newsitems
French Foreign Minister Juppé:Convince Russia on Humanitarian Acces in Syria without NATO.Nor Turks?
French Foreign Minister Juppé:Convince Russia on Humanitarian Acces in Syria without NATO.Nor Turks?

*Strasbourg/EU Parliament/Angelo Marcopolo/- We are currently trying to convince our Russian friends with a Plan for Humanitarian Access in Syria, thanks to Humanitarian Corridors' protection, but apparently leaving NATO out of that equation, (as "EuroFora" had earlier questioned also other French President Sarkozy's close sources), revealed in substance French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé, speaking to Journalists including "EuroFoa" in EU Parliament in Strasbourg at the eve of important Votes tomorrow, Thursday, here by MEPs, due to be followed by more UNO steps asap.
- In particular, "we are working, inside UNO's SC., in order to see if Russia could finally accept mainly to accentuate or adopt Measures relayed to the Humanitarian situation, given the humanitarian desaster which is on the road at Homs and/or elsewhere. F.ex. Humanitarian Corridors could be, eventually, set up, in the framework of a Peace-keeping mission of the UNO and of the Arab Ligue", Juppé pointed out precisely when "EuroFora" approached the spot where he evoked his forthcoming meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Serguei Lavrov.
- "I am already working wery well with the Russians elsewhere in the World, f.ex. at Darfur (south Sudan), told "EuroFora" earlier UNO's unde-Secretary General responsible for international Peace-keeping operations, Alain Le Roy, who had also a particularly useful experience as former Head Expert for the preparation of the Historic Heads of State/Government Summit for the creation of the "Union for the Mediterranean", organized by President Sarkozy in 2008 at the "Grand Palais" in Paris, at the eve of the 7 - 12/2008 French EU Chairmanship.
In fact, it's mainly the implication of NATO which appears as a kind of "Red line" for Russia (and probably also China), in such kind of International operations, while it seems, on the contrary, more open to discussions for UN-sponsored a.o. International Peace-keeping operations, particularly when they focus on urgent Humanitarian issues, (f.ex. as Presidents Medvedev and Sarkozy had reportedly discussed on August 2008 about the conflict between Georgia's central Government and its breakaway regions).

Thus, a joint Draft Resolution on Syria, tabled together by most EU Parliament's Groups for vote on Thursday noon, urgently calls UNO and other Humanitarian Organizations to evaluate Humanitarian needs in violent conflict-stricken zones, where it asks "an immediate Ceasefire" in order to evacuate victims, and for "Free and full Access to the Humanitarian staff entrusted with the duty to provide vital material and services to Civilians seriously affected by Violence, while EU commits itself to boost its Humanitarian assistance, in order to save Lives, namely by Medical products, Food, Water and elementary domestic tools, etc., due to be managed by a "Humanitarian Working Group" among the "Friends of Syria".
But, concerning Syria, the obviously disturbing point for all involved is the fact that the most Militarist State in that Asian-Middle Eastern neighborhood, Turkey, is notorious for its various Military Threats and/or Invasions/Occupations, from the Aegean Sea, vis a vis Greece, threatened by "Causa Bellis", in addition to the former Armenian and/or Kurdish regions, up to the semi-Occupied island of Cyprus, EU Member, followed by Turkish Army's more and more frequent, Deadly Invasions at the autonomous Kurdish Region of Iraq, past threats even against Syria, etc., where its borders are full of Tragic Histories including the Armenian Genocide, the oppression of Kurds, the Ottoman-Turk Empire's military invasions and occupations of almost all Arab Countries (except Morocco, which succesfuly resisted to the Ottoman-Turkish Army), where it destroyed the Historic former Arab Civilisation, degrading all the area, whose Peoples had to fight many hard struggles, helped by a part of Europe, in order to succeed to liberate themselvess from any such remnant of of unforgetable Past Atrocities and underdevelopment.
Therefore, only grave Amnesia or gross Naivety might close some's eyes to Energy-Poor Turkey's real motives if Ankara was let to intervene militarily inside Syria, closer to Iraq's oil/gas, betraying with a delayed U-turn Ankara's EU bid long time supporteur Assad son (who was doing Publicity for Turkey's impopular EU bid even in Paris, even on 2008), and to whom the Turkish regime owes the ousting of former Kurdish rebels' leader Ocalan, back on 1999, from his initial Bekaa valley hidding and training area, provoking an unprepared Odyssey in Italy, Russia, Greece and Kenya, etc. until he as kidnaped at Nairobi...
