english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Haupt arrow newsitems arrow UMP call to Debate at EU Election: A strong EU versus Crisis needs European Consciousness. No Turkey

UMP call to Debate at EU Election: A strong EU versus Crisis needs European Consciousness. No Turkey

Geschrieben von ACM
Friday, 15 May 2009
imag0510_400

Today's vital need to transform EU into a strong Political Europe able to overcome the Global Crisis, calls for a European Consciousness to emerge, something incompatible with Turkey's EU bid,  and this must be debated by all at 2009 EU Election", for  EU Citizens to have a free and informed choice, the Head of France's Governing Party (UMP) Xavier BERTRAND, replied to "EuroFora"'s question, joined by Prime Minister Francois FILLON and candidate MEPs symbolically at Ludres, between Paris and Strasbourg : A symbolic townlet which brings together History and Innovation, Nature and Industry, Human Rights and European crossroads. (See 2nd part, infra).

From Berlin to Ludres (Nancy), top calls from Franco-German Governing Parties not to elude a democratic Debate on Turkey's controversial EU bid at 2009 EU Elections unfolded :

sarko_merkel_berlin_cdu_youth_400

The move echoed statements made earlier this week in Berlin, by German Chancellor Angie MERKEL and French President Nicolas SARKOZY, linking the current need for "a Political Europe with strong Will", and therefore "united together" with "an Identity and Values", to the refusal of Turkey's controversial EU bid, preferring a "privileged Partership" instead, while launching the forthcoming June 2009 EU Elections.

It also comes shortly after a Resolution adopted by EU Parliament on April in Strasbourg which asks all political parties to clearly mark and debate with EU Citizens their various programs on "Europe's Future", which will obviously follow differend paths according to whether it will integrate Turkey, or not. (See infra).

 imag0392_400

    The Secretary General of France's Governing Majority party ("Union for a Popular Majority" : UMP),  f. Minister, Xavier Bertrand, replying to an "EuroFora" Question, launched a call for all Parties involved in June 2009 EU Election to clarify their stance on Turkey's controversial EU bid, in order to give EU Citizens a chance to make a democratic and informed choice :

    - "It's a question of Clarity, Transparency and Truth : During this Electoral campaign, all Political parties should be crystal-clear about this issue", Bertrand replied to "EuroFora"s question on some parties' reluctance to openly take a stance.
    
    - "We  have spoken clearly, included recently in Berlin, ... It's better to Tell the Truth in Politics" and "the right thing to do" in a Democracy, he stressed.

     -" For us (UMP) it's clear : Turkey is a big country, and it can have a privileged partenrship with the EU. But for its demand to enter inside the EU the answer is "No !", the leader of France's Governing Party confirmed to "EuroFora".
-----------------------
    The substantial reasons for that, were  made crystal-clear by France's Prime Minister Francois FILLON :

- "These (2009) EU Elections are not like others. To overcome the current Crisis we need a Political Europe with a strong Will, able to act, innovate and change things.. A main question is  : Shall we let EU go into a slow routine, or will we give her the guiding tools that will make her able to succesfully face the Global competition"?

- "That's why, vis-a-vis the other side of the Ocean (i.e. USA, which always pushes to impose Turkey into the EU, from Clinton to Bush and Obama) we (Europeans) must defend our vision for a Europe which has a substance" :

- "We have a Culture. We have a Cultural Heritage. We have a Civilisation shared with all European countries. Europe has a common Cultural Heritage, a common Culture", Fillon stressed.

- "Europe claims also Moral Values, (i.e. Human Rights, Democracy) which forge our Identity, and outline the limits of this Europe. Humanism, Freedom of Thought, Rule of Law, are European Values. And these Rights are more advanced today in Europe than in the rest of the World, away from EU's borders. The Individual Person is better protected, more recognized in Europe than in other areas of the World."

- "Europe has a Soul, and  must have an Identity. That's why Enlargement must respect some clear Rules about its Borders. Europe cannot enlarge endlessly. .. Europe must be organized around these Countries which share its Cultural Heritage, share its History, and share its Values" (i.e. Human Rights).

