english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Haupt arrow newsitems arrow Macron's Top MEPs to EF: Need for New Drugs+Vaccines against Virus Not Denied (as EU seeks to Move)

Macron's Top MEPs to EF: Need for New Drugs+Vaccines against Virus Not Denied (as EU seeks to Move)

Geschrieben von ACM
Monday, 11 October 2021
macron_key_meps_to_agg_eurofora_400


*Strasbourg/Press Club/Eurofora/- As Europe is the Only Continent in the World where Virus' Infections Grow and even Head towards Record-High levels, (UPDATED), while the Few Controversial Fake "Vaccines" Authorized in the EU (Excluding Various Others, particularly "Classic" type vaccines faithful to Pasteur's basic principles), are Obviously Failing, (See, inter alia, also : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/pfizerfakevaccineboomsvirusinaustralia.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fewfakevaccinesfascismcrashes.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/fewfakevaccinesfascismcrashes.html, etc), embattled French President Emmanuel Macron's Top MEPs on Health and WhistleBlowers, Replying to a "Eurofora"s Questions in Strasbourg's Press Club Today, did Not Deny a current Need for New Medical Therapies and Vaccines the soonest.

This Results from a Press Conference where Participated 5 Strasbourg's MEPs of the Presidential Majority, including, mainly, a vice-President of the French National Parliament, former Key Rapporteur of CoE's Assembly on "Whistle-Blowers" : Sylvain Waserman, who has extensively Dealt with Edouard Snowden (See Infra) and Assange's "Wikileaks" (Inter alia, See also: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coerapporteurforassangeprotection.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/coerapporteurforassange.html, etc.)related also to various Critical Issues raised by "Eurofora" in the Recent Past about the Virus' Pandemic, as well as another Key French MEP : Thierry Michels, full Member of the relevant Committees on European and Health affairs at the French National Assembly, and Expert at US-Headquartered MultiNational Medical Research Company "Lilly"'s EU outlet here.

----------------------------

eucom_vp_kyriakides_at_pace_coe__eurofora_400 

+Topically, this comes Shortly After EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides, (Cf. various Kyriakides' Replies to "Eurofora"'s Questions, in her former role as CoE Assembly's President, f.ex. at : ..., etc), had just announced EU's Intention to Try to Boost, in Addition, some Drugs against the Virus, at least as long as, Despite the existence of some controversial vaccines, nevertheless, People are Still Infected and/or Dying from COVIT-19. Meanwhile, Kyriakides spoke also at CoE Parliamentary Assemly's Plenary, Recently in Strasbourg, where she pointed at the Paradox of the Achievement of a 70% Vaccination Target in the EU (i.e. in 27 out of PanEuropean CoE's 47 Member States) on Summer 2021, (Limited to Only the 4 which were Authorized), Despite the current Fact that Infections and Deaths still Persist, and sometimes are even Growing in Europe...

The competent EU Commissioner, Replying to various MEPs' Questions, Acknowledged that there is "a Gap" vis a vis Many Citizens that "we Need to Address" on the Issue of those Few and Controversial "Vaccines", But said that the Main Role belongs to the Member States. And, Even if a Question on some WHO-Recognized Vaccines Not Yet Authorized by the EU, was, Unfortunately, "Forgotten" during the PACE's Debate, nevertheless, Kyriakides, Interestingly, Admitted that, normaly, Member States Could Authorize, in principle, Any Vaccine that they Wish, Independently and in Addition to those already Accepted by EU Organisations, (Nonobstant the Fact that, in Real Practice, such a Possibility seems, at least until now, to be Largely Excluded by a Majority of EU Governments, as, f.ex., was seen at the Pressure exerted on some Slovakia or Greece cases, Contrary to that of Hungary, etc).

-------------------------------

+ So, in Our Question, Today, "Eurofora" Observed mainly that those Few so-called "Vaccines" Authorized by EU Bureaucrats currently look to be rather Failing, given, inter alia, also the Fact that Europe has become,; Nowadays, the Only Continent in the World where particularly Infections, but also Deaths are currently Growing, while Even Pseudo-"Vaccinated" Individuals can Infect Other People, in Addition to themselves Becoming Infected, (Contrary to what happens for All "Classic"-style, Real Vaccines, during 2 Centuries since Pasteur's Invention), at least 4 European Countries have Just "Suspended", these days, one of the Controversial "m-RNA" Novel Tools, Affecting the Human Genome, (Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, Finland, etc), after UnExplained Deaths Soon after those Jams' Shots, in several Countries accross the World, including France, USA, New Zeland, etc., Following "Astrozeneca"'s Notorious earlier Discredit, to the point that even poor Serbia did Not Find Volunteers to get it, (as Also Australia, and Many Others), being Obliged to "Donate" the Unused stocks to More Poor Countries..., Added to "BioNTech/Pfizer"'s 1st Fall in Stock Markets this August 2021, Following, inter alia, also the revelation that it was Fading Out, Losing efficacy Only in 4 Months Time, and needing a "Boost" (or may be, soon a 4rth Intervention, etc), as well as quite Inefficient vis a vis the New Variant "D", responsible of a massive "Flop" on Infections and Deaths in Australia nowadays, (etc).

=> In Consequence, we Asked a Group of 5 Macron's MEPs, including Top Personalities on Health and Whistleblowers in Europe, (See Infra), whether the French President, who had shown, Initialy, a landmark Ambition for Europe's Role in Succesfully Fighting, throughout the World, that Health-devastating or even Deadly Virus' Pandemic, (including by Breakthrough Scientific Research), wouldn't feel now at least Misleaded by some Controversial, Unscrupulous and/or InCompetent Technocrats or Counsellors, Provoking obviously negative Popular Reactions, (particularly at the Eve of Crucial 2022 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections), so that, inter alia, he Might Agree to Find a practical and realistic Way to frankly convince People to get Sufficient Medication, particularly by Adding some New, No Controversial and more Efficient Medical Therapies and Real, Classic Vaccines, to be Authorized the Soonest possible.