A fortiori when Turkish agents' trustworthiness is worse than Doubtful, considering also the fact that the mysterious "disappearance" of an important Syrian dissident against Assad's regime, while he was staying in a Refugee Camp set up in controversial conditions (See CoE's recent criticism, already published earlier by "EuroFora") at the Western/North borders between Syria and Turkey, (the Eastern/North borders being tightly closed by Ankara's Army because of Turkish fears of Kurdish refugees' penetration), was finally proven to be a mere .. hi-jacking by Turkish agents, who betrayed their victim by kidnaping him and giving hi^m as prisoner back to the Assad regime, as a recent judicial investigation found out, confirming rumours.
Added in such a Past and Current, obviously Unreliable, unstable, constantly changing and zig-zaging Turkish opportunism, the recent addition of a 2 Days visit to Turkey by NATO's Secretary General Anders Rasmussen, as well as Ankara's decision to host more NATO Radars (for a future anti-Balistic system sponsored by the USA), from which data the Turkish Government wants to exclude most of its neighbours, including EU Member Cyprus and NATO Strategic Partner Israel, etc., all this naturally does not facilitate the credibility of promisses that NATO would stay aside from Syria...

Thus, not only Russia, but even China and others might raise critical questions if they see that, instead of using mainly Neutral EU Member Country Cyprus (where German and French army and Navy have already logistic and Naval basis under a UNOs-sponsored International Mandate, since 2006's Lebanon borders and coasts' crisis), in addition to Lebanon (a pluralistic country with well known links both to the West and Eastwards), on the contrary, an EU-led coalition might commit the error to let NATO-Member counry Turkey, with its notoriously aggressive Military, and its controversial, Oppressive and Expansionist Past, intervene, in one way or another, by force inside the territory of a neighboring country as Syria.
At the same time, the notorious, still on-going and even aggravating recently (according to various organizations, MEPs, etc) systematic oppression by the Turkish regime against political a.o. dissidents, with a growing number of even elected MPs, Mayors, etc. as well as Journalists, etc. jailed without any judgement, and/or for obviously disproportionate or ridiculous pretexts, can't really give Ankara the image of an "Angel" who would be sincerely devoted into simply defending Human Rights, unless if anyone might like to break a World Record of "Tragi-Comic" blindness... Nor could Turkey be credible, after zig-zaguing hypocritically between years of exceptionaly close links to Mr. Assad's regime (as also recently with former Colonel Khadafi's regime) before, suddenly, changing camp at the last minute, for unclear yet, opportunistic motivations.
The tragic confusion provoked, f.ex. recently after it was proved that suspicions that Turkish Security Service agents had kidnapped an important Syrian political Dissident from a Reefugee Camp, and betrayed him by delivering him as prisoner to Mr. Assad's regime, were, indeed, true, (Comp. a previous, relevant "EuroFora'"s NewsReport on CoE's Reports about Refugee Camps' problems in Turkey) can't be erased simply by the arrest of those agents, without even searching to find and punish anyone among those who were the real instigators, and for whom they did that Dirty job...
As for those old, but declining, lobbies who might still attempt to push towards some ancient draft plans for controversial, Unsafe and Too Expensive Oil/Gas Pipelines through Turkey, they could obviously commit a gross Blunder to eventually transfert that even to Syria, since it's enough to just have a look at a Map, in order to realize that EU's interest naturally is to have a Friendly regime in Syria in order to be able to organize DIRECT (and, therefore, Shorter, Faster, Cheaper and Safer) Transports of Oil/Gas resources from Iraq, Iran, etc., via European Ships through the Mediterranean Sea to EU-based Sea and River Ports, without being threatened to be blocked and/or blackmaled by the interference of any other Foreign State. So that it would be a blatant Blunder if anyone might be so blind as to eventually subordinate that to the risk of ...Turkey's notorious "Vetoes", (See relevant previous "EuroFora"'s NewsReports, with several such practical suggestions, etc.).
(NDLR : "DraftNews", as already sent earlier to "EuroFora"s Subrscribers/Donors. A more accurate and complete Final Version is due asap).
***
Main Menu
Home Press Deontology/Ethics 2009 Innovation Year EU endorses EuroFora's idea Subscribers/Donors FAQs Advanced search Multi-Lingual FORUM EuroFora supports Seabird newsitems In BriefBRIEF NEWS
-
Dégradation de la Turquie par S&P: la bulle financière de croissance artificielle risque à crever ?!00:00 - 03.05.2012
- 00:00 - 12.04.2012
- 00:00 - 25.03.2012
-
Merkel warns Hollande on Turkey if Socialists harm €uro : Pacta sunt servanda(Her reply to EuroFora)00:00 - 06.02.2012
-
CoE asks Turkey Free Movement + International Access +Protection for Syrian Refugees closed in Camps00:00 - 24.01.2012
- 00:00 - 13.12.2011
- 00:00 - 17.11.2011
- 00:00 - 04.11.2011
- 00:00 - 11.10.2011
Popular
- Pflimlin's vision
- The European Athletic "Dream Team", after Barcelona 2010 Sport Championship Results
- Joan Baez in Strasbourg: No real "Greens" in Low-Rhine nor Baden-Württemberg ?!