 - "That's why our refusal to admit Turkey in Europe, is not a mark of hostility vis a vis this big country, .. But this refusal expresses our need to make a European Consciousness emerge inside clearly defined borders. And a European Consciousness will never exist if Turkey is inside the EU !", he concluded, largely applauded.

imag0472_400

 - "On September 2009, when we'll meet with (US President) OBAMA I'll tell him that, as long as he has not integrated MEXICO, we (EU) will not integrate Turkey !', added the President of EU Parliament's largest Group of MEPs, ChristianDemocrats/EPP, Joseph DAUL.
-------------------------
    While  many non-executed ECHR's judgements of 1996-2009 condemning Turkey for continuing grave violations of Human Rights  are due to be discussed in Strasbourg by  CoE's Committee of Ministers at the eve of EU June 2009 Election, it's important to note that earlier Berlin statements by Sarkozy and Merkel, stressing their opposal to Turkey's controversial EU bid, were also linked to Human Rights :

    - Sarkozy said, at this occasion, that, in his view, "an EU without Borders, is a Europa without a will, without Identity, without Values", (i.e. Human Rights). And asked : "If Europe doesn't defend its Values, who will do that for her ?"

    - And Merkel, underlined that "We want a united Europe, and a good neighborhood," .."That's why CDU is for a privileged partnership with Ankara, insted of a  full accession" "Our common position is the following : A privileged partrenship for Turkey, but not full accession", she stressed during the Summit between the Franco-German leaders.

    Merkel spoke side by side with EU Parliament's President, German MEP Hans Gert POETTERING,  indirectly but clearly making a reference (with a play of words specific in German language), to his recent statement, earlier in Strasbourg, to 'Berlin's March 2007 EU Summit, which stressed EU's wish to live united for people's happiness ("im glück vereint"), while celebrating EU's Charter of Fundamental Freedoms", i.e. Human Rights.

    One of the Frontrunner candidates for new MEPs (2009-2014) at Strasbourg's "Eastern" constituency, Arnaud DANJEAN, made it clear, in reply to Citizens' questions :  -"Turkey is a big country, fit for a privileged partership with the EU. But not for EU Membership, because it's not European. And Turkey is not European neither by its Geography, nor in History or Culture, nor from a Democratic point of view (given Turkish Army's power over civilians), nor in moral Values, ("because it doesn't even recognize the Armenian Genocide", while Human Rights' violations continue), "not even for our GeoPolitical aims, (since we don't want to have common borders with Iraq, Iran, etc)", he said, largely applauded.

imag0406_400

------------------------
Barnier to "EuroFora" : EU - Turkey "Negotiations" are  "for Privileged Partnership"..
--------------------------
    - For us, what is going on now, between EU and Turkey are "Negotiations for a Partnership", and "we don't know when they will end. We shall see" for that. But on the substance, "our position is clear : We (France's Governing Party UMP) are clearly on the idea that Turkey will not enter in the EU, but will have a Privileged Partnership", said the Head of France's Governing Party's candidate MEPs, former EU Commissioner and Foreign Minister, currently Minister of Agriculture, Michel BARNIER, to "EuroFora"
----------------------------------------
    With Sarkozy's photo and moto everywhere : -"When Europe wants, Europe can", French Governing Party UMP's leaders stressed that things were not as usual :

     - "Now it's Time for a New European Voluntarism. Time to be Bold. The time has come to find anew the audacious spirit of Europe's founding fathers, as fex. Robert Schuman, Guy Monnet, Gasperi, General de Gaulle, etc. For audacious new industrial projects, as those of the creation of the "CECA"  (Steel and Coal European Community), Airbus, Ariane rocket, the Euro, which protects from inflation, europan Sovereignity projects as Galileo (Satellite Navigation system), etc. We are glad to work together with (French) President (Nicolas Sarkozy), and find anew this boldness. It's a time for voluntarism, for politics", stressed the Head of UMP's candidates for new MEPs, former EU Commissioner and current Minister, Michel BARNIER.  

