english french german greek italian lithuanian russian serbian spanish
Home arrow newsitems arrow US Left interferes in EElection: Hillary Ousts MEP supporting Assange? GAFA Collusion bans Rightists

US Left interferes in EElection: Hillary Ousts MEP supporting Assange? GAFA Collusion bans Rightists

Written by ACM
Thursday, 09 May 2019
debate__forum


*Strasbourg/Angelo Marcopolo/- While alleged Russian "Interference" in US Presidential Elections of 2016, and particularly "Collusion" with it, has reportedly Not been proven, even After more than 2 Years of Expensive Controvesial Investigations, which send several People to Jail for various other claims against them, on the Contrary,

in Europe, powerful US Left's Establishment Top Figures are more or less openly and largely interfering in the forthcoming, Crucial EU Parliament's Elections of May 2019, and, in most cases, even "Collusion" has become obvious...

----------------------------------------

- Among various other cases, recently, Question-marks were raised when an Important EU Parliament's Rapporteur on WhistleBlowers, member of the Socialist Group, (2nd Biggest), but also President of the "Radical" Left Party (Centrist), graduate of France's prestigious "Ecole Polytechnique", and former Long-Time Senior Officer at various Key Ministries (Defense, Prime Minister, Trade, etc) during former Presidents Chirac and Sarkozy, of the Right (2002 - 2009), as well as Hollande, of the Left (2012-2014), MEP Virginie Roziere, was, suddenly, placed in a Non-Eligible position  at the Party's list for the May 2019 Election, and, afterwards, even Ousted from that Party, withOut any known Official Explication...

- Doubts were stimulated also by the Fact that MEP Roziere had just clearly Declared her Support to "Wikileaks" co-Founder Assange for a Political Asylum (f.ex. in France, etc), as Whistleblower, shortly after he was notoriously abandoned by the new Government of Ecuador (in the Embassy of which he had been obliged to find Refuge from Persecutions in London, UK, during many years), and immediately Arrested, Condemned and Imprisoned by the British Authorities, in view also of Long-Standing Extradition Demands by the Swedish and USA Governments since a remote Past.

- EU Rapporteur on WhistleBlowers made that Declaration Twice, in favour of Protecting Assange with Asylum, in Reply to a relevant "Eurofora'"s Question, that we Published here (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/eurapporteurforwhistleblowersonassange.html), during her Press Conference in EU Parliament in Strasbourg, on the 16th of April 2019.

=> Soon After that event, Suddenly emerged those 2, UnExpected, Negative Incidents against her, which were mentioned above (Comp. Supra), for which she was Surprised, and did not yet know their real reasons, being obliged to Suppose that they were due to some kind of "Pressure", probably exerted on the current leadership of the French Socialist Party by someone. (A mere Hypothesis being that it might, perhaps, eventually concern an obscure affair related to possible future relations of her small party to the Socialists, but withOut any certainty, neither clarity about that)...

  - But it's a Crystal-clear and Notorious Fact that "Assange’s real Sin was preventing Hillary CLINTON from becoming President !" (on 2016), as it was stressed Nowadays, at the Headlines of a key Article written by the Famous Conservative American Journalist Tucker Carlson, (a favorite also of New US President Don Trump), and published at "Fox News", just after the recent Arrest in London...

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton had, indeed, largely Commented, in Press Statements (where she appeared very Satisfied), the Arrest of Assange, that she strived to Justify with Legal Pretexts similar to those indeed used in real practice, as it was made known also in Public Afterwards.

=> So, indeed, obviously, Many Converging Facts, (including that "Insider"'s prior knowledge by Hillary : Comp. Supra), plead in favour of the most Probable Hypothesis : I.e. that Hillary (and/or someone around her entourage) would have, effectively, Intervened to exert "Pressure" over the French Socialist Party, in order to Exclude EU Parliament's Rapporteur on the "WhistleBlowers", Virginie Roziere, from her MEP's job, at the Last Minute before the forthcoming, May 26, 2019 EU Elections, Because of her Positive stance in Favour of giving him a Political Asylum.

- Indeed, the French Press which announced the above-mentioned Incident of unexpected (and otherwise unexplained), sudden Exclusion of the EU Parliament's Rapporteur, from the Socialist Party's eligible List, significantly Pictures as only Photo, that of Roziere's Replies to the above-mentioned "Eurofora"'s Questions on Assange, during that crucial Press Conference, (Comp. Supra) !