- CoE Political Director Laurens to EuroFora:Strasbourg Democracy Forum to link Citizens as MEPs call?
- UN Spokesman Nesirky to EuroFora on IMF's Straus-Kahn UN VIP Pass +NY trip after Turkey UN/CoE event
- CoE's GRECO President Kos to EuroFora on EU deal : No 3 levels of fight against Corruption in Europe
- MEPs strive for EU logic while Libya Army action goes NATO +Monetary Stability Mechanism to €uroZone
- EEAS Crisis response +Operations Director Miozo to EuroFora on 1st EU mission to Libya + MEPs' votes
Latest News
- Franco-German continuity, but differences on the table. Next weeks crucial for June EU Summit
- Dégradation de la Turquie par S&P: la bulle financière de croissance artificielle risque à crever ?!
- Sarkozy au parvis des Droits de l'homme/Trocadero: Humanisme Européen contre Délocalisation +Dumping
- Draghi responds positively to Sarkozy call for New Growth model including ECB
- Hollande va relancer l'adhésion Turque à l'UE, Sarkozy s'oppose. Les Médias escamotent.Le PS esquive
Statistics
Visitors: 2721239Archive
Login Form
Other Menu

An "Eugenic" loophole Amendment, which might expose to Dangers reminiscent of "3rd Reich's" notorious Genetic Abuses, hidden at the last minute inside an otherwise Good, larger Health policy Package scheduled to be voted on Thursday, was strongly denounced by a coalition of MEPs from various Political Groups and Countries, in a Press Conference held this afternoon at EU Parliament in Strasbourg.
Mainly calling to "Select Human Embryos", via "Genetic Counselling" and "pre-implantation" Techniques including "Genetic Tests", in order to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", it might open ways to Dangerous Practices in Future, they denounced in substance.
But they also made it clear that a much larger Report inside which this Controversial Amendment "No 15" was added in dubious circumstances, officialy destinated to struggle against "Rare Diseases", and drafted by Professor Antonios Trakatellis, was otherwise "an Excellent Report", aiming at a "completely Uncontroversial target" of Health policy on which "all MEPs and Experts are united, believing that Europe should act" to protect People's Health (See "EuroFora"'s earlier News).
The controversy came at a particularly delicate moment for the EU in relation to Citizens, at the eve of June 2009 EU Elections, and shortly before Ireland re-votes for "Lisbon Treaty"..
- Denouncing risks of "an Eugenic demand, very similar to what we had during the 3rd Reich in Germany, but now coming from some Scientisists themselves", German ChristianDemocrat/EPP MEP Dr. Peter Liese stressed that critical MEPs were against "Eugenic" engineering with "Selection of Human Embryos", and anything which might ultimately lead up to to a "Selection of Human Race". It doesn't help to "eradicate" Human Lives, he added.
Several Experts and NGOs expressed "Deep Concern", as f;ex. DR M.C. Cornel of the "European Society of Human Genetics", which stressed, on this occasion, that "the importance of Non-Directiveness in Reproductive issues is a Central characteristic of Human Genetics, after the Atrocities committed in the name of Genetics in the first half or the 20th Century".
- "This is completely Unacceptable", stressed Italian Liberal MEP Vittorio Prodi, on the Controversial Amendment, also because pushes to "eliminate early Human Life", as he noted.
- "This opens a Dangerous Road, rather a Motorway", denounced Danish MEP Mrs Margrette Auken, from the "Greens", observing that various similar attempts were made in the Past "not only in Germany, but also in several other Countries, "even at the 1970ies", "f.ex. on forced Sterilisation of Roma" People, and other criticisable situations f.ex. in the UK, in Sweden, etc. as she said.
+ Other NGOs, as f.ex. "LebenHilfe" from Berlin, added that, among various other Risks, could also be that, by exploiting the pre-implantation Genetic Diagnostics and the Selection of "healthy" Embryos, some may "propagate" several "Eugenic" aims, starting f.ex. by pushing to eradicate Human Livies which might "Cost too much" to preserve, ultimately exposing to dangers reminiscent of the "3rd Reich"'s atrocious abuses.
In consequence, ChristianDemocrats/EPP and "Green" MEPs "decided by Majority to vote against" this Controversial Amendment, anounced to Journalists the 5 MEPs who participated in the Press Conference, representing a wide spectrum, from Liberals to "Greens" and ChristianDemocrats, and from Hungary, Italy, Germany and Danemark up to Ireland (Gay Mitchell), etc.
----------------------------------
Hungarian ChristianDemocrat MEP Laszlo Surjan said "that it was "Suddenly, at the End of the Procedure" in Committee, that "appeared this (Controversial) Amendment, which has nothing to do" with the main purpose of the Report, on which all agreed.