    Citizens have the Right to expect real Debates on European issues, instead of nationalist agendas and personal attacks by those who have confused EU Elections and National ones, he added, pointing at UMP's Program with 30 proposals, unveiled earlier today.

    -"This new (EU Parliament's) Mandate (2009-2014) will not be similar to others. Because we are in a context of Crisis, and there are much more important expectations from Europe". A greater commitment is required by circumstances from all involved, including Member States. If might be necessary to rush, to set aside cumbersome proceduralism, what one was accustomed to. Fex. if we had to follow the customary procedures, the War between Russia and Georgia would not have been stoped in August 2008. The 1st EuroZone Summit which started to stimulate the Economy, would never take place, (etc). Because, simply, this was not the usual thing to do", said Xavier BERTRAND from the outset.

    FILLON reminded that, in order to face the Global Crisis, it's on Economic Policies also, that "we succeeded to bring the debate at EU level" Thus, he invited EU Citizens to "participate to June 2009 EU Elections in order to strengthen EU Parliament which controls Brussel's Bureaucracy", voting "for a Europe wich has a Will and a Heart".

- "Let's continue to Change Europe !", is indeed the 2009 EU Election's logo for the French Governing Party UMP.

 -"Sarkozy sometimes had to rush, to push hard for things to be done, (during the 2008 French EU Presidency), but, at the end, main decisions were taken by Unanimity" among EU's 27 Member States, including old and new Central-Eastern European Countries, observed  Joseph DAUL.

"As 66% of German People believe too, it's together that Europeans will succeed to overcome this Global Crisis". "European Solidarity already went beyond EuroZone, to include even other EU Member States"; he added.
----------------------
Similar moves on Turkey's controversial EUI bid were, indeed, multiplying, in various ways, at several EU Member Countries :

F.ex. in Austria, the governing party confirmed recently that it has promised a "Referendum on Turkey". In Germany, the CSU party leader, the Bavarian Horst SEEHOFER, has recently asked also  for "a Referendum on Turkey" throughout all Germany. Cyprus Government's stance for Turkey's "full membership, if it fully meets the conditions", was challenged in favor of the Franco-German view by 4 other parties' candidates, including main opposition's Top MEP CASULIDES, (DHSY, Europarty, Socialist, DHKO, etc). In Holland, the mainstream parties appear concerned by a risk to lose voters in favor of other movements, more critical on Turkey's controversial EU bid, if they don't make their position crystal-clear. Even in the UK, eurosceptics loudly denounced Turkey's EU bid, added to "Veritas" party, present throughout the EU. Some surprises cannot be excluded, at least partly, even in Slovakia, Bulgaria, Belgium, Lithuania, Poland, etc.
---------------------------
    All these moves were often kind, but clear replies to Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davoutoglou's demand, earlier the same day, while meeting with out-going EU Commissioner on Enlargment, Finnish Socialist Oli Rehn, for EU Countries not to make of Turkey's controversial EU bid "an Internal (sc !) issue", as he said for EU's enlargement. He echoed Turkish Prime Minister Edogan's earlier demands in Brussels to dissuade EU Cizitens to discuss Turkey's controversial EU bid during June 2009 EU Elections. It can be also be taken as a reply to Turkish Prime Minister Abdulah Giul's earlier claim that "politicians come and go" (referring to Sarkozy and Merkel), and that Turkey could, later-on, "close negotiation chapters in 5 minutes !"..
------------------------------------
Socialists elude Turkey's issue, while their voters are Divided ?! ..
------------------------------------
    Curiously, however, both at an EU level and in some big countries as France, Socialist parties seem ...reluctant to participate to a Public Debate on Turkey's controversial EU bid :

    -  French Socialist leader Martine AUBRY, both earlier in Strasbourg and this week in Paris, while she kept on criticizing Sarkozy for secondary matters or national policy issues, on the contrary, she ommitted any reference to Sarkozy and Merkel's famous statements on Turkey's controversial EU bid, made in Berlin from Sunday..

