaccines against that Virus, in order to Convince several People, who are still Hesitating, to Accept to be vaccinated.

    China Also took the Initiative to Just Publish an Interesting Overview of All the Different Kinds of Technologies used for the Currently Existing Vaccines against this Pandemic's Virus, Already Invented and Produced by Various Countries throughout the World Nowadays, (Even if, "Eurofora" observed that, probably, there might be some More than that coming, sooner or later, f.ex. in Russia, France, Cuba, etc).

    + Meanwhile, Various Recent Incidents about the Few Vaccines already Authorized by EMA in the EU, have Notoriously Affected, more or less, their Reputation :

    - F.ex., "Astrazeneka" seems quite Discredited, by some (even Deadly) UnExpected Dangerous Side-Effects, ...to the point that several Countries had even to Donate their UnUsed Doses to more Poor Nations, (f.ex. Serbia to Other Western Balkan States, etc) !

______________________________________________

 

virus_uk_infections_itv__eurofora_400
 

virus_uk_infection_cases_rise_anew_june_2021_who__eurofora_400_01 

    - As for the Turkish-USA BNT-"Pfizer" (and partialy Armenian-USA "Moderna"), a real "Shock" surfaced These Days, when it was Revealed that Even  The Most Vaccinated European Country : the UK, as well as Israel, (probably the Most Vaccinated in the World), have Suddenly Faced serious Setbacks, by a "Sharp Augmentation of the Number of Infections..., (an Astonishing Fact that Merkel also Pointed out Today). In the Case of Israel it's, reportedly, even the ...50% of New Infcctions which, Astonishingly, affected People Already Vaccinated by BNT-Pfizer !

    + Meanwhile, in Addition to an, already, quite Long List of "Side Effects" (eventualy including "Allergy", particularly for the 2nd Dose), those 2 "mRNA" Novel Vaccines were Recently Criticized Also for Risks to Provoke Blood "Thrombosis", "Dermatic" Problems, and Now (June 2021) even "Heart" Problems (in 2% of the recipients)...

    ++ Probably the Most Dangerous : Already Since they were Authorized, Curiously, there was Not Any Guarantee at all that Such a Kind of Novel "Vaccines" (See Infra) might Ensure, or Not, that the Individual recipients would Stop Infecting Other People, (Otherwise Inevitably acting like Jombie-"Silent Killers", Infecting UnAware and UnProtected Victims, Lured by their False Appearance as "Vaccinated"...), with Obvious Grave Risks for the Entire Society ! Contrary to All "Classic" Vaccines, indeed, this Crucial Function was, Astonishingly, Not Even Checked when those  Novel Medical Tools were Presented for Authorisation by USA and EU Experts, and Still Nowadays, Despite some Misleading and Inaccurate Recent Clumsy Attempts to Claim the Contrary, in Fact, the 1st serious Study, due to be Peer-Revised, duly Controled, and Integraly Published, is Expected to eventualy arrive Only some ...Months' Later from now ! ("Eurofora" had Already Warned about such a Big and Exceptional Lacuna, as Early as Since 2020, at the Eve of the 1st Authorisations by the FDA and EMA, and anew Afterwards, including by Raising Questions at Key EU Video-Press Briefings, competent Top Press Spokesmen for Healh, Publishing relevant Articles, etc., and this UnPrecedented Novel Problem was, Afterwards, Acknowledged Even by Top EU Officials, etc. : See, inter alia, Also, f.ex.: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfijfyjhjh.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/eusummitonvaccinesquestions.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pseudovaccinespassportstohell.html, etc).     

    Last, but Not Least, ...All those 3 or 4 "Vaccines", which are the Only to be Available to 500 Millions of European People, in Face of the Threat to be Killed by that Virus Otherwise, Curiously use some "Novel" Technologies, Never Seen Before in Human History, and Affecting the Human "Genome" (by DNA and/or RNA Manipulations),, as it's Obvious, and Clearly Reminded, inter alia, also by that interesting Global Overall Review of All Kinds of Currently Available "Vaccines", just Published by China's Public Health Authorities, (Comp. Supra). This Inevitably Excludes, as things stand Nowadays, Any Previous Chance to Thoroughly Verify any Eventualy Negative Side-Effect on Human Health, which Might Appear Only After several Months or Years. (Including, f.ex., perhaps, Cancer-provoking, or Not, which, in Many Cases of various Genetic Manipulations on Human Embryos Artificialy Fabricated in Labos, Notoriously Appear Only quite Late, Long Afterwards, as Even Supporters of Artificially Fabricated Babies have Acknowledged, also in Recent Important Collective Studies, Published f.ex. on 2020, etc).

Such Facts have Already provoked several Concerns, among the People, Both in USA and the EU, as well as Elsewhere in the World. But Moreover, to this is Added also a Fear of some Critics that Such Novel Technologies Affecting the Human Genome might, Eventualy, be Abused by some Maveric Technocrats or Bio-Terrorists, Bio-War Weapons, etc., in order to Alter the Genomes of one or more Persons, perhaps Groups of People, and/or of All or Different Parts of an Overall Population, (including perhaps Exploiting Frequent so-called "Vaccine-UPDATES", etc), for Dark Aims of Manipulation of those Persons and/or of a whole Society... That's, f.ex., one of the Main Reasons for which, inter alia, Also French Professor Christian Perronne, Long-Time Director of Infectiology Departments in Paris' Hospitals, and Connaisseur on Vaccines in general, Refused Even to Name such Novel Medical Tools as "Vaccines", Simply Because, all Normal, Classic, Real Vaccines, All the Way from their Inventor : Pasteur, (Researcher and University Professor in Strasbourg on the 19th Century), Always Protected the Society Against Infections by those who had Received a Real Vaccine. But Professor Perronne was Brutaly Attacked and ...Fired from his Job, shortly After Denouncing such Genetic Manipulation Risks by those mRNA Pseudo-"Vaccines", also in a substantial Critical Article Published on December 2020 at a Marginal but Serious Global Media, (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fdaandcontroversialvirusvaccines.html). However, Replace a  necessary Democratic Scientific Dialogue, by Brutal Oppression, does Not Convince Anyone ! On the Contrary...

Certainly, European Science should Have the Capacity required in order to Not Abandon Half a Billion of European People to the Risk of an Eventual Blackmail to "Choose" Between being Killed or Geneticaly Manipulated by Foreign gadgets !

Unless Europeans Succeed, Despite everything, to Find a Way to Survive, Inspired from their Ancient Heroe, Ulysse's World-Famous Legend of "Skyla-Haribdi"...

---------------------------------

 virus_hungary_infections_data_2021_who__eurofora_400

 virus_hungary_deaths_data_2021_who__eurofora_400

Among various Other Possibilities, f.ex., small Hungary's Successful, Last-Minute Diversification of Vaccines, and/or Big Australia's Brillant Achievement, already During more than 10  Months now, (from September 2020 up to June 2021, included), to Jump from just another Banal Error in too Hasty DeConfinement, as Most Other Countries, to a Rare Freedom from Both Infections and Deaths, (almost Disappeared), imply by Following China's Succesful Example of Public Health Protection Measures, are Rock-Solid Facts.-

virus_australia_infections_data_2020__2021_who__eurofora_400

virus_australia_deaths_data_2020__2021_who__eurofora_400

-----------------------

As for French President Macron's initial Dream for a real European Cure and/or Vaccine against the Pandemic, it may Always Inspire People...

 

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------------

 

 

StartUpEU

Statistics

Visitors: 45074439

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.