english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Pagina principale arrow newsitems arrow Classic Vaccines in Clinical Phase = absolute Majority. But None Authorized by the EU yet = ZERO !

Classic Vaccines in Clinical Phase = absolute Majority. But None Authorized by the EU yet = ZERO !

Scritto da ACM
martedì, 10 agosto 2021

list_of_covid_vaccines_cabdidates_worldwide_who__eurofora_400

*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- Even if the absolute Majority among the 110 candidate COVID Vaccines which have Currently Reached up to a Clinical Phase (i.e. completed Final Trials type 3) throughout the World, are of a "Classical" Technology, whose Safety and Efficacy has Already been more or less, Tested and Proven, on Various other Occasions during the last 2 Centuries (See Infra), Nevertheless, None among them has Yet been Authorized by the EU until now !...

    On the Contrary, the EU has Authorized 4 Controversial Vaccines, All of a Novel Technology, withOut real Precedent in Medical History, and, therefore, of UnKnown Yet possible Side Effects on Human Health : 2 "Genetic" so-called "Vaccines" ("ANRm" kind, as the Turkish-American "BNT-Pfizer", and the USA's "Moderna"), and 2 with a "Virus Vector" (which may Affect the Human Genome in the Core of a Cell : "AstroZeneka" with a ...Himpadji origin part, and "Johnson-Johnson"'s "Janssen"). The First 2 are Completely UnKnown until Nowadays, and the Following 2 use a Technology Only Tried Earlier on the Exceptional case of "Ebola", withOut a Real Practice : As, by an,Other "Coincidence", also for the Controversial Novel Drug "Remdisevir", of Doubtful effects).

    But All the Other, numerous "Classic" Technology cabdidate Vaccines, Faithful to World-Famous European French Inventor Louis Pasteur's (a former Strasbourg University Professor) well-Known Principles, have been, Curiously Snobed by EU's Experts, until now... This Includes All Kinds of "InActivated" or "Attenuated Virus", and "Protein SubUnits", etc, which have, Notoriously, been Already succesfully  Used, During several Decades, Also against Many and Various Other Familiar Diseases, as, f.ex. : the Flu, Polio, Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR), the ChickenPox and Shingles, or Whooping Cough, Tetanus, Diphtheria and MeningoCoccal Meningitis, (etc)..., as WHO reminds.

    >>> They represent an Absolute Majority of about 51% - 57%, among Candidate Vaccines against COVID Virus, currently at Clinical Phase, (particularly if the "virus-like particles"/"VLP" [6%] are treated as Non-Genetic tools, f.ex. against Hepatites B, Human Papillomavirus, Influenza, Malaria, Mosquirix/RTS,S, etc).

    + The Rest of 43% Candidate Vaccines at Clinical Phase include a Minority of"Genetic" Tools, ("DNA" or "RNAm" : 9% + 16% = 25%), while "Viral Vectors" ("replicating" or "not-replicating":  2% + 15% = 17%) May Affect Human Genome, by penetrating at Cells' Core, etc. "Vnr" and/or "Vvnr" "Antigen-presenting Cells", in some "New" Versions, Might be "Genetically Engineered" recently (2% + 1% = 3%), But that does Not concern yet All of them.

    ------------------------

    => The Main Critical point is that practicaly Nobody clearly Explained Why the EU has Chosen, until now, to Exclude All that absolute Majority of "Classic" Vaccines, and Impose, often by the Forceps (See : "Pass" Cartificates' Row), Only a Few, Controversial "Genetic" +"Virus-Vector" Genome-Affecting Novel Tools, (Comp. Supra)...

    + Particularly when the "Classic" Vaccines' Safety is, more or less, Already Tested and Known, since Many Years ago, while, on the Contrary, the Risks of Eventual "Side Effects" among thosa Novel", mainly "Genetic" Tools, (Perhaps Years Later), are almost entirely UnKnown (as even WHO observes) !

    ++ In Addition, as also WHO Systematically Warns (After "Eurofora", EU Commission's President, the CoE, etc), "there are Currently No substantive Data available related to the Impact of" those Genome-Affecting Novel Tools "on Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 ...Virus" to the Detriment of Other People... On the Contrary, all "Classic" Vaccines use to normaly Protect the Society from further Spread by those who have been Really and properly Vaccinated. (So that "...Pasteur would Spin in his Grave", if he heard of those Fake-"Vaccines", in fact : "Gene Therapy Tools",  as Denounced French University Professor Perronne since 12/2020, while the False Appearances given by Controversial "Pass/Certificates" for such Fake-"Vaccines" might Provoke "Devastating" Effects against Public Health, as CoE Warned on 6/2021)...