    Experienced observers guessed that this Paradox may be due to the fact that, while most French "Socialist" Politicians favor Turkey's EU bid, on the contrary, more than 42% of the People usually voting for them, are against, according to recent Polls..  .

    On EU level also, President of EU Parliament's Socialist Group, German MEP Martin SCHULTZ replying to a "TCWeekly" question earlier in Strasbourg, said that his group prefers to give priority on the Global Financial Crisis, instead of Turkey's issue.

A d French Socialist leader Martine AUBRY, even if she had previously underlined her personal stance in favor of Turkey's EU bid, whenever Ankara might be "ready", on the contrary, she reportedly didn't say anything in reply to the Sarkozy - Merkel joint Berlin Statements, during an important political meeting she held afterwards..

- "I don't know if and when Turkey might fullfil the Human Rights, Democracy and Economy criteria. We shall see. But we (i.e. the Socialist Party) are in favor of the principle of Turkey's entry into the EU", said later to "EuroFora" French Socialist MEP Catherine TRAUTMANN, head of PS' candidates for the Eastern region, including Strasbourg. "Turkey has been a candidate for a long time (NDLR : since 1999's Socialist Governments in Germany, France, the UK, Greece, etc, and the 1st Majority Abstention in EU Elections) and the rules must not be changed afterwards", she added , (apparently forgeting that 27 EU Governments already decided in 2006 and 2007 that negociations with Turkey are "Open-Ended", i.e. might end into a Privileged Partnership and not accession)... "Turkey must be judged with same rules as other countries, and without Discrimination", Trautman added, curiously forgetting the "No" previously said by the EU to Moroco..

    A point that Fillon's speech at Ludres, following Sarkozy's statements in Berlin with Merkel, ...already adressed, since the criteria they apply on Turkey can obviously be applied equally to any other country : F.ex. Moroco, Algeria, Tynesia, Egypt, Kazakstan, Turkmenistan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Dubai, etc., and many other Non European States accross the World, with which France and EU often have close, good, or even excellent relations.

    But even Socialist MEP Trautman seemed to have a few Reservations on Turkey : - "At the same time, we (EU) must see if we want Turkey to play a certain role in a geopolitical area, or not. The USA are pushing for that, but USA are not confronted with the problem of Integration of such a big country as Turkey. So, they have only a GeoStrategic point of view. That's why we (EU) don't have to do anything Americans tell us. They (USA) don't decide for us (EU)", she tried to differenciate a bit.. But, once again, she simply came back to the Turkey in the EU position, noting that "Turkey was a member of the (paneuropean) CoE", (the paneuropean oganization with 47 Member States, including Azerbaidjan, etc), since the Cold War period..

However, Trautman's sayings to "EuroFora" naturally cannot be taken as of equal authority as a clear  Public Declaration made at the Top level of Socialist Party's leadership, .. which remained, curiously, too discreet on Turkey...
-------------------
But, paradoxically, it's a Socialist MEP from Hungary who drafted an interesting Resolution, timely adopted by EU Parliament in Strasbourg on April 2009, asking from all Political Parties to clearly debate on their different Projects about Europe's future...

The reply to be given to the key - Question "what kind of Europe do we want in Future", is so obviously affected by the choices made on Turkey's controversial EU bid, (fex. on Human Rights and Democracy, Geographical Borders and History, Culture and Identity, Social Cohesion and levels of Education, Science/Technology and Economy, close, popular links to EU Citizens or Bureacratic contempt, etc), that Sarkozy has even explicitly included the question of Turkey as a key part of the issue of "Europe's Future" : This was stressed in his 2007 Speech on Europe in Strasbourg, in the compromise he offered to EU Commission on August 2007 (to continue negotiations on condition to freeze 5 Chapters linked to Accession and start a reflection on "Europe's Future", etc), up to these 2009 January and May statements on June EU Elections..  