-----------------------------------------

+ But the most Obvious US Left's "Interference" in the 2019 EU Elections, mostly with a blatant "Collusion" of some key political Accomplices in Europe, are Massive American Left, GAFA's Censorship and/or Bans of many European Citizens expressing Various Dissident or Critical Views, of Social and/or Political character, in Direct Relevance to these crucial May 2019 EU Votes, which has reached UnPrecedented Levels, and goes on Multiplying such incidents more and more Rapidly and Wider, affecting a growing lot of People :

- This often Oppressive, New Phenomenon of Foreign Interference in 2019 EU Elections, goes much Further than the alleged "Russian Interference" in US 2016 Election, since it's Not Limited Just to Find and Publish certain relevant Informations, for Public Debate, (as Critics had Accused various Russian circles), But, on the Contrary, seriously Affects the very Liberties and Human Rights of the Victims, Hindering also or Suppressing Democratic Public Debate.

++ To the point that GAFAs, (i.e. notoriously US "Liberals", that is Left-leaning, or "Socialists" in the European terminology, mainly based at the East Coast, nowadays Pelosi's California), such as Facebook, Tweeter, Google, etc, have reportedly Started to Attack not only the Opposition, but Even pro-Government Fans, particularly in Countries with Elected Government of the Right, of Unity of the Right, or of Rightsists :

=> Thus, f.ex., in Poland, the competent Minister for Digital affairs, Dorota Głowacka, of the Rightist Government by the PiS Party ("Law and Order"), was obliged on 2018 to seek an Agreement with "Facebook" to at least Inform the Internet Users and Explain them for which Reasons it would intend to Censor, Suspend, or even Ban them for their sayings. However, she reportedly regrets that the Private entity of Facebook did not yet accept to  entrust a Judge with the Duty to Finally Decide whether to Censor and/or Ban someone, or not....

+ Moreover, in Italy, USA's GAFAs reportedly attacked Recently with Series of Massive "Freeze" or Bans of Accounts generally from People like-minded with various Supporters of the Elected Coalition Government of "5 Stars" and "Lega" !...

++ In Addition, such American "Social Networks" were strongly Accused, at a Debate organized in EU Parliament in Brussels, to have already "Shut Down More Internet Accounts in Germany, than in Russia !", as AfD's MEP Maximilian Krah denounced, (See : http://www.eurofora.net/newsflashes/news/euparliamentelectoraldebatemaimed.html, + https://www.dw.com/en/which-way-is-europe-heading/a-48663278).

>>> The most Important, perhaps is the Fact that a "Collusion" of several Accomplices inside Europe appears Blatant, and, even, it's often openly and shamlessly Revendicated by certain EU Politicians and/or EU Officers, against political opponents, whose fans they Accuse for "Fake News" or "Exagerations", etc, excusing, in their eyes, the appeal to American Left's GAFAs to intervene oppressively, (and withOut any clear Legal Guarantee to Prevent Abuse by Globalized Foreign Private Entities)...

- Thus, f.ex., inter alia, it was also Surprizing to watch even the usually Softly speaking, Kind and Smiling German Socialist MEP Jon Leinen, during a recent debate in EU Parliament, to Not Deny the accusation of AfD's MEP Maximilian Krah that his Socialist Party had passed Laws pushing the American Left's GAFAs to "Hinder People's Access to Public Debates at the Internet", for which he "should be Ashamed", as he argued.

- Indeed, Leinen simply limited himself to reply that he was "Not Ashamed", because several People published "Fake News" and/or Other things which "Cross the Line", as he vaguely said.

>>> In such Exceptional Conditions, withOut any Precedent in Modern History, some Mainstream Medias went as far as to even observe that GAFA's European Headquarters, like Facebook a.o., located in Ireland, had been Recently set up in a Mode of ..."War-like preparations" (sic !), as these EU Elections approach !


- That really sounds Spooky...


=> In these circumstances, when we even found that, suddenly, a Popular French-speaking Political Forum, working fine for Decades, had been curiously Blocked during More than 2 Weeks' Time, at the Eve of such Crucial EU Elections, who could really Believe that it was only for strictly "Technical" reasons, and a pure "Coincidence", instead of ...another "Complot" ?


That's precisely the People's Mood that a Well Organized, and really Democratic Election must Prevent, by succeeding to SafeGuard EU Citizens' Fair share of Free Speech.

 

 

(../..)