He denounced an "Unhonest" move, and called to "avoid this kind of unacceptable situations". Nobody should "Select People", Surjan stressed.
- "We (MEPs) had No Chance to Discuss" this last-minute Amendment earlier added at a Committee's level, said German MEP Peter Liese
Speaking to "EuroFora", Dr. Liese, the Spokesman of the ChristianDemocrat/EPP Group in EU Parliament, said that MEPs didn't oppose other references of the Report f.ex. on "Genetic Tests", because they were "no proposals" to impose them, while, on the contrary, there was "a Problem" if anyone attempted to "impose" f.ex. this or that Genetic Technique and "Genetic Counselling", etc. to the People on human reproduction.
-------------
The precise Text :
-----------------
Controversial parts of Amendment No 15 ask mainly "to lead finally to the Eradication" of "Hereditary" "rare diseases", "through Genetic Counselling .., and ..pre-Implantation Selection of healthy Embryos".
But EU Rapporteur Professor Trakatellis, said to "EuroFora" that fears should be alleviated by Guarantees that all this should be done only "where appropriate", when it's "not contrary to existing National Law", and "always on a Voluntary basis", according to other Parts of the Amendment.
He stressed that the main aim was to allow "a free and informed choice of persons involved", without imposing them anything : - "It's not an obligatory, but advisary" text, he said.
To make that point clear, he was ready, in agreement with many MEPs, to eventually drop at least that part of the controversial Amendment which initially called for "efforts to ..lead finally to the Eradication of those rare diseases" "which are Hereditary".
But, until late Wednesday evening, reportedly together with many other MEPs, he stood by all the rest of the controversial Amendment, (fex. on the "Genetic Counselling" and the "pre-implantation Selection of healthy Embryos"), so that critical MEPs, going from ChristianDemocrats as Dr. Liese, to "Greens" or "Ind/Dem", observed to "EuroFora" that "this was not enough" to close the dangerous loophole.
Particularly since, as Professor Trakatellis noted himself, "this is already allowed to the U.K.", and "other National Legislations would probably follow, sooner or later" in a similar direction. As for a general call to "Eradicate Hereditary rare Diseases", this "should happen, at any case, in practice, de facto", to protect public Health.
On the contrary, "our goal should be to help patients suffering from rare diseases, not to eradicate the patients. In case of genetic disease risk, the decision should not be guided by scenarios" made by politicians. "Perents who may decide to accept a child, even if handicapped or with genetic disease, must be respected and supported with solidarity", critical MEPs stated.
- "Any Pressure" to "a patient or couple (who "should be able to make an informed choice consistent with their own values"),"from health Professionals, Public Health Policies or Governemental Institutions, or Society at large, should be avoided", stresses the "European Society for Human Genetics".
----------------------------------
Each MEP's vote will be registered !
-----------------------------------
The Socialist Group requested a "Split vote" on the Amendment 15, first without, and afterwards with the words "lead finally to the Eradication" etc.
But the first "split vote" leaves intact all the other parts of the Controversial Amendment, (i.e. "Genetic Counselling", "Selection of healthy Embryos", etc).
That's why, 3 Groups of MEPs : ChristianDemocrats/EPP, "Greens/EFA", and "Ind/Dem", have asked for "Roll Call Votes", on everything regarding the Controversial Amendment No 15, and on the final outcome of the resulting Report as amended, which will register all the individual positions to be taken by each MEP.
Something which will obviously make each MEP think twice before voting for one or another choice, to be sure that he/she will make the right choice in front of EU Citizens, particularly at these pre-Election times...
Crucial Votes were scheduled between 12 Noon and 1 p.m. local Strasbourg time, in the middle of a long series of various other Reports, and after a long Public Debate on the larger Health policy package, from 9 to 11.50 am.
The specific Report inside which was hidden the controversial Amendment is due to be debated between 11 and 12 am.
So that more last-minute Surprises may not be excluded a priori...
Particularly at the present Historic moment, when even the Institutional Future of the EU depends on the result of a second Referendum on "Lisbon Treaty", later this year, in ...Ireland, a mainly Catholic country, where People are particularly sensitive in such kind of socio-cultural and values issues...
Polls
SMF Recent Topics SA
- Germany: Socialists ... (0) by GVK369
- Hollande: Pas de cha... (3) by JVJ
- Turkish Economy Down... (0) by JohnsonE
- Sarkozy Wins 2nd rou... (1) by Lorelay
- A qui profite le cri... (6) by Candide
- Stop Harassing the D... (0) by HugoHegelMiltonCesarPlato
- Cops+Journalists blo... (0) by JVJ
- Wulff heraus => S... (2) by GVK369
- Immigrés/chomeurs/fr... (0) by JVJ
- €uroArea Exports' su... (1) by François

