Moreover, rumours by experienced sources inside the EU, coming from  a period previous to 1999's controversial decision to give Turkey a "Candidate" status, already earmarked the Year 2013 as probably the most "crucial" moment for decisions on Turkey, because of changes expected on EU's Financial Perspectives (fex.on Agriculture or Regional Funds, etc). I.e. during the 2009-2014 Mandate of MEPs who will be elected by June 2009 EU Elections ! Otherwise, afterwards it risks to be too late for EU Citizens...

Unless things change, in the few time available before the June 4 to 7 Elections..
But are 2 Weeks enough for a clear and serious Debate, to give a real chance for 350 millions of EU Citizens to be informed and think before deciding ?

***

Ludres (Nancy) : EU Symbol ? History and Innovation, Nature and Industry, Human Rights and European crossroads.
ludres._400 

    Ludres, a beautiful 7000 inhabitats townlet which brings together History and Innovation, Natural Environment and big Industrial sites, Human Rights and European crossroads, attracted France Governing party's meeting for 2009 EU Elections,  not only because it's close to Strasbourg's EU Parliament's main building, but probably also because it can offer some useful and timely European Symbols :

    At the beautiful Mountainous outskirts of Nancy, Ludres is an Historic City existing since Pre-Historic times (- 800 JC), before the Gallo-Roman fortifications, but proud to have offered the Steel which served to build Paris' Eiffel tower, inaugurated at an International Exhibition, before becoming the 1st to have a Cabled TV, and celebrate a Decade of Internet 1997-2007, honored many times as @@@@ EU Internet city between 2003-2007 :
    A pioneer well ahead of EU's 5 Billion Economic "Stimulus" plan, voted at EU Parliament in Strasbourg on May 2009 on a Report by German MEP Heiner Böge, President of Budget's committee, with a large part for High-speed Broad band Communications at Rural areas, as French Minister on Information Society's development and perspectives, Nathalie KOZIUSKO-MORIZET (of Polish origin) highlighted.

    Close to Lorrain region's biggest Industrial site (with the larger number of enterprises), and at the crossroads of High-Speed Train between Paris and Strasbourg, Luxembourg, Brussels (Belgium) and Frankfurt or Stuttgard (Germany), Bale (Switzerland), or Milano (Italy), 7 minutes from Nancy's famous Stanislas' square (historically linked to Poland's royal family), Ludres is twinned with cities from current EU chair : Czech republic, Germany and Austria (from Bavaria and Tyrol respectively).

    But Ludres' old Church reminds that it's also home-town of a Humanist politician, killed at the 1st World War (1915), who consecrated a part of his life to defend poor People's Rights, and became famous when the French Assembly adopted his draft Law for the protection of widows and orphan Children : Ferri de Ludres.

    Following a typical "Srasbourg" model (i.e. a City where all Europeans meet, but surrounded by splendid Nature), Ludres could be a symbol for many other towns throughout Europe who'd like to bring together the beauty of Rural space and elementary Human Solidarity, with the efficiency of Modern technologies, all linked with Europe's biggest axes.

***
EUDigitalForum

Statistics

Besucher: 54924378

Archive

Login Form





Daten merken

Passwort vergessen?
Noch keinen Account? Account anlegen

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

cedh_press_conflistening_agg

ECHR's President to "EuroFora" on Journalists Gongadze and Adali murders : Principles must apply to all States, without discrimination.


+ ECHR's Statistics on Freedom of Expression (See below).


 European Court of Human Rights' President, Jean-Paul Costa, questioned by "EuroFora" on Journalists' murders, as in Gongadze and Adali's cases etc., strongly stressed all CoE Member States' obligation to make efficient Investigations to find and punish those responsible, and underlined that ECHR's case-law's principles must apply to all without any discrimination.

His call was clearly supported by various Top MEPs who denounced a risk of "Double Standards" if some Journalists' murders are investigated, while others don't.

To avoid such risks, CoE's Parliamentary Assembly adopted a Resolution, on the occasion of Ukranian Journalist Gongadze's murder, "stressing", as a matter of general Principle, "the importance it attaches to the safety of Journalists and political activists, especially those linked to opposition groups, in ALL member states of the CoE". All "crimes against journalists and political activists must be investigated ... as a matter of priority, without political interference".