 

 

------------------------

-


EUDigitalForum

Statistics

Visitors: 32474122

Archive

Login Form





Remember me

Lost your Password?
No account yet? Create account

Syndicate

RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML

Other Menu

 sarko_merkel_mieux

The official presentation of a "Program" respecting People's choices voted in the June 7, 2009 EU Elections, to be debated in EU Council and EU Parliament during its 1st Session on July in Strasbourg, is the No 1 Priority, according to Democratic principles, for the Franco-German axis, said the main winners at the ballot box, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angie Merkel.

They stressed  that the New EU Commission's President must have a "Program" in favor of an EU which "protects" its Citizens, regulates financial markets and aims at a "Political" Europe" : a wording they have used as incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid.

They also declared ready for a "political" endorsment of "Mr. Barroso's candidacy" in June's EU Council, considering that an official decision would have to be made after EU Parliament's debates and votes, possibly from next month (July), with the legally necessary final acceptance shortly after Lisbon Treaty's entry into force, hoped for September or October.


- "A Program, and Mr. Barroso" : This resumes, in substance, the anouncements made by Sarkozy and Merkel, on the question of current EU Commission's President, Barroso's declared wish to succeed to himself for a second mandate, to be extended during the following 5 years.

 In their 1st meeting after EU Elections, they observed that "the Franco-German axis counted in European Elections' campaign... But, we both keep a realistic view : We saw the number of those who abstained, and we must absolutely give them an answer. We also see the disilusionment of an important number of Europeans vis a vis Europe, and we are aware of the responsibilities we have".

sarko

 - The "Duty" of the new EU Commission's President, after June 7, 2009 EU Elections' result, "is to act for a Europe which protects the Europeans, to commit himself into working for a better Regulation of Financial transactions, ... and to have a Political will for Europe", underlined Sarkozy.

Therefore, "we have asked M. Barroso... to clarify, to officialy present the intentions he has", he anounced.

- "We want to speak also about the Programme", explained Merkel.

- "It's important that for the next EU Parliament's mandate (2009-2014) we take the right Decisions for Europe.  Obviously on Persons, but mainly Decisions on Issues", she stressed.

- "It's not simply a question of a Person, it's also a question of a Programme". We are "really asking Mr. Barroso to commit himself on a Program, and on Principles, on Values", Sarkozy added.

EU President-in-office, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer, accepted the Franco-German stance :

- "Barroso must present his Programme. The Czech Presidency agrees with that", Fischer reportedly said later, after meeting Sarkozy.

But Press reports from Brussels claimed that Barroso had preferred to be officially appointed by EU Council since June, (i.e. next week), "because this was implied by the current Treaty of Nice, according to him", and considered any delay until the possible ratification of the new, Lisbon Treaty on September/October, as "undemocratic".

- "At any case, independently of what Germany and France ask, it's also EU Parliament's wish". "We shall propose Mr Barroso's candidacy... But even in the framework of Nice Treaty, EU Parliament has to be associated in this Decision", the French President observed.

If this is correctly done, then "we support Mr. Barroso's candidature", and "if the (EU) Parliament agrees, we might ratify this decision since July", (i.e. next month), they both said.

smerkem_400

- "France and Germany support Baroso's candidacy, But we want to speak also on the Program. We believe that this Program should be established in close cooperation with EU Parliament, and that's why we have followed an appropriate way", said Merkel.  - If EU Parliament wants, this election can take place on July,  but this must be done in full agreement.

- "We shall support Mr. Barroso's candidacy, without doubt", said Sarkozy. "But we have asked from Mr. Barroso, as I told him yesterday, to put into detail.. his intentions, at the eve of his 2nd mandate, if the situation avails itself.


    France and Germany "don't want to take an Official Legal Decision by writting" during "the next (EU) Council" (on June 18-19), declared Sarkozy.  Because they prefer, at this stage, only "a Political decision" on June, "so that we (EU Council) can work together with EU Parliament", which starts to meet only Next Month, since July in Srasbourg, "leaving a Legal decision by writting for later".

    - "If the Conditions are fuillfiled in EU Parliament, we (EU Council) are ready to give the agreement and make it offficial", said Merkel

    - "But, now we are working in the base of Nice Treaty. If tommorow we want to work in the spirit of Lisbon Treaty, we have to find a proper way", she added.

    - "Of course it's Legally complicated, because we are going to make a Political proposal to the forthcoming Council, for an EU Commission's President, on the basis of Nice Treaty : So, we (EU Council) will not appoint the Commissioners. Only the President.  If EU Parliament agrees, it could endorse this position on July", explained Sarkozy.