Indeed, Macron had shared his Dream for the possible Invention of "a European Antidote" to that Deadly Vaccine, at a landmark Speech, right from the Start of this Pandemic (See: http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/macronandeuagainstvirus.html, etc), But, on the Contrary, Later-on, Europe appeared Divided, leaving the World's Medical Leadership Only to ...Turko-Americans or Otherwise purely USA, added to Post-BREXIT UK, as far as it concerns a Few Controversial Fake-"Vaccines" related to COVID-19 and Affecting the Human Genome, which proved to be quite InEfficient, sometimes Dangerous, and even UnPopular...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

macron_keymep_michels_to_agg_eurofora_400 

 - What you ("Eurofora") evoked, reminds the fact that, when I worked on the Coordination of European Countries vis a vis that Sanitary Crisis, one of the Ideas that we had Supported was the Creation of an EU Agency able to Face such Public Health Crisis, equiped with some 7 Billions €, for Drugs or Vaccines, including, mainly, by Stimulating Breakthrough Medical Research, observed Top French MEP Thierry Michels in Reply. This may become quite Topical, Nowdays, in the framework of the 2021-2022 Conference on Europe's Future, while, in the Past, almost Nobody spoke about such a development, he pointed out...

 + Meanwhile, indeed, EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides has Just proposed something apparently Similar, as she described in her above-mentioned intervention, Recently, at CoE's Assembly (Comp. Supra), All EU Member States have just Benefited from EU's Joint Purchace Strategy on aquiring Vaccines against the Virus, and the EU has notoriously emerged at the 1st Place in the World for the percentage of Vaccinations among its Population, as Michels reminded, (citting also, f.ex., about 80% for France, i.e. much More than Switzerland, etc).

=> Now, concerning your ("Eurofora"'s) Question on the eventual Authorisation of New Vaccines, we (EU) are Waiting, f.ex., that Producer Countries, as also Russia, China, and/ors, Present their Files to the competent European Authorities,  as EMA, etc. But it's true that, f.ex. Russia is Not precisely an Example in Vaccinations' percentage, while, at any case, the EU brought us a way to collectively Manage that Health Crisis, Michels concluded, (apparently Skipping, however, the Fact that the WHO has Already Recognized 2 Chinese Vaccines near Pasteur's "Classic" principles, which have Not Yet been Authorized by the EMA, as "Eurofora" reminded)...

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

french_assembly_vp_waserman_to_agg_eurofora_400 

++ Vice-President of French Parliament, and Rapporteur on "WhistleBlowers", initialy of the CoE, and Now of the National Assembly of France too, MEP Sylvain Waserman, Replying also to "Eurofora"'s Question, prefered to Focus  mainly on the point concerning Macron's Decision-Making on Key Issues about the Deadly Virus' Pandemic Crisis, in order to Challenge the view that the French President might, eventualy, be, sometimes Influenced by some Bureaucrats :

- Indeed, he referred, inter alia, Also to certain Crucial and Difficult Choices, Already made in some Strategic Importance Dillemas, including, f.ex., the DeConfinement of Summer 2020, etc., Stressing that President Macron had always carefully "Heard", before deciding, what several Scientific Experts and other stakeholders had to advise, But, Finaly, had Chosen Independently of that, according to what he sincerely Believed to be better for the People, the Country, and all Europe. And he observed, in this regard, Also the Fact that, Despite some undue Warnings about Alleged "Catastrophes" branded by certain sides, Nevertheless, such Risks have Not materialized at all. On  the Contrary, Waserman pointed, on this occasion, at Macron and Merkel's notorious Success to broker a landmark Franco-German and afterwards EU Agreement, on July 2020 in a Brussels' exceptionaly Long Summit, for a New kind of Strong joint Financial Support to a European Recovery Plan, (currently Starting to be Implemented from 2021), etc.

=> Therefore, he Obviously implied that, Also on "Eurofora"s above-mentioned Question about Eventual New Therapies and/or Vaccines, an Adequate Decision Could be made asap, withOut any Undue Influence by anyone else.

+ Interestingly, as far as it concerns, in Addition, Public OvberSight, Transparency and Democratic Accountability of various such Hard Choices, after the Adoption of his 1st Report on "Whistle-Blowers" by CoE's PanEuropean Assembly, (Following a long Investigation, which included even a landmark Video-Press Conference with World-Famous dissident Edouard Snowden at the CoE, where "Eurofora" participated actively : See http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/whistleblowersineuandcoe.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/snowdenfriendshelpwhistleblowers.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/snowdenlaughonlongmuellerspyingtrump.html + http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/muellerand911.html, etc), Waserman Examined this same Key Issue also in relation with EU's similar, but not identical, latest Regulation, in order to Conclude in a New Report for a Draft Legislation in France for the 1st Time, which would be Officially Presented, for Final Adoption by the National Assembly, in Paris Soon. (That may cover, also, at least some among "Eurofora"'s relevant Press Investigatory and Critical Publications on Crucial Issues about the Virus' Pandemic : Comp. Supra +).

 

(../..)

 

("Draft-News")

 

-----------------------------------------------

 

Enterprise Europe Network

Statistics

Besucher: 52913432

Archive

Login Form





Daten merken

Passwort vergessen?
Noch keinen Account? Account anlegen

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Resultate

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.