Costa was replying to "EuroFora"s question on the fact that, after CoE's Committee of Ministers, also CoE's Assembly had just adopted a Resolution on Gongadze murder case, based on an ECHR's judgement of 2005, asking a full Investigation from Ukraine, who has found and condemned  in 10 years of jail 2 executants, but not yet the instigators.

While nothing similar was yet done for dissident Turkish Cypriot Kutlu Adali's murder, with 5 bullets shot at his head out of his Family's home in the territories of Cyprus occupied by Ankara's army, despite another ECHR's judgement of the same year 2005, and despite Turkey's claim that nobody was found among those responsible for the murder, and that there was nothing more to do..

In order to be credible and efficient, CoE's mechanisms shouldn't find a way to at least ask for full investigations of all Journalists' murders anywhere they might be committed, without exceptions ?

adali_gongadze


- "On the larger question that you raised, I'd like to say, since we are in a period of stock-taking on ECHR's 50 Years, that the Court's case-law developed certain concepts ....such as the Positive obligations of States, part of which are also the procedural obligations", started to reply ECHR's President.

 - "Whenever Journalists, Lawyers, Defenders of Human Rights, or even simple Citizens are murdered, the States are held responsible, not only if its their own security forces' agents who committed these murders, but also if they didn't make sufficiently substantial and efficient Investigations", he stressed.

- "I want to strongly underline that we (ECHR) have found in many cases numerous violations of Articles 2 and 3 against States, ....(about) murders or torture, ...because they didn't make enough Investigations in order to try to find and punish those responsible".

- "We (ECHR) do that vis-a-vis all 47 (CoE) Member States, without any discrimination".

"Naturally, the circumstances in each particular case may be differend, and we can't ommit to apply the rules of proof, or the rules of criminal procedure".

"But we try, by all means, to apply these principles of our case-law, to all States", he concluded.

imag0335_400


      Costa's call was strongly supported by several Top CoE MEPs, from various Political areas


- "To investigate the murder of one Journalist, and not of another, looks like Double Standards", denounced the President of EuroLeft Group in CoE's Assembly, Dutch MEP Tiny Cox.  

- "What is the reason ? Politics or specificity of a case ? Of course, if Cyprus and Turkey are involved, it's always a Political case"..

- "Murders of Journalists should always be fully investigated, because killing Journalists is not only killing persons, but also killing Free Press".  "We (CoE's Assembly) should do our outmost to help People who are working on Free Press and they are under threat or murdered".

Because for Free Politics, Free Press is a pre-requisitive : Parliamentarians  cannot  function without a Free Press. Not investigating, is not protecting ourselves".

So we should investigate all Journalists' murders : We are talking about Gongadze, about the Cypriot man (Adali), about the Journalist murdered in Moscow one week ago, etc", Cox concluded

- "CoE can' look at these cases differently. CoE can't wear Blinckers  !".
- "If the one is investigated, so has to be also the other. Why there wasn't full investigation ? Why's that ?", wondered British  Socialist MEP, Alan Meale.

- "A good idea" would be to "make a Motion for Resolution", and "join all Journalists' murders. Adali and Gongadze etc", said to "EuroFora" EU Parliament Political affairs Committee's President, Goran Lindbland, ChristianDemocrat MEP from Sweden.


(See also earlier News at "EuroFora" on similar issues).
-------------------------------

ECHR's Statistics on Freedom of Expression :


    Almost Half of condemnations by ECHR for violations of Freedom of Expression in 2008, concern Turkey : 20 out of a total of 48 for all CoE's Member States.

    Russia, Poland, France and Moldova were condemned only 3 times. Romania, Greece, Portugal, 2 times, and the other CoE Member States only 1 time, or none.
--------------------
    During the last Decade : 1998 - 2008, Turkey was condemned for violating Freedom of Expression in ..169 cases, while Austria only in 24.

    France and Moldova in 14 and 13, respectively, closely followed by Russia and Poland with 11 and 10, respectively. The rest of CoE Member States had less than ten condemnations.    
    

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Resultate

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.