    But, on Autumn, "if Ireland ratifies Lisbon Treaty, there will be, at any case, a 2nd Decision, to appoint the Commission's President, this time on the basis of Lisbon treaty, and then, we, the EU Member States, would have to appoint (also) the EU Commissioners", he added.

    As for the precise Timing :  - "Everything is suspended until the Irish vote... Now, we must all make everything possible to help Ireland to say "Yes"" to Lisbon Treaty... The Irish Referendum, ..will take place either on September or on October. It's a Question which depends on the Irish. And,  then, we shall have the Choice of the Candidates for the permanent Institutions of Europe".

    However, "if Ireland says No, we, French and Germans, have to assume our responsibilities, and we'll do so", he concluded.

    But British and Swedish governments were reportedly eager to have a final EU Council decision on Barroso since this month, on June's European Council. While the other EU Member Countries are divided, several of them preferring to wait until EU Parliament pronounces itself, on July, and/or until Lisbon Treaty might be ratified by Ireland at the beginning of the Autumn. Barroso's current mandate ends on November.

    There are also various, contradictory and/or unpredictable reactions inside EU Parliament vis a vis Barroso's wish to continue a 2nd mandate, because many MEPs are openly or secretly opposed, reluctant, or hesitating.

    In the biggest EU Countries, as France and Germany, EU Citizens voted on June 2009 EU Elections for a renovated, non-technocratic but Political Europe which cares for its Citizens, with an Identity, Values and Borders, declared incompatible with Turkey's controversial EU bid, by mainstream, pro-European Governing Parties. Similar choices were also supported in several other small or medium EU Countries.

    On the contrary, whenever, in other Countries, Governing and other mainstream Parties didn't make these choices or eluded them, EU Citizens massively voted for euro-Sceptics whenever they were the only ones to to promise anti-bureacratic change and oppose Turkey's demand to enter into the EU, (f.ex. in the UK, Netherlands, etc).

    It's seems to be an Open Question whether Sarkozy and Merkel's conditions will be really accepted by Barroso, who was appointed on 2004 in a different political context, (with Socialist Prime Ministers in Germany, France, etc), had rejected in the Past the idea of EU becoming "equal to the USA" as "ridiculous", and pushed for Turkey's contoversial EU bid, trying to "soften" or contain the changes desired by the People who voted for Merkel and Sarkozy with another policy vis a vis Turkey on 2005 in Germany and on 2007 in France, as they did all over Europe on 2009.

    In addition to many EPP Governments, it's 3 remaining Socialist Prime Ministers : Gordon Brown in the UK, Zapatero in Spain, and Socrates in Prortugal, who support Barroso, as well as Liberal Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt. But their Parties lost the June 2009 EU Elections.

    Questioned whether there was still "Time" for "other" possible "Candidates", Sarkozy and Merkel did not deny, nor made any comment on that, but simply said that "it's not for us to make publicity for any candidates. We anounced our choice ("A Program, and Mr. Barroso"). But we respect any other candidate".

    Among various other names cited are former Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt, former UNO's Human Rights Commissioner Mary Robinson of Ireland, Italian former EU Commission's vice-President Monti, etc. Meanwhile, Luxembourg's PM Juncker, (who had been unanimously accepted by EU Council for EU Commission's Presidency on 2004, but refused), announced his intention to resign from "EuroGroup"'s Chair. Thus, he might be available for another Top EU job.

    As "EuroFora"'s "opinion" said (See publication dated 9/6/09) : - "If the current candidates (i.e. Barroso, etc) to the Top EU jobs promise and guarantee to respect People's democratic choices, then, it's OK".

"Otherwise, Europe must find new candidates, really motivated and able to implement these democratic choices of the People."

    Because, "in Democracy, the forthcoming choices for EU's Top Jobs,...should be made according to EU Citizens' Votes in June 7, 2009 European Elections, and main EU Governments' strategic policies".
        

***

Polls

2009 EU Elections were won by Parties against Technocracy and Turkey's controversial EU bid, while the 1999-2004 Majority Abstention trend decelerated. What should be done in 2009-2014 ?

Results

SMF Recent Topics SA

Copyright (c) 2007-2009 EIW/SENAS - EuroFora.net. All rights reserved. ISSN 1969-6361.
Powered by Elxis - Open Source CMS.