     Concerning that, it's Already a Worrying Fact that Countries which are Pioneers in such Fake-"Vaccines" and relevant "Passes", have Faced, Recently, an "Explosion" of Virus' Infections, (as, f.ex., in the UK, Spain, Greece, Netherlands, etc., followed by France and Others), while, on the Contrary, those Countries who Added also "Classical" Vaccines and/or SafeGuarded Public Health Measures, Succeeded to practicaly Stop Virus' Infections and Deaths, (such as, f.ex., China, Australia, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, San Marino, Serbia, etc), in Addition to USA's Recent spectacular "U-Turn" (from May to July 2021) on so-called "Vaccinated" Individuals' Obligation to Wear "Masks", be Excluded at US-Canada Borders, etc. Last, but not least, Beyond UK's "Boom" in more than 5 Millions People Waiting to Find a Bed in Hospitals, (Soon, even 13 Millions, according to the Minister of Health !), the Additional Fact of South Korea's Big Spread of massive Infections (and Deaths), suddenly Emerging ...Since those Pseudo-"Vaccines" appeared from December 2020, Until Nowadays, on August 2021, is a Stunning Reality, (see relevant WHO's Graphic, Herewith).

s._korea_virus_infections__booms_since_fakevaccines_who__eurofora_400 

-----------------------------

    +++ But a Most Dangerous Factor is, Also, that, while such Fake-"Vaccines" Notoriously Affect a Protein, at the same time, according to mainstream "BBC", Even "Tiny Modifications of Proteins" might "provoke Catastrophes" (sic !) inside the Human Body, that has Many Thousands of Proteins, with a "very Complex Molecular Structure", from which, Only about "17%" is Currently Known... Moreover, Genetic Manipulations ("Gene Editing") in Mamals, including Humans, May Provoke UnKnown Yet "Side Effects", particularly "Cancer", but also Chronic Diseases, as a landmak Big Collective Study on Artificial Procreations in Labos, Published on 2020 in China, Warned....

    Risks for such Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Persons themselves, having used Genome-Affecting, Controversial Novel Tools (Comp. Supra), include, in Addition, a too Rapid Drop in Protection from Infections, (particularly in the Turko-USA "BNT-Pfizer", which Droped down to Only 64% on June, and ...39% on July in Israel !), just ...2 Months After the 2nd Dose, reportedly Obliging to take even a 3rd, "Booster" Shot, (and currently Threatening to have to Repeat that, Also "Forward", during the foreseable Future !). Something that the WHO Finds Shocking, particularly as many Other, Poor Countries, have Not Yet got 1 First Shot... Meanwhile, however, Even ...inside USA's "White House" were found Infected Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Individuals, as 45% of UK's Deaths from the Virus concerned, Also, such Pseudo-"Vaccinated" People recently, Added to an UnExected Big Number of Similar Infections in a July 4 Event at the USA, and an Equivalent Proportion of Hospitalized such Victims at "Serious" conditions in Greece, (etc).   

    On the Contrary, at least Some among the "Classical" Vaccines, appear reportedly Able to Face Most Virus' "Variants" of concern, (f.ex. one from Russia's Saint-Petersburg, expected towards the End of 2021, and one Forthcoming in the USA, etc), while, in Addition, a Chinese "Classic" Vaccine would have (according to the "WHO") an Efficacy of ..."100%" (sic !) against Hospitalisations in Severe Conditions, and/or Deaths. (NDLR : Not Exhaustive List).

    => In Such Circumstances, EU's Stuborn Refusal, Until Now, to Authorize any "Classic" Vaccine, among an Absolute Majority of current Candidates Worldwide (Comp. Supra), at the Same Time that Controversial (and Failing) "Fake-Vaccines", Dangerously Affecting Human Genome, are Recently Imposed even to UnWilling People, by the Forceps, (Ibid), Obviously has No more Excuses or Pretexts, and URGENTLY Needs to be Droped and Changed !

    Particularly Nowadays, at the 200th Anniversary of Louis Pasteur's Birth : 1.821 - 2.021, Europe Must Prove (Both to its Citizens and the World) that is has Still Memory of its History, and Creative, Responsible Strength.

 

(../..)

 

('Draft-News")

 

--------------------------------------------

 

EuroStars-Eureka

Statistics

Ospiti: 52349106

Archive

Login Form





Ricordami

Hai perso la tua Password?
Non hai ancora un Profilo? Crea Profilo

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu


  imag0573_400

    An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.

    Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.

    But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).

    The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..    

- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.


    Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".

     - "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.

     - "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.

    + Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.

    In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
    Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.

    He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.

    - "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese

    Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
    Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".

    But  EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.

    He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything :  - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.

    To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".

    But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.

    Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.

    On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.

    - "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".

----------------------------------

Each MEP's vote will be registered !

-----------------------------------   

The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.


    But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).

    That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.   

Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...


    Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.

    The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.

    So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...

    Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
 

      ***     
 
     (Draft due to be updated).
 
***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Risultati

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.